Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-03-07
14:55:52 ildikov smcginnis: cool, tnx
15:00:31 mriedem mdbooth: lyarwood: on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/431540/
15:00:38 mriedem so you've got this nice tempest test https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427808/
15:00:43 mriedem but the problem is that doesn't run on stable/newton
15:00:49 mriedem because devstack on newton doesn't enable swap volume testing
15:01:01 mriedem i think that's because we needed that other pivot patch
15:01:07 mriedem but i think that's merged
15:02:15 lyarwood mriedem: true, so I need to backport the devstack change to stable/newton before this lands right?
15:02:18 mriedem this one https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427290/
15:02:28 mriedem ^ is what we needed to fix swap volume right?
15:02:40 lyarwood mriedem: yeah
15:04:08 mriedem ok hold up there were actually 2 changes in devstack
15:05:15 mdbooth mriedem: You're an encyclopaedia(sp?) of CI knowledge
15:05:41 mriedem i will take that as a compliment
15:06:09 lyarwood mriedem: are you cp'ing them back to newton?
15:06:15 lyarwood mriedem: happy to if you don't have time
15:06:50 mriedem lyarwood: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/442548/
15:07:10 lyarwood mriedem: thanks
15:13:34 mriedem lyarwood: btw i think i'll plan a stable/ocata release for early next week
15:15:33 lyarwood mriedem: cool, I'll try to go over the open queue a few times this week to clear it out
15:15:45 mriedem lyarwood: btw, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/441457/
15:15:54 mriedem the ocata backport of that isn't merged yet :)
15:16:05 mriedem maybe i should have -WIP'ed
15:16:08 lyarwood really?
15:16:12 lyarwood urgh
15:16:14 mriedem https://review.openstack.org/#/c/441456/
15:16:36 lyarwood time to uninstall gertty
15:16:38 mriedem despite being the fuel for intergalactic travel, no one uses spice
15:16:49 lyarwood haha, true
15:17:02 lyarwood I'll +W the ocata one now, I was sure I had already
15:17:16 mriedem cool
15:18:29 openstackgerrit Roman Podoliaka proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Ironic: add support for instance RAID configuration https://review.openstack.org/408151
15:55:16 jaypipes vdrok: good evening. so the first patch in the Ironic inventory series has merged: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/441543/
15:55:37 vdrok jaypipes: yup, saw that, thank you!
15:55:39 jaypipes vdrok: the next in the series is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/441544/3
15:55:44 jaypipes vdrok: working on that now.
15:55:50 vdrok I'm tacking those :)
15:56:03 jaypipes vdrok: would be great to take the final patch in the series and start running your integration tests.
15:56:16 jaypipes vdrok: final patch is a new functional test mriedem added: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/442254/1
15:56:59 mriedem that's not the final patch is it?
15:57:04 mriedem just a side thing
15:57:10 mriedem little something something on the side
15:57:27 jaypipes mriedem: oh, it's not dependent?
15:57:29 jaypipes gotcha
15:57:42 jaypipes vdrok: k, feel free to ignore that last patch ;)
15:57:55 jaypipes vdrok: just test on 441544 :)
15:58:12 vdrok gotcha
15:58:56 mriedem jaypipes: right i just thought, while reviewing the base patch, that we could do an easy functional test to the invalid resource class case to avoid the mocked unit tests failing us later,
15:59:04 mriedem it was easier to add than i thought so i pushed it up last night
15:59:22 jaypipes mriedem: cool, thanks very much for that :)
15:59:24 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: virt: implement get_inventory() for Ironic https://review.openstack.org/441544
15:59:32 jaypipes mriedem: fixed pep8^
15:59:55 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add test for inventory with invalid ResourceClass https://review.openstack.org/442498
16:06:19 mriedem easy docs bug if someone wants to take it - will help out operators https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1670738
16:06:19 openstack Launchpad bug 1670738 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "man page needed for "nova-manage db online_data_migrations"" [Medium,Triaged]
16:07:34 mriedem hmm, dansmith didn't we used to have a hook that ran online_data_migrations in the CI jobs and dump the results?
16:07:44 mriedem i'm not seeing the hook here http://logs.openstack.org/52/440652/2/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-full-ubuntu-xenial/6883d38/logs/
16:07:54 mriedem or http://logs.openstack.org/52/440652/2/check/gate-grenade-dsvm-neutron-ubuntu-xenial/74bea3f/logs/
16:08:06 dansmith mriedem: in the grenade jobs yeah
16:08:23 mriedem ok something regressed, i'll check it out
16:08:39 dansmith it's in upgrade.sh, I just grepped
16:08:51 dansmith nova/upgrade.sh
16:09:16 mriedem that's not what i'm thinking of
16:09:31 mriedem oh i'm thinking of this https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/gate/post_test_hook.sh
16:11:05 mriedem hmm, unrelated but http://logs.openstack.org/52/440652/2/check/gate-grenade-dsvm-neutron-ubuntu-xenial/74bea3f/logs/grenade.sh.txt.gz#_2017-03-02_20_38_16_615
16:11:12 mriedem nova-manage cell_v2 map_cell0: error: argument --database_connection: expected one argument
16:11:22 mriedem database_connection_url: command not found
16:13:16 mriedem i see the issue
16:16:08 mriedem https://review.openstack.org/442599
16:16:13 mriedem i'm not sure why we have the || true in there
16:16:21 mriedem probably for the old bug where map_cell0 would return 1
16:17:19 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Get instance availability_zone without hitting the api db https://review.openstack.org/439754
16:17:20 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Enlighten server tags API about cells https://review.openstack.org/440856
16:17:20 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Teach HostAPI about cells https://review.openstack.org/442162
16:17:21 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Make os-availability-zones know about cells https://review.openstack.org/442163
16:17:21 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Target cell in super conductor operations https://review.openstack.org/438022
16:17:22 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Change MQ targeting to honor only what is in the context https://review.openstack.org/438023
16:17:22 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Make scheduler target cells to get compute node instance info https://review.openstack.org/439891
16:17:23 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Make consoleauth target the proper cell https://review.openstack.org/441461
16:17:23 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Add cell field to Destination object https://review.openstack.org/438024
16:17:24 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Make conductor ask scheduler to limit migrates to same cell https://review.openstack.org/438025
16:17:24 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Teach simple_tenant_usage about cells https://review.openstack.org/441388
16:17:25 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Teach os-aggregates about cells https://review.openstack.org/442200
16:30:11 mriedem dansmith: the archive_deleted_rows post-test-hook only runs on the nova-next job i guess http://logs.openstack.org/52/440652/2/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-nova-next-full-ubuntu-xenial-nv/51f2ea4/logs/devstack-gate-post_test_hook.txt.gz
16:30:15 mriedem just fyi
16:31:52 dansmith hmm why is that?
16:33:06 mriedem https://github.com/openstack-infra/project-config/commit/df865a4e9d6830abb553f077ce885d8493210efa
16:33:31 mriedem i'm guessing we just put it there since it's a nova-specific job really,
16:33:42 mriedem and was a fancy snowflake at the time, which is where we put things like that
16:34:01 dansmith ah I see, because it evolved from the placement job/
16:34:29 mriedem https://review.openstack.org/#/c/376567/ says we could make it fatal
16:34:32 mriedem could/should
16:34:35 mriedem we could think about that now
16:34:45 mriedem so if archive starts breaking then we fail the job
16:34:51 dansmith yeah
16:37:12 dansmith mriedem: why is there no single-create test in this? https://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/master/tempest/api/compute/admin/test_auto_allocate_network.py
16:37:36 mriedem there is
16:37:37 mriedem https://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/master/tempest/api/compute/admin/test_auto_allocate_network.py#L150
16:37:52 dansmith mriedem: that tests no allocate right?
16:37:57 mriedem correct

Earlier   Later