Posted	Nick	Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-06-29
07:23:14	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/nova master: Powervm configuration cleanup https://review.openstack.org/575171
07:23:24	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/nova master: placement: s/None/null/ in consumer conflict msg https://review.openstack.org/577171
08:02:45	lyarwood	gibi: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/483324/10/nova/compute/manager.py@6042 - just noticed some additional whitespace in an old change of yours, odd how pep8 didn't pick up on it.
08:27:24	openstackgerrit	huanhongda proposed openstack/nova stable/queens: [Stable Only] Remove soft-deleted instances from quota_usages https://review.openstack.org/579093
08:33:40	gibi	lyarwood: yeah, that is odd
08:38:01	bauzas	shit, my manners
08:38:04	giblet	lyarwood: do you feel it worth a patch to remove tht extra line?
08:42:49	lyaaaaaaaarwood	giblet: honestly no, was just reading the LM rollback code and noticed it.
08:44:32	giblet	lyaaaaaaaarwood: OK, let's keep it that way. I have no idea if we can teach pep8 to detect this
08:51:13	openstackgerrit	Tetsuro Nakamura proposed openstack/nova master: Add microversion for nested allocation candidate https://review.openstack.org/565487
08:51:14	openstackgerrit	Tetsuro Nakamura proposed openstack/nova master: Fix nits in placement-return-all-resources series https://review.openstack.org/573604
08:51:49	giblet	lyaaaaaaaarwood: which part?
08:52:00	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: Fix the rescue race for vGPU instances https://review.openstack.org/577424
08:52:07	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/nova master: Merge server create schema for legacy BDM extension https://review.openstack.org/577152
08:52:14	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/nova stable/pike: Add policy rule to block image-backed servers with 0 root disk flavor https://review.openstack.org/563700
09:08:41	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/nova master: Use ironic-tempest-dsvm-ipa-wholedisk-bios-agent_ipmitool-tinyipa in tree https://review.openstack.org/578878
09:08:55	openstackgerrit	Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: Use nova.db.api directly https://review.openstack.org/543262
09:12:01	PapaOurs	cdent: good morning
09:12:11	cdent	morning
09:12:14	PapaOurs	cdent: re: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/575127/2/nova/api/openstack/placement/util.py
09:12:34	PapaOurs	cdent: looks like the minimum webob version we support doesn't have it
09:13:00	PapaOurs	cdent: https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/master/lower-constraints.txt#L18
09:13:09	cdent	ah, yeah, that's probably true.
09:13:31	cdent	It came in with webob's big accept header refactoring
09:13:58	cdent	it would be nice to raise the constraint if possible, but I could also adapt that code I suspect
09:14:51	cdent	PapaOurs: what's your opinion?
09:15:55	PapaOurs	cdent: I dunno
09:16:03	PapaOurs	cdent: I'm not super expert on g-r
09:16:17	PapaOurs	cdent: what I know is that we can at least ask for a bump on lower-reqs
09:16:42	PapaOurs	but the big webob refactoring could be refraining people accepting this bump
09:17:29	PapaOurs	cdent: so we could be more conservative on placement, and just try to have a backwards compatible call
09:17:32	cdent	how did you discover this?
09:17:40	PapaOurs	cdent: a downstream bug
09:17:56	PapaOurs	cdent: since lower-reqs aren't updated, we're still on 1.7
09:18:25	cdent	have you got time to make a patch?
09:18:35	cdent	(if not, I can give it a go)
09:19:39	openstack	bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1596308 in openstack-nova "Placement API unexpected error: 'MIMEAccept' object has no attribute 'acceptable_offers'" [Unspecified,New] - Assigned to nova-maint
09:19:39	PapaOurs	cdent: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596308
09:20:31	PapaOurs	cdent: I can file an upstream bug against nova, and do the patch yeah
09:20:42	PapaOurs	patch(es) even
09:20:44	cdent	that would be awesome
09:20:54	PapaOurs	one for lower-reqs, and one for placement
09:27:40	cdent	PapaOurs: please mention the bug here once you create it
09:27:59	openstack	Launchpad bug 1779287 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "placement can throw exception if webob<1.8 in use" [High,Confirmed] - Assigned to Sylvain Bauza (sylvain-bauza)
09:27:59	PapaOurs	cdent: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1779287
09:28:42	PapaOurs	cdent: I'm firing a patch against nova
09:30:09	cdent	you nick today is really throwing me off
09:32:04	PapaOurs	cdent: it's my new friday nick
09:32:17	cdent	what does it mean?
09:32:29	PapaOurs	BearDad
09:33:25	cdent	is this were slack I'd have to respond to that with some kind of emoji
09:33:39	cdent	Anyway, I spent the whole first 3/4 of our conversation having no idea who you were
09:33:54	cdent	thinking "oh cool, new downstream person coming upstream"
09:34:29	cdent	so I am half sad and half happy
09:38:08	PapaOurs	cdent: you can still whois me ;)
09:38:42	PapaOurs	but sorry for the emotional lift :)
09:45:38	openstackgerrit	Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/osc-placement master: CLI allocation candidates (v1.10) https://review.openstack.org/514647
09:45:39	openstackgerrit	Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/osc-placement master: New dict format of allocations (v1.11, v1.12) https://review.openstack.org/542819
09:45:40	openstackgerrit	Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Transactionally update allocations (v1.13) https://review.openstack.org/546674
09:45:41	openstackgerrit	Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Add nested resource providers (v1.14) https://review.openstack.org/546675
09:45:42	openstackgerrit	Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Limit allocation candidates (v1.15, v1.16) https://review.openstack.org/548043
09:45:43	openstackgerrit	Andrey Volkov proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Allocation candidates parameter: required (v1.17) https://review.openstack.org/548326
09:46:44	openstackgerrit	Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Fix placement incompatible with webob 1.7 https://review.openstack.org/579110
09:50:22	PapaOurs	cdent: finucannot: efried: https://review.openstack.org/579110
09:55:48	finucannot	PapaOurs: Can we not just bump the lower-constraints on that?
09:58:43	cdent	finucannot: see the backlog, there's some discussion of doing both
09:58:58	cdent	s/doing/trying/ and seeing which one floats
10:02:42	kaisers	Hey Novas, anyone familiar with Nova+QEMU please have a look: It seems to me the change https://review.openstack.org/#/c/553072/ introduced a dependency for QEMU v2.9+ while https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/LibvirtDistroSupportMatrix shows QEMU v2.5 as minimum supported version. The patch only checks for a libvirt version but not for QEMU 2.9+ . Or maybe i'm overlooking something? (QEMU v2.9 adds the pass mtu to guest fe
10:03:57	kaisers	I'm not absolutely sure my 2.9 ref is the required feature but it's the best lead i found so far. Our CIs are stumbling on setting the MTU as they're running QEMU 2.5 (because Xenial release)
10:11:57	openstackgerrit	Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor the policies to policy https://review.openstack.org/579113
10:11:57	openstackgerrit	Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: Add InstanceGroupPolicy object https://review.openstack.org/573628
10:39:23	openstackgerrit	Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Define common variables for irrelevant-files https://review.openstack.org/578882
10:50:08	openstackgerrit	Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: manage: Remove dead code https://review.openstack.org/579118
10:50:45	finucannot	PapaOurs: Wanna send this through? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/530923/
10:59:00	openstackgerrit	Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Update admin/flavors document https://review.openstack.org/573063
11:18:57	openstackgerrit	Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Handle LM rollback error when detaching volumes from transient domain https://review.openstack.org/579125
11:18:59	lyaaaaaaaarwood	kashyap: ^ as discussed earlier, would you mind taking a look?
11:19:17	kashyap	lyaaaaaaaarwood: _Just_ about to grab a quick bite
11:19:27	lyaaaaaaaarwood	kashyap: ack no rush
11:20:01	kashyap	Have it open in a tab. Will look.
11:20:10	lyaaaaaaaarwood	thanks, enjoy lunch :)
12:19:48	tssurya	mriedem, melwitt: good morning! I have replied on spec with comments on the confusions regarding delete stuff (sorry for the delay, I missed the notifications somehow).
12:20:17	tssurya	if its not clear, whenever you are free later on, we could do an IRC chat
12:22:38	openstackgerrit	Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova stable/queens: Make nova service-list use scatter-gather routine https://review.openstack.org/579135
12:31:10	mriedem	tssurya: ok, i'm not adequately caffeinated yet
12:32:04	tssurya	mriedem: np, we can do it later in your evening as well
12:33:06	openstackgerrit	Surya Seetharaman proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: Make nova service-list use scatter-gather routine https://review.openstack.org/579136
12:41:24	PapaOurs	finucannot: re: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/579110/ we can't just bump the lower version easily
12:42:05	PapaOurs	finucannot: because a lot of projects use webob, and in between 1.7 and 1.8, there are some not backwards compatibilty
12:44:00	openstackgerrit	Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: CLI allocation candidates (v1.10) https://review.openstack.org/514647
12:44:01	openstackgerrit	Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: New dict format of allocations (v1.11, v1.12) https://review.openstack.org/542819
12:44:02	openstackgerrit	Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Transactionally update allocations (v1.13) https://review.openstack.org/546674
12:44:03	openstackgerrit	Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Add nested resource providers (v1.14) https://review.openstack.org/546675
12:44:04	openstackgerrit	Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Limit allocation candidates (v1.15, v1.16) https://review.openstack.org/548043
12:44:05	openstackgerrit	Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Allocation candidates parameter: required (v1.17) https://review.openstack.org/548326
12:45:24	mriedem	we do have per-project lower constraints now for a reason
12:45:32	mriedem	this doesn't need to be backported
12:45:48	mriedem	i'm not sure if everyone assumes that all services on the same host are deployed in containers or venvs now though
12:46:10	mriedem	we certainly don't in devstack..
12:50:34	PapaOurs	mriedem: so, what's your opinion ?

Earlier   Later