Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2020-05-13
23:41:56 melwitt ah, good luck :)
#openstack-nova - 2020-05-14
00:46:44 openstackgerrit Wenping Song proposed openstack/nova master: delete sub resource provider when delete resource provider https://review.opendev.org/719163
00:49:25 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Configure latex_engine = 'xelatex' for pdf docs build https://review.opendev.org/727898
01:07:14 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Configure latex_engine = 'xelatex' for pdf docs build https://review.opendev.org/727898
01:32:15 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose provider-config-file spec for Victoria https://review.opendev.org/725788
01:36:51 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Re-proposes 'Proposal for a safer remote console with password authentication' https://review.opendev.org/719720
02:48:28 tony_su gibi, sean-k-mooney : Thanks for reviewing and merging the spec.
02:50:43 tony_su gibi, sean-k-mooney : I will start to rebase related patches and send out for code review once they are ready.
03:03:55 melwitt fyi the openstack-tox-docs job is failing for nova since a recent upper-constraints bump, I have proposed a fix here https://review.opendev.org/727898 I have also sent a ML post
05:56:38 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Configure latex_engine = 'xelatex' for pdf docs build https://review.opendev.org/727898
07:10:38 openstackgerrit Nalini Varshney proposed openstack/nova master: Add migration to make key field type VARBINARY in aggregate_metadata table, https://review.opendev.org/725522
07:35:02 brinzhang_ sean-k-mooney: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727589/2 do I need to update this patch? I have not concern stephenfin has already fixed these issue, but he abandoned.
07:49:09 gibi good morning Nova
07:49:29 bauzas whoops my manners
07:49:34 bauzas good morning Nova
07:50:26 brinzhang_ morning nova
07:50:59 brinzhang_ hi gibi, bauzas, I saw you are -1 for https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727140/1, the flake8 error fix patch
07:51:44 gibi brinzhang_: my -1 is about the fact that 3.8.1 added yet another check that needs to be fixed
07:51:48 brinzhang_ I submit a same one, before that I have not concern stephenfin's patch, do I need to continue ?
07:52:24 brinzhang_ gibi: I will see http://paste.openstack.org/show/793434/
07:52:40 bauzas brinzhang_: my concerns was about making sure what we would need to change
07:52:49 gibi I guess stephenfin abandoned the patch as we went a different direction, capping the version
07:53:34 brinzhang_ yeah
07:53:55 brinzhang_ I mean, if there is no sense to fix, I think I would abandon too.
07:56:16 brinzhang_ https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727347/ gmann bumped hacking to 3.0.1, I am not sure whether this can avoid these pep8 error happen again
07:58:30 brinzhang_ gibi: stephenfin and I fixed the issue is reported by https://review.opendev.org/#/c/724260/6, and https://review.opendev.org/#/c/726564/2.
07:59:12 brinzhang_ I found your paste is not easy to fix, may need to change the function name, such as "./nova/tests/unit/api/openstack/compute/microversions.py:34:5: F811 redefinition of unused 'index' from line 29"
07:59:18 brinzhang_ :P
08:02:05 gibi brinzhang_: those redefinitions are intentional and not cause a python bug due to the decorator top of it will generate unique functions dynamically. So I think F811 needs to be ignored in tox.ini
08:03:01 gibi I think it is OK to fix the issues reported by the other new checks along with version bump
08:03:09 gibi but please consult stephenfin too
08:03:54 brinzhang_ gibi: agree
08:04:49 brinzhang_ gibi: yeah, I will try to update the patch to latest, and then consult
08:05:32 gibi OK, cool
08:20:58 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova master: Fix flake8 error from hacking <3.0.1 https://review.opendev.org/727589
08:45:27 bauzas brinzhang_: gibi: FWIW, +Wd https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727347/1
08:45:57 bauzas brinzhang_: but then I don't understand why we should merge https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727589/
08:46:04 gibi bauzas: thanks
08:50:36 bauzas gibi: any change I should be reviewing ?
08:51:23 openstack Launchpad bug 1878024 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "disk usage of the nova image cache is not counted as used disk space" [Undecided,Confirmed] - Assigned to Balazs Gibizer (balazs-gibizer)
08:51:23 gibi bauzas: not from me at the moment. I still busy with https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1878024
08:51:41 bauzas gibi: okay, just saying, you have https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bug/1869050+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
08:51:51 bauzas should I look at it ?
08:52:13 gibi bauzas: yes please. I already forgot about that
08:52:23 bauzas heh, no worries
09:00:45 brinzhang_ bauzas: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727589/ this patch just only fixed some unreasonable issue, IMO, if we don’t fix it, we don’t know when it will *explode*
09:01:08 brinzhang_ after all, it has reported in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/724260/6, and https://review.opendev.org/#/c/726564/2.
09:11:09 bauzas brinzhang_: that's the exact reason why we have minimum versions
09:11:41 bauzas once we bump the minimum, we no longer need to care about what was bad for older versions
09:12:23 brinzhang_ bauzas: I know you mean, but these code realy not have a good code style, right?
09:13:41 brinzhang_ I can say with certainty that merged this change will only make Nova's code more readable.
09:14:37 bauzas then that's not a bugfix
09:14:42 brinzhang_ especially https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727589/3/nova/tests/unit/compute/test_compute_mgr.py this patch
09:14:49 brinzhang_ s/patch/file/
09:14:57 bauzas and just a bikeshed
09:15:23 brinzhang_ if there is no this blank line, it..
09:16:09 brinzhang_ Yes, this bug was submitted before https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727347/1
09:16:58 brinzhang_ because it caused pep8 error in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/724260/6, and https://review.opendev.org/#/c/726564/2.
09:17:26 brinzhang_ that time I think it is a bug, that why report
09:19:18 sean-k-mooney bauzas: we will eventually have to fix the pep8 issues by the way when we update hacking
09:19:36 sean-k-mooney and therefor get the newer flake8
09:20:02 bauzas again, we have minimum versions FTW
09:20:16 sean-k-mooney yep wont help
09:20:43 bauzas the point is, if we want to support new flake8 version, then yes indeed we need to verify this works
09:20:46 sean-k-mooney the new min version of hacking is so we get a version that caps flake8 and we have capped the hacking version
09:20:50 bauzas and then updating what we need
09:21:07 sean-k-mooney so when we update the hacking version we will get a new flake8 and have to fix the issue then
09:21:09 bauzas but that's another concern
09:21:22 bauzas correct, that's another change
09:21:39 bauzas anyway, /me needs to get my kid from the school since it opened again today :(
09:22:00 bauzas (until next kids vacations)
09:22:12 sean-k-mooney i would have assumed your productivig increased with them going back to school
09:22:31 sean-k-mooney so in net it should still be better
09:23:03 sean-k-mooney even if its about to go down now that you are going to pick them up
09:25:17 brinzhang_ Agree, a good foundation can make a difference.
09:42:32 bauzas sean-k-mooney: hell, unfortunately no
09:42:48 bauzas sean-k-mooney: I was working between 9am-1pm and then 2pm-7.30pm
09:42:55 bauzas even with the kids
09:43:07 bauzas they were asking me for teaching only for 1 hour
09:43:30 bauzas now, it's 9am-11.30am and then 1.30pm-4.30pm
09:43:39 bauzas :(
09:53:01 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: cyborg evacuate support https://review.opendev.org/715326
09:55:27 sean-k-mooney gibi: brinzhang_ filed https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/cyborg-rebuild-and-evacuate
09:56:09 sean-k-mooney ill add it to the meeting adgenda but im hoping we are all fine with proceeding with that as a specless blueprint since i have already implemented it
09:57:09 gibi sean-k-mooney: thanks
09:58:55 sean-k-mooney bauzas: im going to update the numa in placmenet spec for the victoria templeate and resubmit it now. that ok with you?
09:59:34 brinzhang_ sean-k-mooney: got it, thanks, I will register suspend/resume and shelve/unshelve as the same rebuild/evacuate
10:00:11 brinzhang_ sean-k-mooney, gibi: and there is also another blueprint need to be done, https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/define-cyborg-arq-binding-notification-event
10:01:09 gibi stephenfin: do you mean merging https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727898/ is not needed if we merging https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727898/ and doing a version bump?
10:01:13 brinzhang_ I write poc code, but there is not time to add UT, when I have free time, I will summit a WIP patch for this
10:01:45 gibi stephenfin: I mean merging your patch https://review.opendev.org/#/c/727992/
10:03:58 gibi brinzhang_: could you write one sentence in that bp about what you need implemented?
10:04:50 brinzhang_ gibi: ok
10:04:53 gibi thanks
10:07:37 stephenfin gibi: Yeah, exactly
10:08:29 gibi stephenfin: if we can merge that quickly then I'm OK to wait for the better solution
10:09:06 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova-specs master: re-propose numa with placement https://review.opendev.org/728009
10:09:42 brinzhang_ gibi: I modified https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/define-cyborg-arq-binding-notification-event description in simple, is it ok?
10:11:35 gibi brinzhang_: what you have to add regarding "accelerators binding notifications." ?
10:11:44 gibi what you have to add to nova

Earlier   Later