| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2021-05-14 | |||
| 14:17:09 | slaweq | I hope it's the last missing part which is preventing us with moving on with neutronclient deprecation | |
| 14:17:09 | slaweq | I hope it's the last missing part which is preventing us with moving on with neutronclient deprecation | |
| 14:17:42 | slaweq | gtema: I see that 2 tests in osc-functional-devstack and osc-functional-devstack-tips are failing but I think it's not related to that patch at all | |
| 14:17:42 | slaweq | gtema: I see that 2 tests in osc-functional-devstack and osc-functional-devstack-tips are failing but I think it's not related to that patch at all | |
| 14:17:49 | slaweq | gtema: thx | |
| 14:18:05 | gtema | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/790393 - please check it | |
| 14:18:05 | gtema | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/790393 - please check it | |
| 14:18:13 | gtema | this should fix this failure | |
| 14:18:13 | gtema | this should fix this failure | |
| 14:19:14 | slaweq | gtema: thx | |
| 14:19:17 | slaweq | looks good for me | |
| 14:19:18 | slaweq | looks good for me | |
| 14:19:48 | gtema | thks | |
| 14:23:54 | amotoki | slaweq: sorry for not reviewing the coresponding sdk patch. will look the above patch. | |
| 14:23:54 | amotoki | slaweq: sorry for not reviewing the coresponding sdk patch. will look the above patch. | |
| 14:24:12 | slaweq | amotoki: no problem, sdk patch is already merged and released :) | |
| 14:24:12 | slaweq | amotoki: no problem, sdk patch is already merged and released :) | |
| 14:24:34 | slaweq | now, I hope that osc approach will be ok and we will be able to move on :) | |
| 14:24:35 | slaweq | now, I hope that osc approach will be ok and we will be able to move on :) | |
| 14:24:36 | amotoki | slaweq: yeah, I know | |
| 14:24:36 | amotoki | slaweq: yeah, I know | |
| 14:24:41 | slaweq | :) | |
| 14:24:42 | slaweq | :) | |
| 14:33:33 | gtema | mordred, if you are here around I would appreciate help in figuring out why https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/791023 doesn't help getting func tests running on "r1" feature branch | |
| 14:33:33 | gtema | mordred, if you are here around I would appreciate help in figuring out why https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/791023 doesn't help getting func tests running on "r1" feature branch | |
| 14:35:09 | mordred | You shouldn't need that ... Zuul should fall back to master of there are not matching branches in the other repos | |
| 14:35:10 | mordred | You shouldn't need that ... Zuul should fall back to master of there are not matching branches in the other repos | |
| 14:35:38 | gtema | apparently it doesn't do that - for some reason in not a single patch func tests are running | |
| 14:35:39 | gtema | apparently it doesn't do that - for some reason in not a single patch func tests are running | |
| 14:41:18 | mordred | Hrm | |
| 14:41:18 | mordred | Hrm | |
| 14:44:50 | mordred | corvus: ^^ if you have a spare couple of seconds - sdk has a feature branch and the functional tests aren't running on it. I don't see any explicit branch matchers or anything like that | |
| 14:44:50 | mordred | corvus: ^^ if you have a spare couple of seconds - sdk has a feature branch and the functional tests aren't running on it. I don't see any explicit branch matchers or anything like that | |
| 14:45:26 | mordred | and I'm curious what part of my zuul knowledge has atrophied | |
| 14:45:26 | mordred | and I'm curious what part of my zuul knowledge has atrophied | |
| 14:45:57 | gtema | :) same for me, I'm also digging through docs, code, results and can't get it | |
| 14:45:57 | gtema | :) same for me, I'm also digging through docs, code, results and can't get it | |
| 14:46:20 | mordred | yeah. it's like - there's a nagging thing in the back of my brain telling me there is a reason that I should know | |
| 14:46:20 | mordred | yeah. it's like - there's a nagging thing in the back of my brain telling me there is a reason that I should know | |
| 14:47:12 | gtema | p.s. I hate cloud layer - only for identity and block storage I have already produced so many patches, that it is enough for some months of reviews | |
| 14:47:12 | gtema | p.s. I hate cloud layer - only for identity and block storage I have already produced so many patches, that it is enough for some months of reviews | |
| 14:47:40 | gtema | you touch a tiny things and everything falls apart | |
| 14:47:40 | gtema | you touch a tiny things and everything falls apart | |
| 14:49:48 | mordred | yeah. I can't remember if I said it or not - but I've been toying with the idea in my head of reworking the nodepool openstack driver to not need the various advanced features we have in the cloud layer | |
| 14:49:48 | mordred | yeah. I can't remember if I said it or not - but I've been toying with the idea in my head of reworking the nodepool openstack driver to not need the various advanced features we have in the cloud layer | |
| 14:50:00 | mordred | so that we could rethink it all from the sdk side | |
| 14:50:00 | mordred | so that we could rethink it all from the sdk side | |
| 14:50:21 | gtema | you haven't | |
| 14:50:21 | gtema | you haven't | |
| 14:50:39 | mordred | because, let's be honest - half of the cloud layer is to deal with rackspace. and the other half is to handle conditions that haven't been a real issue out in the wild in many years | |
| 14:50:39 | mordred | because, let's be honest - half of the cloud layer is to deal with rackspace. and the other half is to handle conditions that haven't been a real issue out in the wild in many years | |
| 14:50:41 | gtema | in any way, I think cloud layer is useful (in general) | |
| 14:50:41 | gtema | in any way, I think cloud layer is useful (in general) | |
| 14:51:26 | gtema | generally touching it now I find tons of cases where we miss something in proxy/resource, so mostly useful findings | |
| 14:51:26 | gtema | generally touching it now I find tons of cases where we miss something in proxy/resource, so mostly useful findings | |
| 14:51:32 | gtema | but so much work | |
| 14:51:33 | gtema | but so much work | |
| 14:51:46 | mordred | oh - yeah - I mean I think the api is good - but there's also several places where it's too complex to understand | |
| 14:51:46 | mordred | oh - yeah - I mean I think the api is good - but there's also several places where it's too complex to understand | |
| 14:52:00 | mordred | and I'm not sure all of those places are as 100% needed as they were when they were written | |
| 14:52:01 | mordred | and I'm not sure all of those places are as 100% needed as they were when they were written | |
| 14:52:18 | gtema | I spent yesterday whole day rewriting ONLY role assignments to come from proxy directly | |
| 14:52:18 | gtema | I spent yesterday whole day rewriting ONLY role assignments to come from proxy directly | |
| 14:52:26 | mordred | jeez | |
| 14:52:26 | mordred | jeez | |
| 14:53:27 | gtema | btw, I have an idea of integrating caching directly into resource and not on cloud - this may help in other places | |
| 14:53:27 | gtema | btw, I have an idea of integrating caching directly into resource and not on cloud - this may help in other places | |
| 14:53:48 | gtema | but before this I need to complete this cloud layer crazyness | |
| 14:53:48 | gtema | but before this I need to complete this cloud layer crazyness | |
| 15:56:31 | mordred | ++ | |
| 15:56:31 | mordred | ++ | |
| 18:03:28 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Extend functional test of image https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/790393 | |
| 18:03:28 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Extend functional test of image https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/790393 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2021-05-17 | |||
| 07:19:09 | slaweq | frickler: hi, can You check my comments in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/791315 ? thx in advance | |
| 07:19:10 | slaweq | frickler: hi, can You check my comments in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/791315 ? thx in advance | |
| 08:20:43 | frickler | slaweq: commented, thx for reminding me. I'd be interested to see what others think about this | |
| 08:20:43 | frickler | slaweq: commented, thx for reminding me. I'd be interested to see what others think about this | |
| 08:44:17 | openstackgerrit | Polina Gubina proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add IPsecSiteConnection resource and proxy layer functionality for it https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/791140 | |
| 09:33:16 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/os-api-ref master: Replace 'add_stylesheet', 'add_javascript' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-api-ref/+/765788 | |
| 09:33:16 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/os-api-ref master: Replace 'add_stylesheet', 'add_javascript' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-api-ref/+/765788 | |
| 09:42:50 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/os-api-ref master: Switch testing to Xena testing runtime https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-api-ref/+/788896 | |
| 09:42:50 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/os-api-ref master: Switch testing to Xena testing runtime https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-api-ref/+/788896 | |
| 10:20:59 | openstackgerrit | Polina Gubina proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add IPsecSiteConnection resource and proxy layer functionality for it https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/791140 | |
| 10:20:59 | openstackgerrit | Polina Gubina proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add IPsecSiteConnection resource and proxy layer functionality for it https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/791140 | |
| 15:20:48 | sum12 | I tried searching for an example but couldnt find any. and its not very clear from the code. | |
| 15:20:48 | sum12 | I tried searching for an example but couldnt find any. and its not very clear from the code. | |
| 15:21:25 | sum12 | is it possible to have service specific credentials including region passed to the Connection object ? | |
| 15:21:25 | sum12 | is it possible to have service specific credentials including region passed to the Connection object ? | |
| 15:22:56 | sum12 | i guess regions can be done but not credentials (username,password) . Correct ? | |
| 15:22:56 | sum12 | i guess regions can be done but not credentials (username,password) . Correct ? | |
| 15:41:16 | mordred | sum12: the system isn't really set up for individual services to have their own credentials or their own region. a Connection is a connection to a region of a cloud and the credentials are the credentials to get a keystone token for that region. if you have a different set of credentials for a service or it has some specific region, what you'll want to do is just make a Connection dedicated for that region/user combo and only use it for the | |
| 15:41:16 | mordred | relevant service | |
| 15:41:16 | mordred | sum12: the system isn't really set up for individual services to have their own credentials or their own region. a Connection is a connection to a region of a cloud and the credentials are the credentials to get a keystone token for that region. if you have a different set of credentials for a service or it has some specific region, what you'll want to do is just make a Connection dedicated for that region/user combo and only use it for the | |
| 15:41:16 | mordred | relevant service | |
| 15:43:53 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add compute microversion 2.79 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/790900 | |
| 15:43:54 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add compute microversion 2.79 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/790900 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2021-05-18 | |||
| 09:25:05 | openstackgerrit | Georgina Shippey proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update checks for validate_certs in openstack_cloud_from_module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/791291 | |
| 16:30:21 | openstackgerrit | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add support to setting image tags https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/783850 | |
| 16:30:21 | openstackgerrit | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add support to setting image tags https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/783850 | |
| 18:53:37 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add support to setting image tags https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/783850 | |