Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-cyborg - 2026-06-30
12:49:01 chandankumar paste.opendev.org/show/bDXSGmjCs9TH0NRXcVaK/ not yet, it is in my list.
12:50:50 opendevreview chandan kumar proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: Add generic NVMe driver spec with secure cleanup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg-specs/+/985349
12:53:10 chandankumar sean-k-mooney: two more reviews good to merge https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/994816 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/994830 from Melanie.
12:58:11 sean-k-mooney ah the api sample tests and api refe set ya i skimmed them breifly but ill try and review those later in the week
12:58:37 chandankumar sure
13:00:42 jgilaber Hi all! IRC meeting will start in ~ 1 hour, add your topics to the agenda https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-cyborg-irc-meeting#L48
13:37:15 opendevreview chandan kumar proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: Add generic NVMe driver spec with secure cleanup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg-specs/+/985349
13:48:07 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/cyborg master: Refactor RequestContext https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/995195
13:52:08 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/cyborg master: Remove unused context properties https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/995205
14:00:33 opendevmeet The meeting name has been set to 'cyborg'
14:00:33 opendevmeet Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:33 opendevmeet Meeting started Tue Jun 30 14:00:33 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is jgilaber. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:33 jgilaber #startmeeting cyborg
14:00:47 jgilaber Hello! Who is around today?
14:00:47 sean-k-mooney o/
14:00:51 chandankumar o/
14:01:04 jgilaber While we gather, feel free to add topics to the agenda https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-cyborg-irc-meeting#L48
14:01:24 rlandy o/
14:01:27 jgilaber courtesy ping: amoralej bogdando
14:01:33 morenod o/
14:01:38 amoralej o/
14:01:53 jgilaber let's give folks a minute and we'll start with the first topic
14:02:18 jgilaber #topic Reminder: Spec freeze on July 2
14:02:29 jgilaber we have two specs open
14:02:32 jgilaber #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg-specs/+/982276
14:02:42 jgilaber #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg-specs/+/985349
14:03:18 melwitt o/
14:03:19 jgilaber I'll do another pass of the nvme spec after the meeting but I think that one is good to go
14:03:37 chandankumar I will take a look at mdev spec tomorrow
14:03:57 sean-k-mooney jgilaber: i just left comments on yours +1 with minor change im happy to merge it
14:04:06 sean-k-mooney chandankumar: yours is next on my list
14:04:09 sean-k-mooney for after the meeting
14:04:19 jgilaber ack thanks sean-k-mooney I'll look after the meeting
14:04:23 chandankumar thank you!
14:04:47 jgilaber looks like we're in good shape, anything else on this topic?
14:05:30 jgilaber ok, next topic
14:05:33 jgilaber #topic Freezing python-cyborgclient improvements
14:05:45 jgilaber this one if from rlandy I believe
14:05:51 jgilaber #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-cyborgclient/+/994696
14:05:54 rlandy yes...
14:06:18 rlandy this change started with bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-cyborgclient/+bug/2146351
14:06:39 rlandy which requires removing the old v1 API
14:06:48 rlandy from cyborgclient
14:07:09 rlandy but there is also the piece of sdk accelerator v2 support
14:07:44 rlandy looking at the description, the bug now contains many parts
14:08:02 rlandy and we need to rethink the approach here
14:08:15 rlandy as initially the plan was the keep using the openstacksdk
14:08:36 rlandy so chandankumar and I are bringing this to the team to establish a direction
14:08:47 rlandy because this is probably bigger than one bug
14:09:08 rlandy and we need to decide what should be addressed immediately vs taking a longer design
14:09:36 jgilaber problem 3 in the bug report seems backwards to me
14:09:56 jgilaber I don't think we want to move the accelerator proxy to the client
14:10:10 chandankumar yes, that needs to be fixed
14:10:15 sean-k-mooney rlandy: so the python-cybrogclient
14:10:19 sean-k-mooney alrady uses the sdk
14:10:22 sean-k-mooney for v2
14:10:34 sean-k-mooney so this was orgianly intened to track only the v1 removal
14:10:50 melwitt yeah what's in the description there looks like specless blueprint material
14:11:08 rlandy ok - so that is possibly the right direction - to make the bug just cover v1 removal
14:11:23 rlandy and move the rest to some spec/blueprint etc.
14:11:23 sean-k-mooney yes
14:11:37 sean-k-mooney we did dicss this in the ptg
14:11:49 sean-k-mooney so the propsoal was to remove v1 this cycle and deprecate teh shell
14:12:00 rlandy so I would propose to abandon this change - and it complicates things
14:12:10 rlandy and just start over with the v1 removal
14:12:12 sean-k-mooney by shell i mean cybrog command
14:12:19 rlandy taking the rest to PTG?
14:12:30 sean-k-mooney sure we can do that
14:12:44 rlandy ok - chandankumar - you in agreement here?
14:12:55 sean-k-mooney my hope was to deprecate the python-cybrogclient repo next cycle entirly if we end up upstreamign ti to osc
14:13:00 chandankumar But for this release, Do we want to fix existing interface and not add any coverage there
14:13:15 sean-k-mooney and if not resuding it down to only the osc plugin in 2027.2
14:13:16 chandankumar with v1 removal
14:13:27 rlandy the issue is there is a lot in common
14:13:38 sean-k-mooney chandankumar: which interface?
14:13:52 chandankumar I mean device enable /disable interface
14:14:27 sean-k-mooney oh that is a sperate bug
14:14:31 chandankumar https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-cyborgclient/+bug/2151792
14:14:35 sean-k-mooney we shoudl fix that but not as part of this
14:14:50 sean-k-mooney we shoudl fix htat by preposoing the sdk change
14:15:17 jgilaber it looks to me that with the v1 removal https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-cyborgclient/+bug/2146351 should be done
14:15:51 chandankumar ok
14:16:20 sean-k-mooney so proeblem 1 and 2 are really the scope of this i think
14:16:35 sean-k-mooney "Problem 3: Migrate accelerator proxy from openstacksdk into cyborgclient" wans never intended to be done
14:16:36 chandankumar sounds good to me drop v1 from cyborgclient and rest of enahncement/fixes goes to sdk change
14:16:44 sean-k-mooney so i think that where the confustion came form
14:16:49 jgilaber +1 sean-k-mooney
14:17:03 chandankumar srry that is Add support from accelerator proxy from openstacksdk into cyborgclient
14:17:15 sean-k-mooney yes
14:17:50 sean-k-mooney we do not want to "Migrate the SDK accelerator proxy into cyborgclient"
14:18:12 chandankumar yup
14:18:26 sean-k-mooney so are folk ok if i update teh bug to just remove problem 3
14:18:27 chandankumar I will drop that section from the bug and keep it to v1 removal to clear confson
14:18:30 sean-k-mooney then i htink we are good
14:18:37 sean-k-mooney ack
14:18:40 sean-k-mooney works for me
14:18:41 rlandy ok- thank you
14:19:07 rlandy I will submit a new change for the 1 and 2 and abandon the current change
14:19:21 rlandy jgilaber, thank you - I think we are ok here
14:19:32 jgilaber ack, thanks

Earlier   Later