Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-01-11
00:43:26 openstackgerrit Sarafraj Singh proposed openstack/nova: WIP: Add service_token for nova-glance interaction https://review.openstack.org/412634
00:43:54 openstackgerrit Sarafraj Singh proposed openstack/nova: DNM: Test service token https://review.openstack.org/413232
01:14:08 oomichi alex_xu: can you take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/320375 ? it is a little difficult to understand for me
01:18:23 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova: WIP: Test cellsv1 https://review.openstack.org/418141
01:25:31 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova: WIP Count resources to check quota for cells https://review.openstack.org/416521
01:25:31 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova: Make Quotas object favor the API database https://review.openstack.org/410945
01:25:31 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova: Add online migration to move quotas to API database https://review.openstack.org/410946
01:27:08 openstackgerrit Huan Xie proposed openstack/nova: XenAPI Use os-xenapi lib for nova https://review.openstack.org/406059
01:54:30 oomichi alex_xu: johnthetubaguy: can you take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/389314 ? That seems making sense for me.
02:06:36 alex_xu oomichi: will review the patch after the meeting
02:08:31 openstackgerrit Huan Xie proposed openstack/nova: XenAPI Remove useless files when use os-xenapi lib https://review.openstack.org/411241
02:12:56 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova: Plumbing for tagged nic attachment https://review.openstack.org/415622
02:12:57 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova: Libvirt support for tagged volume attachment https://review.openstack.org/418100
02:12:57 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova: Plumbing for tagged volume attachment https://review.openstack.org/391941
02:12:58 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova: API support for tagged device attachment https://review.openstack.org/376021
02:12:58 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova: Libvirt support for tagged nic attachment https://review.openstack.org/415520
02:53:32 gmann oomichi: alex_xu johnthetubaguy : yea even i did not find why we enforced volume policy in attachment APIs.
02:54:19 gmann oomichi: alex_xu johnthetubaguy : for clear view we should separate volume attachment controller in separate file for easy maintenance.
02:54:50 openstackgerrit huangtianhua proposed openstack/python-novaclient: Make _console() public https://review.openstack.org/414364
03:07:22 openstackgerrit zhangyujun proposed openstack/nova: Use JSON-Schema to validate bmd https://review.openstack.org/418654
03:09:22 openstackgerrit zhangyujun proposed openstack/nova: Use JSON-Schema to validate bdm https://review.openstack.org/418654
03:17:38 openstackgerrit Wang Qing wu proposed openstack/nova: Introduce base PowerVM driver https://review.openstack.org/391288
03:20:33 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova: Add query parameters white list for server list/detail https://review.openstack.org/408571
03:26:59 openstackgerrit zhangyujun proposed openstack/nova: Use JSON-Schema to validate bdm https://review.openstack.org/418654
04:07:26 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova: Libvirt support for tagged volume attachment https://review.openstack.org/418100
04:07:26 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova: Plumbing for tagged nic attachment https://review.openstack.org/415622
04:07:27 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova: API support for tagged device attachment https://review.openstack.org/376021
04:07:27 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova: Plumbing for tagged volume attachment https://review.openstack.org/391941
04:07:28 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova: Libvirt support for tagged nic attachment https://review.openstack.org/415520
05:20:00 openstackgerrit zhangyujun proposed openstack/nova: Update JSON Schema for flavor access https://review.openstack.org/418683
05:20:33 openstackgerrit ChangBo Guo(gcb) proposed openstack/nova: DNM: just test https://review.openstack.org/415413
05:58:03 openstackgerrit Wang Qing wu proposed openstack/nova: WIP(2): Introduce base PowerVM driver (disk drv) https://review.openstack.org/409401
06:05:30 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/415978
06:08:48 alex_xu oomichi: johnthetubaguy re:https://review.openstack.org/#/c/389314/ I added comment about a solution for deprecate the rule first and remove it next release, if we care about this should be process for removing a policy rule.
06:23:49 gokhan Hi Team, I tried to create virtuozzo containers on nova but I am getting errors.My production is mitaka. I have a compute node which is installed virtuoozo.These are logs http://paste.openstack.org/show/594498/ Can you help me ?
06:38:01 mnestratov gokhan:hi
06:38:13 mnestratov I can help you
06:39:41 mnestratov gokhan: what virtuozzo version do you have?
06:41:03 gokhan mnestratov I have 7.0.1 I installed from https://download.openvz.org/virtuozzo/releases/openvz-7.0.1-554/x86_64/iso/openvz-iso-7.0.1.iso
06:41:35 gokhan and for openstack I followed https://help.virtuozzo.com/customer/portal/articles/2524013
06:43:02 mnestratov gokhan: so you are trying devstack, right?
06:43:51 gokhan mnestratov, no not devstack, I am using it on production
06:44:30 mnestratov gokhan: ok I see
06:47:13 gokhan mnestratov, I followed also https://openvz.org/Basic_operations_in_OpenVZ_environment for creating container. I have created container successfully. But with openstack, I didn't achieve it.
06:54:11 openstackgerrit Roman Dobosz proposed openstack/nova-specs: Provide detailed error information for placement API https://review.openstack.org/418393
07:06:03 mnestratov gokhan: looks like you need commit d4aa455d53c91c6dfebbf9a9850f7b6c3fef4545 to fix this issue
07:06:24 mnestratov gokhan: review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/182257/
07:07:35 mnestratov gokhan: there was a lot of changes merged since mitaka regarding virtuozzo support
07:09:11 gokhan thanks mnestratov, I will try it
07:09:14 mnestratov gokhan: thus, I'd recommend you to use newton
07:11:49 mnestratov gokhan: did you create a container image yourself or use our test one?
07:12:37 gokhan mnestratov: I used test one
07:13:29 mnestratov gokhan: ok, just wanted to clarify
07:16:18 gokhan mnestratov: ok firstly I will commit these changes . If it doesn't work, I will try newton
07:16:36 mnestratov gokhan: same error?
07:17:06 mnestratov oh I thought you tried already
07:17:42 gokhan no I haven't tried yet.
07:26:59 openstackgerrit Sergey Nikitin proposed openstack/nova: Change parent of diagnostics objects to NovaObject class https://review.openstack.org/394480
07:26:59 openstackgerrit Sergey Nikitin proposed openstack/nova: Standardization of VM diagnostics info API. https://review.openstack.org/355540
07:27:00 openstackgerrit Sergey Nikitin proposed openstack/nova: Completed implementation of instance diagnostics for Xen https://review.openstack.org/399613
07:27:21 openstackgerrit avnish proposed openstack/nova: Remove useless ddt requirements https://review.openstack.org/418747
08:57:21 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova: Add query parameters white list for server list/detail https://review.openstack.org/408571
09:12:28 alex_xu bauzas: johnthetubaguy good morning, I found this patch similar to the force param on evacuate https://review.openstack.org/#/c/408955/11/nova/compute/api.py@3145, but i feel that if the instance without request_spec obj, then the API just don't the thing user expected silently. Does it sounds ok? will Hydrate a fake spec very complex?
09:13:34 bauzas alex_xu: not sure I understand your concern
09:14:23 bauzas alex_xu: FWIW, all the instances are now having a RequestSpec
09:14:26 bauzas since Newton
09:14:59 bauzas because I wrote a DB migration for creating a RequestSpec for all the already created instances
09:15:13 alex_xu bauzas: oops, we have data migration for it? I saw this comment https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/compute/api.py#L3897, just thought it may still have that case
09:15:22 alex_xu bauzas: ah, got it, cool
09:15:25 bauzas alex_xu: yup, sec
09:17:24 openstackgerrit Mikhail Feoktistov proposed openstack/nova: libvirt: ephemeral disk support for virtuozzo containers https://review.openstack.org/312488
09:19:14 bauzas alex_xu: https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/09f2d4d5ec3a699176d70c2407ced0ce7cd58197
09:20:31 openstackgerrit Mikhail Feoktistov proposed openstack/nova: libvirt: ephemeral disk support for virtuozzo containers https://review.openstack.org/312488
09:22:18 alex_xu bauzas: thanks, i see now. we probably just need some cleanup later
09:22:49 bauzas alex_xu: what's missing is that we don't delete yet the RequetSpec if the instance is deleted
09:25:00 alex_xu bauzas: is there any blocker? or we just miss it?
09:26:22 bauzas nothing but time :)
09:26:32 alex_xu bauzas: ok :)
09:30:27 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/415978
09:44:58 openstackgerrit Abhishek Kekane proposed openstack/nova: Use is_valid_cidr and is_valid_ipv6_cidr from oslo_utils https://review.openstack.org/320375
09:47:32 gmann alex_xu: why we want to handle _* separately in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/408571/36
09:48:27 gmann alex_xu: i mean just 400 in server.py will be enough right instead of allowing it in schema and later allow to go from strip_additional_property
09:49:17 gmann alex_xu: also how about treating that same as other additional property, just ignore
09:53:19 lyarwood_ mdbooth: morning, was anything blocking https://review.openstack.org/#/c/383859/ aside from core reviews?
09:54:24 alex_xu gmann: if we didn't put _* in the schema, they will be stripped out
09:56:37 alex_xu gmann: we have discuss it whether we can just ignore at last api meeting http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova_api/2017/nova_api.2017-01-04-13.00.log.html
09:56:48 alex_xu gmann: start from "13:07:35"
09:57:18 alex_xu gmann: but yes, I'm not sure people like current implement.
10:03:22 gmann alex_xu: oh yea, for db model object internal attributes.
10:04:07 gmann alex_xu: but only allow in strip_additional and later 400 should be enough may be instead of explicitly allow in original schema ?
10:06:55 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova: Add query parameters white list for server list/detail https://review.openstack.org/408571
10:23:29 openstackgerrit zhangyujun proposed openstack/nova: Update JSON Schema for flavor access https://review.openstack.org/418683
10:40:18 mdbooth lyarwood_: Actually I've got it open right now. I was writing some docs for it at the suggestion of sfinucan and noticed a race, which I'm addressing.
10:40:27 mdbooth But basically no.
10:44:59 openstackgerrit Jiri Suchomel proposed openstack/nova: Retry few times when creating the initial connection to libvirtd. https://review.openstack.org/416928
10:45:17 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova: Add sort_key white list for server list/detail https://review.openstack.org/415142
10:46:58 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova: Add new policy for server list/detail with all_tenants https://review.openstack.org/415330
10:49:41 openstackgerrit avnish proposed openstack/nova: Removed unnecessary utf-8 encoding https://review.openstack.org/418838
10:49:48 openstackgerrit avnish proposed openstack/python-novaclient: Removed unnecessary utf-8 encoding https://review.openstack.org/418839
10:52:45 sfinucan Morning/afternoon, folks. On this, review day, could I get some eyes on two bug fixes: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396184/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/392643/

Earlier   Later