| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-01-11 | |||
| 22:39:19 | zzzeek | mriedem: yeah i can manufacture fake large DBs with a script here am more wondering, if i went into the nova DB of some huge customer, how big would these tables be. because migrating from mariadb5.5 -> 10.1 requires a dump+ restore | |
| 22:39:35 | zzzeek | and for tens of millions of rows it's a hit | |
| 22:40:00 | mriedem | zzzeek: so i'd ask jhesketh b/c he has some large dbs for just that kind of question | |
| 22:40:12 | mriedem | zzzeek: otherwise we'd have to ask some godaddy or cern people probably | |
| 22:40:20 | zzzeek | mriedem: thanks | |
| 22:46:51 | mriedem | dansmith: so i guess on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/416585/ we have some kind of weird catch-22 because the cellsv1 job fails on that patch, but passes on your nova one that uses that | |
| 22:47:07 | mriedem | http://logs.openstack.org/85/416585/8/experimental/gate-tempest-dsvm-cells-ubuntu-xenial/e9f1fe9/console.html#_2017-01-11_19_25_38_191005 | |
| 22:47:42 | dansmith | mriedem: we might be able to merge the nova patch before the devstack one, if you want to try | |
| 22:47:49 | dansmith | or we just queue the nova one up and let the devstack one gate it, which I think is probably fine given the stability of things right now | |
| 22:47:50 | dansmith | your call | |
| 22:48:00 | dansmith | I needed the depends-on to test them together | |
| 22:48:13 | mriedem | so we don't need the depends-on to make the nova one pass? | |
| 22:48:21 | dansmith | I don't know | |
| 22:48:25 | dansmith | we might not | |
| 22:48:27 | dansmith | probably don't | |
| 22:49:09 | mriedem | ok, well the cells v1 job is gating of nova and other repos (not devstack though sadly) so if we land the devstack change first, it's going to break things until the nova one lands | |
| 22:49:18 | mriedem | s/of/on/ | |
| 22:49:21 | openstackgerrit | Sarafraj Singh proposed openstack/nova: Add service_token for nova-glance interaction https://review.openstack.org/412634 | |
| 22:49:50 | dansmith | yeah, but we can get them both in the gate together | |
| 22:49:58 | dansmith | but I'll remove it and let is run to see | |
| 22:50:22 | mriedem | ok | |
| 22:51:12 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova: Make metadata server know about cell mappings https://review.openstack.org/417962 | |
| 22:51:12 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova: Multicell support for instance listing https://review.openstack.org/396775 | |
| 22:51:13 | openstackgerrit | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova: Don't bypass cellsv1 replication if cellsv2 maps are in place https://review.openstack.org/418141 | |
| 22:56:24 | openstackgerrit | Sujitha proposed openstack/nova: Adding auto_disk_config field to InstancePayload https://review.openstack.org/419185 | |
| 22:58:54 | openstackgerrit | Sujitha proposed openstack/nova: Adding auto_disk_config field to InstancePayload https://review.openstack.org/419185 | |
| 23:00:52 | openstackgerrit | Claudiu Belu proposed openstack/nova: Hyper-V: Adds vNUMA implementation https://review.openstack.org/282407 | |
| 23:07:14 | openstackgerrit | Claudiu Belu proposed openstack/nova: Hyper-V: Adds vNUMA implementation https://review.openstack.org/282407 | |
| 23:07:49 | claudiub|2 | well, i'm out. thanks for the reviews! | |
| 23:09:52 | mriedem | zzzeek: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2017-January/012425.html | |
| 23:10:56 | zzzeek | mriedem: wow thanks! | |
| 23:20:45 | openstackgerrit | Sujitha proposed openstack/nova: Adding auto_disk_config field to InstancePayload https://review.openstack.org/419185 | |
| 23:29:33 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova: Expose a REST API for a specific list of RPs https://review.openstack.org/392569 | |
| 23:30:44 | jaypipes | edleafe: good pickup on the location of the except block in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/392569/. Pushed a fix for that. Please re-review at your earliest. | |
| 23:31:01 | jaypipes | mriedem: ^ is mostly written by me so I don't want to +2 it. | |
| 23:31:13 | jaypipes | if you and dansmith could tackle, that would be great. | |
| 23:32:27 | mriedem | jaypipes: yeah it's on my list, would also like alex_xu and sdague to look | |
| 23:33:43 | jaypipes | mriedem: thx | |
| 23:33:58 | jaypipes | mriedem: going through the feature freeze review list now, trying to get reviews done. | |
| 23:36:29 | mriedem | cool we've made some solid progress today, 1 merged and have 3 in the queue | |
| #openstack-nova - 2017-01-12 | |||
| 00:02:56 | dansmith | mriedem: passed the cells job but failed something else, probably unrelatedly | |
| 00:39:05 | mriedem | so apparently my foundation membership has lapsed b/c i haven't been voting in board of directors elections, | |
| 00:39:20 | mriedem | is there an easy way to get my membership back or i just need to do the initial sign up stuff all over again? | |
| 00:41:11 | mriedem | can i be ptl if i'm not a foundation member? i'm pretty sure i'm breaking some laws right now. | |
| 00:48:58 | mriedem | ooo i'm back in | |
| 00:49:08 | mriedem | EmilienM: https://review.openstack.org/419217 | |
| 01:36:20 | openstackgerrit | Ken'ichi Ohmichi proposed openstack/nova: Deny invalid flavor extraspec for cpu_policy https://review.openstack.org/406377 | |
| 01:55:10 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova: Hyper-V: Adds vNUMA implementation https://review.openstack.org/282407 | |
| 01:59:10 | tovin07 | johnthetubaguy, mriedem, could you review this one https://review.openstack.org/#/c/254703/ ? patch in novaclient is OK now. Thank you! | |
| 02:03:12 | EmilienM | mriedem: thanks! | |
| 02:13:49 | mriedem | tovin07: probably not tonight | |
| 02:13:56 | mriedem | but it's on the list | |
| 02:14:20 | mriedem | dansmith: looks like my series of backports for the scheduler report client in newton are going to be needed after all for ironic https://review.openstack.org/#/c/416734/ | |
| 02:14:26 | mriedem | ^ was failing before the depends-on | |
| 02:14:26 | tovin07 | mriedem, thanks! | |
| 02:14:40 | mriedem | which pulls in this whole series https://review.openstack.org/#/c/416762/ | |
| 03:14:35 | alex_xu | diana_clarke: yea, agree with you , we need better error message. At least the "query parameter 0" confuse user. I guess "0" due to the input are array type. | |
| 03:25:49 | openstackgerrit | Davanum Srinivas (dims) proposed openstack/nova: Better black list for py35 tests https://review.openstack.org/419250 | |
| 03:32:36 | mriedem | dansmith: we should talk to vladikr about this tomorrow https://review.openstack.org/#/c/405948/ | |
| 03:32:41 | mriedem | i don't want to forget about that one | |
| 03:35:23 | vladikr | mriedem, I'm here - I'm try to re-implement it all with storing the vlan in info_cache - having some issues with that though.. that's why I didn't update yet | |
| 03:35:48 | mriedem | vladikr: ok yeah i assumed you'd need to see how that change makes the rest of the series behave | |
| 04:01:49 | openstackgerrit | Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova: [poc] add a decorator to reject know bad filters. https://review.openstack.org/419256 | |
| 04:39:41 | openstackgerrit | zhangyujun proposed openstack/nova: Use JSON-Schema to validate bdm https://review.openstack.org/418654 | |
| 04:43:10 | openstackgerrit | zhangyujun proposed openstack/nova: Use JSON-Schema to validate bdm https://review.openstack.org/418654 | |
| 04:49:36 | openstackgerrit | zhangyujun proposed openstack/nova: Use JSON-Schema to validate bdm https://review.openstack.org/418654 | |
| 06:07:26 | khushbu | Hi | |
| 06:08:21 | khushbu | Hi! I am working on this https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.concurrency/+bug/1630575 trying to recreate the issue can ayone send the doc link to run tests for oslo.concurrency | |
| 06:08:21 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1630575 in oslo.concurrency "python3 memoryview error" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Khushbuparakh (khushbuparakh) | |
| 06:08:42 | khushbu | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/288351147/nova-py34-fail.log these are log file | |
| 06:28:24 | openstackgerrit | Hussain Chachuliya proposed openstack/nova: Deny volume swapping with non-bootable volume https://review.openstack.org/407346 | |
| 06:48:22 | openstackgerrit | Zhihai Song proposed openstack/nova: Enable functional.test_servers on Python 3 https://review.openstack.org/419299 | |
| 06:51:16 | gokhan | hi team, I have a question about nova-lxd . I have openstack mitaka installation. I created container with lxd. it is running but network is unreacheable. I am using linux bridge . These are logs http://paste.openstack.org/show/594656/. what can be reason of this. Which settings must be done with lxdbridge ? | |
| 06:51:42 | openstackgerrit | zhangyujun proposed openstack/nova: Update JSON Schema for flavor access https://review.openstack.org/418683 | |
| 07:02:34 | openstackgerrit | zhangyujun proposed openstack/nova: Use JSON-Schema to validate bdm https://review.openstack.org/418654 | |
| 07:02:37 | openstackgerrit | Huan Xie proposed openstack/nova: XenAPI: Fix vif plug problem during VM rescue/unrescue https://review.openstack.org/413469 | |
| 07:12:41 | openstackgerrit | Huan Xie proposed openstack/nova: Fix class type error in attach_interface() function https://review.openstack.org/419308 | |
| 07:38:31 | openstackgerrit | Wang Qing wu proposed openstack/nova: WIP(3): Introduce base PowerVM driver (console) https://review.openstack.org/409402 | |
| 08:36:10 | mfeoktistov | Hello! I would like to add a new filter to etc/nova/rootwrap.d/compute.filters | |
| 08:36:10 | mfeoktistov | string like "ploop: RegExpFilter, ploop, root, ploop, init, -s, .*, .*" | |
| 08:36:10 | mfeoktistov | I can see that we use oslo.privsep now. | |
| 08:36:10 | mfeoktistov | And I have a question. How to use it? | |
| 08:39:37 | openstackgerrit | zhangyujun proposed openstack/nova: Query parameter validation for hosts API https://review.openstack.org/418880 | |
| 08:51:45 | openstackgerrit | Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova: [poc] add a decorator to reject know bad filters. https://review.openstack.org/419256 | |
| 09:33:58 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: api-ref: Fix a parameter in os-availability-zone.inc https://review.openstack.org/417233 | |
| 09:35:20 | gibi | jo | |
| 09:35:22 | gibi | sorry | |
| 09:41:22 | openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/415978 | |
| 10:00:13 | alex_xu | gmann: johnthetubaguy Kevin_Zheng, another idea, we write a new formatter which always reject the validation. Then the schema may looks like this {"system_metadata": {"type": "string", "format": "reject_always"}}, then when user input system_metadata in the query, 400 returned. And we have a way to custom the error message returned from formatter. | |
| 10:10:26 | gmann | alex_xu: i see. | |
| 10:11:13 | gmann | alex_xu: i like to idea but worrying if it make json schema confusing but format name is conveying that anyways | |
| 10:12:28 | alex_xu | gmann: yea, benefits are we needn't python code to raise badrequest, less hacky in other places, no need one more decorator | |
| 10:12:47 | gmann | alex_xu: but one issue, format will not work if it is not string | |
| 10:13:03 | alex_xu | gmann: the query string in the url, always string :) | |
| 10:13:10 | gmann | alex_xu: yea better than python code doing that | |
| 10:13:22 | gmann | alex_xu: ah yea | |
| 10:15:27 | alex_xu | Kevin_Zheng will give a try, to see how that looks like | |
| 10:16:27 | gmann | alex_xu: but when it comes to schema it will be list of values right | |
| 10:18:12 | alex_xu | gmann: yea | |
| 10:18:57 | gmann | so "system_metadata" value will be in list while doing validation | |