| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2019-01-21 | |||
| 16:59:48 | sean-k-mooney | ok | |
| 17:02:09 | gibi | mriedem, sean-k-mooney: thanks for the discussion. talk to you tomorrow | |
| 17:05:04 | cfriesen | sean-k-mooney: am I understanding this right that the "physical_network" name in the pci whitelist will be correlated against the neutron provider network for the passed-in neutron port? | |
| 17:05:53 | sean-k-mooney | cfriesen: it correaltes to the the neutron physenet | |
| 17:07:09 | sean-k-mooney | cfriesen: so yes it corralate to the provider:physical_network in the neutron network object | |
| 17:07:43 | cfriesen | cool, thanks | |
| 17:25:42 | openstackgerrit | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: auto detach/attach sriov ports on migration https://review.openstack.org/629589 | |
| 18:13:47 | sean-k-mooney | hi so quick question. _rollback_live_migration in the compute manager does not currently appear to ever call the virt driver on the source node | |
| 18:14:41 | sean-k-mooney | i assume it would be ok to add a _rollback_live_migration_at_source to the base driver interface that was a noop and implement it for the libvirt driver? | |
| 18:15:27 | sean-k-mooney | we have have rollback_live_migration_at_destination but that dose not help me. | |
| 18:35:34 | cdent | jaypipes: I believe this is for you: http://existentialcomics.com/comic/273 | |
| 18:43:56 | sean-k-mooney | cdent: if only that was the calibar of converstations at a typical bar discussing such matters hehe | |
| 18:44:14 | cdent | i might actually go to bars if that were the case | |
| 18:45:15 | edleafe | sean-k-mooney: I prefer this: http://theincidentaleconomist.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/sportsball.jpg | |
| 18:47:09 | sean-k-mooney | it is good but i can feel the heat of the browns burn in cdents link from here and i dont even follow american football | |
| 19:00:08 | openstackgerrit | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: auto detach/attach sriov ports on migration https://review.openstack.org/629589 | |
| 19:38:28 | jaypipes | cdent: that is friggin brilliant. | |
| 19:44:40 | cdent | jaypipes: isn't it delightful? | |
| 19:49:19 | jaypipes | cdent: it is indeed. | |
| 19:49:50 | cdent | jaypipes: you may be the Übermensch | |
| 19:58:19 | jaypipes | cdent: heh | |
| 20:03:41 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/631829/ well this is new. all post_failures and all i have check apparently passed... | |
| 21:52:38 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Add TargetDBSetupTask https://review.openstack.org/627892 | |
| 21:52:39 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Add PrepResizeAtDestTask https://review.openstack.org/627890 | |
| 21:52:39 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add CrossCellMigrationTask https://review.openstack.org/631581 | |
| 21:52:40 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Add PrepResizeAtSourceTask https://review.openstack.org/627891 | |
| 22:05:45 | zzzeek | mriedem: am I allowed to +2 + workflow my own sqlalhcemy-migrate patch ? | |
| 22:06:10 | mriedem | zzzeek: which one? the mysqlclient one? | |
| 22:06:20 | zzzeek | the "quote=force" one | |
| 22:06:27 | mriedem | i just approved it | |
| 22:06:50 | mriedem | i would like to avoid self approvals, but on that project i think a single +2/+W is probably OK given it's basically just you and me | |
| 22:07:28 | zzzeek | mriedem: that's what i was asking :) | |
| 22:07:46 | zzzeek | er where is verified coming from on that ? is there another zuul job ? | |
| 22:08:46 | mriedem | zuul will run the gate queue jobs on it | |
| 22:09:19 | mriedem | jobs for that project are defined here https://github.com/openstack-infra/project-config/blob/fcc974bf4c0dc324f93a2aec0520e6e4889c106d/zuul.d/projects.yaml#L8106 | |
| 22:21:45 | mriedem | zzzeek: fyi i'm proposing a release for sqla-migrate https://review.openstack.org/632180 | |
| 22:22:23 | zzzeek | mriedem: OK so if this does include the quote=force change, note that I bumped the minimum sqlalchemy vresion to 0.9 | |
| 22:22:49 | mriedem | yup that's why i did a minor version bump | |
| 22:23:14 | zzzeek | mriedem: OK if that's what we need then that's great | |
| 22:23:20 | zzzeek | sqla 0.9 is like 5 years ago | |
| 22:29:04 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Add description about sort order in API ref guideline https://review.openstack.org/627282 | |
| 22:35:09 | jaypipes | mriedem: so I think I remember what that rebuild bug/issue I was asking you about last week was... | |
| 22:35:44 | jaypipes | mriedem: if we rebuild to same host but change the image from the original image, we do a full select_destinations-code-path again, right? | |
| 22:37:02 | jaypipes | mriedem: but we include a single destination host when doing the select_destinations(), yeah? In order to basically determine if the original destination host is still a match for the new image? | |
| 22:38:34 | jaypipes | mriedem: if this is the case, we're seeing a problem where we're getting NoValidHost back from the scheduler because the amount of resources "used" for the original host doesn't account for the original instance. In other words, we erroneously double-up the amount of requested resources when attempting to ask the scheduler if the original host is still a fit. | |
| 22:39:28 | jaypipes | mriedem: or rather, that we're not correctly subtracting the amount of used original instance resources from the amount we request in the "recreate" scheduler request. | |
| 22:39:51 | jaypipes | gawd, this stuff is hard to talk about in any sort of reasonably clear language, sorry :( | |
| 22:47:22 | melwitt | jaypipes: correct that we go through the scheduler for rebuilds, as of queens. fwiw, it looks like it will say NoValidHost when filters fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1744325 but I don't recall issues with doubling up allocations for rebuilds before | |
| 22:47:24 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1744325 in OpenStack Compute (nova) pike "If a rebuild is refused by the scheduler, the instance's imageref is not rolled back" [High,Fix committed] - Assigned to melanie witt (melwitt) | |
| 22:48:05 | melwitt | (that bug shows brief explanation of rebuild going through scheduler and what happens when there's a failure to schedule) | |
| 22:50:32 | mriedem | jaypipes: pretty sure that's been fixed by cfriesen and/or hongbin | |
| 22:50:38 | mriedem | maybe you don't have the backport | |
| 22:50:39 | jaypipes | melwitt: thx Melanie :) as you know, we're on Ocata currently for VMs and I'm seeing that the "solution" internally is "don't change the image when rebuilding"... | |
| 22:51:50 | jaypipes | Have I mentioned I hate the fact that rebuild is basically a crutch because people can't stand to lose their IP addresses because they hard-code them everywhere? :( | |
| 22:52:37 | melwitt | heh, yeah, good ol rebuild | |
| 22:53:03 | melwitt | so, if this is ocata, you wouldn't be going through scheduler for rebuild right? | |
| 22:54:17 | jaypipes | melwitt: yeah, it's been backported. | |
| 22:54:35 | melwitt | ah ok. I'm looking for a bug fix like mriedem mentioned | |
| 22:54:40 | jaypipes | melwitt: well, at least according to https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1744325 (and we have that code merged in our local ocata branch) | |
| 22:54:41 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1744325 in OpenStack Compute (nova) pike "If a rebuild is refused by the scheduler, the instance's imageref is not rolled back" [High,Fix committed] - Assigned to melanie witt (melwitt) | |
| 22:55:46 | melwitt | jaypipes: here we go https://review.openstack.org/561015 | |
| 22:55:49 | melwitt | good memory mriedem | |
| 22:57:00 | jaypipes | melwitt: that's it! thank you! | |
| 22:57:05 | melwitt | \o/ | |
| #openstack-nova - 2019-01-22 | |||
| 00:13:53 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/os-vif master: do not always plug ovs ports. https://review.openstack.org/631829 | |
| 04:55:00 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/os-vif master: Cleanup device at the end of 'test_iproute_object_closes_correctly' test https://review.openstack.org/629112 | |
| 06:17:20 | openstackgerrit | Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Add minimum value in max_concurrent_live_migrations https://review.openstack.org/632240 | |
| 07:53:34 | jangutter | cdent, jaypipes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_Philosophers! | |
| 09:18:14 | openstackgerrit | Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/os-vif master: Import IP implementation modules outside privsep context https://review.openstack.org/629025 | |
| 09:19:10 | openstackgerrit | Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/os-vif master: Add test to check os_vif.internal.command.ip.exists https://review.openstack.org/632077 | |
| 09:22:41 | jangutter | dansmith: remember I threatened some o.vo docs? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/632321 | |
| 09:28:25 | openstackgerrit | Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: Per-instance serial number https://review.openstack.org/619953 | |
| 10:05:56 | kashyap | Anyone else seeing the StringException failures in the 'openstack-tox-lower-constraints' job? | |
| 10:06:00 | kashyap | http://logs.openstack.org/80/630980/6/check/openstack-tox-lower-constraints/aba7c59/testr_results.html.gz | |
| 10:09:25 | openstackgerrit | Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: A few miscellaneous items related to "native TLS" https://review.openstack.org/630980 | |
| 10:09:26 | openstackgerrit | Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Update references to "QEMU-native TLS" document https://review.openstack.org/631283 | |
| 10:10:28 | kashyap | gibi: stephenfin ^ When you get a moment, appreicate if you could re-ACK them. | |
| 10:14:10 | bauzas | gibi: morning | |
| 10:14:23 | bauzas | gibi: do you remember a bit of how works the affinity groups ? | |
| 10:14:50 | bauzas | gibi: I'm working on an internal bug about this, but I have a specific issue | |
| 10:15:18 | bauzas | gibi: when booting an instance asking for a group, the group UUID is just a hint | |
| 10:20:10 | gibi | kashyap: ack | |
| 10:20:31 | gibi | bauzas: yes, the group UUID is just a hint | |
| 10:21:18 | bauzas | gibi: do you remember when we transfrom the hint into some InstanceGroup object ? | |
| 10:22:45 | gibi | bauzas: https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/f7252b586b4b9f5a098fedfa27715b8f7e662af6/nova/scheduler/utils.py#L902 | |
| 10:23:19 | bauzas | gibi: yeah, that's what I remembered but I need to check where we call it | |
| 10:23:26 | bauzas | anyway, sorry for pinging you | |
| 10:23:40 | bauzas | gibi: thanks btw. for the help on functional tests for the reshape | |
| 10:23:48 | gibi | bauzas: yeah, I'm just tracing it backwards from there | |
| 10:23:57 | bauzas | I'm really sorry to be out of upstream for the moment | |
| 10:24:55 | openstackgerrit | caoxufeng proposed openstack/nova master: oslo.config>=6.1.0 which is a dependency of nova requires rfc3986>=1.2.0 https://review.openstack.org/632391 | |
| 10:25:19 | gibi | bauzas: no worries | |
| 10:27:11 | gibi | bauzas: still not the right spot https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/00b14a233886cbcaccf1576904571a59ca8b6535/nova/compute/api.py#L876 | |
| 10:28:07 | gibi | bauzas: this is the place https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/00b14a233886cbcaccf1576904571a59ca8b6535/nova/compute/api.py#L1180 | |
| 10:30:57 | gibi | kashyap: done | |
| 10:32:06 | kashyap | gibi: Thank you very much. :-) | |
| 13:04:51 | jaypipes | jangutter: ha! that's awesome :) | |
| 13:07:06 | jangutter | jaypipes: I've got the hardcover, it most definitely is. | |
| 13:07:18 | jaypipes | :) | |
| 13:55:22 | sean-k-mooney | jaypipes: hi regarding teh libvirt min version. looking at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/LibvirtDistroSupportMatrix#Nova_release_min_version we had planned to set it to somthing in the 3.y.z seriese in stien. do you think setting it to 3.2.0 would be resonable? | |