Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2023-02-07
16:30:40 sean-k-mooney i have seen that before but never looked into it ya look useful
16:31:18 dansmith gibi: yeah, it's kinda nice :)
16:31:39 bauzas ideally I would like to trace the whole parenting stack that triggered the leaky thread
16:32:32 gibi bauzas: we will hopefuly get the name of the leaky test case and then we can create a local reproduction
16:33:11 bauzas gibi: a stack would have been better but yeah
16:33:20 gibi you have a stack
16:33:25 gibi but it start when the thread starts
16:33:40 bauzas that's the parent stack I want :)
16:33:43 gibi yeah
16:33:45 gibi that is hard
16:35:09 bauzas yup
16:35:25 bauzas anyway, reviews appreciated on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/872975
16:35:40 bauzas moving on ?
16:35:52 sean-k-mooney sure
16:36:39 bauzas #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status
16:36:41 gibi I'm on it
16:36:51 bauzas #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag.
16:36:54 bauzas #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag.
16:37:01 bauzas #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures
16:37:12 bauzas done with this topic, phew.
16:37:18 bauzas #topic Release Planning
16:37:23 bauzas #link https://releases.openstack.org/antelope/schedule.html
16:37:28 bauzas #info Antelope-3 is in 1.2 weeks
16:37:39 bauzas I said 1.2 because it will be on Thursday next week
16:37:47 bauzas #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/antelope All accepted blueprints for 2023.1
16:37:52 bauzas #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-antelope-blueprint-status Blueprint status for 2023.1
16:37:59 bauzas feel free to comment it as much as you want ^
16:38:28 bauzas I was originally planning to do a full reviews set by today, but due to the former topic, I abandoned my promise
16:39:00 elodilles a bit related to release: 'Release final os-vif for 2023.1 Antelope' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/872779
16:39:06 bauzas (yet again saying, don't expect the reviews to magically happen, be present and interact with us)
16:39:19 bauzas elodilles: good catch I forgot to add it the agenda
16:39:23 bauzas Important :
16:40:05 bauzas #info Thursday is the non-client libs feature freeze, which means we can only accept features changes for os-vif, os-traits and os-rc up until Thursday
16:40:25 bauzas later changes will be on hold until next release
16:40:40 elodilles ++
16:41:17 bauzas I haven't looked at os-vif, os-traits and os-resourceclasses master branches, but I think we have open changes on them
16:42:16 bauzas so, if anyone wants some addition to those libraries, I'd recommend them to ping me or anyone else for reviews
16:43:05 bauzas last point
16:43:18 bauzas FeatureFreeze is on next Thursday
16:43:26 bauzas we'll see how the gate goes by that time
16:43:59 bauzas but as for the older releases, the most important for having your series accepted for Antelope is to get a +W before Thursday EOB
16:44:20 bauzas we'll manage the rechecks if needed
16:44:41 bauzas don't freak out by the gate stability, but please continue to ensure your patches are ready for reviews
16:44:55 sean-k-mooney elodilles: i was planning to propose an os-vif release to include rodolfos patches
16:45:06 sean-k-mooney so i want to confirm the sha before we move forward with that
16:45:10 sean-k-mooney ill do that after the meeting
16:45:16 elodilles sean-k-mooney: as i know he updated the release patch already
16:45:18 bauzas sean-k-mooney: thanks, appreciated
16:45:47 elodilles sean-k-mooney: but please -1 if something is still missing
16:45:53 sean-k-mooney ack just looking now ill +1 if its correct
16:46:06 elodilles sean-k-mooney: that is even better :)
16:46:46 bauzas I think for os-traits I've seen one patch from Uggla
16:47:02 bauzas but I don't think we can reasonably merge the nova related series
16:47:15 Uggla yep but it can wait.
16:47:34 bauzas next topic, if so
16:47:37 bauzas #topic vPTG Planning
16:47:43 bauzas a bit early butn
16:47:49 bauzas #link https://www.eventbrite.com/e/project-teams-gathering-march-2023-tickets-483971570997 Register your free ticket
16:48:26 bauzas also
16:48:34 bauzas #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bobcat-ptg Draft PTG etherpad
16:48:55 bauzas every cycle, we're asked how long we should have sessions
16:49:25 bauzas I thought it would be better to somehow have an idea on how many topics we gonna discuss before saying how many slots we need :)
16:49:36 bauzas but I know
16:49:47 bauzas lots of topics will arrive the week before the PTG :)
16:50:03 sean-k-mooney the more virtual ptgs we have the less energy i have for them. that said i would prefer to have more slots over more days then a few short long ones
16:50:04 bauzas the thing is, you have the etherpad, feel free to amend it
16:50:14 sean-k-mooney s/short//
16:50:41 bauzas sean-k-mooney: this cycle, we will also have a "physical PTG" at the middle of bobcat-1
16:50:54 bauzas that could alleviate some discussions
16:50:55 sean-k-mooney that should really be for C planning
16:51:08 bauzas or B implementation phasing :)
16:51:26 sean-k-mooney either/both its close to Spec Freeze
16:51:33 bauzas I haven't checked whether the proposed B agenda is merged yet
16:51:39 sean-k-mooney so proably to late for directional changes on large specs
16:52:01 bauzas sean-k-mooney: don't disagree, I'm just saying it could help some small contributors to get audience when they need
16:52:02 elodilles B schedule was merged
16:52:08 bauzas cool
16:52:10 bauzas so
16:52:13 sean-k-mooney https://releases.openstack.org/bobcat/schedule.html
16:52:16 sean-k-mooney so yes its merged
16:53:02 bauzas https://releases.openstack.org/bobcat/schedule.html ays that pPTG will be 3 weeks before specfreeze (if we agree on the PTG at b-2 being spec freeze)
16:53:23 bauzas so, that's why I'm saying we could have a shorter but productive vPTG
16:53:31 bauzas like 2 hours per day
16:53:45 bauzas (and ideally, I'd like to attend some TC discussions this time)
16:54:00 sean-k-mooney i would prefer to frontload the plannign to the vPTG and have the physical one be more C focused but ok
16:54:16 bauzas don't disagree
16:54:19 sean-k-mooney because of its time in the cycle it feels more like a fourm then a ptg
16:54:23 bauzas anyway, we're rushing out of time
16:54:30 bauzas #topic Review priorities
16:54:41 bauzas #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2)
16:54:47 bauzas #info As a reminder, cores eager to review changes can +1 to indicate their interest, +2 for committing to the review
16:54:51 bauzas #topic Stable Branches
16:54:57 bauzas elodilles: you have 5 mins (sorry)
16:54:59 elodilles #info stable branches seem to be OK back till wallaby
16:55:04 bauzas huzzah
16:55:05 elodilles stable/wallaby gate is passing (failing openstacksdk-functional-devstack job was removed from wallaby)
16:55:13 bauzas thanks gmann for the hard work on stable/wallaby
16:55:18 elodilles yepp
16:55:19 elodilles ++
16:55:21 elodilles #info stable/victoria gate is affected by the same failing openstacksdk-functional-devstack job

Earlier   Later