| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-05-17 | |||
| 15:30:30 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: not by gibi patch, it is made voting in tempest side I think lee adedd this c8s integrated job | |
| 15:30:43 | sean-k-mooney | so form my persepitve this is a change in expecation from teh QA team | |
| 15:31:06 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: I know, we are trying if c9s as base can be stable as that is must needed for FIPS testing also which a community wide goal now. | |
| 15:31:38 | sean-k-mooney | yep im aware of the fips intersect | |
| 15:31:56 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: if c9s is not stable we will make it clear 1. can centos community help in making it stable 2. if no then let's not spend time on this and drop the entire support like opensuse we did | |
| 15:32:10 | bauzas | I said it downstream but I saw something fun : https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/update-userdata Registered by Steve Baker on 2013-10-07 | |
| 15:32:16 | gmann | and having them voting is my main goal to know the data | |
| 15:32:37 | bauzas | on that date, I was just starting to work on Nova :) | |
| 15:32:43 | sean-k-mooney | gmann: right so when i brogt it up at the ptg for the last 3 ptgs or more | |
| 15:32:47 | bauzas | and my kid was 3yo :) | |
| 15:33:01 | sean-k-mooney | i started with not having it voting ot not blocke patche merging until it was table | |
| 15:33:16 | sean-k-mooney | gmann: i wanted to have it voting eventuly too | |
| 15:33:36 | sean-k-mooney | and mensiton using fips testing as one of the reasons to do this as well as teting newer libvirt | |
| 15:33:44 | sean-k-mooney | gmann: so i think we are aligned | |
| 15:34:00 | sean-k-mooney | just was not expecting it to be voting until m2 honestly | |
| 15:34:19 | gmann | sean-k-mooney: yeah, I think we are saying same thing. if that become unstable we will make it non voting even that is what QA plan is. but as long as it is passing (we will fix the detach things) it is ok to try | |
| 15:34:49 | sean-k-mooney | gmann: untill we fix the detach thing i think its unstable which is why | |
| 15:35:03 | sean-k-mooney | lee had a patch to change it to voting at the end of the sshable series | |
| 15:35:32 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/834546 | |
| 15:35:38 | sean-k-mooney | i guess is what made the change | |
| 15:36:03 | gmann | yeah that is what I did, fixed most flaky test and see | |
| 15:36:04 | sean-k-mooney | it was proably meged too soone but that fine | |
| 15:36:15 | gmann | but sure, let me make all detach tests SSH-able whatever remaining | |
| 15:38:19 | gmann | gibi: left 1 comment, rest lgtm https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/842140/1/tempest/api/compute/base.py#482 | |
| 15:38:48 | sean-k-mooney | hehe | |
| 15:38:55 | sean-k-mooney | we basically asked the same question | |
| 15:39:00 | sean-k-mooney | but i dont think we can hard code | |
| 15:39:03 | sean-k-mooney | to active | |
| 15:39:24 | sean-k-mooney | we can only set it to active if it was "sshaable" or "pingable" | |
| 15:39:32 | sean-k-mooney | if the instance was stopped when you resize it | |
| 15:39:40 | sean-k-mooney | it wont go to active after its resized | |
| 15:40:02 | gibi | it was hardcoded to ACTIVE before the change | |
| 15:40:13 | gibi | so I think we can hardcode it now too :) | |
| 15:40:16 | sean-k-mooney | i guess we dont resize stoped guests? | |
| 15:40:23 | gibi | I guess so | |
| 15:40:38 | sean-k-mooney | ok then they can update that when the add a test for that | |
| 15:40:47 | sean-k-mooney | so ok hardcode it | |
| 15:40:51 | gibi | cool | |
| 15:40:53 | gibi | I will respin | |
| 15:40:56 | gmann | if run validation is disabled then hard coded is ok | |
| 15:41:05 | gmann | and we know detach will be the issue that time | |
| 15:46:53 | gmann | these carry forwards comments from previous PS are becoming more iterating now. I am sure 3rd person reviewing this first time will be confused on it if they are fixed or not - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/842140/2/tempest/api/compute/base.py | |
| 15:47:08 | gmann | *irritating :) | |
| 15:47:21 | gmann | may be just for me | |
| 15:47:44 | sean-k-mooney | ya they are | |
| 15:47:59 | sean-k-mooney | i have started activly cleaning them up when i do reviews now | |
| 15:48:37 | sean-k-mooney | so i take a pass over a review comparing the old patch to new and and mark them as done if they are | |
| 15:48:47 | sean-k-mooney | then i do a reivew after the patch is "clean" | |
| 15:49:02 | sean-k-mooney | its a pain | |
| 15:52:28 | gmann | yeah | |
| 16:02:02 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:02:02 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:02:02 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue May 17 16:02:02 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:02:02 | bauzas | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:02:10 | bauzas | sorry, was late | |
| 16:02:11 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:02:14 | dansmith | o/ | |
| 16:02:16 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:02:25 | Uggla | o/ | |
| 16:02:33 | bauzas | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting | |
| 16:03:12 | bauzas | and the heat wave here makes me melting | |
| 16:03:25 | bauzas | let's start then | |
| 16:03:31 | bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:03:36 | bauzas | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:03:40 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 14 new untriaged bugs (-5 since the last meeting) | |
| 16:03:49 | bauzas | kudos to Uggla for this excellent work | |
| 16:04:26 | bauzas | he wrote a triage etherpad (yet again, this wasn't mandatory to do it) but in case you wanna know what he triaged https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-20220510 | |
| 16:04:46 | bauzas | #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 26 open stories (0 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement | |
| 16:04:53 | bauzas | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:05:20 | bauzas | which leads me to the last point | |
| 16:05:51 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: are you okay with holding the bug baton for this week ? | |
| 16:06:01 | sean-k-mooney | yes | |
| 16:06:06 | bauzas | gracias | |
| 16:06:12 | bauzas | #info Next bug baton is passed to sean-k-mooney | |
| 16:06:38 | bauzas | any bugs to discuss before we move on ? | |
| 16:07:03 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:07:10 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:07:15 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status | |
| 16:07:19 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-emulation&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Emulation periodic job runs | |
| 16:07:25 | bauzas | all the above seems fine ^ | |
| 16:07:37 | bauzas | and not fine like in a fire | |
| 16:07:51 | artom | I think Uggla had a bug he wanted to double-check? Dunno if you want to leave that for the open discussion | |
| 16:07:59 | artom | 1959186 (appears to be valid TBC tomorrow) | |
| 16:07:59 | artom | triaged | |
| 16:08:01 | bauzas | artom: we can | |
| 16:08:52 | sean-k-mooney | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1959186 | |
| 16:08:59 | bauzas | I'll leave it for open discussion then | |
| 16:09:06 | bauzas | people can start digesting it meanwhile | |
| 16:09:25 | sean-k-mooney | initally this does not seam like a bug | |
| 16:09:28 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:09:29 | sean-k-mooney | but know behavior but ya | |
| 16:09:34 | bauzas | #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures | |
| 16:09:35 | sean-k-mooney | lets wait till later | |
| 16:09:46 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:09:52 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html | |
| 16:09:56 | bauzas | #info Zed-1 is due in 2 days | |
| 16:09:58 | bauzas | \o/ | |
| 16:10:09 | bauzas | before we discuss about this milestone | |
| 16:10:13 | bauzas | #info Spec review day happened last week on May 10th | |
| 16:10:18 | bauzas | #info 2 specs were approved but a lot of them were reviewed. Kudos to the team for this hard work. | |