| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-cyborg - 2019-05-23 | |||
| 08:12:58 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add NPU and GENERIC type in DB and obj https://review.opendev.org/660548 | |
| 08:12:58 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add Huawei Ascend driver https://review.opendev.org/660874 | |
| 08:47:00 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add NPU and GENERIC type in DB and obj https://review.opendev.org/660548 | |
| 08:47:00 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add Huawei Ascend driver https://review.opendev.org/660874 | |
| 08:59:39 | openstackgerrit | jacky06 proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: Replace git.openstack.org URLs with opendev.org URLs https://review.opendev.org/654984 | |
| 15:44:08 | stephenfin | Any chance we could get these merged, please? https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:create-stein+(project:openstack/os-acc+OR+project:%2509openstack/python-cyborgclient) | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2019-05-24 | |||
| 08:46:16 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/cyborg-specs master: New Cyborg Generic Driver Proposal https://review.opendev.org/655125 | |
| 09:42:11 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add Huawei Ascend driver https://review.opendev.org/660874 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2019-05-25 | |||
| 02:21:00 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add NPU and GENERIC type in DB and obj https://review.opendev.org/660548 | |
| 02:21:01 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add Huawei Ascend driver https://review.opendev.org/660874 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2019-05-27 | |||
| 05:34:20 | openstackgerrit | caoyuan proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: Replace git.openstack.org URLs with opendev.org URLs https://review.opendev.org/654984 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2019-05-28 | |||
| 06:58:52 | Sundar__ | @liliu @Li_Liu Please ping me on IRC. For developing patches in a series, please look at https://docs.openstack.org/contributors/code-and-documentation/patch-series-tutorial.html | |
| 07:53:00 | Li_Liu | Testing | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2019-05-29 | |||
| 03:00:23 | ikuo_ | Hi Sundar. | |
| 03:00:31 | Sundar__ | Hi ikuo_ | |
| 03:00:51 | Sundar__ | Wait a min for others to join? | |
| 03:01:00 | Coco_gao | start now ? | |
| 03:01:46 | ikuo_ | let's wait a min | |
| 03:02:50 | wangzhh | Hi all. | |
| 03:02:59 | Sundar__ | Hi Coco_gao, wangzhh | |
| 03:03:11 | ikuo_ | Hi wangzhh | |
| 03:03:12 | Coco_gao | Hi Sundar and ikuo_ | |
| 03:03:24 | Sundar__ | May be time to get started | |
| 03:03:36 | Sundar__ | #startmeeting openstack-cyborg | |
| 03:03:37 | openstack | Meeting started Wed May 29 03:03:36 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Sundar__. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 03:03:38 | openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 03:03:40 | openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_cyborg' | |
| 03:03:46 | Sundar__ | #topic Roll call | |
| 03:04:17 | Sundar__ | #info Sundar | |
| 03:04:20 | wangzhh | #info wangzhh | |
| 03:04:36 | ikuo_ | #info ikuo_ | |
| 03:04:49 | Sundar__ | #topic Agenda | |
| 03:04:52 | Sundar__ | https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/CyborgTeamMeeting | |
| 03:04:53 | Coco_gao | #info Coco_gao | |
| 03:05:05 | Sundar__ | Anything to add to this agenda? | |
| 03:05:36 | Sundar__ | #topic Nova spec update | |
| 03:05:41 | ikuo_ | It's good | |
| 03:06:29 | Sundar__ | There was a feedback to move the Cyborg binding to Nova compute manager. I implemented it and made some measurements on 1 2-node system, but that doesn't predict scaling impact | |
| 03:07:11 | Sundar__ | Meanwhile, several folks gave that feedback. SO, I have changed the spec to match that | |
| 03:07:22 | Sundar__ | Does anybody have any concerns or comments? | |
| 03:08:17 | Sundar__ | The spec is close to finish, so please provide your comments soon | |
| 03:08:36 | ikuo_ | Where do you mean in the spec? | |
| 03:09:36 | Sundar__ | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/603955/13/specs/train/approved/nova-cyborg-interaction.rst,unified Line 240 | |
| 03:10:01 | wangzhh | Fine with me. | |
| 03:10:03 | Sundar__ | Lines 240-263 | |
| 03:10:29 | Sundar__ | Good | |
| 03:10:44 | Sundar__ | #topic python cyborg client | |
| 03:10:54 | Sundar__ | Thanks to ikuo_ for starting http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-May/006543.html | |
| 03:10:55 | yikun | #info yikun | |
| 03:11:02 | Sundar__ | Hope you all had a chance to catch up | |
| 03:11:27 | Coco_gao | still need to some time to catch up, sorry. | |
| 03:11:50 | Sundar__ | Coico_gao, NP. I'll try to summarize. | |
| 03:12:26 | Sundar__ | python-cyborgclient should be rewritten as an OSC plugin or a new repo should be created for that: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-May/006574.html | |
| 03:13:07 | Sundar__ | Dean tTroyer (http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-May/006577.html) suggests we could write a plugin to OSC, as part of OSC repo itself. | |
| 03:13:39 | Li_Liu | #info Li_Liu | |
| 03:13:56 | Coco_gao | Thanks for the summay~ | |
| 03:14:00 | ikuo_ | So we should rewrite the whole cyborgclient.. In fact, I cannot imagine the impact. | |
| 03:14:05 | Sundar__ | Either way, it is good for Cyborg to implement OpenStack SDK, so that the client can use it to call the API | |
| 03:14:45 | Sundar__ | First, do we all agree that we should use the OpenStack SDK (independent of other options)? | |
| 03:15:26 | xinranwang | #info xinranwang | |
| 03:15:35 | xinranwang | Hi all, sorry for late | |
| 03:15:56 | ikuo_ | Is it other thing but OSC plugin? | |
| 03:16:24 | Sundar__ | ikuo_ : It seems like a large impact. In practice, current client is mostly v1. So its objects either don't exist (like accelerators) or have changed a lot (like deployables). Plus, there are new pones like device profiles | |
| 03:16:43 | Sundar__ | So, I suspect anyway it will be a big change | |
| 03:16:43 | wangzhh | Sundar, if we rewrite cyborgclient as an OSC plugin, who guys are responsible for the milestone? | |
| 03:17:00 | Coco_gao | Agree to use openstack sdk first. | |
| 03:17:21 | Li_Liu | is this a train target? | |
| 03:17:35 | Sundar__ | wangzhh: Good question, I don't know :). It means we are not in control, as Dean says. Or, we could write our own plugin from scratch -- more work but more control. | |
| 03:17:42 | Sundar__ | Li_Liu: Yes | |
| 03:18:38 | Sundar__ | ikuo_: "Is it other thing but OSC plugin?" <-- OpenStack SDK and OSC plugin are 2 different things | |
| 03:18:50 | Sundar__ | SDK is a way for other services (or cyborg client) to call CYborg API | |
| 03:19:01 | ikuo_ | OK, I agree Use openstack sdk | |
| 03:19:10 | Sundar__ | Whereas OSC plugin is a way to implement the client using standard mechanisms | |
| 03:19:54 | Sundar__ | Coco_gao, ikuo_: Thanks for voting on SDK. Anybody disagrees? | |
| 03:20:31 | wangzhh | Agree SDK +1 | |
| 03:20:37 | Li_Liu | sounds good | |
| 03:20:52 | Sundar__ | Great :) I like consensus :) | |
| 03:21:03 | xinranwang | Agree | |
| 03:22:06 | ikuo_ | But rewriting for OSC plugin by only NTT, it is difficult, I think. | |
| 03:22:50 | Sundar__ | ikuo_: I understand | |
| 03:23:11 | Sundar__ | Now, for the difficult question -- should we write a separate osc plugin (like many other projects have done) or try to make this a part of osc repo? Dean says: "if Cyborg were completely backed by the SDK we would consider adding its commands directly to the OSC repo." | |
| 03:23:37 | Sundar__ | Once we adopt the SDK, may be it gets easier? Plus, I agree others should support NTT | |
| 03:24:16 | wangzhh | ikuo, can u help to split the task on storyboard? | |
| 03:24:45 | Sundar__ | I suspect there will be less UT and functional tests if we use the OSC repo. If there is concern about dependence and timelines, I could ask Dean. | |
| 03:24:56 | Sundar__ | (Or any of you could respond on the ML.) | |
| 03:26:43 | ikuo_ | Wangzhh: so we should split our cyborgclient task to 1) use openstacksdk and 2) OSC plugin /repo? | |
| 03:27:07 | Coco_gao | Maybe more smaller tasks. | |
| 03:28:19 | wangzhh | Coco, Yep. So that others can take part of them to support NTT. | |
| 03:28:35 | ikuo_ | I got it. | |
| 03:29:10 | Coco_gao | I will first finish my part and then join you to finish other tasks. | |
| 03:29:22 | wangzhh | Thx. ikuo_. | |
| 03:29:39 | ikuo_ | All right. thanks. | |
| 03:30:03 | Sundar__ | Sounds like a plan. Should I ask on the ML what is the risk to timeline from using osc repo? | |
| 03:30:21 | ikuo_ | Yes, please! | |
| 03:30:31 | Sundar__ | Will do | |
| 03:30:49 | Coco_gao | Yes | |
| 03:31:01 | Sundar__ | #agreed Cyborg will implement OpenStack SDK. The client will call the API through that | |
| 03:31:26 | Sundar__ | #action Sundar: gets pros and cons of using the osc repo, vs. writing a plugin | |
| 03:31:49 | Coco_gao | BTW, does engineering meeting still exist? | |
| 03:31:51 | Sundar__ | #action: ikuo_ will create storyboard tasks | |