| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-cyborg - 2018-12-12 | |||
| 03:17:58 | Li_Liu | thanks a lot for the work | |
| 03:18:14 | Sundar | Li_Liu: The db spec has progressed a lot. Only a couple of points left, which you wanted to address offline. I replied by email about half hour ago. | |
| 03:18:52 | Coco_gao | I received you email | |
| 03:19:00 | Li_Liu | Sundar, I saw that one, I think i address them in my patch already | |
| 03:19:01 | Yumeng_ | Sundar, for tasks in Client and DB https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2004248. which one has a higher priority currently? | |
| 03:19:13 | Coco_gao | I will update the OVO object patch as well as submmit New DB patch. | |
| 03:19:34 | Li_Liu | Coco_gao, are you gonna work on the DB object based on the new db spec? | |
| 03:20:42 | xinranwang | Coco_gao: I can take over the diff part in conductor if you don't have enough time :) | |
| 03:20:59 | Coco_gao | Yes. | |
| 03:21:01 | Coco_gao | Li | |
| 03:21:06 | Sundar | The table currently named ARQ actually has ExtARQ data, since it includes Cyborg-private fields. That's why I said the table is better named as ExtARQ. ExtARQ is a superset of ARQ | |
| 03:21:26 | Li_Liu | that seems a lot of work, you might wanna offload them | |
| 03:22:01 | Coco_gao | xinran, I have the diff function in the old ovo patch, so it won't take long if the db object is ready. | |
| 03:22:26 | Li_Liu | Sundar, you mean there will not be a ARQ table then. only ExtARQ | |
| 03:22:51 | Sundar | Li_Liu: Yes | |
| 03:22:56 | Coco_gao | Li, I think the ExtARQ combines old ARQ and ExtARQ | |
| 03:23:02 | Li_Liu | ok, I will make the change right now | |
| 03:23:11 | Sundar | Li_Liu: Thanks | |
| 03:24:20 | Sundar | For the question of whether attach handles go with deployables or devices, one could argue both ways but I thought it is easier if it goes at the device level. if we want to keep it in the current form, it may require an upgrade later. As long we are all ok with that, I am fine | |
| 03:24:24 | Coco_gao | Li_Liu, I will implement table device and deployable and attribute. Other DB work might owned by zhenghao or anyone else? | |
| 03:24:57 | Sundar | Coco_gao: It may make sense to split the db work, since there are so many. Thanks for suggesting that. | |
| 03:24:59 | Li_Liu | Coco_gao, I will talk with zheng hao and xinran for the work load | |
| 03:25:07 | Yumeng_ | coco I have can help | |
| 03:25:22 | Coco_gao | OK, you can discuss with zhenghao about other DB works. | |
| 03:25:31 | xinranwang | Coco_gao: ok, this patch is an initial version of conductor update, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/624340/, plz review it to see if it fits your requirements. It need more functions to be implemented. | |
| 03:25:31 | Coco_gao | Thanks, Yumeng_ | |
| 03:25:43 | Li_Liu | Sundar, I kinda lean towards let attachHandle reference to Device now | |
| 03:25:51 | Coco_gao | #info Coco_gao | |
| 03:26:42 | Sundar | Li_Liu: OK :) It is all a bit hypothetical because the devices in Stein train frame will work fine either way. | |
| 03:27:38 | Sundar | BTW, even if we put in device level, we have to figure out how to handle a PCI card wih 2 FPGAs, if that ever becomes a thing | |
| 03:27:54 | Li_Liu | sure | |
| 03:28:32 | Coco_gao | xinranwang, I will check your patch, thank you. | |
| 03:28:37 | Li_Liu | ok, I think it's great we can finalize the spec and can push things further | |
| 03:29:28 | Li_Liu | #topic AoB | |
| 03:29:57 | Li_Liu | On top of what we have discussed, do you guys have anything to add? | |
| 03:30:11 | xinranwang | Sundar: do you have any concern about the POC code I put in the community? | |
| 03:30:51 | Coco_gao | Sundar, You mean that cyborg client code is ready? | |
| 03:31:04 | Sundar | xinranwang: My main concern is this is an outdated poc, and it may cause confusion. | |
| 03:31:35 | Sundar | Coco_gao: I have made some changes to Cyborg client too. I will put that on a feature branch too. But it is still WIP | |
| 03:31:35 | Coco_gao | or we still need other one to implement that? | |
| 03:32:38 | xinranwang | Sundar: I understand your concern, it should be clarified to nova that these patches is for reference only | |
| 03:32:52 | Sundar | BTW, clarification: The prototype is not the final code. There will be many TODOs. Our developers are free to re-implement, or fill the gaps while leveraging the prototype | |
| 03:33:34 | Coco_gao | Yes , I think so. | |
| 03:34:03 | Sundar | Coco_gao, Zhenghao and possibly Yumeng_ are working on the db. Xinran is working on the agent/conductor API and the diff. Is that correct? | |
| 03:34:47 | Li_Liu | Sundar I think so | |
| 03:35:10 | Yumeng_ | Sundar: yes, next time please also email me(bao.yumeng@zte.com.cn) if there is any update about the specificaiton :) | |
| 03:35:30 | Coco_gao | Or add yumeng to the reviewer. | |
| 03:35:33 | Sundar | Yumeng_: Sure :) Thanks for helping! | |
| 03:35:40 | Li_Liu | We did not have you before? Yumeng_ | |
| 03:35:48 | Li_Liu | We will in the future | |
| 03:36:12 | Coco_gao | That's great | |
| 03:36:13 | Yumeng_ | not yet before. great! :) | |
| 03:36:19 | Li_Liu | :) | |
| 03:36:32 | Li_Liu | ok, I think we can wrap up for today | |
| 03:36:39 | Sundar | We have tons more things to do. Like new v2 APIs, checking that v1 APIs srtill work, adding tempest tests, .... | |
| 03:36:58 | Li_Liu | oh yes, gonna be a fun 2019 | |
| 03:37:02 | Sundar | Can we identify owners for that? I propose that Xinran and I can work on the APIs? | |
| 03:37:12 | Li_Liu | sure | |
| 03:37:27 | Sundar | xinranwang: I think you have worked with pecan layer before. Are you fine with that? | |
| 03:38:00 | Coco_gao | OK, we can identify the owner now. | |
| 03:39:10 | Sundar | Do we have some developers to check rolling upgrades from Rocky to Stein? The v1 APIs should return null result in Stein, I think | |
| 03:39:23 | Sundar | For e.g. list deployables will return [] | |
| 03:41:52 | Sundar | Silence ... Shall we take this up next week? | |
| 03:42:02 | Yumeng_ | Sundar: did you notice this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/619997/ | |
| 03:42:15 | Coco_gao | I can list deployables in my previous POC. | |
| 03:42:26 | Li_Liu | Sundar, I guess we can come up with a complete list first | |
| 03:42:31 | xinranwang | Sundar: Yes, I can work with you on Cyborg-Nova API side | |
| 03:43:00 | Coco_gao | Have you got authenticated before asking. | |
| 03:44:10 | Sundar | Yumeng_: We are dropping the accelerators table in Stein. So this API should be modified to return [] all the time in Stein? | |
| 03:44:20 | Yumeng_ | I made this change in v1 APIs to avoid returns null for the situation where we actually have accelerators | |
| 03:45:03 | Sundar | Yumeng_: is anybody using Cyborg today, and therefore relying on tv1 he API? | |
| 03:46:23 | Sundar | *the v1 API | |
| 03:46:49 | Li_Liu | I don't think anyone is using cyborg | |
| 03:46:53 | Sundar | Li_Liu: OK, we can form that task list by next meeting | |
| 03:47:19 | Li_Liu | Sundar, we can talk on zoom in case you need it | |
| 03:48:11 | Sundar | Sure | |
| 03:48:11 | Coco_gao | I can get the deployable list, I also have the test code if you need that. | |
| 03:48:32 | Yumeng_ | Sundar,Li liu: ok, maybe next meeting. I will dig more to discuss with you guys. | |
| 03:48:35 | Coco_gao | Anyway, let's arrange other meething. | |
| 03:49:39 | Li_Liu | ok | |
| 03:50:11 | Li_Liu | can we wrap up? I think it's almost lunch time for china folks :P | |
| 03:50:43 | Coco_gao | Yes, It's time for lunch, bye. | |
| 03:50:50 | Li_Liu | #endmeeting | |
| 03:50:52 | openstack | Meeting ended Wed Dec 12 03:50:50 2018 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 03:50:53 | Yumeng_ | see you guys | |
| 03:50:54 | openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_cyborg/2018/openstack_cyborg.2018-12-12-03.05.html | |
| 03:50:55 | openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_cyborg/2018/openstack_cyborg.2018-12-12-03.05.txt | |
| 03:50:56 | Li_Liu | have a good day/night | |
| 03:50:57 | openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_cyborg/2018/openstack_cyborg.2018-12-12-03.05.log.html | |
| 03:55:42 | openstackgerrit | Li Liu proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: Added initial draft for new DB model https://review.openstack.org/615462 | |
| 05:32:00 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/cyborg master: Checked in README for the pilot branch. https://review.openstack.org/624576 | |
| 05:32:00 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/cyborg master: Main changes for the db layer. https://review.openstack.org/624577 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2018-12-16 | |||
| 10:23:17 | openstackgerrit | wangzhh proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add "Report device data to cyborg" https://review.openstack.org/596691 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2018-12-17 | |||
| 15:43:00 | openstackgerrit | coco-Gao proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add new DB schema: sqlachemy and alembic scripts. https://review.openstack.org/625630 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2018-12-18 | |||
| 04:53:05 | openstackgerrit | Li Liu proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: Added initial draft for new DB model https://review.openstack.org/615462 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2018-12-19 | |||
| 03:07:41 | Li_Liu | let's wait for others | |
| 03:07:56 | xinranwang | Hi all | |
| 03:08:23 | Li_Liu | Hi Xinran | |
| 03:09:45 | wangzhh | Hi | |
| 03:10:13 | Li_Liu | HI ZhengHao | |