| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-08-03 | |||
| 15:11:34 | jgilaber | but only require it after all compute services are upgraded | |
| 15:12:37 | jgilaber | right now this is left as the operators responsibilty to configure both services correctly so conflicts do not occurr | |
| 15:12:59 | dansmith | jgilaber: but there can be no cyborg-provided devices in the tree until that happens, agreed? | |
| 15:14:41 | jgilaber | no, currently there can be cyborg managed devices | |
| 15:16:23 | sambork | Uggla, thanks! | |
| 15:16:50 | dansmith | jgilaber: without problems? if so, I'm not sure what problem the extra pre-filtering will resolve | |
| 15:17:07 | dansmith | your spec says "to prevent collisions" so that tells me there _would_ be problems | |
| 15:22:48 | jgilaber | yes, there would be problems indeed | |
| 15:24:57 | dansmith | okay I'm not really sure how we went wrong here... my point is that today they can't be mixed without problems, so there's no sort of "before" scenario we need to protect across an upgrade boundary, | |
| 15:25:21 | dansmith | just the after case where we need to make sure to never find cyborg devices *once* they start being reported | |
| 15:26:15 | jgilaber | in this concrete case, the version check is to avoid requiring the owner trait before it's added | |
| 15:26:42 | jgilaber | it protects against nova becoming unable to schedule resources, not against nova-cyborg conflicts | |
| 15:26:53 | dansmith | I guess doing a service version check to determine if we _can_ always select for OWNER_NOVA is okay, although it's sort of unfortunate to have to do that extra bit of expensive work | |
| 15:27:32 | dansmith | the assumption is that even if you never use cyborg, all nova's mdev devices will be reported with that trait henceforth so after we're past the upgrade boundary we can just always require that trait for everyone right? | |
| 15:28:12 | jgilaber | that's right | |
| 15:28:46 | jgilaber | althought the proposal was to add the trait to all nova resource providers, not only mdevs | |
| 15:35:04 | lajoskatona | sean-k-mooney: Hi, there is a patch ( https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/982085) for https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2051685 (After repeat of incomplete migration nova applies wrong (status=error) migration context in update_available_resource periodic job) | |
| 15:36:50 | lajoskatona | sean-k-mooney: and a reproducer functional test under the commit. As I remember we had a chance to have a short chat about it, if you have time can you please check it? Bence / rubasov started to work on it but He was moved to another project so I am kind of responsible for it now :) | |
| 15:38:42 | Uggla | Reminder, upstream meeting in ~20mn | |
| 16:00:10 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:00:10 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:00:10 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Mon Aug 3 16:00:10 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Uggla. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:00:10 | Uggla | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:00:19 | Uggla | Hello everyone | |
| 16:00:34 | bauzas | o/ and welcome back | |
| 16:00:39 | dansmith | o/ | |
| 16:00:40 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:00:48 | Leo[m] | o/ | |
| 16:01:07 | tkajinam | o/ | |
| 16:01:21 | lajoskatona | o/ | |
| 16:02:32 | Uggla | Let's start | |
| 16:02:47 | Uggla | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:02:52 | Uggla | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:03:02 | Uggla | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:03:10 | Uggla | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:03:19 | Uggla | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal | |
| 16:03:26 | Uggla | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&branch=stable%2F*&branch=master&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:03:34 | Uggla | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:03:39 | Uggla | #info Please try to provide a meaningful comment when you recheck | |
| 16:03:52 | fwiesel | o/ | |
| 16:04:10 | Uggla | I have just look quickly at the gate. That looks ok. Anything to say ? | |
| 16:05:10 | Uggla | seems not, moving on | |
| 16:05:11 | Uggla | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:05:19 | Uggla | #link https://releases.openstack.org/hibiscus/schedule.html | |
| 16:05:26 | Uggla | #info Nova deadlines are set in the above schedule | |
| 16:05:33 | elodilles | (just a heads-up that 2027.1 Indri release schedule is available: https://releases.openstack.org/indri/schedule.html ) | |
| 16:05:34 | Uggla | #info PTG etherpad for 2026.2 is available: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.2-ptg | |
| 16:05:49 | Uggla | #info Tomorrow is first Nova Implementation Review Day | |
| 16:06:13 | Uggla | I think I'll have a look at the virtiofs cold migration. | |
| 16:06:36 | Uggla | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:06:44 | Uggla | #link New file for Hibiscus https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.2-status | |
| 16:06:49 | Uggla | #info I have updated Launchpad and the above doc. Please ping me if you spot something missing. | |
| 16:06:55 | Uggla | #info Starting: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.2-status#L16 interesting bugs to review. | |
| 16:07:07 | Uggla | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:07:19 | elodilles | thanks | |
| 16:07:26 | elodilles | #info osc-placement's stable/2025.2 and stable/2025.1 gate is blocked by tox-docs job - fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/998816 | |
| 16:07:42 | elodilles | i'll backport the fix when this has landed ^^^ | |
| 16:07:50 | elodilles | #info other stable gates should be OK | |
| 16:07:59 | elodilles | at least i'm not aware of any issue | |
| 16:08:05 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:08:26 | Uggla | thx elodilles | |
| 16:08:33 | Uggla | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:08:34 | elodilles | np | |
| 16:08:44 | Uggla | fwiesel, something to share ? | |
| 16:08:51 | fwiesel | Hi, no news from my side, except that I will be on PTO until September | |
| 16:09:07 | Uggla | thx, enjoy your PTO | |
| 16:09:11 | fwiesel | thx | |
| 16:09:47 | Uggla | #topic Kamil's news about eventlet removal | |
| 16:10:29 | Uggla | Neither Kamim not gibi are available today, but Kamil gave an update earlier: | |
| 16:10:35 | Uggla | Not much to update. This week's eventlet-removal work in Nova was dominated by test work: gibi is trying to make the functional-py313-threading job voting (#997216), while a refactor replacing StaticallyDelayingWrapper with a futurist-based executor (#997410) is under review | |
| 16:11:10 | Uggla | #topic Nova using openstack sdk for neutron | |
| 16:11:23 | Uggla | hello lajoskatona, something to share today ? | |
| 16:11:28 | lajoskatona | Hi, | |
| 16:12:03 | lajoskatona | the actually what I shared last week: I added option to SDK to have filtering option for fields | |
| 16:12:05 | lajoskatona | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/995724 | |
| 16:12:42 | lajoskatona | with this we can do the same low-cost API requestst toward Neutron like it happened with neutronclient | |
| 16:13:21 | lajoskatona | that's it actually for this topic from me | |
| 16:13:41 | Uggla | thx lajoskatona | |
| 16:13:52 | Uggla | #topic Confidential computing, status of SNP and TDX features | |
| 16:14:06 | Uggla | tkajinam, antia something you'd like to share ? | |
| 16:14:42 | antia | Got a TDX vm up and running. Will add some documentation to go with it. | |
| 16:14:56 | Uggla | antia cool ! | |
| 16:15:42 | tkajinam | I've not yet checked https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999249 but will review it later this week | |
| 16:16:13 | Uggla | I understood SNP is merged now, so nothing remaining on that side ? | |
| 16:16:58 | tkajinam | yeah, nothing from nova's perspective | |
| 16:17:23 | Uggla | tkajinam cool thanks for all this work. | |
| 16:17:32 | tkajinam | though I've found a few problems with ovmf in ubuntu 26.04 package. in case anyoen is interested please check https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/edk2/+bug/2161231 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/edk2/+bug/2160129 | |
| 16:17:42 | tkajinam | at this moment c10s would be a better choice, it seems | |
| 16:18:59 | Uggla | tkajinam good to know thanks | |
| 16:19:09 | Uggla | anything else ? | |
| 16:19:49 | tkajinam | nothing from my end | |
| 16:19:59 | Uggla | ok moving on | |
| 16:20:05 | Uggla | #topic Bug scrubbing | |
| 16:20:17 | Uggla | #info 80 open bugs | |
| 16:20:24 | Uggla | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:20:29 | Uggla | #link https://truc.uggla.fr/ to follow the trend. | |
| 16:20:34 | Uggla | Next meeting (this week): [public] Upstream bug triage. Wednesday, August 5th · 15:30 – 16:00 UTC. Video call link: meet.google.com/zjr-rxus-hzj | |
| 16:20:59 | Uggla | i'll try to sync it probably tomorrow. | |
| 16:21:10 | Uggla | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:21:21 | Uggla | nothing listed on the agenda. | |