| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-10-26 | |||
| 14:22:29 | gtema | with older versions, cause sdk==0.41.0 is not working with "any" OSC | |
| 14:22:36 | gtema | and older OSC falls on osc-lib | |
| 14:23:07 | gtema | and finally falling on "module 'collections' has no attribute 'MutableMapping'" | |
| 14:25:16 | fungi | yeah, that's why i'm trying to reproduce with clean venvs first, because i'd like to know how to create an equivalent of the working reference venv i have from scratch | |
| 14:25:28 | gtema | ok, thks | |
| 14:26:44 | fungi | also note that the venvs in question are built for python 3.6 because they're on an ubuntu 18.04 lts (bionic) server | |
| 14:26:57 | fungi | looks like i need to force downgrade cryptography because of that | |
| 14:34:14 | fungi | python3.6 -m venv foo | |
| 14:34:18 | fungi | foo/bin/pip install -U pip setuptools wheel | |
| 14:34:21 | fungi | foo/bin/pip install openstackclient python-openstackclient==3.17.0 openstacksdk==0.41.0 python-cinderclient==4.0.1 | |
| 14:34:24 | fungi | sudo foo/bin/openstack --os-cloud=openstackci-rax --os-region-name=DFW --os-volume-api=1 volume list | |
| 14:34:35 | fungi | gtema: that ^ reproduces a working one for me | |
| 14:35:00 | gtema | ugh, now I need to find somewhere py36 for me ;-) | |
| 14:35:01 | gtema | thanks | |
| 14:36:03 | fungi | i'm winding forward with openstacksdk versions to find the one where the first breakage occurs | |
| 14:37:20 | fungi | huh, so i was able to wind forward to openstacksdk==0.48.0 and it continues working | |
| 14:37:58 | fungi | also it may be reproducible on newer python interpreters, i haven't tried yet | |
| 14:38:58 | gtema | okay, in any way now I nearly always fall on policies | |
| 14:39:19 | gtema | I mean either some other py exception of policy | |
| 14:40:31 | fungi | i'm able to make i work with 0.102.0 in fact | |
| 14:40:54 | gtema | lol - so something different in playing a role | |
| 14:41:06 | gtema | welcome in the dependency hell | |
| 14:42:27 | fungi | yes, i'm trying to play with other dependency variables now | |
| 14:43:07 | gtema | what is the issue with v2 itself? | |
| 14:43:19 | gtema | maybe fixing this will cost less then making v1 work | |
| 14:43:20 | fungi | not completely implemented in rackspace | |
| 14:43:24 | gtema | ah, ok | |
| 14:43:45 | fungi | at least that's my understanding, but i can get a more specific error | |
| 14:45:25 | fungi | what was the cinderclient version where v2 api support was dropped? | |
| 14:45:47 | gtema | roughly a year ago | |
| 14:46:05 | gtema | https://opendev.org/openstack/python-cinderclient/commit/6ebee33bf219d42fcd0d4bf2a8c0819bddb24f3c | |
| 14:47:05 | fungi | yeah, if i pin python-cinderclient<8 i only get the deprecation warning for v2 | |
| 14:48:04 | fungi | adding --debug, it looks like it's trying to get /v2/610275/610275/volum | |
| 14:48:31 | fungi | er, it's trying to get /v2/$id/$id/volume/detail | |
| 14:48:42 | fungi | from the block storage api endpoint | |
| 14:48:43 | gtema | ok, seems like a bug | |
| 14:48:50 | fungi | and that returns a 404 not found | |
| 14:50:18 | fungi | server list uses /v2/$id/servers/detail so i guess the doubled project id in the url is a problem | |
| 14:51:11 | gtema | yeah, on the other side v2 cinder is not present in the "service_catalog" - explicitly in the quotes since this is a thing on its own | |
| 14:51:56 | gtema | and using normal OSC it fails to find volumev2 endpoint for region | |
| 14:54:41 | fungi | right, i got that as well once i pinned back a bit | |
| 14:56:34 | frickler | fungi: checking on bridge we set block_storage_endpoint_override to .../v2/610275. maybe drop the last part of that | |
| 14:56:45 | fungi | ooh, good eye | |
| 14:56:56 | opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Implement server and host evacuate commands https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/828708 | |
| 14:57:56 | frickler | I haven't found a cli option to override that override | |
| 14:58:14 | gtema | in cli no way | |
| 14:58:40 | gtema | the problem is that this override is only influencing SDK, but not cinderclient itself | |
| 14:59:03 | fungi | frickler: good call. with that edit i'm able to get it work with latest sdk and cli installable on python 3.6, as long as i pin python-cinderclient<5 | |
| 14:59:30 | fungi | i'll push up a change to our clouds.yaml since that simplifies what we need to do to make the cli work | |
| 14:59:50 | gtema | that all sounds like a very dirty hack ;-) | |
| 15:03:45 | frickler | with the same cap it also works on the new bridge with py3.10 | |
| 15:04:02 | opendevreview | HaeIYoon proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add image metadef object operations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/858350 | |
| 15:04:12 | frickler | hack for maybe-a-non-openstack cloud, but progress anyway | |
| 15:04:41 | gtema | this is exactly what I always want to say - this doesn't feel like openstack cloud | |
| 15:05:28 | frickler | though admittedly there may be an old private cloud running icehouse or similar that might alse need the capped cinderclient | |
| 15:06:03 | frickler | *also | |
| 15:06:21 | gtema | sooner or later we will drop cinderclient from osc, but we can't really test all of those things | |
| 15:06:28 | frickler | so possibly still worth fixing that dependency | |
| 15:06:36 | frickler | and I agree about testing and all that | |
| 15:07:06 | frickler | just dreaming about an ideal world, that still should be possible to work | |
| 15:07:34 | fungi | https://review.opendev.org/c/opendev/system-config/+/862706 Correct block_storage_endpoint_override for rax | |
| 15:07:53 | gtema | the bigger question for me is that such clouds most likely run on py2, how should we be able to make this running if admin want to use newer OSC | |
| 15:09:04 | frickler | fungi: I think that comment about v1 is wrong. this is about the v2 api and at least "volume list" works fine for me with v2 | |
| 15:10:10 | frickler | gtema: for the use case I'm thinking about, the client would be running a modern system, just talking to the API of an old cloud | |
| 15:11:05 | gtema | I know, it just so frustrating and funny at the same time | |
| 15:11:17 | fungi | frickler: oh, you're right! | |
| 15:11:20 | fungi | amending | |
| 15:11:48 | frickler | also capping cinderclient\<8 seems to be enough | |
| 15:11:57 | fungi | yep, i was about to test that | |
| 15:14:25 | fungi | okay, amended | |
| 15:14:43 | fungi | also confirmed that <8 works if i drop the v1 override from the command | |
| 15:15:31 | fungi | remains to be seen if i'll be able to do things like server attach/detach now, but at least volume list is working | |
| 15:15:37 | fungi | i'll play around with it a bit more | |
| 15:34:57 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: compute: Fix '--network none/auto' handling https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/862730 | |
| 15:35:01 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: compute: Add missing microversion check for networks https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/862731 | |
| 17:38:26 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored ci script with shellcheck suggestions and install collections https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/861955 | |
| 17:49:31 | opendevreview | Denys Mishchenko proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Existing images update name, visibility etc https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/862565 | |
| 18:20:34 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Always remove temporary files in volume's integration test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/862741 | |
| 20:06:17 | opendevreview | Denys Mishchenko proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Existing images update name, visibility etc https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/862565 | |
| 20:22:00 | opendevreview | Denys Mishchenko proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Existing images update name, visibility etc https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/862565 | |
| 21:04:22 | opendevreview | Denys Mishchenko proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Existing images update name, visibility etc https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/862565 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-10-27 | |||
| 06:58:16 | opendevreview | Jiri Podivin proposed openstack/cliff master: Clarification of the algorithm used https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/862690 | |
| 07:03:00 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Run Ansible devel branch job on Python 3.10 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/856987 | |
| 07:23:47 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Always remove temporary files in volume's integration test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/862741 | |
| 08:47:16 | opendevreview | Jiri Podivin proposed openstack/cliff master: Clarification of the algorithm used https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/862690 | |
| 09:10:16 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Always remove temporary files in volume's integration test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/862741 | |
| 10:02:16 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Run Ansible devel branch job on Python 3.10 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/856987 | |
| 12:13:00 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Run Ansible devel branch job on Python 3.10 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/856987 | |
| 12:13:34 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Run Ansible devel branch job on Python 3.10 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/856987 | |
| 12:30:36 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Run *-devstack-ansible-devel job on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS (Jammy Jellyfish) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/856987 | |
| 12:31:34 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Run *-devstack-ansible-devel job on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS (Jammy Jellyfish) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/856987 | |
| 12:34:47 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Run *-devstack-ansible-devel job on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS (Jammy Jellyfish) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/856987 | |
| 15:48:56 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Always remove temporary files in volume's integration test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/862741 | |
| 16:02:34 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Run *-devstack-ansible-devel job on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS (Jammy Jellyfish) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/856987 | |
| 18:36:55 | ard_ | hey, I am working on a https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/862565 and have several question which I can't answer myself. According to https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/image/v2/index.html?expanded=update-image-detail there is a set of image properties which can't be updated and this will result in 403 reply. The set I believe is here: https://github.com/openstack/glance/blob/master/etc/schema-image.json | |
| 18:36:55 | ard_ | and this does include kernel_id and ramdisk_id . At the same time version of the script tries to change them if such params defined and differs from the present image. | |
| 18:38:26 | ard_ | at the same time min_disk and min_ram are not tried to be updated. Am I missing something? | |
| 19:37:44 | ard_ | jm1: regarding image.update_image with id and image object. If you send image object request.body being produced with {'op': 'remove', 'path': '/stores'} and lots of properties which aren't planned to touch. Because they are correct in existing image. openstacksdk==0.102.0 So my change has this strange workaround https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/862565/8/plugins/modules/image.py#585 | |
| 19:53:39 | ard_ | Here is a little bit more details: https://paste.opendev.org/show/817361/ So does it means that update args should contain all properties to not attempt removing them? Then the logic in the module is not correct. Otherwise there is an issue in sdk version .0.102.0 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-10-28 | |||
| 07:05:48 | opendevreview | Denys Mishchenko proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Existing images update name, visibility etc https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/862565 | |