Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2020-11-25
10:44:45 bauzas but it shouldn't be a thing for the project itself
10:45:01 bauzas gibi: I'm not saying ML threads are unnecessary
10:45:08 bauzas they're good for getting noticed
10:45:13 gibi kashyap: that mail originally served as a heads up of the deployers and packagers, and it serverd that purpose well.
10:45:17 owalsh bauzas: we need a f2f PTG :-)
10:45:24 gibi owalsh: +100
10:45:25 bauzas but then, the debate should happen elsewhere in a gerrit change
10:45:39 bauzas owalsh: gibi: you can't imagine how I feel nowadays
10:45:56 bauzas and I just got notice that my usual ski trip around New Year will be over
10:46:15 bauzas my mood is presently at the 3rd basement
10:46:24 kashyap gibi: Oh, definitely. Wasn't criticizing, BTW :)
10:46:27 gibi bauzas: I'm sorry to hear that :/
10:46:44 stephenfin bauzas: you ski too much anyway
10:46:45 kashyap bauzas: "will be over" as in "it won't happen"?
10:46:49 kashyap stephenfin: LOL
10:46:59 gibi kashyap: no critic is taken. you and bauzas are right debating thing in that wide ML thread is a bold move
10:47:04 bauzas stephenfin: I haven't done that since March, it's been too long
10:47:40 bauzas kashyap: it shouldn't happen as ski resorts will stay closed until mid-Jan as our president told yesterday
10:47:43 kashyap It's okay; it serves as a record still. And writing out clarifies thinking :)
10:48:03 bauzas gibi: next round, you'll be invited
10:48:05 kashyap bauzas: Right; makes sense. As skii resorts were one of the "super-spreader" events back in March
10:48:18 gibi bauzas: I would love to try again
10:48:57 bauzas gibi: I did that for a couple of colleagues, I'm all up to redo this with a larger crew
10:49:14 bauzas anyway, back to the topic
10:49:26 bauzas gibi: anything worth for me reviewing about this ?
10:49:41 gibi midcycle up in the french alps!
10:49:43 bauzas I guess the WSGI config enablement is on its way, right?
10:50:37 gibi WSGI needs a second core https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/763750
10:51:02 bauzas ack, looking
10:52:32 gibi there is a non-dangerous func test refactor here https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/758210
10:52:49 owalsh gibi: re every conductor being a superconductor when api db is set - is that going to affect scaling?
10:53:37 gibi owalsh: good question
10:57:14 gibi owalsh: you might be able to still do conductor separation
10:57:43 owalsh still have mq/db sharding I guess
10:58:31 owalsh and only the cell local computes are on the same mq
10:58:33 gibi owalsh: if you have a conductor with an [api_database]connection config, but only configured to listen to the cell message bus, then that conductor will not get super-conductor type requests, but still can handled the upcalls for the late affinity check
10:59:06 gibi I would love dansmith to confirm this ^^
10:59:13 gibi as I'm not 100% certain
11:00:03 owalsh gibi: ack, thanks. Makes sense. I'll make a note to check with dansmith in 2021 :-)
11:01:44 bauzas gibi: just begging for a relnote in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/763750 so we don't hide this fancy feature
11:02:15 bauzas owalsh: gibi: I missed that point, dan is off until next year ? woah.
11:03:56 gibi bauzas: he told me that he will be away on PTO from this week until end of the year
11:04:11 bauzas that's good to know
11:04:29 gibi bauzas: I can add a reno for the sys.argv patch sure
11:04:35 bauzas I'm still facing unexpected and weird issues with the RPC API bump, I guess I'll defer it until he returns
11:04:52 bauzas because I'm out of steam on finding the problem
11:09:23 openstackgerrit Wenping Song proposed openstack/nova master: Nova supports password encrypted VNC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/622336
11:24:47 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support sys.argv in wsgi app https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/763750
11:24:55 gibi bauzas: now with a reno ^^
11:31:22 gibi bauzas: also if you are in a review mood, there is another test refactor series here. This is a bit bigger though https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22remove-fake-notifier%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged)
11:39:17 gibi bauzas: and here is some testcoverage restored as a neutron bug has been fixed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/755995
11:42:22 openstack Launchpad bug 1905224 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "bfv instance create failed due to insufficient resources, the volume is always attaching" [Undecided,New]
11:42:22 gibi lyarwood: +2d https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/757894 then I realized the we have a possibly related fresh bug in the untriaged list https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1905224
11:42:46 lyarwood gibi: looking
11:43:03 gibi "fresh" as it is reported from Pike
11:43:06 lyarwood gibi:`I am in pike version`
11:43:08 lyarwood yeah lol
11:43:24 gibi fresh means freshly opened :D
11:43:28 gibi sorry
11:43:59 lyarwood so that's https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/743220 I think
11:45:26 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Use _evacuate_server helper in func test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/758210
11:47:06 gibi lyarwood: thanks!
14:00:34 lyarwood stephenfin: https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/e035ff4079c2cc6b32db1f637a3e3a816c2af191/nova/api/validation/extra_specs/hw.py#L73-L77 - any reason we can't point at the o.vo types for this list of enums? https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/e035ff4079c2cc6b32db1f637a3e3a816c2af191/nova/objects/fields.py#L271-L277
14:00:56 lyarwood stephenfin: just wiring up a validator for my ephemeral encryption spec and didn't want to duplicate things between the two
14:01:17 stephenfin None that I'm aware of. I simply didn't think to
14:01:48 lyarwood stephenfin: kk, might give it a go in a FUP
14:23:22 openstackgerrit Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Fix rendering in the PTL guide https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/764175
14:26:09 stephenfin elod: lyarwood: Do you think you could look through https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522bug/1879878%2522+status:open+branch:stable/train this week? The stable/ussuri patches landed some time ago
14:26:29 stephenfin (https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522bug/1879878%2522+status:merged+branch:stable/ussuri for reference)
14:26:44 lyarwood stephenfin: ack, can I trade https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/757894
14:26:55 stephenfin fair
14:27:27 lyarwood stephenfin: FWIW you were previously +2 on this but I can't see the vote since the upgrade
14:27:32 lyarwood weird
14:27:50 stephenfin I was thinking I'd reviewed this previously
14:28:15 gibi lyarwood: there is a show all messages button
14:28:32 stephenfin ahhh
14:28:35 stephenfin good spot
14:28:40 gibi the new gerrit only shows the last X message in the log by default
14:30:20 elod stephenfin: i've gone through them a while ago, i don't remember exactly, but I think there is some patch that I would appriciate if some other stable core would also review, hence I gave +1 only
14:31:28 stephenfin Hmm, I wonder are there any other stable cores around this week? Mel and Dan are both out, afaik
14:31:43 elod (and maybe not all the patches were merged yet at that time, but if you say now they are, then I'll have another look :))
14:32:13 stephenfin Perhaps I can answer any questions if it's to do with the functionality itself?
14:32:24 lyarwood elod: I think you were waiting for review on the bugfix itself, I've got that open now
14:33:40 lyarwood oh no you had comments in there
14:33:50 lyarwood stephenfin: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/751367
14:34:11 elod yeah, that's the one, just wanted to link that
14:34:20 lyarwood https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/751367/2/nova/compute/manager.py#4527 sorry
14:34:48 elod but I have to read my comments as I've forgotten already what I wrote :)
14:35:27 stephenfin Ah, I thought that was more of a note to self than a request for change. I can clarify the conflict in the commit message, sure
14:35:30 elod yes, I have to get used to the new gerrit UI too o:)
14:36:43 stephenfin Although, for the sake of potentially saving me some effort, I'm not wrong in saying the cross-cell resize patches are the culprit. I'm just less specific than I could be :)
14:39:09 lyarwood gibi: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/758971 - btw forgot to ask for a review of this releasenote update now that the device detach issue is resolved
14:40:09 gibi lyarwood: on a call but look at it after it
14:40:50 lyarwood gibi: ack thanks, no rush.
14:51:36 gibi lyarwood: good catch +A
15:01:07 gmann gibi: fixed your comment on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/762721
15:03:42 gibi gmann: thanks +2
15:03:54 gmann thanks
15:25:59 stephenfin bauzas: Think you could look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/756549/ if you're in a reviewing mood?
15:26:18 bauzas stephenfin: I'm always up for reviewinh

Earlier   Later