Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-05-23
20:41:19 dansmith or just dependson it and remove it if it's good
20:41:20 mriedem https://review.openstack.org/#/c/436094/ right?
20:41:28 dansmith yar
20:41:38 mriedem i'm going to do another one on top of this for something else in that method
20:41:43 dansmith okay
20:41:44 mriedem we have some funny business toward the end
20:42:17 efried mriedem Thanks for the Sphinx thing; that spec change merged.
20:42:53 mriedem \o/
20:59:42 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove cells v2 transition code from update_instance https://review.openstack.org/467382
20:59:42 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test changes with multiple cells https://review.openstack.org/467383
21:00:40 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test changes with multiple cells https://review.openstack.org/467383
21:00:41 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Remove cells v2 transition code from update_instance https://review.openstack.org/467382
21:05:41 mriedem efried: heh https://review.openstack.org/#/c/465135/
21:05:46 mriedem this was a known issue awhile ago
21:06:41 efried mriedem Yes, I'm pretty sure I also proposed blocking 1.6.1 last week in some other project that didn't get updated by the bot.
21:07:14 efried mriedem keystone-specs, it was: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/465543/
21:08:04 efried mriedem I believe it was to get https://review.openstack.org/#/c/460344/ to pass.
21:36:35 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Handle uuid in HostAPI._find_service https://review.openstack.org/461519
21:36:36 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Handle uuid in HostAPI.compute_node_get https://review.openstack.org/461532
21:36:36 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Use uuid for id in Services API https://review.openstack.org/464280
21:42:10 melwitt the target_cell behavior change tripped me up, sigh
21:42:10 melwitt I wish I had realized it much earlier
21:44:31 mriedem that's why i had to rebase ^
21:44:36 dansmith you're welcome
21:45:36 melwitt I totes forgot I used target_cell in my patches. go me
21:46:00 melwitt I was like, why are my counts totally whack?
21:47:07 dansmith because you forgot to use target_cel and were in 1998?
21:47:22 mriedem i'm assuming pants were backward
21:47:25 mriedem *weren't
21:47:49 melwitt dansmith: does target_cell magically make objects queried from the db under it have self._context set to the cell db?
21:48:45 dansmith melwitt: if you use the yielded context to initialize them then yes
21:48:54 melwitt like with target_cell(ctxt, mapping): instance = Instance.get()
21:49:28 dansmith target_cell(ctxt, mapping) as cctxt
21:49:36 dansmith instance = Instance.get_by_uuid(cctx)
21:49:38 dansmith will work
21:50:11 melwitt dansmith: like this, the instances are queried inside of group.count_members_by_user() https://review.openstack.org/#/c/457859/7/nova/quota.py@1890
21:50:40 melwitt and I'm not sure if the instances will have the right context in that case?
21:51:07 dansmith melwitt: no, see that's the problem.. group already has a context, right?
21:51:15 dansmith the target won't do anything it that context anymore
21:52:15 melwitt okay, I see
21:52:53 dansmith melwitt: not sure that code would actually work before actually
21:52:55 dansmith with multiple cells
21:53:09 melwitt yeah, I don't think so, now that I realize what's going on here
21:53:15 dansmith because it'll start several greenthreads, but by the time they run they'll all be back to untargeted I think
21:53:31 dansmith unless you copied it first, but that's what you get with the yield now anyway
21:54:20 penick mriedem did you just make a kris kross reference?
21:54:36 mriedem penick: you need to be around more,
21:54:40 mriedem those get made nearly weekly
21:54:46 melwitt yep, that
21:55:07 penick I felt like I had to say something, so you'd know at least someone got it
21:55:28 cdent don't encourage him
21:55:29 melwitt we all know kris kross
21:56:52 melwitt dansmith: I think things worked by chance bc the already targeted (via set_target or something) got the instance_group from the right cell earlier in the request
21:56:52 penick Ah ok. I wont jump (jump) next time I see it then
21:57:07 dansmith melwitt: sounds right
22:01:24 mriedem efried is gone?
22:01:40 melwitt instance create does a get for the requested server group to check the number of members quota. it currently assumes the group is in the same cell as the instance but I think that might not be always true. ugh
22:09:36 melwitt I guess that's out of scope for my patches though
23:19:59 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add FixedIP.get_count_by_project() https://review.openstack.org/446246
23:19:59 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add FloatingIP.get_count_by_project() https://review.openstack.org/446247
23:20:00 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add get_count_by_vm_state() to Instance object https://review.openstack.org/446244
23:20:01 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add SecurityGroup.get_counts() https://review.openstack.org/446245
23:20:01 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Remove 'reserved' count from used limits https://review.openstack.org/446242
23:20:01 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Remove useless quota_usage_refresh from nova-manage https://review.openstack.org/446243
23:20:02 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Count server groups to check quota https://review.openstack.org/446240
23:20:02 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Count networks to check quota https://review.openstack.org/446241
23:20:05 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Count instances to check quota https://review.openstack.org/416521
23:20:05 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add InstanceGroup.get_counts() https://review.openstack.org/457857
23:20:06 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add check_deltas() and limit_check_project_and_user() to Quotas https://review.openstack.org/446239
23:20:07 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add InstanceGroup._remove_members_in_db https://review.openstack.org/457858
23:20:07 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Count server group members to check quota https://review.openstack.org/457859
23:20:08 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Count security groups to check quota https://review.openstack.org/457860
23:20:11 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Make Quotas object favor the API database https://review.openstack.org/410945
23:20:11 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Count fixed ips to check quota https://review.openstack.org/457861
23:20:13 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add online migration to move quotas to API database https://review.openstack.org/410946
23:20:15 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Count floating ips to check quota https://review.openstack.org/457862
23:29:30 mriedem melwitt: are the members of the group not created at the same time in the same cell?
23:29:47 mriedem could be on different hosts if an anti-affinity group, that would be the one to wonder about
23:41:54 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Amend the "list-show-all-server-migration-types" spec https://review.openstack.org/460847
23:47:20 mriedem dansmith: is your fleetify devstack change expected to pass the live migration job?
23:47:25 mriedem i don't think that runs on devstack does it?
23:47:39 mriedem looks like it doesnt
23:47:44 dansmith mriedem: a nova change that depends on it should pass yeah,
23:47:48 dansmith it was passing all last week
23:48:12 mriedem ok i hit this http://logs.openstack.org/83/467383/2/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-multinode-live-migration-ubuntu-xenial/05a0806/console.html#_2017-05-23_21_53_09_472165
23:48:13 dansmith mriedem: there is a patch on the top of my set that youneed tho
23:48:21 mriedem oh i see
23:48:37 dansmith mriedem: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/458537/
23:49:21 mriedem ok, everything else pass on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/467382/ and down so i'll consider that a success for now
23:49:25 mriedem *passed
23:49:44 dansmith cool
23:54:22 cfriesen under what circumstances would we hit https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1691545 ? Do you need to have multiple cells?
23:54:22 openstack Launchpad bug 1691545 in OpenStack Compute (nova) ocata "Significant increase in DB connections with cells" [High,Fix committed] - Assigned to melanie witt (melwitt)
#openstack-nova - 2017-05-24
00:50:29 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/467344
00:52:33 mriedem cfriesen: you don't need to have multiple cells,
00:52:36 mriedem it wasn't about that
00:52:53 mriedem it was an issue where we thought db connections were being cached by oslo.db or sqla but they weren't
00:53:01 mriedem so every time one was created it was new and they weren't getting gc'ed
01:31:43 openstackgerrit Huan Xie proposed openstack/nova master: XenAPI use os-xenapi v2 in nova https://review.openstack.org/453493
02:35:06 melwitt mriedem: guh, instance groups and members are in the API db. I forgot

Earlier   Later