| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2021-11-30 | |||
| 16:01:37 | bauzas | okay, let's statry | |
| 16:02:29 | bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:02:35 | bauzas | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:02:40 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 23 new untriaged bugs (-6 since the last meeting) | |
| 16:02:53 | bauzas | thanks to all who helped | |
| 16:03:00 | bauzas | #help Nova bug triage help is appreciated https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage | |
| 16:03:33 | bauzas | #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 25 open stories (-8 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement | |
| 16:03:37 | bauzas | ditto ^ | |
| 16:03:47 | bauzas | impressive number | |
| 16:04:08 | bauzas | I know the names :p | |
| 16:04:27 | dansmith | o/ | |
| 16:04:30 | bauzas | any particular bug to discuss before we move to the next topic ? | |
| 16:05:13 | bauzas | I guess no | |
| 16:05:20 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:05:27 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:05:43 | bauzas | no new gate bug I can see | |
| 16:05:51 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status | |
| 16:06:08 | bauzas | the issue we discussed last week is fixed ^ | |
| 16:06:27 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures, file a bug, and add an elastic-recheck signature in the opendev/elastic-recheck repo (example: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/759967) | |
| 16:06:55 | bauzas | fwiw, I haven't see any specific issue with our gate | |
| 16:07:06 | gibi | bauzas: the issue is not fixed it just did not appear in the recent runs | |
| 16:07:21 | bauzas | ah right, it was a race | |
| 16:07:23 | gibi | I don't know about any active effor on our side making that fixed | |
| 16:07:32 | gibi | it was about the pmlogger service | |
| 16:07:39 | bauzas | right | |
| 16:08:18 | bauzas | ok, nothing else to tell ? | |
| 16:08:50 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:09:02 | bauzas | #info Yoga-2 is due Jan 6th#link https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html#y-2 | |
| 16:09:05 | opendevmeet | Removing item from minutes: #info Yoga-2 is due Jan 6th#link https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html#y-2 | |
| 16:09:05 | bauzas | #undo | |
| 16:09:19 | bauzas | #info Yoga-2 is due Jan 6th | |
| 16:09:21 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html#y-2 | |
| 16:09:37 | bauzas | #info Next spec review day to be planned for mid-Dec | |
| 16:09:41 | bauzas | so, | |
| 16:10:08 | bauzas | what do you think about Dec 14th for a new spec review day ? | |
| 16:10:21 | bauzas | the next week, I'll be off | |
| 16:10:23 | sean-k-mooney | +1 for 14th | |
| 16:10:44 | gibi | 14th works for me | |
| 16:10:49 | bauzas | we have a few open specs | |
| 16:10:58 | gibi | I'm off from the 20th | |
| 16:11:11 | bauzas | gibi: maybe like me | |
| 16:11:32 | bauzas | maybe I'll work on the Dec 22th day | |
| 16:11:38 | bauzas | but... | |
| 16:11:57 | bauzas | I'm not sure we would have quorum | |
| 16:12:09 | bauzas | ok, any other thought? | |
| 16:13:03 | bauzas | #agreed Next spec review day will be Tuesday Dec 14th | |
| 16:13:08 | gibi | I will not be around in the week of Yoga-2 | |
| 16:13:19 | bauzas | I'll provide a new ML email | |
| 16:13:20 | gibi | I will be back on the 10th of Jan | |
| 16:13:32 | bauzas | gibi: oh, you're now living in France ? | |
| 16:13:37 | bauzas | :p | |
| 16:14:00 | gibi | I've just checked, no :D | |
| 16:14:21 | bauzas | anyway, no worries | |
| 16:14:37 | bauzas | we will only have the spec deadline for yoga-2 | |
| 16:15:25 | gibi | I have two placement specs to get approved :) | |
| 16:15:31 | bauzas | I've seen them :p | |
| 16:15:50 | bauzas | anyway, moving on | |
| 16:16:08 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:16:16 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1 | |
| 16:16:22 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/816861 bauzas proposing a documentation change for helping contributors to ask for reviews | |
| 16:16:32 | bauzas | I'm afraid I didn't had time to modify it | |
| 16:16:49 | bauzas | nothing to discuss then for this week | |
| 16:17:05 | bauzas | unless people want to have review priorities ? | |
| 16:17:46 | bauzas | fwiw, my main priority will be unified limits reviews | |
| 16:18:32 | bauzas | OK, next topic | |
| 16:18:39 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:18:48 | bauzas | I'm sitting down, listening to elodilles | |
| 16:18:52 | elodilles | #info stable gates are OK | |
| 16:19:00 | elodilles | stable/xena has ~3 merged bug fixes, maybe we can wait some more bug fix to land before we do a release | |
| 16:19:10 | elodilles | and that's it | |
| 16:20:12 | bauzas | I was triaging a bug related to the compute service delete issue, and I saw we hadn't yet merged https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/802847 | |
| 16:20:55 | bauzas | I'll look at other backports that are fixing bad bugs, and I'll try to review them | |
| 16:21:25 | elodilles | thanks in advance \o/ | |
| 16:22:01 | bauzas | well, no problem | |
| 16:22:08 | bauzas | moving on | |
| 16:22:16 | bauzas | #topic Sub/related team Highlights | |
| 16:22:24 | bauzas | Libvirt :lyarwood ? | |
| 16:22:33 | lyarwood | Nothing from me | |
| 16:22:36 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:22:43 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:22:48 | bauzas | (gmann) Specless BP approval request for RBAC community-wide goal | |
| 16:23:02 | bauzas | #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/policy-defaults-refresh-2 | |
| 16:23:12 | bauzas | gmann: around ? | |
| 16:23:51 | dansmith | I am, if you have questions | |
| 16:24:09 | bauzas | honestly, I don't think I have any concerns | |
| 16:24:32 | dansmith | I've been working on a patch to get servers back to the place where we want it, | |
| 16:24:33 | bauzas | maybe one about upgrades and what it means for operators that were modifying the policies | |
| 16:24:35 | dansmith | as an example people can work from | |
| 16:24:39 | dansmith | and it's very close | |
| 16:24:51 | bauzas | but this is just changing the defaults | |
| 16:24:54 | dansmith | gmann and johnthetubaguy[m] are mostly happy I think, just working out one more functional thing | |
| 16:25:19 | dansmith | bauzas: well, this is pretty much all about defaults anyway, | |
| 16:25:34 | dansmith | and nobody could really have rolled to the new ones yet anyway, so not an upgrade concern, IMHO | |
| 16:25:46 | dansmith | but the revised plan involves less change when they do upgrade | |
| 16:26:31 | bauzas | dansmith: I guess you're referring to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/815158/20/goals/proposed/consistent-and-secure-rbac.rst as the revised plan ? | |
| 16:26:40 | dansmith | yep | |
| 16:27:24 | bauzas | ok, | |
| 16:27:45 | bauzas | this plan isn't yet sold but whatever it will be, nothing will really change from nova | |
| 16:28:02 | dansmith | well, things have to change in nova of course, | |
| 16:28:08 | bauzas | so as you said, I don't think there is any upgrade concern then | |