Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2025-12-15
16:46:38 Uggla 1
16:47:30 Uggla Thanks for joining this meeting. I wish you happy Christmas holidays and an happy new year. See you beginning of 2027.
16:47:36 fwiesel Thanks, and happy holidays.
16:47:36 gibi Yeah enjoy the vacation period folks! And after this week see you in 2026
16:47:48 gibi Uggla: of by one :):
16:47:48 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-12-15-16.03.log.html
16:47:48 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-12-15-16.03.txt
16:47:48 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-12-15-16.03.html
16:47:48 opendevmeet Meeting ended Mon Dec 15 16:47:48 2025 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:47:48 Uggla #endmeeting
16:48:22 Uggla gibi, yes 2026
16:48:25 elodilles thanks o/
16:48:26 Uggla :)
16:49:16 tkajinam thank you !
16:49:57 gibi thanks
18:03:16 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for services APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953196
18:03:29 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for server usage audit log APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953209
18:03:41 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for tenant network APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956088
18:19:05 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for simple tenant usage APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956096
#openstack-nova - 2025-12-16
02:59:14 gmaan gibi: while reviewing the tpool_wrap series, I have one comment but +w this first change. I did not want to block the whole series as this comment is not something can break but I think this is good to do as follow up - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956089/17/nova/tests/unit/test_utils.py#240
03:00:25 gmaan will continue review the remaining one tomorrow
04:11:38 opendevreview Masahito Muroi proposed openstack/nova master: Add bug 2106085 reproducer test case https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971153
04:11:38 opendevreview Masahito Muroi proposed openstack/nova master: Add check_instance_state validation to lock API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/946223
04:49:42 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Make RBD Tpool usage conditional https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956089
04:49:55 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Make libvirt Tpool proxying conditional https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956090
08:40:35 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Collect result of _live_migration_operation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971156
08:48:30 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Remove eventlet from libvirt/test_driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/970070
08:48:30 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Remove eventlet from CacheConcurrencyTestCase https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/970069
08:48:31 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Remove eventlet from libvirt/volume/test_mount https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/970071
09:09:53 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Enable mypy on nova/utils.py https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969936
11:19:50 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Rally job for eventlet-removal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960130
11:41:20 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Follow up test change for 8c8047ce2afae https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971171
11:44:46 gibi gmaan: ^^ that is a followup based on your comment on the first tpool change you approved yesterday
11:44:53 gibi thanks for all the reviews
12:26:01 opendevreview Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: NUMA Topology with Resource Providers: Scheduler changes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971176
12:27:18 opendevreview Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: NUMA Topology with Resource Providers: Libvirt NUMA Migrate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971177
13:27:32 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Make guestfs' Tpool usage optional https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/965821
14:37:38 jayaanand Do we have to follow those recommandations?
14:37:38 jayaanand Hello Everyone, I am from NetApp. One of our client is looking for ephemeral volumes solution with FlexGroup similar to Ceph. Can i look at current Ceph ephemeral volumes solution and come up with similar solution for NetApp. Is there any recommendation from Nova community. Please let me know. Thank you! your response is greatly appreciated. Also, i am seeing new framework proposals from community for Ephemeral volumes.
15:46:09 opendevreview Johannes Kulik proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Attaching a volume returns HTTP 202 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971068
16:03:48 gmaan gibi: ack, thanks
17:26:02 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/os-vif master: Add pyroute2 tap device creation support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/971231
17:29:31 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: blueprint: iothreads-for-instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/939254
19:29:45 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Make image upload tpool usage conditional https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/966505
#openstack-nova - 2025-12-17
00:46:23 cardoe sean-k-mooney: what do ya need from me on the spec? You want me to actually create the base 2026.2 file?
00:46:44 cardoe Cause it failed cause it says 2026.2 is not opened yet.
08:33:37 opendevreview Marius Leustean proposed openstack/nova master: Faults from cell DB missing in GET /servers/detail https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/699176
08:44:29 jkulik melwitt, sean-k-mooney you left -1 on ^ before. would be nice if you could take another look
08:53:34 sean-k-mooney jkulik: looks form 1000 feet the patch looks more or less correct minor comment inline
08:54:24 jkulik thank you!
08:54:42 sean-k-mooney jkulik: its nice ot have a functional reporudcer test for most bug but its not alwasy required so if you had time to add one following the repoduce and fix patther that would be nice but not strictly required.
09:35:24 opendevreview Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: stop using _get_mem_encryption_config() for SEV checks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967970
09:35:24 opendevreview Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: create generic check for mem encryption support by host https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967969
09:35:25 opendevreview Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: make RP creation independent of specific encryption models https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967972
09:35:25 opendevreview Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: remove explicit SEV dependency from nova.scheduler.utils https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967971
09:35:26 opendevreview Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: adjust requirement checks for mem_encryption guests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967974
09:35:26 opendevreview Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: refactor _guest_configure_mem_encryption() for extensibility https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/967973
09:35:27 opendevreview Taketani Ryo proposed openstack/nova master: mem-enc: introduce a check between mem_encryption and locked_memory https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971300
09:51:48 opendevreview Marius Leustean proposed openstack/nova master: Faults from cell DB missing in GET /servers/detail https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/699176
10:17:09 sean-k-mooney cardoe: often that is doen by the first person to propsoe a spec for the cycle in a sperate commit yes
10:17:39 sean-k-mooney cardoe: but we can do that quickly to unblock you or you can just create teh dir lik https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/970298/3/specs/2026.2/approved/refine-network-setup-procedure-in-live-migrations.rst
14:28:07 gibi bauzas, stephenfin this is a trivial unit test change that needs second core (gmaan is already +2) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971171
14:35:12 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Compute manager to use thread pools selectively https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/966016
14:35:13 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Run nova-compute in native threading mode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/965467
14:35:13 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Libvirt event handling without eventlet https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/965949
14:40:28 bauzas gibi: sent to the gate
14:44:52 gibi bauzas: thank you
14:57:48 opendevreview Julia Kreger proposed openstack/nova master: Add VNC console support for the Ironic driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/942528
15:10:44 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Follow up test change for 8c8047ce2afae https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971171
15:17:22 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Run nova-compute in native threading mode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/965467
15:17:22 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Libvirt event handling without eventlet https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/965949
15:30:08 gibi this year's last eventlet sync https://meet.google.com/bcy-uqoz-hje
18:51:18 rm_work[m] sean-k-mooney: hey, I'm struggling with this issue I think, hoping I might be able to pick your brain: https://github.com/canonical/cloud-init/issues/5221
18:53:11 rm_work[m] I don't need cloud-init to actually RUN any code, but I DID expect the result of the call (the JSON my vendordata2 endpoint returned) to show up in /var/lib/cloud/ somewhere... but /var/lib/cloud/instance/vendor-data2.txt is just empty
22:40:16 sean-k-mooney rm_work[m]: if your using config drve then yes it can be mounted there althoguh its possible that it was not automounted for some reason
#openstack-nova - 2025-12-18
03:03:49 rm_work sean-k-mooney: So the issue I guess was that A) it doesn't get everything, only things set to be "cloud-init", and then also it doesn't accept JSON, it has to be a pure string, which is kinda dumb but it "works", I just `json.dumps` my json before I send it and have to load it up on the other side T_T
03:03:58 rm_work but did get it working finally. like... an hour ago lol
05:41:44 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Update api-ref for server create https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/937534
06:15:51 rm_work It’s weird that “DynamicJSON” type vendor data endpoint can’t return JSON 😅
06:16:22 rm_work But will cloud-init run code if I return a code block the same way as user data?
06:25:19 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Update api-ref for server create https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/937534
09:39:56 jkulik sean-k-mooney: if you have some time left, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/699176 got updated again (faults from cell DB) to address your comments. if not, happy holidays :)
11:30:24 sean-k-mooney jkulik: +2 from me but im not sure if melwitt or gibi will have time to review before the go on pto for the year
11:31:07 jkulik thank you. that's fine, I'll keep on bugging people next year then. but if it looks finished to you, that's already very helpful feedback :)
11:33:23 sean-k-mooney we can always ad dmore testing liek fucnitonal test ectra but i think what you have proesed is good enough and i think it sovles the orginal reported porblem without changing things unessisarlly
11:33:58 sean-k-mooney so to me it looks good as a single atomic commit that is self contained and backportable
12:55:31 opendevreview huanhongda proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: NUMA fit instance to host with cpu/ram_allocation_ratio https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971409
12:59:55 opendevreview huanhongda proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: NUMA fit instance to host with cpu/ram_allocation_ratio https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971409
13:46:54 opendevreview Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add 2026.2 spec structure https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/971413
14:04:35 gibi Uggla: gmaan: FYI I filed the bug for the py312-threading intermittent failure I mentioned yesterday https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2136815 I have a good idea now why it is happening so I will probably able to fix it.
14:05:34 Uggla gibi 👍
14:41:23 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [DNM]Show issue with loopingcall in threading mode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971431
14:59:35 stephenfin gibi: random question on https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py#L2680-L2685
14:59:50 stephenfin that assumes the device has an alias. Will devices always have an alias?
15:01:20 stephenfin I ask because we have tests validating behavior of functions with devices with and without the alias attribute, e.g. https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/tests/unit/virt/libvirt/test_driver.py#L10725
15:01:31 stephenfin I don't know if those are valid tests or not
15:02:44 gibi stephenfin: I assuem that libvirt always assign alias as that is what coming back from libvirt in the event. Nova might or might not explicitly set the alias
15:03:23 stephenfin Yes, that's my thinking also (and my experience from brief local testing)
15:03:56 gibi i think that test covers the case when nova request the detach by using an alias or by not using the alias
15:04:09 gibi that is independent from the device having an alias in libvirt

Earlier   Later