| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-06-10 | |||
| 14:07:23 | opendevreview | Rafael Castillo proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack stable/1.0.0: Backport improvements to recordset module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/844089 | |
| 18:25:20 | opendevreview | Rafael Castillo proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: DNM: Test setting sdk version in build_test_packages https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/844859 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-06-13 | |||
| 10:09:45 | opendevreview | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add CRUD methods for Neutron router ndp proxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/749036 | |
| 12:18:09 | opendevreview | Pavlo Shchelokovskyy proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Replace python-dev with python3-dev in bindep https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/845585 | |
| 13:06:13 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix Baremetal cloud layer https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/844312 | |
| 13:06:16 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: cloud: Update docstrings for network functions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/843435 | |
| 13:06:19 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: cloud: Update docstrings for accelerator functions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/843436 | |
| 13:06:32 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: cloud: Update docstrings for image functions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/843437 | |
| 13:06:35 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: cloud: Update docstrings for block storage functions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/843438 | |
| 13:06:38 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: cloud: Update docstrings for identity functions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/843439 | |
| 13:06:41 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: cloud: Update docstrings for object store functions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/843440 | |
| 13:06:44 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: cloud: Update docstrings for compute functions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/843441 | |
| 13:06:46 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: cloud: Remove a load of normalize helpers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/845122 | |
| 13:06:50 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: compute: Add support for instance actions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/843449 | |
| 13:06:54 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: network RBAC policy: allow query for target tenant https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/834442 | |
| 13:07:01 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add CRUD methods for Neutron router ndp proxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/749036 | |
| 13:17:18 | opendevreview | Rafael Castillo proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update image for new sdk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/845304 | |
| 16:13:48 | opendevreview | Rafael Castillo proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update image for new sdk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/845304 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-06-14 | |||
| 02:22:46 | opendevreview | yangjianfeng proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add router ndp proxy commands https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/749038 | |
| 05:58:53 | opendevreview | yangjianfeng proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add router ndp proxy commands https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/749038 | |
| 09:04:48 | opendevreview | Arx Cruz proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update role_assignment to use proxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/843830 | |
| 11:06:41 | opendevreview | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Implement supplementary list filtering https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/845726 | |
| 12:27:15 | opendevreview | Arx Cruz proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update endpoint to new proxy layer https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/840640 | |
| 14:39:54 | Adri2000 | hello, does anyone use the nova resize feature through openstacksdk? I have a user reporting issues with that as the sdk will expect the instance to go back to active whereas in reality the instance will go trough the verify_resize state | |
| 14:41:12 | gtema | you should ask how is he using it. Generally in sdk there is also method `confirm_server_resize` | |
| 14:41:56 | gtema | and the code in SDK does not "expect instance go back to active" | |
| 14:43:55 | Adri2000 | gtema: yep I saw the confirm resize method indeed. I'm trying to get a minimal test case from him, to be able to reproduce the issue. if and when I get that, I'll come back with more details. thanks for your reply :) | |
| 14:44:12 | gtema | okay | |
| 15:14:31 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update catalog service for the new sdk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/839352 | |
| 15:26:12 | opendevreview | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Respect filters in list_projects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/845776 | |
| 15:32:48 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update endpoint to new proxy layer https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/840640 | |
| 15:39:03 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update role_assignment to use proxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/843830 | |
| 15:55:03 | opendevreview | Shnaidman Sagi (Sergey) proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Moves keypair_info from cloud to proxy object https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/827274 | |
| 16:02:31 | opendevreview | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Switch project_info to new SDK https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/845782 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-06-15 | |||
| 00:53:10 | opendevreview | yangjianfeng proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add router ndp proxy commands https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/749038 | |
| 08:11:19 | opendevreview | Arx Cruz proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update routers_info for the new SDK https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/838489 | |
| 09:42:11 | opendevreview | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Switch project_info to new SDK https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/845782 | |
| 10:07:35 | opendevreview | Arx Cruz proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update routers_info for the new SDK https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/838489 | |
| 13:43:12 | slaweq | gtema hi, regarding neutron-vpnaas support in OSC - I asked about it on our Neutron team meeting yesterday | |
| 13:43:35 | slaweq | and amotoki told me that support for that should be there through neutronclient plugin | |
| 13:43:53 | slaweq | it's like that for all neutron advanced services according to what amotoki told me | |
| 13:43:58 | slaweq | can You check that maybe? | |
| 13:46:46 | gtema | the point was that you can't abandon neutronclient with this done this way | |
| 13:48:45 | opendevreview | mbu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Wait for volume being available to set bootable or readonly https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/845991 | |
| 13:48:48 | gtema | ah, wait | |
| 13:49:48 | gtema | I maybe confusing neutronclient and `neutron` cli | |
| 13:50:35 | slaweq | gtema yes, we don't want to abandon python-neutronclient python bindings | |
| 13:50:44 | slaweq | we only want to get rid of the CLI part of it | |
| 13:50:58 | slaweq | as python bindings from it are used e.g. by heat AFAIK | |
| 13:51:06 | slaweq | so there's no plan to remove it currently | |
| 13:51:53 | gtema | yeah, but this is now this way | |
| 13:53:03 | gtema | okay, but this part is a CLI, so are you going to get rid of that? | |
| 13:54:29 | slaweq | hmm, I think I will need to talk about it with amotoki once again :) | |
| 13:54:39 | gtema | anyway - we can move this into OSC | |
| 13:56:03 | slaweq | but we would need to move it also to SDK first, right? | |
| 13:56:24 | gtema | we can reuse most of the code just adding required bits in SDK | |
| 13:56:42 | gtema | sending messages through matrix bridge seems really stuck for a while | |
| 13:58:22 | gtema | so repeating broken sync communication: we need add few things to SDK; we can move CLI stuff for vpnaas into OSC making it use SDK; I got over summit some other user saying some of router agents were also not supported by OSC - will check that also; Once this done you can drop CLI part of neutronclient | |
| 14:01:38 | opendevreview | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Switch project_info to new SDK https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/845782 | |
| 14:03:54 | amotoki | gtema: slaweq: I just looked thru what are discussed above. | |
| 14:03:57 | amotoki | the python-neutronclient repo contains three parts: neutron CLI, OSC plugin and python-bindings. | |
| 14:04:58 | gtema | right, that is now also my understanding of the code | |
| 14:05:00 | amotoki | OSC plugin mainly convers advanced services like vpnaas, fwaas and dynamic-routing | |
| 14:05:24 | amotoki | in addition the OSC plugin covers some experimental/addtional features in the neutorn repo. | |
| 14:05:37 | gtema | do you want them to stay in neutronclient or should we move it under OSC? | |
| 14:05:40 | amotoki | the laster is a verytricky part | |
| 14:06:09 | amotoki | gtema: IMHO at least neutron features in OSC neutornclient plugin should be moved to OSC | |
| 14:06:29 | gtema | which ones? | |
| 14:07:37 | amotoki | gtema: this lists the commands covered by OSC neutronclient plugin https://docs.openstack.org/python-neutronclient/latest/cli/osc_plugins.html | |
| 14:08:24 | amotoki | for example, "openstack network trunk create" is covered not by OSC but by OSC neutronclient plugin | |
| 14:08:34 | amotoki | it is a feature in the main neutorn repo. | |
| 14:08:47 | gtema | so we should move them to core OSC, right? | |
| 14:08:55 | amotoki | yes | |
| 14:09:02 | amotoki | I believe it is less confusing | |
| 14:09:40 | gtema | okay. afaik only vpnaas is not currently covered by sdk | |
| 14:09:55 | amotoki | of course advanced services like vpnaas can be moved to OSC/SDK, but I think features in neutron repo should be moved to OSC first. | |
| 14:10:52 | gtema | once we move things into OSC I do not want to reintroduce dep on neutronclient, so need to cover things in SDK first | |
| 14:10:58 | gtema | I will work on that | |
| 14:13:06 | amotoki | sounds good. I will help it. | |
| 14:13:55 | gtema | cool. Pls find out how to enable vpnaas in devstack and you can make change to add it to the devstack-networking jobs. We have currently vpnservice resource, but it is untested (in func jobs) | |
| 14:14:11 | amotoki | at a quick look of the sdk repo, fwaas is covered by sdk. vpnaas, dynamic-routing, bgpvpn and sfc are not covered by SDK | |
| 14:14:40 | gtema | ok, then eventually we should add enable them all in devstack | |
| 14:15:35 | amotoki | gtema: sure. I will check how to enable vpnaas in the jobs. I know how to enable vpnaas in devstack. | |
| 14:15:50 | gtema | sound great, thanks amotoki | |
| 14:16:27 | amotoki | gtema: we first need to make them enabled in the SDK gate, right? | |
| 14:16:56 | gtema | yes | |
| 14:17:08 | amotoki | thanks | |
| 14:17:23 | gtema | thank you | |
| 14:17:54 | amotoki | the summit sounds a great trigger to revive pending topics :) | |
| 14:20:41 | gtema | yeah, right | |
| 14:20:56 | gtema | people eventually get rid of frustration ;-) | |
| 14:21:46 | frickler | dynamic-routing doesn't work with OVN, so it would need an alternative OVS-based job | |
| 14:22:17 | gtema | oh, and that is where whole fun starts again ;-) | |
| 14:32:53 | slaweq | gtema frickler I'm not sure about which job You are talking now but osc-functional-devstack job now runs with ml2/ovs https://github.com/openstack/python-openstackclient/blob/master/.zuul.yaml#L83 | |
| 14:32:56 | opendevreview | mbu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Wait for volume being available to set bootable or readonly https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/845991 | |
| 14:33:09 | slaweq | so we should be good to run dynamic-routing there too probably | |
| 14:33:31 | gtema | we will see if it fails ;-) | |
| 14:38:05 | frickler | slaweq: oh, I wasn't aware of that. then we maybe need to add a job to test things on ovn instead | |
| 14:38:53 | frickler | in theory it shouldn't matter for clients, but there's theory and then there's reality ;) | |
| 14:46:56 | slaweq | frickler true, in theory it shouldn't matter :) | |