| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2021-09-04 | |||
| 07:46:41 | gtema | Wrt 2) somehow I am not 100% sure it will work. It may decide to rebase whole change and not only the last change | |
| 07:46:53 | gtema | Thus option 1) is the easiest way | |
| 09:16:31 | thomasb06 | as I have no UI, I'll go for option 2). Monday I'm back on the computer that has the repo, I'll try to rebase there. If clone the repository again on another computer and commit other changes, it's going to be messy I guess? | |
| 09:37:41 | thomasb06 | from another computer: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/807427 | |
| 09:38:08 | thomasb06 | branch is feature/r1 and it's one commit far from the Head | |
| 09:47:00 | gtema | Under UI I mean gerrit | |
| 10:42:33 | thomasb06 | Yes, I haven't installed the gerrit UI yet. What I did was to clone the repository on another computer and as the copy was clean redo the modifications straight from the Head. Monday, I'll need to clean the three failed commit but I'm not sure about how to do it. Maybe `git fetch --force`? | |
| 11:06:41 | gtema | You don't install it | |
| 11:06:57 | gtema | The link you posted - simply open it with browser | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2021-09-06 | |||
| 09:44:23 | thomasb06 | About the three commits I did wrong, would it be enough to click 'Abandon' in the UI? | |
| 09:44:47 | gtema | yes | |
| 09:54:36 | thomasb06 | Done, the new commit is: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/807427 | |
| 09:56:57 | thomasb06 | Sorry about it. Next time, I'll be more carefull and use commit --amend. From 4pm to 6pm, I have another tiny timeframe if you would have another cleaning modification for me | |
| 10:12:53 | gtema | thomasb06: if you look at https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/feature/r1/openstack/tests/unit/block_storage/v3/test_proxy.py#L36 (pretty much the file as whole) | |
| 10:13:04 | gtema | you see there are multiple test classes | |
| 10:13:17 | gtema | which split test functions base on the "resource" we test | |
| 10:13:44 | gtema | similar is present in https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/feature/r1/openstack/tests/unit/compute/v2/test_proxy.py | |
| 10:14:18 | gtema | so if you can apply the same pattern (splitting single test class into multiple) for all the other services it would be great | |
| 10:14:34 | gtema | basically openstacl/tests/unit//v/test_proxy.py | |
| 10:14:40 | gtema | * basically openstack/tests/unit//v/test_proxy.py | |
| 10:29:24 | thomasb06 | If I understood well you would need all the files `openstack/tests/unit/*/v/test_proxy.py` to be split into test classes as in `block_storage/v3/test_proxy.py` and `compute/v2/test_proxy.py` ? | |
| 10:30:42 | gtema | Yes | |
| 10:31:25 | thomasb06 | Very well, I start today | |
| 10:31:36 | gtema | You can also consult with the corresponding proxy file at all | |
| 10:32:13 | gtema | If you want, we can perhaps have a call today so that I get you briefly through the structure of the project | |
| 10:32:41 | thomasb06 | Maybe it's safer indeed | |
| 10:33:45 | thomasb06 | We have the same timezone so between 4 and 6, you can call any time. And at other moments too, I can take a 5mn break | |
| 10:34:16 | thomasb06 | may I post my number here? Not too sure about it... | |
| 10:35:46 | gtema | Not necessary | |
| 10:36:00 | gtema | I will send link for web conference | |
| 10:36:07 | gtema | Around 17 | |
| 10:36:36 | thomasb06 | Alright, I'll by my mailbox | |
| 11:41:39 | opendevreview | Mamatisa Nurmatov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add Neutron Local IP CRUD https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/804988 | |
| 14:36:21 | gtema | thomasb06, are you here? Having time now? | |
| 14:38:51 | thomasb06 | Yes, I'm ready | |
| 14:40:07 | gtema | https://meetpad.opendev.org/sdk | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2021-09-07 | |||
| 12:07:40 | opendevreview | Laurent Almeras proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: use idempotent behavior + diff https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/806745 | |
| 14:21:45 | thomasb06 | gtema: Hello. Maybe I can start with `feature/r1/openstack/tests/unit/image/v2`, there seem to be few test files in the tree? | |
| 14:36:37 | thomasb06 | first trial of spliting the `TestImageProxy` class: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/807734 | |
| 14:41:24 | gtema | yeah thomasb06 - left comments. You need to split it further as this change (one file per change, and not one split per change | |
| 14:53:42 | thomasb06 | corrected | |
| 14:57:36 | gtema | thks | |
| 15:21:21 | thomasb06 | and I just added the `TestMisc` class | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2021-09-08 | |||
| 14:21:09 | opendevreview | Rodolfo Alonso proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add "check_limit" to network Quota class https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/806254 | |
| 14:33:57 | thomasb06 | gtema: the accelerator unit test can split too | |
| 14:34:11 | gtema | Ok | |
| 14:36:48 | thomasb06 | how can I make a `git pull` to get the latest files? This command asks for a distant and a branch | |
| 14:44:47 | thomasb06 | Here is the commit: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/807886 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2021-09-09 | |||
| 13:21:31 | gtema | thomasb06 - if your question is still valid - you should not really use git pull (unless willing to go to real clean master). Instead you do `git review -d CHANGE_ID`. This will ensure you get latest version of your change | |
| 13:21:51 | gtema | otherwise (for branch) `git checkout master && git pull` | |
| 13:50:56 | opendevreview | Alfredo Moralejo proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Replace assertItemsEqual with assertCountEqual https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/808079 | |
| 14:52:24 | ebbex | I have a problem where "openstack image set --property hw_qemu_guest_agent=no <uuid> && openstack image show <uuid>" always shows up as hw_qemu_guest_agent='True' in the output, can anyone else see if they get the same result? | |
| 14:53:52 | gtema | you may try to use `openstack image unset --property hw_qemu_guest_agent <uuid>`. Maybe this can make it | |
| 14:53:59 | ebbex | "glance image-show <uuid>" shows it correctly as "no". | |
| 14:54:48 | ebbex | I can even set the property to "horse" and glance shows it correctly but the openstack-client always evaluates it to 'True' for some reason. | |
| 14:54:59 | gtema | hmm, can you post output of the API response from`openstack image show <uuid> --debug`? | |
| 14:55:39 | ebbex | and it's only this property for some reason, hw_machine_type, hw_disk_bus, hw_scsi_model, etc. all fine. | |
| 14:55:49 | gtema | hmm | |
| 14:56:17 | gtema | ok, found | |
| 14:56:26 | gtema | in the SDK the attribute is declared as bool | |
| 14:56:45 | gtema | which means it will not really support `no`, but `false` | |
| 14:59:32 | ebbex | aha, that explains that I suppose. | |
| 15:00:55 | ebbex | the docs I've read on the property say it should be "yes", so really scratched my head when I set it to "no" but it still showed as 'True'. | |
| 15:03:09 | gtema | that was quite bad implementation decision in glance/wherever, cause all other known attributes are really bools, here it is described as "boolean `yes` or `no`" | |
| 15:09:18 | ebbex | hmm, well it doesn't help that i set the property to 'False', 'false' or 'no'. It still reports it back as 'True'. | |
| 15:11:26 | gtema | well: | |
| 15:13:12 | ebbex | oh dear :( | |
| 15:14:44 | ebbex | so there is only setting the property or unsetting it? But nova respects the property if 'no' or 'yes'? (I'll have to check that out next) | |
| 15:15:19 | gtema | this question I can not answer sadly | |
| 15:16:59 | ebbex | nova/objects/image_meta.py: 'hw_qemu_guest_agent': fields.FlexibleBooleanField() | |
| 15:19:34 | ebbex | so nova seems to respect the the value, they even have tests for it with values "yes" and "no". | |
| 15:20:11 | gtema | https://opendev.org/openstack/oslo.utils/src/branch/master/oslo_utils/strutils.py#L122 | |
| 15:20:15 | gtema | this is where it lands | |
| 15:20:47 | gtema | anyway - we should fix it in SDK. This is clearly not a bool, but string for us | |
| 15:22:57 | ebbex | thanks, any place I should file a bug for this? | |
| 15:23:20 | gtema | reports are not welcome, but fixes are ;-) | |
| 15:23:28 | gtema | I will do this shortly | |
| 15:24:07 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add compute microversion 2.78 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786290 | |
| 15:24:52 | ebbex | Is it as easy as changing the line "hw_qemu_guest_agent = resource.Body('hw_qemu_guest_agent', type=bool)" ? | |
| 15:25:14 | ebbex | (to something else that is) | |
| 15:31:07 | opendevreview | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Change image.hw_qemu_guest_agent to be string https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/808101 | |
| 15:31:30 | gtema | yeah ebbex - like that but also test should be adapted | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2021-09-10 | |||
| 12:56:05 | thomasb06 | gtema: Hello. The directory baremetal could be split too but it's v1 only. It is ok? | |
| 12:56:27 | gtema | sure - everything what you find and you think is reasonable | |
| 12:57:15 | thomasb06 | cool. It's the third I make so maybe I should follow the alphabetical order from now on | |
| 12:57:42 | gtema | yeah | |
| 13:13:42 | thomasb06 | There's TestMisc too: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/808209 | |
| 14:34:25 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/cliff stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/808339 | |
| 14:34:27 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/cliff stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/808340 | |
| 14:34:29 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/cliff master: Add Python3 yoga unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/808341 | |
| 14:35:09 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstacksdk stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/808353 | |
| 14:35:12 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstacksdk stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/808355 | |
| 14:35:15 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Update master for stable/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/808356 | |
| 14:35:18 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add Python3 yoga unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/808360 | |
| 14:35:37 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/808361 | |
| 14:35:41 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/808362 | |
| 14:35:51 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Update master for stable/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/808366 | |
| 14:35:55 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Add Python3 yoga unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/808368 | |
| 17:39:18 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for reading node's "boot_mode" and "secure_boot" fields https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/802101 | |
| 17:39:28 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for changing baremetal node's boot_mode and secure_boot states https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/804529 | |