| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-09-09 | |||
| 09:29:24 | opendevreview | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/os-service-types master: Add venus service-type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-service-types/+/856384 | |
| 09:54:11 | frickler | gtema: 856521 is needed to unblock OSC gate, not sure if you'd still want to wait for haleyb to re-review | |
| 09:54:23 | gtema | yeah, will do in few minutes | |
| 10:05:43 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Unify resource list filtering https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/853052 | |
| 11:21:04 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/cliff stable/zed: Update .gitreview for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/856725 | |
| 11:21:06 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/cliff stable/zed: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/856726 | |
| 11:21:07 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/cliff master: Add Python3 antelope unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/856727 | |
| 11:21:22 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstacksdk stable/zed: Update .gitreview for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/856728 | |
| 11:21:24 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstacksdk stable/zed: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/856729 | |
| 11:21:25 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Update master for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/856730 | |
| 11:21:27 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add Python3 antelope unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/856731 | |
| 11:21:36 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib stable/zed: Update .gitreview for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/856732 | |
| 11:21:37 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib stable/zed: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/856733 | |
| 11:21:39 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Update master for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/856734 | |
| 11:21:40 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Add Python3 antelope unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/856735 | |
| 11:24:13 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: volume: Trivial docstring fixes to 'wait_for_status' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/822315 | |
| 11:24:15 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add address-scope to NDP proxy tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/856521 | |
| 11:35:03 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/os-service-types master: Update api_ref for Cyborg project https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-service-types/+/856373 | |
| 14:14:35 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Implement project cleanup for object-store https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/853015 | |
| 14:42:00 | gtema | stephenfin frickler: did you ever completely understood all the different networking models in openstack? When I see some comments in the SDK code (for networks handling) my hairs are raising up. This is code is not manageable | |
| 14:42:39 | stephenfin | gtema: I leave networking to other people with more time than me 😇 It's madness | |
| 14:43:21 | gtema | just read that: https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/openstack/cloud/meta.py#L160 | |
| 14:44:51 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/cliff stable/zed: Update .gitreview for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/856725 | |
| 14:45:34 | stephenfin | gtema: Like I said, madness :) | |
| 14:46:21 | gtema | yeah, but we need to manage it somehow. ansible guys are now struggling that their improved tests are failing under certain conditions. No surprise with logic like that | |
| 14:46:56 | gtema | and I wanted to streamline this for R1.0 also. But don't even have idea from which side to touch it - insane | |
| 14:47:27 | gtema | that also proves to me why InterOp as such does not work (and will never work) | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-09-11 | |||
| 00:43:44 | opendevreview | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/os-service-types master: Add venus service-type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-service-types/+/856384 | |
| 09:59:23 | frickler | stephenfin: gtema: after digging a bit, it seems that ^^ as well as the earlier change for cyborg are wrong, instead https://opendev.org/openstack/service-types-authority/src/branch/master/service-types.yaml needs to be patched. then a bot should do the other update including the sha and timestamp bump | |
| 10:02:28 | gtema | Service-types-authority, cool, another new repo. For me it conflicts with os-service-types repo | |
| 10:47:19 | frickler | seems the latter is meant to be the python-consumable copy of data in the former. not sure why one couldn't do that in a single repo. I can't remember ever having seen this setup before, either | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-09-12 | |||
| 06:24:50 | opendevreview | Shnaidman Sagi (Sergey) proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Run Ansible devel branch job on Python 3.10 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/856987 | |
| 08:39:03 | opendevreview | Ulrich Schwickerath proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Added "openstack image metadefs namespace list" command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/854557 | |
| 11:30:22 | opendevreview | Kristian Kucerak proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Change subnets_info modules to work with new SDK https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/857041 | |
| 12:25:28 | opendevreview | Polina Gubina proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: add missing function to identity resource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/857045 | |
| 12:29:48 | opendevreview | Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix wrong assertion methods https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/857046 | |
| 12:48:02 | opendevreview | Ananya proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Makes stack module compatible with new sdk version https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/848266 | |
| 13:21:15 | opendevreview | Polina Gubina proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: fixes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/857159 | |
| 13:26:28 | opendevreview | Polina Gubina proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: add missing function to identity resource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/857045 | |
| 14:00:59 | dtantsur | folks, looking for a 2nd +2 on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/849564 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/849402 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/856549 please | |
| 14:01:06 | dtantsur | I think it's important for 1.0 and for the collections | |
| 14:26:23 | opendevreview | Kristian Kucerak proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Change subnets_info module to work with new SDK https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/857041 | |
| 15:14:34 | opendevreview | Eunyoung Kim proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add metadef schema resource to v2 metadefs api https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/857200 | |
| 15:23:11 | opendevreview | Eunyoung Kim proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add metadef schema resource to v2 metadefs api https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/857200 | |
| 15:33:33 | gmann | gtema: reminder for PTL planning for 2023.1 cycle, I have added sdks in the leaderless project list https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/2023.1-leaderless | |
| 15:33:56 | gmann | gtema: please let us know if you are planning to continue or anyone else volunteering ? | |
| 16:04:53 | frickler | gmann: I thought that that was settled with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/election/+/856526 | |
| 16:06:41 | gmann | frickler: ohk, I think there is wrong data in election email. where barbican and OpenStackSDK are also listed. thanks. noted in etherpad | |
| 17:49:46 | gtema | Gmann, yeah, I ruled this with Amy directly | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-09-13 | |||
| 06:39:43 | opendevreview | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: Add Venus as log-management service https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/service-types-authority/+/857080 | |
| 06:47:54 | frickler | dtantsur: ^^ seems you might be the only remaining active api-sig-core. is that group still active anyway? | |
| 06:50:13 | frickler | seems nobody touched the jobs in a long time, I will look into fixing those later today | |
| 07:08:09 | gtema | frickler: do you mean service-types-authority? BTW, do you know which team is responsible for the project? I see irc is mapped into the sdk room, but it is not official delivery of our team | |
| 07:09:57 | gtema | ah, and in gerrit it group is related somehow to api-sig-core | |
| 07:11:01 | gtema | right: api-sig is not active anymore, we had last meeting more then a year ago. iirc it was agreed to stay in standby until required, since anyway all the docs were already written | |
| 07:11:20 | frickler | yes, api-sig is what I came up with, too | |
| 07:11:37 | frickler | seems now action is required with a new project, at least in getting zuul to work again | |
| 07:13:35 | frickler | also lots of cores are no longer active from what I know, maybe some cleanup would be good | |
| 07:14:24 | frickler | I thinking whether this should better move under TC umbrella nowadays | |
| 07:14:25 | gtema | tja, let's wait wat dtantsur responds and eventually consider adoption. I was part of the team, but by that time there was already no reason for cores to exist | |
| 07:15:23 | gtema | since it relates to os-service-types repo I would rather think to merge those 2 and leave them under sdk, since we are the main consumer of this type of data | |
| 07:16:33 | frickler | not sure about that, it is currently blocking api-ref publishing for venus, so at least some wider impact. | |
| 07:17:00 | gtema | hmm, maybe right | |
| 09:14:18 | dtantsur | frickler: the API SIG is no longer active, but I do still have core rights | |
| 09:15:09 | dtantsur | somebody needs to fix the CI there.. | |
| 10:35:51 | opendevreview | Polina Gubina proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: add missing function to identity resource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/857045 | |
| 11:45:59 | opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: Set py_modules to an empty list in setup.py https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/service-types-authority/+/857349 | |
| 11:48:30 | opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: Add Venus as log-management service https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/service-types-authority/+/857080 | |
| 12:05:06 | frickler | dtantsur: ^^ seems like that was an easy fix, stolen from other projects which had the same issue some time ago. | |
| 12:05:15 | frickler | brinzhang: added a comment in the venus patch | |
| 12:06:13 | gtema | yeah, this "fix" is slowly spreading across other projects | |
| 12:07:03 | opendevreview | Ananya proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Makes stack module compatible with new sdk version https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/848266 | |
| 12:07:04 | frickler | gtema: that sounds as if you don't like it, I'm open to better proposals | |
| 12:07:21 | gtema | nono, don't mean that. | |
| 12:08:09 | gtema | I mean it feels rather hack to an artificial problem. I clearly admit there is no other way and I just observe it being applied quite often | |
| 12:25:04 | opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: Update api-ref for cyborg https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/service-types-authority/+/857367 | |
| 12:26:27 | frickler | ^^ that should be the fixup for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-service-types/+/856373 | |
| 12:30:21 | dtantsur | frickler: approving; the venus patch has an outstanding comment | |
| 12:31:23 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: added api requirements for new "openstack image metadefs namespace list" command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/854612 | |
| 12:31:26 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: image: Trivial grouping of image proxy methods https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/856270 | |
| 12:33:09 | frickler | dtantsur: yes, that comment is mine, too. if you agree with it I can fixup the patch since I think brinzhang may have eod'd by now | |
| 12:33:51 | frickler | or I can do a follow-up, then we can see the publishing actually succeed in between | |
| 12:34:15 | dtantsur | frickler: yeah, a follow-up is probably fine (and I wonder how many wrong links we have there already - ironic-inspector is one) | |
| 12:34:45 | frickler | I just wanted to avoid generating too many revisions, but seeing what happened in 2019 that's maybe moot | |
| 12:35:03 | gtema | dtantsur, maybe you remember where it is consumed and whether we can merge it with os-service-types? | |
| 12:35:39 | dtantsur | gtema: I would assume it's consumed everywhere where machine-friendly information is needed. os-service-type is python, we need to be careful around it. | |
| 12:36:42 | gtema | well, json (inside) is machine friendly, so we could just eventually add additional interface for that | |
| 12:37:06 | gtema | cause I really hate having 2 projects with same data but serving 2 interfaces | |
| 12:39:57 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/service-types-authority master: Set py_modules to an empty list in setup.py https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/service-types-authority/+/857349 | |
| 12:51:39 | opendevreview | Kristian Kucerak proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Change subnets_info module to work with new SDK https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/857041 | |
| 13:17:22 | opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: Drop override for venus api-ref https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/service-types-authority/+/857430 | |
| 13:25:03 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/service-types-authority master: Update api-ref for cyborg https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/service-types-authority/+/857367 | |
| 13:33:17 | frickler | another job that needs fixing, I almost expected that to fail https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/acfdf5109f4044b2992c1389eade3045 | |
| 13:34:32 | frickler | it even failed the last time it ran before today in 2019, not a good sign https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=propose-updates&project=openstack/service-types-authority | |
| 13:35:06 | gtema | tja | |
| 13:39:39 | opendevreview | Rafael Castillo proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update quota for 2.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/851483 | |
| 14:15:52 | opendevreview | Eunyoung Kim proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add metadef schema resource to v2 metadefs api https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/857200 | |
| 14:18:27 | opendevreview | Eunyoung Kim proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add metadef schema resource to v2 metadefs api https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/857200 | |
| 15:30:14 | opendevreview | Eunyoung Kim proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add metadef schema resource to v2 metadefs api https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/857200 | |
| 15:36:40 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/service-types-authority master: Add Venus as log-management service https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/service-types-authority/+/857080 | |