| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-cyborg - 2020-04-07 | |||
| 05:01:48 | openstackgerrit | Xinran WANG proposed openstack/cyborg master: Introduce microversion https://review.opendev.org/696860 | |
| 06:18:59 | openstackgerrit | Xinran WANG proposed openstack/cyborg master: Introduce microversion https://review.opendev.org/696860 | |
| 08:55:27 | openstackgerrit | ShaoHe Feng proposed openstack/cyborg master: support program for fake driver https://review.opendev.org/697011 | |
| 09:30:12 | openstackgerrit | ShaoHe Feng proposed openstack/cyborg master: support program for fake driver https://review.opendev.org/697011 | |
| 09:30:13 | openstackgerrit | ShaoHe Feng proposed openstack/cyborg master: support program for all drivers. https://review.opendev.org/697639 | |
| 10:11:20 | openstackgerrit | Li Liu proposed openstack/cyborg master: Address the hostname problem mentioned https://review.opendev.org/696014 | |
| 11:40:10 | openstackgerrit | Li Liu proposed openstack/cyborg master: Address the hostname problem mentioned https://review.opendev.org/696014 | |
| 11:43:39 | openstackgerrit | ShaoHe Feng proposed openstack/cyborg master: support program for fake driver https://review.opendev.org/697011 | |
| 11:43:40 | openstackgerrit | ShaoHe Feng proposed openstack/cyborg master: support program for all drivers. https://review.opendev.org/697639 | |
| 12:14:17 | openstackgerrit | ShaoHe Feng proposed openstack/cyborg master: bug fix for cyborg run on multi-host https://review.opendev.org/693784 | |
| 12:24:42 | openstackgerrit | ShaoHe Feng proposed openstack/cyborg master: bug fix for cyborg run on multi-host https://review.opendev.org/693784 | |
| 13:29:11 | gmann | brinzhang: ACK, i will check sometime later | |
| 16:48:09 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/cyborg master: Introduce microversion https://review.opendev.org/696860 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2020-04-08 | |||
| 00:59:02 | openstackgerrit | Wenping Song proposed openstack/python-cyborgclient master: test-followup https://review.opendev.org/718286 | |
| 02:56:44 | openstackgerrit | Shogo Saito proposed openstack/python-cyborgclient master: Update requirements for openstacksdk release https://review.opendev.org/712852 | |
| 03:44:49 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-cyborgclient master: Cleanup py27 support https://review.opendev.org/717459 | |
| 06:03:21 | brinzhang | gmann: thanks for check the introduce functional test patch | |
| 06:34:43 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/cyborg master: Cleanup py27 support https://review.opendev.org/717521 | |
| 07:47:14 | openstackgerrit | YumengBao proposed openstack/cyborg master: Refactor v2 arq api https://review.opendev.org/696089 | |
| 12:03:45 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-cyborgclient master: Update requirements for openstacksdk release https://review.opendev.org/712852 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2020-04-09 | |||
| 00:41:43 | brinzhang | gmann: I would like to add the contributing from https://review.opendev.org/#/c/712246/5/doc/source/contributor/contributing.rst to common contribution docs, but I found there already exist, but it is hard to find, | |
| 00:41:50 | brinzhang | gmann: and it is not on the same page as the use of git, which makes me very uncomfortable. | |
| 00:42:05 | brinzhang | using git page https://docs.openstack.org/contributors/common/git.html#id1 | |
| 00:42:16 | brinzhang | using gerrit paage https://docs.openstack.org/contributors/common/setup-gerrit.html#what-is-gerrit | |
| 00:42:33 | openstackgerrit | Wenping Song proposed openstack/cyborg master: revert device and deployable when resource provider create fail https://review.opendev.org/718584 | |
| 00:43:00 | brinzhang | IMO, they are should in one page, or need some super link | |
| 02:52:01 | openstackgerrit | YumengBao proposed openstack/cyborg master: Refactor v2 arq api https://review.opendev.org/696089 | |
| 03:03:29 | Yumeng | hi xinranwang,xinranwang and Li_Liu | |
| 03:03:37 | xinranwang | Hi | |
| 03:03:52 | Yumeng | hi hi. | |
| 03:03:54 | Yumeng | hi Li_Liu | |
| 03:04:11 | Yumeng | hi brinzhang | |
| 03:04:21 | s_shogo | Hi all | |
| 03:05:20 | brinzhang | Hi Yumeng and all, today I have some need to do right now, I am sorry cannot participate in today's meetting | |
| 03:05:45 | Yumeng | ok. no worries. let's get started | |
| 03:05:59 | Yumeng | #startmeeting openstack-cyborg | |
| 03:06:01 | openstack | Meeting started Thu Apr 9 03:05:59 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Yumeng. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 03:06:02 | openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 03:06:02 | chenke | Hi all. sorry for later. | |
| 03:06:04 | openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_cyborg' | |
| 03:06:04 | chenke | #info chenke | |
| 03:06:14 | xinranwang | #info xinranwang | |
| 03:06:17 | Yumeng | #topic Roll call | |
| 03:06:21 | Yumeng | #info Yumeng | |
| 03:06:33 | s_shogo | #info s_shogo | |
| 03:07:28 | Yumeng | I suppose the agenda for today is reviewing pending patches | |
| 03:08:07 | Yumeng | let's go through by priorities from high | |
| 03:08:33 | xinranwang | The microverison patch has been merged, thank you all for reviewing :) | |
| 03:08:47 | chenke | good job. | |
| 03:09:56 | Yumeng | great! Thanks Xinran for the efforts ! and v2 doc need review https://review.opendev.org/#/c/715980/ | |
| 03:10:55 | xinranwang | Yes, please review this doc patch as well. thanks Yumeng | |
| 03:11:34 | Yumeng | s_shogo and xinranwang, do you have any other patches need review? | |
| 03:11:58 | xinranwang | No other patches from m | |
| 03:12:00 | xinranwang | *me | |
| 03:12:06 | Yumeng | ok | |
| 03:12:30 | openstackgerrit | YumengBao proposed openstack/cyborg master: Refactor v2 arq api https://review.opendev.org/696089 | |
| 03:12:55 | s_shogo | This one. I'm working with Sundar's comment. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/698190/ | |
| 03:13:56 | chenke | Ok. will reivew it. | |
| 03:14:04 | s_shogo | Shaohe may have opinion about this programming patch, as the previous meeting : I can ask him in wechat. | |
| 03:14:12 | s_shogo | thank you, chenke | |
| 03:14:37 | Yumeng | I notice shaohe also has several patches realted to programming https://review.opendev.org/#/q/owner:shaohe.feng%2540intel.com+status:open | |
| 03:15:17 | Yumeng | are they related to yours? s_shogo | |
| 03:16:14 | s_shogo | At a glance, It seems to be driver layer, my patch provides api. | |
| 03:16:28 | s_shogo | I'll investigate and check them after this meeting, thanks. | |
| 03:16:54 | Yumeng | ok. seems different. I will ask him if need merged in this release. | |
| 03:17:21 | s_shogo | ok. | |
| 03:17:34 | Yumeng | so there also left Brin's patches https://review.opendev.org/#/q/owner:zhangbailin%2540inspur.com+status:open | |
| 03:18:49 | Yumeng | and mine two: arq refactor https://review.opendev.org/#/c/696089/, and add policy role https://review.opendev.org/#/c/699102/ | |
| 03:19:31 | Yumeng | please help to review! not big change. | |
| 03:20:15 | Yumeng | chenke: do you have any pending patches? | |
| 03:20:37 | chenke | oh. no patch for me. But a patch needs us wo notice. | |
| 03:20:37 | xinranwang | Ok, will review them. | |
| 03:20:44 | chenke | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/718584/1/cyborg/conductor/manager.py | |
| 03:21:31 | chenke | This patch seems help cyborg to sync data with placement. We should consider whether it's needed or not. | |
| 03:23:54 | xinranwang | Yes, I just saw this. | |
| 03:24:38 | xinranwang | IMO, it is reasonable. | |
| 03:25:45 | Yumeng | +1 agree with Brin's comment. xinranwang: do we plan to decouple placement report in next release? | |
| 03:26:34 | chenke | It looks okay, but needs further analysis. | |
| 03:27:17 | xinranwang | I think it depends on users' demand, if we want cyborg run as a standalone project, yes, we should decouple them | |
| 03:29:42 | chenke | It looks okay, but needs further analysis. To be honest, the current piece of code looks a bit redundant. About placement reporting and cyborg database update are mixed together. But I have no better idea about decoupling them. | |
| 03:30:50 | xinranwang | chenke: yes, that's what I am thinking too. If we want decouple them, it will generate more redundant code, because both of them need to do the diff. | |
| 03:32:46 | chenke | Ye. seems no better code to make report and sync cyborg db. Let's these code stay as it is. | |
| 03:32:50 | Yumeng | emmm,seems a problem to choose a less evil one. let's keep it as one topic of the PTG. | |
| 03:33:26 | Yumeng | #topic AoB | |
| 03:33:35 | Yumeng | Anything else? | |
| 03:33:35 | brinzhang | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/718584/1/cyborg/conductor/manager.py are you talking this patch? | |
| 03:33:54 | Yumeng | yes brinzhang | |
| 03:34:24 | xinranwang | Yumeng: Sure, btw, do we have ptg etherpad where we can put the topic in, I'd like add some :) | |
| 03:34:47 | brinzhang | I dont think we should keep current logical, if so, maybe when we do next cycle to add a device, we cannot get the device occupied in obj | |
| 03:35:45 | chenke | Hi brin. "we cannot get the device occupied in obj" means what? | |
| 03:35:48 | Yumeng | xinranwang: ok, will let you know later. I will discuss with Sundar, and maybe we can create one! | |
| 03:36:03 | xinranwang | chenke: I think this patch does solve problems, it does not change the main logic, just revert the cyborg DB. I think it is useful. | |
| 03:36:25 | chenke | Agree. | |
| 03:36:28 | brinzhang | IMHO, the logic of the current code in this file makes it complicated to read. If possible, I hope to be able to refactor it. | |
| 03:36:31 | xinranwang | Yumeng: thanks！ | |
| 03:36:53 | brinzhang | xinranwang, right, it just resolve the problem, not change any logical | |
| 03:37:16 | chenke | brinzhang. Agree. If we have better solution. I want to talk about it. | |
| 03:37:42 | Yumeng | brinzhang: yes. let's discuss it more detaily. | |
| 03:37:45 | brinzhang | Yumeng: We can take https://review.opendev.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/cyborg+branch:master+topic:unittest.mock to PTG | |
| 03:38:03 | xinranwang | brinzhang: Yes, we are trying to find a way to decouple the code. There is still some gaps. We'd better let it be like it is(the main logic) in this release, and we can discuss in PTG. | |