Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2022-08-18
16:25:00 gouthamr https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:openstacksdk-manila-support
16:25:00 gtema I hate typing from mobile - this is a fight agains auto-correct
16:25:07 gouthamr looks like we need to do them again
16:25:28 gouthamr thanks for checking on this though; i'll rebase and try to see if we can un-WIP some of these
16:25:52 gtema at least rebase would be the beginning
16:25:52 diablo_rojo_phone gtema: yeah less fast and less access to links :) Thank you.
16:26:07 gtema welcome diablo_rojo_phone
16:26:36 gtema wrt changes: once I looked last time on them there were unaddressed review comments or so and no activity at all
16:27:17 gtema if we can land at least some of them I would be happy to include them in R1
16:28:03 gtema otherwise we would need to leave them for later. I do not want to see this much of work simply abandoned
16:28:04 gouthamr great! i rechecked a couple and added my +2 back
16:28:14 gtema cool, thks
16:28:30 diablo_rojo_phone Yay progress!
16:28:31 gtema once we land at least some of those I will take care of moving them to master branch
16:28:40 gouthamr great thanks gtema!
16:28:49 gtema wlcm
16:29:08 diablo_rojo_phone I think that was the last topic?
16:29:19 gtema yupp, the last
16:29:37 diablo_rojo_phone Sweet.
16:29:41 gtema I have one more topic, but without neutron folks support we can not do much
16:30:11 diablo_rojo_phone slaweq: around?
16:30:23 diablo_rojo_phone I don't see Lajos in this channel.
16:31:51 gtema I added it to agenda anyway. The question is that we have added some of the vpnaas functionality, but we can't test it since I can't understand how to activate it in devstack
16:32:07 gtema I did everything like vpnaas code does but tests are still skipped
16:32:17 diablo_rojo_phone Ahh that is indeed an issue.
16:32:32 diablo_rojo_phone I don't know how to set that stuff up in devstack either
16:33:02 gtema yeah, that is the point. I was asking slaweq about that, he promised to have a look, but most likely no time
16:33:35 diablo_rojo_phone That happens.
16:33:47 gtema right, this is life
16:34:21 diablo_rojo_phone Indeed
16:34:27 gtema that's all folks (c)
16:34:50 gtema or is it (r) - no clue
16:35:21 diablo_rojo_phone Yep that's it
16:36:16 diablo_rojo_phone #endmeeting
16:36:31 diablo_rojo_phone Except I have no authority.
16:36:36 gtema #agreed :)
16:36:38 diablo_rojo_phone On this nick apparently
16:36:43 seongsoocho diablo_rojo: gtema I have an one question to you. There seem to be a lot of old and already resolved issues registered in the storyboard. We want to find these and close the issue, but rather than closing it at will, we want to have you review it. How to do it efficiently?
16:36:44 gtema #endmeeting
16:37:14 frickler wait until the hour is up, then anyone can end the meeting
16:37:26 gtema hmm. My problem is that I can't use storyboard effectively, I just become mad after 10 seconds of starting with it
16:37:30 diablo_rojo_phone frickler: ahh got it. Thank you.
16:38:03 seongsoocho gtema: Yes.. The storyboard is really slow.
16:38:39 gtema seongsoocho, maybe you comment inside the issues whether you think it can be closed. At least I will receive email (if spamfilter will not catch it first)
16:39:01 gtema and with that at least I will have a chance to comment or really close it
16:39:27 seongsoocho Okay. I'll comment if I think I can close it.
16:39:40 gtema thanks
16:39:44 seongsoocho thanks
16:40:16 slaweq gtema: hi, sorry, I forgot about it
16:40:32 slaweq Do you have patch woth that job so I can check it?
16:40:37 gtema slaweq: no worries, it will not run away
16:40:49 gtema https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/846618
16:40:55 slaweq I'm not at my desk now but I will take a look later tonight or tomorrow morning
16:41:13 diablo_rojo I'm back!
16:41:16 diablo_rojo #endmeeting
16:41:16 opendevmeet Meeting ended Thu Aug 18 16:41:16 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:41:16 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/sdk_osc/2022/sdk_osc.2022-08-18-16.02.html
16:41:16 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/sdk_osc/2022/sdk_osc.2022-08-18-16.02.txt
16:41:16 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/sdk_osc/2022/sdk_osc.2022-08-18-16.02.log.html
16:41:47 diablo_rojo I guess I could have kept it going since slaweq is here now
16:41:50 gtema awesome, thanks. In the change I just repeated how vpnaas code sets up jobs, but tests are still skipped, so I do not know whether the it is not activated, or whether tests are having wrong skip
16:42:14 gtema he is not on desk, therefore no problems of not logging it
16:42:27 gtema s/on/at/
20:36:22 opendevreview hai wu proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for fault object per Server API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/853703
20:56:57 opendevreview hai wu proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for fault object per Server API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/853703
20:57:42 opendevreview hai wu proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for fault object per Server API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/853703
#openstack-sdks - 2022-08-19
06:09:12 opendevreview Rafael Castillo proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Updates volume for 2.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/853749
11:53:55 opendevreview Areg Grigoryan proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Bugfix for paginating for complex paths https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/853656
13:17:56 opendevreview Areg Grigoryan proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Bugfix for paginating for complex paths https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/853656
18:29:05 opendevreview hai wu proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for fault object per Server API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/853703
18:31:22 opendevreview hai wu proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for fault object per Server API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/853703
#openstack-sdks - 2022-08-20
01:21:41 opendevreview Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Replace assertItemsEqual with assertCountEqual https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/853842
01:24:13 opendevreview hai wu proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for fault object per Server API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/853703
12:50:34 opendevreview hai wu proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for fault object per Server API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/853703
14:53:06 opendevreview hai wu proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for fault object per Server API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/853703
19:02:29 opendevreview hai wu proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for fault object per Server API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/853703
#openstack-sdks - 2022-08-22
08:13:53 opendevreview Arx Cruz proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update federation_mapping_info module to use proxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/849283
08:58:48 opendevreview Frikin Evgenii proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix processing stack_status when make create stack https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/853768
09:23:19 opendevreview Frikin Evgenii proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix processing stack_status when make create stack https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/853768
09:57:46 opendevreview Arx Cruz proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update federation_mapping_info module to use proxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/849283
10:12:14 opendevreview huang liujie proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Replace base64.encodestring with encodebytes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/853940
10:30:43 opendevreview Jan Hartkopf proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: add support for microversion 2.93 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/847792
10:48:53 opendevreview Jan Hartkopf proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: add support for microversion 2.93 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/847792
10:55:29 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Microversion 2.91: Support specifying destination host to unshelve https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/853949
11:14:03 opendevreview Arx Cruz proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update federation_mapping_info module to use proxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/849283
12:10:33 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Deprecate special value 'auto' for attribute 'id' of compute_flavor https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/852936
12:12:58 jm1 gtema: hello :) maybe you could help me with this patch? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/852119/
12:13:24 gtema ok, will have a look later today
12:13:54 jm1 gtema: updating the server fails because no floating ip gets attached when auto_ip is set to true
12:14:33 gtema uhg, that is one of the most tricky cases: how IP is getting assinged. There are 2000000000 different ways
12:14:42 gtema will have a deeper look
12:17:56 anskiy gtema: could you, please, take a look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/848095/ again?
12:18:20 gtema ok
12:19:18 anskiy thank you! :)
12:19:27 jm1 gtema: it uses add_ips_to_server and passes a server object (with server details but without add_server_interfaces being called before) and auto_ips=True. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/852119/8/plugins/modules/server.py#1093
12:21:31 jm1 gtema: the issue seems to be that add_ips_to_server returns None instead of a server object
12:35:59 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Replaced expensive get_server() and fixed issues in server module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/852119
12:36:58 jm1 gtema: oh... maybe the issue is obscured by the until keyword in ci test. i am trying something else and will ping you when i need more help
12:40:15 gtema hmm, ok. Such things we would need to be able to reproduce on bare devstack as well, cause only this will be useful
12:48:19 jm1 gtema: i have another issue with this add_ips_to_server function. this is what i want to accomplish: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/828613/11/ci/roles/floating_ip/tasks/main.yml#271

Earlier   Later