Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2021-11-30
16:16:32 bauzas I'm afraid I didn't had time to modify it
16:16:49 bauzas nothing to discuss then for this week
16:17:05 bauzas unless people want to have review priorities ?
16:17:46 bauzas fwiw, my main priority will be unified limits reviews
16:18:32 bauzas OK, next topic
16:18:39 bauzas #topic Stable Branches
16:18:48 bauzas I'm sitting down, listening to elodilles
16:18:52 elodilles #info stable gates are OK
16:19:00 elodilles stable/xena has ~3 merged bug fixes, maybe we can wait some more bug fix to land before we do a release
16:19:10 elodilles and that's it
16:20:12 bauzas I was triaging a bug related to the compute service delete issue, and I saw we hadn't yet merged https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/802847
16:20:55 bauzas I'll look at other backports that are fixing bad bugs, and I'll try to review them
16:21:25 elodilles thanks in advance \o/
16:22:01 bauzas well, no problem
16:22:08 bauzas moving on
16:22:16 bauzas #topic Sub/related team Highlights
16:22:24 bauzas Libvirt :lyarwood ?
16:22:33 lyarwood Nothing from me
16:22:36 bauzas cool
16:22:43 bauzas #topic Open discussion
16:22:48 bauzas (gmann) Specless BP approval request for RBAC community-wide goal
16:23:02 bauzas #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/policy-defaults-refresh-2
16:23:12 bauzas gmann: around ?
16:23:51 dansmith I am, if you have questions
16:24:09 bauzas honestly, I don't think I have any concerns
16:24:32 dansmith I've been working on a patch to get servers back to the place where we want it,
16:24:33 bauzas maybe one about upgrades and what it means for operators that were modifying the policies
16:24:35 dansmith as an example people can work from
16:24:39 dansmith and it's very close
16:24:51 bauzas but this is just changing the defaults
16:24:54 dansmith gmann and johnthetubaguy[m] are mostly happy I think, just working out one more functional thing
16:25:19 dansmith bauzas: well, this is pretty much all about defaults anyway,
16:25:34 dansmith and nobody could really have rolled to the new ones yet anyway, so not an upgrade concern, IMHO
16:25:46 dansmith but the revised plan involves less change when they do upgrade
16:26:31 bauzas dansmith: I guess you're referring to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/815158/20/goals/proposed/consistent-and-secure-rbac.rst as the revised plan ?
16:26:40 dansmith yep
16:27:24 bauzas ok,
16:27:45 bauzas this plan isn't yet sold but whatever it will be, nothing will really change from nova
16:28:02 dansmith well, things have to change in nova of course,
16:28:08 bauzas so as you said, I don't think there is any upgrade concern then
16:28:29 bauzas nothing will really change from a nova perspective if you prefer
16:28:37 dansmith but mostly just undoing some of the proposed stuff that hasn't been able to be realized yet.. stepping back from some of that stuff that we merged proactively
16:28:40 bauzas things have to change, but upgrades aren't a concern either way
16:29:00 dansmith much less of a concern than what they were, but of the stuff we're keeping, no real change, yeah
16:29:24 dansmith and keystone will go first which will help our upgrade be even less impactful than it was going to be, if we ever got past the big bubble we had going
16:29:48 bauzas to answer the original paperwork question, I think there is no controversy to tell it's a specless BP and we don't to document this as we already have https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/815158/20/goals/proposed/consistent-and-secure-rbac.rst
16:30:02 bauzas we don't need* to
16:30:13 dansmith ++
16:30:44 bauzas that said, of course this work will need some release notes
16:30:54 dansmith obviously
16:30:55 bauzas to explain the changes to the operators
16:31:00 bauzas ok
16:31:04 bauzas anyone has other concerns N?
16:31:22 bauzas dang, I need to learn typing
16:31:58 bauzas (and that's what happens when you have a french keyboard with ? located near n and requiring shift)
16:32:08 bauzas anyway
16:32:41 bauzas #agreed https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/policy-defaults-refresh-2 accepted as a specless BP as the direction is already explained in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/815158/
16:32:50 bauzas moving on, last topic
16:33:12 bauzas (ganso) Raising awareness of vif_multiqueue_enabled in flavor work that is ready to be reviewed/merged
16:33:15 bauzas ganso: around ?
16:33:21 ganso o/
16:33:34 bauzas #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multiqueue-flavor-extra-spec
16:33:49 ganso so as the topic titles says: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bp%252Fmultiqueue-flavor-extra-spec%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged)
16:34:14 ganso we've discussed 2-3 weeks ago about this and that it could/may be specless, but it was approved to be specless ~6 months ago
16:34:20 bauzas ganso: nothing changed during the implementation phase requiring further discussion ?
16:34:45 ganso bauzas: as far as I know, nothing changed and the code is complete
16:35:05 bauzas the BP was previously approved as specless so I don't see problems approving it again providing there were no changes in design
16:35:08 ganso I rebased it and it is passing CI
16:35:13 bauzas (requiring further discussions)
16:36:11 ganso I'm pretty much shepherding this set of changes now, but the work was done by stephenfin
16:36:12 bauzas ganso: I guess you're taking over stephenfin's work ?
16:36:22 ganso yes
16:36:25 bauzas OK, that's crystal clear then
16:36:39 bauzas I don't have any problems reapproving it
16:36:49 bauzas anyone else disagreeing ?
16:36:49 ganso great =)
16:37:28 bauzas #agreed https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multiqueue-flavor-extra-spec to approve it again as a specless BP for the yoga release cycle
16:37:50 bauzas we're at the end of the agenda, anything else to mention ?
16:38:15 bauzas I'm happy to say we were quick this time :)
16:38:24 gibi \o/
16:38:30 bauzas if not,
16:38:34 bauzas #endmeeting*
16:38:34 opendevmeet Meeting ended Tue Nov 30 16:38:34 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:38:34 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2021/nova.2021-11-30-16.00.html
16:38:34 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2021/nova.2021-11-30-16.00.txt
16:38:34 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2021/nova.2021-11-30-16.00.log.html
16:38:49 bauzas man, I'm fed up with my typing issues
16:40:03 bauzas thanks all
16:40:22 elodilles thanks bauzas o/
16:40:57 bauzas I'm a gross person, I haven't officially thanked you all at the end of the meeting
16:42:09 elodilles :D
17:07:13 bauzas gmann: can I put you assignee on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/policy-defaults-refresh-2 ?
17:14:48 opendevreview Nicolas Parquet proposed openstack/nova master: Add v2.91 microversion, allowing @ and dot (.) characters in keypair name https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/781076
18:05:52 gmann bauzas: sure, thanks
18:07:59 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Revert project-specific APIs for servers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/816206
18:08:00 opendevreview Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Make API fixture pass roles https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/819907
18:08:26 dansmith gmann: this has the fixture change on top ^ so you can see it not working without it, and then working when we change that
18:08:42 dansmith I haven't done more digging on why this is required, but hoping it's something you can spot easily
18:08:53 gmann dansmith: ok, checking
18:08:54 dansmith I wonder if we're not really testing fake policy like we think in functional?

Earlier   Later