Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2021-07-09
16:42:32 gouthamr yes
16:42:59 gouthamr i'll ofcourse add the rest of you for that final +W too, if you've not already looked :)
16:44:08 gouthamr kafilat's internship ends in a few weeks; i'm hoping we can get her work in; and iterate - it's all going to have to be merged back from the feature/r1 branch into master anyway
16:44:39 artom gouthamr, hehe, I'm the wrong Art(e|o)m :)
16:44:58 artom (Not often I get to say that in a non-Russophone environment)
16:45:51 gouthamr so i'll help with that cherry-picking etc; but having patch dependencies (resources that have a fk dependency on other resources, "sub" resources etc) is hurting her productivity for now
16:47:39 gouthamr artom: :D i blame freenode chaos on my nick confusions
16:51:34 gouthamr also would be nice to see this one merged: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/799323
16:55:14 mordred ++ to project cores
18:14:02 gouthamr \o/
18:14:23 gouthamr i've a question regarding microversions in the API requests in the functional tests
18:15:45 gouthamr when i write a functional test, and set a min_version in the class, it only seems to be used for validating if the version is supported: https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/commit/9dc4a841145200583ac3f8c56df775a165e5f2f4/openstack/tests/functional/shared_file_system/test_availability_zone.py#L18
18:16:16 gouthamr i'd like the request to be made with that microversion
18:17:12 gouthamr is there any way i can do that? i tried setting the user and operator cloud versions to a specific version, but that didn't seem to make a difference: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/799208/2/openstack/tests/functional/shared_file_system/base.py
#openstack-sdks - 2021-07-10
04:00:16 opendevreview Pete Zaitcev proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Allow to list containers of other accounts https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/731395
12:26:04 mordred gouthamr: well ... what you'll need to do is override the version discovery document: https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/openstack/tests/unit/fixtures/shared-file-system.json
12:26:20 mordred sdk is always going to make requests based on version discovery negotiation
12:27:08 mordred so if you want to test that it's doing the right thing, you'd want, inthe setup of that test, to tell it to return a version discovery doc with an appropriate max microversion
12:27:29 mordred (there should totally be a base test class api for doing this easily - sorry about that)
#openstack-sdks - 2021-07-11
04:19:12 gouthamr hi modred: thanks for the response; the unit test fixture is for the unit tests alone, no? i was looking to get the request made in the functional test to use a specific microversion
04:19:14 gouthamr mordred*
04:20:24 gouthamr i can do this locally by setting "shared_file_system_api_version" in the devstack-admin cloud profile in /etc/openstack/clouds.yaml - i was wondering if we can have that behavior occur in the tests
#openstack-sdks - 2021-07-12
12:52:53 opendevreview Uemit Seren proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add subnet pool module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/800463
13:48:04 opendevreview Uemit Seren proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add subnet pool module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/800463
14:29:09 opendevreview Uemit Seren proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add subnet pool module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/800463
14:47:11 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/train: [stable-only] Cap bandit to 1.6.2, bump lower-constraints https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/799690
14:47:11 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/train: Fix reverted osc-lib interface change https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/799662
14:54:39 opendevreview Uemit Seren proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add extra_specs attribute to network and router https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/800492
20:02:38 opendevreview Uemit Seren proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add subnet pool module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/800463
21:24:15 opendevreview Uemit Seren proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add subnet pool module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/800463
#openstack-sdks - 2021-07-13
02:23:16 opendevreview Zane Bitter proposed openstack/cliff master: Colourise and automatically page help output https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/799344
02:23:17 opendevreview Zane Bitter proposed openstack/cliff master: Automatically page interactive root help output https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/799345
08:14:42 opendevreview Uemit Seren proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add subnet pool module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/800463
09:37:42 opendevreview Uemit Seren proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add subnet pool module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/800463
10:10:53 stephenfin diablo_rojo_phone: I totally forgot to send you stuff for students to work on. Sorry! /o\ I assume we're past that?
10:20:04 stephenfin gtema: Can you look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/799662 and its predecessor (which fixes stable/train for OSC)?
10:20:14 gtema yupp
10:20:38 stephenfin gtema: Also, if you want another stable core on OSC/SDK then I'm happy to help out. I'm stable on oslo so I know the rules
10:20:51 gtema :)
10:20:56 gtema cool
10:21:23 gtema actually you should be, since currently all cores are maintainers if I remember correctly
10:21:34 stephenfin it doesn't appear so
10:21:41 gtema ok, will check
10:56:56 diablo_rojo_phone stephenfin: actually not. Thursday is the day of the event.
10:57:26 stephenfin diablo_rojo_phone: \o/ I can come up with some stuff after lunch if you still need it?
11:06:23 diablo_rojo_phone stephenfin: yes please! Works for me.
11:20:21 opendevreview Uemit Seren proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add subnet pool module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/800463
12:38:43 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-openstackclient stable/train: [stable-only] Cap bandit to 1.6.2, bump lower-constraints https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/799690
12:38:47 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-openstackclient stable/train: Fix reverted osc-lib interface change https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/799662
13:25:32 opendevreview Uemit Seren proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add subnet pool module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/800463
14:07:02 opendevreview Uemit Seren proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add subnet pool module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/800463
19:08:41 stephenfin diablo_rojo_phone: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2009054
19:15:22 diablo_rojo_phone stephenfin: thanks!
19:33:49 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: volume: Add 'volume transfer request create --(no-)snapshots' option https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/800715
#openstack-sdks - 2021-07-14
15:09:58 gshippey any possibility on getting feedback on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/799508? Looking to add support for keystone service providers, first time contributing to this project
17:00:12 gouthamr gtema diablo_rojo_phone: have you folks had any further thoughts on adding one/more manila reviewers?
17:01:33 gtema Guys, you need to start reviewing patches yourself. If we add you as reviewers, but you do not review - why's that?
17:01:46 gtema From manilla patches only one was reviewed by you
17:03:22 gouthamr gtema: ? sorry, i perhaps missed review notifications
17:04:14 gtema From around 10 manila patches only one was finally approved by you. Others had some iterations, but are now not reviewed
17:04:20 gouthamr yes
17:04:47 gtema And this is normally a signal for me when I see you approve the patch
17:04:59 gouthamr i've been looking at these; i can add my comments there
17:08:35 gouthamr so if you see a +1 from one of us, you're looking to treat that as a +2?
17:09:24 gouthamr i'm okay with that - just want to know what the operating procedure should be around here :)
17:10:17 gouthamr i'd love to see https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/796040 merge for one - its been worked on for a while
17:41:04 gouthamr gtema: hey you might know the answer to my prior queries to this channel - i'd like to specify a microversion for a particular SDK call; is this possible today?
17:41:29 gouthamr i tried doing something like this: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/799208/2/openstack/tests/functional/shared_file_system/base.py
17:41:34 gouthamr but it didn't seem to have an effect
#openstack-sdks - 2021-07-15
11:33:08 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Replace deprecated inspect.getargspec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/800918
11:37:54 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Replace deprecated inspect.getargspec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/800918
#openstack-sdks - 2021-07-17
03:14:52 opendevreview Cuong proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add protocol listener octavia https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/801176
#openstack-sdks - 2021-07-19
11:08:45 opendevreview Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Wait for pool to be active and online https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/801286
13:28:45 opendevreview Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add protocol listener octavia https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/801176
20:39:11 opendevreview Uemit Seren proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add extra_specs attribute to network and router https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/800492
#openstack-sdks - 2021-07-20
09:26:46 opendevreview Uemit Seren proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add extra_specs attribute to network and router https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/800492
16:42:34 mchlumsky Hi! :)
16:42:34 mchlumsky I am using the openstacksdk and I am trying to list all the users in a particular group (in keystone). There's an endpoint for it (https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/identity/v3/index.html?expanded=id627-detail#list-users-in-group) but I can't find an equivalent in the openstacksdk. Did I miss it somehow?
17:06:03 gtema mchlumsky sadly right now it's not implemented, but it is rather easy to do so. I'll look if I find time doing that shortly
17:06:26 opendevreview Merged openstack/cliff master: Add conflict_handler parameter as attribut in Command class https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/794792
17:33:47 mchlumsky gtema thank you! :)
21:17:53 opendevreview Uemit Seren proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add extra params to create_router & create_network https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/801535
#openstack-sdks - 2021-07-22
14:27:17 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Remove block storage v2 support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/801864
14:36:32 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Remove block storage v2 func tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/801864
14:40:33 gibi hi! you might noticed the openstacksdk-functional-devstack job started to fail since cinder merged the v2 api removal in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/792299
14:40:54 gibi I proposed the removal of the v2 func test from the job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/801864 to unblock the gate
14:57:05 gmann gibi: also we should have test v2 as separate job and default jobs test to v3 only. that is how we did in tempest integration jobs
14:59:08 gtema SDK has a contract to work on older clouds (not only for OSC, but also ansible collections, Zuul, etc). Dropping v2 support is definitely not the way we will go. Dropping tests seems ok, but I will check for a possibility to check whether specific version is available (in some cases we have skipTest if service is not available)
15:01:46 gibi gtema: ack. I've limited experience in sdk so I follow any lead. I just wanted to unblock the gate
15:02:16 gtema clear. If I am not able to find alternative solution in 1-2 hours I will approve the patch
15:02:27 gibi gtema: thanks. I appreciate it!
15:02:35 gtema then we can revert the tests with some logic
15:06:35 gmann gtema: gibi we can skip in v2 test in job
15:06:45 gmann I can try after TC meeting
15:07:14 gibi gmann: feel free to take over my patch I will probably disappeare in a hour or so
15:07:41 gmann gibi: I can do in separate and then we can discuss best way to remove v2 in your patch ?
15:07:59 gibi that works for me too
15:41:43 opendevreview Ghanshyam proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Skip block_storage.v2 test in functional job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/801872
15:42:57 gmann gtema: ^^
16:01:57 opendevreview Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Extend has_version function to accept version parameter https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/801900

Earlier   Later