Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-03-07
14:44:14 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: conf: Fix indentation in conf/netconf https://review.openstack.org/430717
14:44:15 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: netutils: Ignore 'use_ipv6' for network templates https://review.openstack.org/430910
14:44:15 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: conf: Deprecate 'use_ipv6' https://review.openstack.org/430911
14:44:16 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Ignore 'use_ipv6' for port filters https://review.openstack.org/430909
14:44:16 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: conf: Deprecate 'allow_same_net_traffic' https://review.openstack.org/430913
14:44:17 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: conf: Final cleanups in conf/network https://review.openstack.org/431023
14:44:17 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Ignore 'allow_same_net_traffic' for port filters https://review.openstack.org/430912
14:44:18 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: conf: Deprecate most 'network' option https://review.openstack.org/430914
14:44:25 mdbooth kaboom!
14:44:27 mriedem i'd like to get that backported to ocata and released before a lot of people start upgrading
14:44:38 sfinucan sdague: ^^^
14:44:44 sfinucan mriedem: Sure. I'll take a look now
14:46:08 edleafe mriedem: not sure I follow. The test you added is in ova/tests/functional/api/openstack/placement/test_report_client.py
14:46:32 mriedem edleafe: yeah which is a functional test on the scheduler report client
14:46:34 mriedem which is what we need
14:47:06 mriedem edleafe: as noted in the review, the functional test is testing the entire report client stack for that negative scenario, rather than just piecemeal unit tests - which are removed in that same change
14:47:10 mriedem because the unit tests can lie
14:49:04 mriedem bauzas: i plan on backport https://review.openstack.org/#/c/442035/ to ocata, do you have any issue with that?
14:49:09 mriedem *backporting
14:49:46 ildikov smcginnis: FYI, I added a few extra characters and whitespaces to that reno and now the test seems happy... :)
14:50:13 smcginnis ildikov: Oh good. I should take a look at how you did that. I wasn't able to get it to work.
14:50:24 smcginnis (and was too lazy to really figure it out) :)
14:50:59 mriedem smcginnis: you need the | for rst formatting
14:51:00 sfinucan mriedem: Yeah, that fix makes sense. Done
14:51:10 mriedem sfinucan: thanks
14:51:24 mriedem smcginnis: https://docs.openstack.org/developer/reno/usage.html#note-file-syntax
14:51:26 mdbooth mriedem: Speaking of backports, you had a W-1 on this Newton backport until the Ocata backport merged, which it now has: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/431540/
14:51:31 ildikov mriedem: smcginnis: that was my guess too, but wasn't 100% sure
14:51:36 smcginnis ildikov, mriedem: So use a | and guve a little extra indent.
14:51:37 sfinucan mriedem: Someone should probably submit a patch to reno to use '|' in the default templates
14:51:49 mriedem sfinucan: go for it
14:51:51 mriedem i always use |
14:51:57 mriedem regardless of whether i need it or not
14:52:03 ildikov smcginnis: I think the extra indent wasn't necessary
14:52:15 ildikov mriedem: +1
14:52:32 smcginnis ildikov: That link helps. I know I've read it before, but must have missed that detail.
14:52:55 ildikov smcginnis: it's a pretty easy one to miss like how I did yesterday
14:53:09 smcginnis ildikov: Definitely.
14:53:14 ildikov smcginnis: but the tests look good for that patch overall, so I'm optimistic about v3 :)
14:53:39 sfinucan mriedem: Ah, someone already has. Good to know
14:54:00 smcginnis ildikov: It looked pretty good other than the reno failure last ime.
14:54:42 ildikov smcginnis: yep, so the base v3 should be there any minute and then we can figure out the microversion part
14:55:02 mdbooth sfinucan: Thanks for the re-review of the nfs patch. It's now on top of this one, btw: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/438970/
14:55:05 smcginnis ildikov: Great first step to build off of.
14:55:09 ildikov smcginnis: and will need a new cinderclient for that too IIRC
14:55:30 mdbooth This had a bit of discussion last week in the context of the Cinder v3 stuff.
14:55:36 smcginnis ildikov: I'm still waiting on one final fix before a new release. I'll try to push on that one.
14:55:40 sfinucan mdbooth: Ah - missed that. I'll take a look at that too shortly
14:55:45 mdbooth sfinucan: Thanks
14:55:52 ildikov smcginnis: cool, tnx
15:00:31 mriedem mdbooth: lyarwood: on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/431540/
15:00:38 mriedem so you've got this nice tempest test https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427808/
15:00:43 mriedem but the problem is that doesn't run on stable/newton
15:00:49 mriedem because devstack on newton doesn't enable swap volume testing
15:01:01 mriedem i think that's because we needed that other pivot patch
15:01:07 mriedem but i think that's merged
15:02:15 lyarwood mriedem: true, so I need to backport the devstack change to stable/newton before this lands right?
15:02:18 mriedem this one https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427290/
15:02:28 mriedem ^ is what we needed to fix swap volume right?
15:02:40 lyarwood mriedem: yeah
15:04:08 mriedem ok hold up there were actually 2 changes in devstack
15:05:15 mdbooth mriedem: You're an encyclopaedia(sp?) of CI knowledge
15:05:41 mriedem i will take that as a compliment
15:06:09 lyarwood mriedem: are you cp'ing them back to newton?
15:06:15 lyarwood mriedem: happy to if you don't have time
15:06:50 mriedem lyarwood: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/442548/
15:07:10 lyarwood mriedem: thanks
15:13:34 mriedem lyarwood: btw i think i'll plan a stable/ocata release for early next week
15:15:33 lyarwood mriedem: cool, I'll try to go over the open queue a few times this week to clear it out
15:15:45 mriedem lyarwood: btw, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/441457/
15:15:54 mriedem the ocata backport of that isn't merged yet :)
15:16:05 mriedem maybe i should have -WIP'ed
15:16:08 lyarwood really?
15:16:12 lyarwood urgh
15:16:14 mriedem https://review.openstack.org/#/c/441456/
15:16:36 lyarwood time to uninstall gertty
15:16:38 mriedem despite being the fuel for intergalactic travel, no one uses spice
15:16:49 lyarwood haha, true
15:17:02 lyarwood I'll +W the ocata one now, I was sure I had already
15:17:16 mriedem cool
15:18:29 openstackgerrit Roman Podoliaka proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Ironic: add support for instance RAID configuration https://review.openstack.org/408151
15:55:16 jaypipes vdrok: good evening. so the first patch in the Ironic inventory series has merged: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/441543/
15:55:37 vdrok jaypipes: yup, saw that, thank you!
15:55:39 jaypipes vdrok: the next in the series is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/441544/3
15:55:44 jaypipes vdrok: working on that now.
15:55:50 vdrok I'm tacking those :)
15:56:03 jaypipes vdrok: would be great to take the final patch in the series and start running your integration tests.
15:56:16 jaypipes vdrok: final patch is a new functional test mriedem added: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/442254/1
15:56:59 mriedem that's not the final patch is it?
15:57:04 mriedem just a side thing
15:57:10 mriedem little something something on the side
15:57:27 jaypipes mriedem: oh, it's not dependent?
15:57:29 jaypipes gotcha
15:57:42 jaypipes vdrok: k, feel free to ignore that last patch ;)
15:57:55 jaypipes vdrok: just test on 441544 :)
15:58:12 vdrok gotcha
15:58:56 mriedem jaypipes: right i just thought, while reviewing the base patch, that we could do an easy functional test to the invalid resource class case to avoid the mocked unit tests failing us later,
15:59:04 mriedem it was easier to add than i thought so i pushed it up last night
15:59:22 jaypipes mriedem: cool, thanks very much for that :)
15:59:24 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: virt: implement get_inventory() for Ironic https://review.openstack.org/441544

Earlier   Later