| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2026-08-14 | |||
| 16:17:33 | stephenfin | That broadly matches what I know from keyring | |
| 16:17:38 | stephenfin | jinx 😅 | |
| 16:17:54 | cardoe | The proper way to do it I see involves touching ksa and python-openstackclient and maybe more. | |
| 16:19:43 | cardoe | We've also got "openstack cloud [current,list,set,show,unset,use]" commands | |
| 16:20:23 | cardoe | Not sure if you ever heard of https://github.com/major/supernova | |
| 16:21:08 | stephenfin | I have not | |
| 16:21:55 | stephenfin | Is that still relevant with cloud files/OS_CLOUD? | |
| 16:22:03 | cardoe | No | |
| 16:22:12 | cardoe | But it was something Rackspace did before that existed. | |
| 16:22:57 | cardoe | We started a replacement that was OSC based forever ago as well. | |
| 16:24:01 | cardoe | So the websso implementation is coming from that code base. | |
| 16:24:59 | stephenfin | And I guess this is relevant because the caching ties into the model for those "clouds"? | |
| 16:25:20 | cardoe | yeah | |
| 16:25:29 | cardoe | I'm happy to show you sometime if that'd be easier. | |
| 16:26:10 | cardoe | I've got ~30 entries in my clouds.yaml | |
| 16:29:58 | cardoe | I've also "fixed" one of the reasons that system scope and project scope token usage failed. Which was that it was annoying to have two OS_CLOUD representations and have to switch between the two for different operations. | |
| 16:30:33 | cardoe | Unfortunately it breaks compat with stock OSC. | |
| 16:30:50 | cardoe | But that'd be another place I'd love to get your feedback on how I could do this in an upstreamable way. | |
| 16:31:38 | cardoe | Whatever I change, I'm more than happy to contribute the same changes to gophercloud as well. | |
| 16:34:29 | cardoe | Of course I realize I'm getting a bit ahead of myself here. | |
| 16:34:36 | cardoe | So happy to just get the websso stuff done. :) | |
| 16:34:44 | stephenfin | All sounds good. That would be interesting to see | |
| 16:35:17 | stephenfin | But yeah, going back to the websso stuff: if we could get it in without the caching first, that would simplify the change greatly I suspect | |
| 16:36:02 | stephenfin | Then for the caching, I would normally suggest a spec, but we don't do those in SDK. So instead, how about we get a user doc that describes how to use the caching, which we can then use to inform the code? | |
| 16:38:18 | stephenfin | I suspect how it "feels" is more important than the code, particularly given the different types of application we've to content with (file-based caching is far more important for short-lived processes like OSC than for long-lived ones like nova, while I guess threading is a concern for the latter but not the former) | |
| 16:40:09 | stephenfin | ...and, you know, the fact code is now cheap 😅 | |
| 16:49:42 | opendevreview | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/codegenerator master: fix(openapi): safely handle schemas missing 'type' field https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/codegenerator/+/1000983 | |
| 18:06:45 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/codegenerator master: fix(openapi): safely handle schemas missing 'type' field https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/codegenerator/+/1000983 | |
| 18:51:49 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add functional tests and Zuul job for accelerator (Cyborg) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/995851 | |
| 18:51:49 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add AGENTS.md and document functional test conventions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/1000999 | |
| 20:49:34 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add AGENTS.md and document functional test conventions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/1000999 | |
| 23:02:36 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add functional tests and Zuul job for accelerator (Cyborg) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/995851 | |