Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2022-11-02
11:17:57 opendevreview PB proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: updated argument spec based on documentation example https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863208
11:39:47 opendevreview PB proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: updated argument spec based on documentation example https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863208
11:40:09 opendevreview PB proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: updated argument spec based on documentation example https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863208
12:10:39 opendevreview PB proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: updated argument spec based on documentation example https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863208
12:27:26 opendevreview PB proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: updated argument spec based on documentation example https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863208
13:08:27 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Existing images update name, visibility etc https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/862565
13:20:43 arddennis jm1: regarding https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/862565 what is required from my side to do? Should I change script logic to use additional method to update properties instead of image.id usage? It seems that next steps are not clean for me.
13:21:15 jm1 arddennis: hey :) i just submitted an update for that patch :D
13:21:42 jm1 arddennis: you dont have to do anything. once ci has passed and you are happy with my changes, we just need another core to vote on that patch and then we can merge it
13:22:43 arddennis jm1: sounds good :)
13:23:08 jm1 arddennis: so please vote on the changes :D
13:30:58 jm1 arddennis: thanks and sshnaidm has voted too! so once ci has passed, we can merge :)
13:31:12 opendevreview Shnaidman Sagi (Sergey) proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: DNM test latest devel test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863267
14:18:08 opendevreview PB proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: updated argument spec based on documentation example https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863208
14:20:57 opendevreview PB proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Bulk creation of OpenStack SG rules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863208
17:54:13 opendevreview Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Existing images update name, visibility etc https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/862565
18:48:10 opendevreview PB proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Bulk creation of OpenStack SG rules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863431
19:24:19 opendevreview Shnaidman Sagi (Sergey) proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix documentation defaults for modules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863267
19:24:41 opendevreview Shnaidman Sagi (Sergey) proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix documentation defaults for modules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863267
21:15:43 opendevreview Shnaidman Sagi (Sergey) proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix documentation defaults for modules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863267
21:19:04 opendevreview Shnaidman Sagi (Sergey) proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix documentation defaults for modules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863267
#openstack-sdks - 2022-11-03
08:13:53 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored volume_info module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863483
08:35:58 opendevreview PB proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Bulk creation of OpenStack SG rules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863208
09:18:21 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored volume_info module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863483
09:27:37 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored volume_backup{,_info} modules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863486
09:32:11 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored volume_info module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863483
09:32:36 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored volume_backup{,_info} modules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863486
10:29:31 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored volume_backup{,_info} modules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863486
10:30:23 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored volume_snapshot{,_info} modules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863498
11:47:41 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored config module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863512
12:44:14 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored config module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863512
13:05:52 opendevreview Rafael Castillo proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Updates server_metadata for 2.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863178
13:19:46 opendevreview Rafael Castillo proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Updates server action for 2.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/857976
13:19:55 opendevreview Rafael Castillo proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Updates server_metadata for 2.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863178
13:45:00 rcastillo gtema: hi, it'd be awesome if you could have a look at this patch when you get a chance https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/857947
13:45:13 gtema ack
14:10:59 opendevreview TaeJun Jang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: title: Add image metadef namespace command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/863525
14:35:43 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: [DNM] Refactored volume_backup{,_info} modules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863486
14:42:29 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored integration test of openstacksdk logging feature https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863529
15:07:53 opendevreview Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored volume_info module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863483
16:14:03 servagem Hello! Could someone review patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/862513 ? Thank you
20:19:23 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: [DNM] Refactored volume_backup{,_info} modules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863486
#openstack-sdks - 2022-11-04
08:54:53 opendevreview Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix documentation defaults for modules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863267
10:25:02 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored volume_backup{,_info} modules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863486
10:26:09 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored volume_snapshot{,_info} modules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863498
10:28:19 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored config module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863512
10:28:52 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored integration test of openstacksdk logging feature https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863529
10:38:03 opendevreview Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix backup metadata management https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/863634
10:38:26 gtema jm1 - this is for you
10:39:11 jm1 gtema: uuuh nice :D thx!
10:39:51 gtema as usual - one line of code is causing heavy misbehave
10:41:55 jm1 gtema: this has never worked before, has it? wondering how people tested their code when they contributed it ..
10:42:40 gtema well, this is metadata. It is not a scope of SDK to test functionality of the service itself with all possible combinations
10:42:50 gtema in this case backup was copied from v2
10:43:01 jm1 gtema: btw do we have to use 3.56 instead of 3.51 because of this? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/863634/1/openstack/block_storage/v3/backup.py#84
10:43:38 gtema no, max_microversion is something like: client support max 3.51 for this resource
10:44:04 gtema so we eventually downgrade server side just to be sure server doesn't send us back what we are not supporting
10:45:04 jm1 gtema: what microversion would be used without your patch?
10:45:12 gtema 3.51
10:45:34 gtema because there is no changes to backup resource afterwards
10:46:01 jm1 gtema: so why do you set it to 3.51 if 3.51 would be used anyway?
10:46:23 gtema no, without that 3.0 is used
10:46:34 jm1 gtema: ah ok, so 3.0 is the default
10:46:36 gtema I misread the question, sorry
10:47:16 gtema SDK opts for max_microversion if set on the resource, otherwise not specify microver at all
10:47:27 jm1 gtema: but how are users supposed to use the user_id attribute if we set microversio to 3.51 instead of 3.56?
10:48:10 gtema where you get 3.56 from?
10:48:34 gtema ah, I missed to look at "get" response
10:48:43 jm1 "The UUID of the project owner. New in 3.56" < https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/863634/1/openstack/block_storage/v3/backup.py#84
10:49:15 opendevreview Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix backup metadata management https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/863634
10:49:41 jm1 gtema: :D thank you
10:50:11 gtema now I see this is again not really correct, since in 3.64 also encryption_key_id is being added
10:50:51 jm1 gtema: one would think that cinder folks would add their new features to osc
10:50:55 jm1 ..and sdk
10:51:09 gtema yupp
10:57:38 opendevreview Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix backup metadata management and update https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/863634
12:44:38 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored volume_backup{,_info} modules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863486
12:45:07 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored volume_snapshot{,_info} modules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863498
12:45:30 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored config module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863512
12:45:52 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored integration test of openstacksdk logging feature https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863529
12:51:46 opendevreview Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: image: Correct typo with 'get_import_info' proxy method https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/862177
13:01:47 opendevreview Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: image: Correct typo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/862178
13:01:51 opendevreview Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: image: Allow listing detailed view of stores https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/862179
13:01:54 opendevreview Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: image: Add 'store' argument to 'delete_image' proxy method https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/862180
13:01:57 opendevreview Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: tests: Avoid potential aliasing of imports https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/862297
13:48:37 diablo_rojo_phone gtema: should I join? I was driving my mom to work and am running late
13:48:55 gtema no problem, we are fine
13:55:10 opendevreview Eunyoung Kim proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: image: Add metadef resource type operations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/861490
14:38:01 opendevreview Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Introduce resource_registry in the proxies https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/863658
16:23:47 opendevreview Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Implement unified search_resources method https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/859845
16:48:50 opendevreview Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix backup metadata management and update https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/863634
16:48:53 opendevreview Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix creation of protected image for old user code https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/838941
19:06:58 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored volume_backup{,_info} modules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863486
19:09:05 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored volume_snapshot{,_info} modules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863498
19:09:29 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored config module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863512
19:09:49 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored integration test of openstacksdk logging feature https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863529
19:10:16 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored project_access module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/863696
#openstack-sdks - 2022-11-05
00:34:14 opendevreview Huda Irshad proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: after adding get_server_action and providing the necessary inputs the return from sever event show is a openstack error https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/863718
09:09:17 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: quota: Allow showing project-specific quotas https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/859957
09:09:19 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: quota: Deprecate 'quota show --class', 'quota set --class' arguments https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/859958

Earlier   Later