| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-cyborg - 2018-12-12 | |||
| 03:50:56 | Li_Liu | have a good day/night | |
| 03:50:57 | openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_cyborg/2018/openstack_cyborg.2018-12-12-03.05.log.html | |
| 03:55:42 | openstackgerrit | Li Liu proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: Added initial draft for new DB model https://review.openstack.org/615462 | |
| 05:32:00 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/cyborg master: Checked in README for the pilot branch. https://review.openstack.org/624576 | |
| 05:32:00 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/cyborg master: Main changes for the db layer. https://review.openstack.org/624577 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2018-12-16 | |||
| 10:23:17 | openstackgerrit | wangzhh proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add "Report device data to cyborg" https://review.openstack.org/596691 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2018-12-17 | |||
| 15:43:00 | openstackgerrit | coco-Gao proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add new DB schema: sqlachemy and alembic scripts. https://review.openstack.org/625630 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2018-12-18 | |||
| 04:53:05 | openstackgerrit | Li Liu proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: Added initial draft for new DB model https://review.openstack.org/615462 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2018-12-19 | |||
| 03:07:41 | Li_Liu | let's wait for others | |
| 03:07:56 | xinranwang | Hi all | |
| 03:08:23 | Li_Liu | Hi Xinran | |
| 03:09:45 | wangzhh | Hi | |
| 03:10:13 | Li_Liu | HI ZhengHao | |
| 03:10:22 | Li_Liu | are you feeling any better now? | |
| 03:11:06 | wangzhh | Auha? Of course. | |
| 03:11:19 | Yumeng_ | #info Yumeng_ | |
| 03:11:20 | wangzhh | Thx. | |
| 03:11:20 | Yumeng_ | hi | |
| 03:11:36 | wangzhh | Hi yummy.:) | |
| 03:11:44 | Yumeng_ | haha | |
| 03:11:54 | Li_Liu | yummy? | |
| 03:11:56 | xinranwang | yummy, cute name | |
| 03:12:04 | Li_Liu | lol | |
| 03:12:26 | Li_Liu | Let's get start then | |
| 03:12:34 | Li_Liu | btw, is coco coming today? | |
| 03:13:49 | Coco_gao | Hi all | |
| 03:13:56 | Li_Liu | #startmeeting openstack-cyborg | |
| 03:13:57 | openstack | Meeting started Wed Dec 19 03:13:56 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Li_Liu. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 03:13:58 | Coco_gao | #info Coco_gao | |
| 03:13:59 | openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 03:14:01 | openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_cyborg' | |
| 03:14:02 | Li_Liu | just on time CoCo | |
| 03:14:11 | Li_Liu | #topic Roll Call | |
| 03:14:16 | wangzhh | #info wangzhh | |
| 03:14:16 | Li_Liu | #info Li_Liu | |
| 03:14:38 | xinranwang | #info xinranwang | |
| 03:15:22 | Sundar | #info Sundar | |
| 03:15:24 | Sundar | Hi all | |
| 03:15:30 | Yumeng_ | yummy is a story.. One of my classmate from Kuwait found it's really diffcult to pronounce Yumeng, but easy to pronunce Yummy.... then my name goes to Yummy... | |
| 03:15:36 | Li_Liu | #topic DB spec | |
| 03:15:42 | wangzhh | Hi sundar. | |
| 03:15:49 | Li_Liu | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/615462/ | |
| 03:16:03 | Li_Liu | I addressed coco comments last night | |
| 03:16:25 | Li_Liu | If there are no more comments for another 24 hours, I will let it merge | |
| 03:17:21 | wangzhh | OK. | |
| 03:18:16 | Li_Liu | Sundar, does it get unblocked/abandoned? | |
| 03:18:16 | Li_Liu | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/602978/ | |
| 03:19:00 | Sundar | Li_Liu: I am fine with it. We already have a disclaimer that small changes are ok | |
| 03:19:25 | Li_Liu | you mean this one ? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/615462/ | |
| 03:19:42 | Sundar | Device profiles are very much in place. The feature branch code is implementing it | |
| 03:19:59 | Sundar | Li_Liu: Yes, I was referring to db spec. | |
| 03:20:24 | Li_Liu | oh, how about this one? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/602978/ | |
| 03:20:29 | Li_Liu | it's from you | |
| 03:20:38 | Li_Liu | about device profiles. | |
| 03:21:27 | Sundar | Yes, as I sadi above, device profiles are part of our proposal, and feature branch code is implementing it. It may be revised slightly based on Nova feedback but the concept of device profiles will be there | |
| 03:21:32 | Sundar | *said | |
| 03:22:25 | Li_Liu | I see, so it will keep hanging there for now then | |
| 03:22:52 | Coco_gao | But I think we can start implementation based on Li's Spec right now, maybe not wait for nova feedback | |
| 03:23:03 | Sundar | Li_Liu: yes | |
| 03:23:12 | Sundar | Coco_gao: Agreed | |
| 03:23:23 | Li_Liu | that's right | |
| 03:23:33 | Li_Liu | #topic DB implementation | |
| 03:23:41 | Li_Liu | CoCo and Sundar | |
| 03:23:42 | Li_Liu | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/625630/ | |
| 03:23:51 | Li_Liu | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/625285/ | |
| 03:24:05 | Li_Liu | I see both patch has migration code | |
| 03:24:25 | Sundar | Li_Liu: They are in different branches | |
| 03:24:39 | Li_Liu | ah | |
| 03:24:45 | Coco_gao | My code is based on Sundar's work. | |
| 03:25:00 | Sundar | Coco_gao, wangzhh and Yumeng will do it for master branch | |
| 03:25:13 | Li_Liu | cool | |
| 03:25:32 | Sundar | hey are doing the 'proper' way. I may have many TODOs because I am trying to do just enough to get a working system that can be shown to Nova | |
| 03:25:51 | Li_Liu | Thanks a lot Sundar | |
| 03:25:59 | Coco_gao | Yes, we are foucing on different areas. | |
| 03:26:36 | Sundar | Li_Liu: Welcome | |
| 03:26:56 | Sundar | I will also submit objects layer code, that Coco and others can leverage | |
| 03:27:08 | Coco_gao | Thanks a lot | |
| 03:27:25 | Sundar | I also have working API layer code. I would suggest not to put that in master branch till we align with Nova | |
| 03:27:27 | Coco_gao | that will be much faster to get the work done | |
| 03:27:42 | Sundar | Coco_gao: Welcome. | |
| 03:28:02 | Li_Liu | Sundar, do you have anyone helping you on that? | |
| 03:28:08 | Li_Liu | seems quite some work | |
| 03:28:22 | Sundar | Also, in our engineering sync on Tuesday China time, we said that we should v1 APIs. But should we keep v1 objects and db layer? | |
| 03:28:49 | Sundar | Li_Liu: No :) | |
| 03:29:09 | Sundar | I started on Thanksgiving weekend and hope to finish on Christmas holiday | |
| 03:29:57 | Li_Liu | ah, speaking of that, we will not have IRC meetings for the next 2 weeks | |
| 03:30:10 | Li_Liu | due to holiday seasons | |
| 03:30:13 | Coco_gao | Yes, I think so. | |
| 03:30:33 | Sundar | Coco_gao and others: Do you have Christmas holidays in China? | |
| 03:30:46 | Coco_gao | Merry Christmas and Happy new year~ | |
| 03:31:08 | Li_Liu | I don't think so | |
| 03:31:18 | Sundar | Coco_gao and all: Same to you all! | |
| 03:31:19 | Li_Liu | there are holidays for X'mas | |
| 03:31:20 | wangzhh | No, maybe just an hours holiday. :( | |
| 03:31:46 | Sundar | wangzhh: An hour's holiday? | |
| 03:31:50 | Coco_gao | No, we don't have holiday but usually we celebrate that~ | |
| 03:32:38 | Sundar | Cool. We said that we should v1 APIs. But should we keep v1 objects and db layer? | |
| 03:33:00 | wangzhh | Sundar, Leave work early that day. | |
| 03:33:30 | Sundar | If v1 API is used to query an accelerator object, for example, we can return null list, because there are no accelerator tables | |
| 03:33:38 | Li_Liu | do the versions have to line up? | |