Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-01-11
22:48:00 dansmith I needed the depends-on to test them together
22:48:13 mriedem so we don't need the depends-on to make the nova one pass?
22:48:21 dansmith I don't know
22:48:25 dansmith we might not
22:48:27 dansmith probably don't
22:49:09 mriedem ok, well the cells v1 job is gating of nova and other repos (not devstack though sadly) so if we land the devstack change first, it's going to break things until the nova one lands
22:49:18 mriedem s/of/on/
22:49:21 openstackgerrit Sarafraj Singh proposed openstack/nova: Add service_token for nova-glance interaction https://review.openstack.org/412634
22:49:50 dansmith yeah, but we can get them both in the gate together
22:49:58 dansmith but I'll remove it and let is run to see
22:50:22 mriedem ok
22:51:12 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova: Make metadata server know about cell mappings https://review.openstack.org/417962
22:51:12 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova: Multicell support for instance listing https://review.openstack.org/396775
22:51:13 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova: Don't bypass cellsv1 replication if cellsv2 maps are in place https://review.openstack.org/418141
22:56:24 openstackgerrit Sujitha proposed openstack/nova: Adding auto_disk_config field to InstancePayload https://review.openstack.org/419185
22:58:54 openstackgerrit Sujitha proposed openstack/nova: Adding auto_disk_config field to InstancePayload https://review.openstack.org/419185
23:00:52 openstackgerrit Claudiu Belu proposed openstack/nova: Hyper-V: Adds vNUMA implementation https://review.openstack.org/282407
23:07:14 openstackgerrit Claudiu Belu proposed openstack/nova: Hyper-V: Adds vNUMA implementation https://review.openstack.org/282407
23:07:49 claudiub|2 well, i'm out. thanks for the reviews!
23:09:52 mriedem zzzeek: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2017-January/012425.html
23:10:56 zzzeek mriedem: wow thanks!
23:20:45 openstackgerrit Sujitha proposed openstack/nova: Adding auto_disk_config field to InstancePayload https://review.openstack.org/419185
23:29:33 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova: Expose a REST API for a specific list of RPs https://review.openstack.org/392569
23:30:44 jaypipes edleafe: good pickup on the location of the except block in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/392569/. Pushed a fix for that. Please re-review at your earliest.
23:31:01 jaypipes mriedem: ^ is mostly written by me so I don't want to +2 it.
23:31:13 jaypipes if you and dansmith could tackle, that would be great.
23:32:27 mriedem jaypipes: yeah it's on my list, would also like alex_xu and sdague to look
23:33:43 jaypipes mriedem: thx
23:33:58 jaypipes mriedem: going through the feature freeze review list now, trying to get reviews done.
23:36:29 mriedem cool we've made some solid progress today, 1 merged and have 3 in the queue
#openstack-nova - 2017-01-12
00:02:56 dansmith mriedem: passed the cells job but failed something else, probably unrelatedly
00:39:05 mriedem so apparently my foundation membership has lapsed b/c i haven't been voting in board of directors elections,
00:39:20 mriedem is there an easy way to get my membership back or i just need to do the initial sign up stuff all over again?
00:41:11 mriedem can i be ptl if i'm not a foundation member? i'm pretty sure i'm breaking some laws right now.
00:48:58 mriedem ooo i'm back in
00:49:08 mriedem EmilienM: https://review.openstack.org/419217
01:36:20 openstackgerrit Ken'ichi Ohmichi proposed openstack/nova: Deny invalid flavor extraspec for cpu_policy https://review.openstack.org/406377
01:55:10 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova: Hyper-V: Adds vNUMA implementation https://review.openstack.org/282407
01:59:10 tovin07 johnthetubaguy, mriedem, could you review this one https://review.openstack.org/#/c/254703/ ? patch in novaclient is OK now. Thank you!
02:03:12 EmilienM mriedem: thanks!
02:13:49 mriedem tovin07: probably not tonight
02:13:56 mriedem but it's on the list
02:14:20 mriedem dansmith: looks like my series of backports for the scheduler report client in newton are going to be needed after all for ironic https://review.openstack.org/#/c/416734/
02:14:26 mriedem ^ was failing before the depends-on
02:14:26 tovin07 mriedem, thanks!
02:14:40 mriedem which pulls in this whole series https://review.openstack.org/#/c/416762/
03:14:35 alex_xu diana_clarke: yea, agree with you , we need better error message. At least the "query parameter 0" confuse user. I guess "0" due to the input are array type.
03:25:49 openstackgerrit Davanum Srinivas (dims) proposed openstack/nova: Better black list for py35 tests https://review.openstack.org/419250
03:32:36 mriedem dansmith: we should talk to vladikr about this tomorrow https://review.openstack.org/#/c/405948/
03:32:41 mriedem i don't want to forget about that one
03:35:23 vladikr mriedem, I'm here - I'm try to re-implement it all with storing the vlan in info_cache - having some issues with that though.. that's why I didn't update yet
03:35:48 mriedem vladikr: ok yeah i assumed you'd need to see how that change makes the rest of the series behave
04:01:49 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova: [poc] add a decorator to reject know bad filters. https://review.openstack.org/419256
04:39:41 openstackgerrit zhangyujun proposed openstack/nova: Use JSON-Schema to validate bdm https://review.openstack.org/418654
04:43:10 openstackgerrit zhangyujun proposed openstack/nova: Use JSON-Schema to validate bdm https://review.openstack.org/418654
04:49:36 openstackgerrit zhangyujun proposed openstack/nova: Use JSON-Schema to validate bdm https://review.openstack.org/418654
06:07:26 khushbu Hi
06:08:21 khushbu Hi! I am working on this https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.concurrency/+bug/1630575 trying to recreate the issue can ayone send the doc link to run tests for oslo.concurrency
06:08:21 openstack Launchpad bug 1630575 in oslo.concurrency "python3 memoryview error" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Khushbuparakh (khushbuparakh)
06:08:42 khushbu https://launchpadlibrarian.net/288351147/nova-py34-fail.log these are log file
06:28:24 openstackgerrit Hussain Chachuliya proposed openstack/nova: Deny volume swapping with non-bootable volume https://review.openstack.org/407346
06:48:22 openstackgerrit Zhihai Song proposed openstack/nova: Enable functional.test_servers on Python 3 https://review.openstack.org/419299
06:51:16 gokhan hi team, I have a question about nova-lxd . I have openstack mitaka installation. I created container with lxd. it is running but network is unreacheable. I am using linux bridge . These are logs http://paste.openstack.org/show/594656/. what can be reason of this. Which settings must be done with lxdbridge ?
06:51:42 openstackgerrit zhangyujun proposed openstack/nova: Update JSON Schema for flavor access https://review.openstack.org/418683
07:02:34 openstackgerrit zhangyujun proposed openstack/nova: Use JSON-Schema to validate bdm https://review.openstack.org/418654
07:02:37 openstackgerrit Huan Xie proposed openstack/nova: XenAPI: Fix vif plug problem during VM rescue/unrescue https://review.openstack.org/413469
07:12:41 openstackgerrit Huan Xie proposed openstack/nova: Fix class type error in attach_interface() function https://review.openstack.org/419308
07:38:31 openstackgerrit Wang Qing wu proposed openstack/nova: WIP(3): Introduce base PowerVM driver (console) https://review.openstack.org/409402
08:36:10 mfeoktistov Hello! I would like to add a new filter to etc/nova/rootwrap.d/compute.filters
08:36:10 mfeoktistov string like "ploop: RegExpFilter, ploop, root, ploop, init, -s, .*, .*"
08:36:10 mfeoktistov I can see that we use oslo.privsep now.
08:36:10 mfeoktistov And I have a question. How to use it?
08:39:37 openstackgerrit zhangyujun proposed openstack/nova: Query parameter validation for hosts API https://review.openstack.org/418880
08:51:45 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova: [poc] add a decorator to reject know bad filters. https://review.openstack.org/419256
09:33:58 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: api-ref: Fix a parameter in os-availability-zone.inc https://review.openstack.org/417233
09:35:20 gibi jo
09:35:22 gibi sorry
09:41:22 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/415978
10:00:13 alex_xu gmann: johnthetubaguy Kevin_Zheng, another idea, we write a new formatter which always reject the validation. Then the schema may looks like this {"system_metadata": {"type": "string", "format": "reject_always"}}, then when user input system_metadata in the query, 400 returned. And we have a way to custom the error message returned from formatter.
10:10:26 gmann alex_xu: i see.
10:11:13 gmann alex_xu: i like to idea but worrying if it make json schema confusing but format name is conveying that anyways
10:12:28 alex_xu gmann: yea, benefits are we needn't python code to raise badrequest, less hacky in other places, no need one more decorator
10:12:47 gmann alex_xu: but one issue, format will not work if it is not string
10:13:03 alex_xu gmann: the query string in the url, always string :)
10:13:10 gmann alex_xu: yea better than python code doing that
10:13:22 gmann alex_xu: ah yea
10:15:27 alex_xu Kevin_Zheng will give a try, to see how that looks like
10:16:27 gmann alex_xu: but when it comes to schema it will be list of values right
10:18:12 alex_xu gmann: yea
10:18:57 gmann so "system_metadata" value will be in list while doing validation
10:18:59 alex_xu gmann: I think the key reason for this trouble was there is no way to express "I want to some specific properties, but I don't want some specific properites, and others just ignore" in the jsonschema
10:19:19 alex_xu gmann: yes
10:19:55 alex_xu gmann: and we still need to use patternProperties for internal attributes, the regex is "^_"
10:20:01 gmann alex_xu: yea, that is missing in json schema lib, they should provide any way to restrict few known properties
10:20:44 gmann alex_xu: true
10:21:12 johnthetubaguy alex_xu: I quite like that
10:21:27 alex_xu johnthetubaguy: cool \o/
10:21:35 johnthetubaguy alex_xu: but yeah, I guess you still have to keep the regex thing
10:22:00 johnthetubaguy alex_xu: what about type: "reject_always"?
10:22:05 johnthetubaguy or is that not allowed

Earlier   Later