Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-05-23
20:12:28 mriedem you don't want to eat boiled meat anyway right?
20:12:51 mriedem where is mdbooth when i need to joke about terrible british meat
20:13:35 penick Correct, but if I picked the things I -wanted- to do, over what the business needs, i'd have a really kickass 10 node openstack cluster running on trunk. But I wouldn't be moving the whole company over to it
20:23:48 mriedem well riddle me this, where is accessIPv4 actually used anywhere in nova anymore?!
20:24:51 mriedem i need an onboarding session
20:24:57 cburgess mriedem Thats a dangerous thing to say to me. :P
20:25:09 mriedem cburgess: whatever i said, it was probably a day ago,
20:25:10 mriedem so remind me
20:25:19 cburgess mriedem Getting enough cloud providers to ask for volume type.
20:25:26 mriedem oh right, page 45
20:25:34 cburgess page 45?
20:25:58 mriedem page 45 of the nova core dungeon master's guide states: "once you get enough people asking for the same feature, regardless of policy, it must be accepted"
20:26:06 cburgess lol
20:26:09 penick Pretty sure you just made that up
20:26:15 cburgess I didn't know such a guide exists. Must be for PTLs only.
20:26:23 mriedem "nova core dungeon master's guide"
20:26:34 cburgess Oh core
20:26:35 cburgess My bad..
20:26:43 mriedem penick: melwitt's is keeping your dining table steady atm
20:26:45 dansmith I haven't seen this guide
20:26:49 cburgess mriedem You do realize that has to become a think now right?
20:27:01 penick We have a dining table?
20:27:04 cburgess melwitt is doing what now?
20:27:11 dansmith isn't that melwitt's workstation now?
20:27:15 melwitt what is happening
20:27:28 mriedem i know what's not happening
20:27:43 mriedem ... https://review.openstack.org/#/c/446239/
20:27:44 mriedem :)
20:28:00 melwitt it's happening, at the subaru dealership even!
20:28:05 mriedem oh snap
20:28:18 melwitt about to upload the quotas bomb again
20:28:25 penick her workstation locality depends on three factors. The season, is the cat being annoying, or is she at the dealership
20:28:28 mriedem page 62 has a subaru coupon coincidentally
20:28:31 mriedem on free granola bar
20:28:33 mriedem *one
20:28:45 penick free granola bar, that's a sweet deal
20:28:53 melwitt I ate a free Cliff bar here earlier
20:28:58 mriedem haha
20:29:26 mriedem i always feel great when some joke i make which might be offensive turns out to be actual fact
20:29:36 melwitt lol, right?
20:29:48 penick man that nova dungeon masters guide is handy
20:29:57 mriedem why do you think we don't add more cores?
20:30:01 mriedem limited supply
20:30:03 mriedem of guides
20:32:02 penick Not cheap to print. also the "Worlds best nova core" mugs don't exactly grow on trees. Those legbreakers at Cafepress charge a fortune
20:32:12 melwitt merge conflicts in local delete code ... grrrr
20:32:24 mriedem melwitt: blame dansmith
20:32:53 melwitt >:| angry eyebrows
20:33:18 dansmith go ahead
20:33:26 dansmith I'll flip this table and leave
20:34:13 melwitt the workstation table might be hard to flip. but could be toppled over
20:34:49 penick Cool cores don't watch tables flip. They just walk away. (-_- )ノ⌒┫ ┻ ┣
20:35:18 dansmith well, I'm not going to flip _this_ table since it has all my monitors and laptop on, but I will go find a suitable table with minimal collateral damage and flip that mofo
20:35:35 melwitt :D
20:36:07 melwitt we're all on the same page here
20:36:40 cburgess dansmith pics or it didn't happen
20:36:45 mriedem you know what i think we can all agree on?
20:36:51 mriedem removing the gluster volume driver https://review.openstack.org/#/c/463992/
20:36:59 cburgess +1 LGTM
20:37:02 dansmith heh
20:39:52 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Cleanup update_instance cell mapping handling https://review.openstack.org/467380
20:39:53 mriedem dansmith: i'm also hoping you don't find problems with ^
20:40:10 mriedem i think that stuff all predates _get_instance storing the targeted cell context on the instance object
20:40:41 dansmith mriedem: can we wait and or depends-on that on the multicell devstack patch?
20:40:56 mriedem i can put a change on top with the depends-on to test it out
20:41:02 dansmith okay
20:41:19 dansmith or just dependson it and remove it if it's good
20:41:20 mriedem https://review.openstack.org/#/c/436094/ right?
20:41:28 dansmith yar
20:41:38 mriedem i'm going to do another one on top of this for something else in that method
20:41:43 dansmith okay
20:41:44 mriedem we have some funny business toward the end
20:42:17 efried mriedem Thanks for the Sphinx thing; that spec change merged.
20:42:53 mriedem \o/
20:59:42 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test changes with multiple cells https://review.openstack.org/467383
20:59:42 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove cells v2 transition code from update_instance https://review.openstack.org/467382
21:00:40 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test changes with multiple cells https://review.openstack.org/467383
21:00:41 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove cells v2 transition code from update_instance https://review.openstack.org/467382
21:05:41 mriedem efried: heh https://review.openstack.org/#/c/465135/
21:05:46 mriedem this was a known issue awhile ago
21:06:41 efried mriedem Yes, I'm pretty sure I also proposed blocking 1.6.1 last week in some other project that didn't get updated by the bot.
21:07:14 efried mriedem keystone-specs, it was: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/465543/
21:08:04 efried mriedem I believe it was to get https://review.openstack.org/#/c/460344/ to pass.
21:36:35 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Handle uuid in HostAPI._find_service https://review.openstack.org/461519
21:36:36 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Use uuid for id in Services API https://review.openstack.org/464280
21:36:36 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Handle uuid in HostAPI.compute_node_get https://review.openstack.org/461532
21:42:10 melwitt I wish I had realized it much earlier
21:42:10 melwitt the target_cell behavior change tripped me up, sigh
21:44:31 mriedem that's why i had to rebase ^
21:44:36 dansmith you're welcome
21:45:36 melwitt I totes forgot I used target_cell in my patches. go me
21:46:00 melwitt I was like, why are my counts totally whack?
21:47:07 dansmith because you forgot to use target_cel and were in 1998?
21:47:22 mriedem i'm assuming pants were backward
21:47:25 mriedem *weren't
21:47:49 melwitt dansmith: does target_cell magically make objects queried from the db under it have self._context set to the cell db?
21:48:45 dansmith melwitt: if you use the yielded context to initialize them then yes
21:48:54 melwitt like with target_cell(ctxt, mapping): instance = Instance.get()
21:49:28 dansmith target_cell(ctxt, mapping) as cctxt
21:49:36 dansmith instance = Instance.get_by_uuid(cctx)

Earlier   Later