| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2021-04-21 | |||
| 10:40:45 | gtema | not that I know of | |
| 10:40:45 | gtema | not that I know of | |
| 10:41:41 | aef | but is it possible? | |
| 10:41:41 | aef | but is it possible? | |
| 10:42:17 | gtema | should be | |
| 10:42:34 | gtema | you would (I guess) need to set auth_type to application_credential | |
| 10:42:34 | gtema | you would (I guess) need to set auth_type to application_credential | |
| 10:42:48 | gtema | and pass also application_credential_{id,secret,name} | |
| 10:42:48 | gtema | and pass also application_credential_{id,secret,name} | |
| 10:45:24 | aef | do you think thats possible through CLI? | |
| 10:45:24 | aef | do you think thats possible through CLI? | |
| 10:46:17 | gtema | should be | |
| 10:46:17 | gtema | should be | |
| 10:49:55 | aef | sadly, the CLI says that it doesn't know a plugin named application_credential | |
| 10:49:55 | aef | sadly, the CLI says that it doesn't know a plugin named application_credential | |
| 10:50:12 | aef | is that available separately somewhere? | |
| 10:50:12 | aef | is that available separately somewhere? | |
| 13:12:55 | noonedeadpunk | gtema: talking about review time - would be awesome to hear about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/783849 as I obviously have missed some testing | |
| 13:12:55 | noonedeadpunk | gtema: talking about review time - would be awesome to hear about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/783849 as I obviously have missed some testing | |
| 13:13:27 | gtema_ | blame on me | |
| 13:13:27 | gtema_ | blame on me | |
| 14:04:08 | openstackgerrit | David Vallee Delisle proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/train: [train-only] lower-constraint and test-requirements https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/787374 | |
| 14:04:34 | openstackgerrit | David Vallee Delisle proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/train: compute: Add 'server group create --rule' option https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/787245 | |
| 15:05:07 | sum12 | I havent registered for the PTG. Do I need to, to get the passcode for the room ? | |
| 15:05:07 | sum12 | I havent registered for the PTG. Do I need to, to get the passcode for the room ? | |
| 15:05:37 | stephenfin | sum12: You shouldn't | |
| 15:05:37 | stephenfin | sum12: You shouldn't | |
| 15:06:12 | stephenfin | gtema_: I'm in the nova sessions so I won't be able to attend the SDK/OSC sessions, unfortunately | |
| 15:06:12 | stephenfin | gtema_: I'm in the nova sessions so I won't be able to attend the SDK/OSC sessions, unfortunately | |
| 15:07:55 | sum12 | so how do I get the passcode ? | |
| 15:07:55 | sum12 | so how do I get the passcode ? | |
| 15:13:08 | sum12 | gtema_:^ | |
| 15:13:08 | sum12 | gtema_:^ | |
| 15:16:46 | zimmerry_ | sum12: https://www.openstack.org/ptg/rooms/grizzly | |
| 15:16:46 | zimmerry_ | sum12: https://www.openstack.org/ptg/rooms/grizzly | |
| 17:11:45 | openstackgerrit | Ryan Zimmerman proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add compute microversion 2.77 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786169 | |
| 17:11:45 | openstackgerrit | Ryan Zimmerman proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add compute microversion 2.77 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786169 | |
| 18:01:15 | openstackgerrit | David Vallee Delisle proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/train: [train-only] lower-constraint and test-requirements https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/787374 | |
| 18:05:00 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add tags option to the image upload https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/783849 | |
| 18:05:01 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add tags option to the image upload https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/783849 | |
| 18:12:17 | openstackgerrit | David Vallee Delisle proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/train: compute: Add 'server group create --rule' option https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/787245 | |
| 18:26:59 | melwitt | gmann: any idea why lower-constraints job on stable/train in osc ^ would be failing with "openstacksdk 0.17.0 depends on keystoneauth1>=3.8.0" https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/71b19e3818584aa7854e2347e080bec2/log/job-output.txt#818 when the patch is not requiring any newer version of openstacksdk? | |
| 18:26:59 | melwitt | gmann: any idea why lower-constraints job on stable/train in osc ^ would be failing with "openstacksdk 0.17.0 depends on keystoneauth1>=3.8.0" https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/71b19e3818584aa7854e2347e080bec2/log/job-output.txt#818 when the patch is not requiring any newer version of openstacksdk? | |
| 18:33:34 | gmann | melwitt: checking | |
| 18:33:34 | gmann | melwitt: checking | |
| 18:34:07 | gmann | melwitt: this one https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/blob/0.17.0/lower-constraints.txt#L17 | |
| 18:34:07 | gmann | melwitt: this one https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/blob/0.17.0/lower-constraints.txt#L17 | |
| 18:34:30 | melwitt | thanks gmann. I can't figure out whether this is just l-c job broken on stable/train unrelated to the patch | |
| 18:34:30 | melwitt | thanks gmann. I can't figure out whether this is just l-c job broken on stable/train unrelated to the patch | |
| 18:34:41 | melwitt | yeah | |
| 18:34:41 | melwitt | yeah | |
| 18:34:45 | gmann | yeah its already broken | |
| 18:34:45 | gmann | yeah its already broken | |
| 18:34:58 | gmann | i see this fix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/787374 | |
| 18:34:58 | gmann | i see this fix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/787374 | |
| 18:36:12 | melwitt | gmann: yeah heh, that's why I was asking. normally we don't bump min versions on stable branches but I get confused on the l-c job failures and when it's valid to bump them because of it? | |
| 18:36:12 | melwitt | gmann: yeah heh, that's why I was asking. normally we don't bump min versions on stable branches but I get confused on the l-c job failures and when it's valid to bump them because of it? | |
| 18:36:19 | gmann | that should fix it unless there are more l-c issue as they shows one by one | |
| 18:36:19 | gmann | that should fix it unless there are more l-c issue as they shows one by one | |
| 18:36:44 | gmann | melwitt: ohk, missed this '^^' :) | |
| 18:36:44 | gmann | melwitt: ohk, missed this '^^' :) | |
| 18:37:14 | melwitt | np, it's my fault I didn't mention it | |
| 18:37:14 | melwitt | np, it's my fault I didn't mention it | |
| 18:37:56 | gmann | melwitt: agree on stable branch and not to bump min. but most of those might have caused by pip resolver or distro things | |
| 18:37:56 | gmann | melwitt: agree on stable branch and not to bump min. but most of those might have caused by pip resolver or distro things | |
| 18:38:14 | gmann | it happened in many projects | |
| 18:38:14 | gmann | it happened in many projects | |
| 18:38:40 | melwitt | gmann: yeah, I have seen at a basic level but did not know details of what was involved (pip resolver or distro things) | |
| 18:38:41 | melwitt | gmann: yeah, I have seen at a basic level but did not know details of what was involved (pip resolver or distro things) | |
| 18:39:25 | melwitt | ok, my bad _dvd it looks like this is most likely fine based on what gmann has explained | |
| 18:39:25 | melwitt | ok, my bad _dvd it looks like this is most likely fine based on what gmann has explained | |
| 18:39:32 | gmann | distro is not updated on stable/train so it is most probably former one | |
| 18:39:32 | gmann | distro is not updated on stable/train so it is most probably former one | |
| 18:40:21 | _dvd | ok thanks | |
| 18:40:21 | _dvd | ok thanks | |
| 18:40:35 | melwitt | thank you for the explanation gmann++ | |
| 18:40:35 | melwitt | thank you for the explanation gmann++ | |
| 18:40:57 | gmann | np! | |
| 18:40:57 | gmann | np! | |
| 18:43:31 | openstackgerrit | David Vallee Delisle proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/train: [train-only] lower-constraint and test-requirements https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/787374 | |
| 18:43:31 | openstackgerrit | David Vallee Delisle proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/train: [train-only] lower-constraint and test-requirements https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/787374 | |
| 18:43:48 | openstackgerrit | David Vallee Delisle proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/train: compute: Add 'server group create --rule' option https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/787245 | |
| 18:43:48 | openstackgerrit | David Vallee Delisle proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/train: compute: Add 'server group create --rule' option https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/787245 | |
| 19:33:03 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add compute microversion 2.57 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/781131 | |
| 19:33:03 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add compute microversion 2.57 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/781131 | |
| 21:25:06 | twilit_dragon | diablo_rojo, just making sure: Are the methods within .../block_storage/v3/_proxy.py supposed to be sorted in any manner? Or do new methods get added towards the bottom of the class definition before all the private methods? | |
| 21:25:06 | twilit_dragon | diablo_rojo, just making sure: Are the methods within .../block_storage/v3/_proxy.py supposed to be sorted in any manner? Or do new methods get added towards the bottom of the class definition before all the private methods? | |
| 21:46:17 | mordred | no particular sort order | |
| 21:46:17 | mordred | no particular sort order | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2021-04-22 | |||
| 04:27:59 | frickler | can we get a sdk release with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786148 soon? | |
| 04:27:59 | frickler | can we get a sdk release with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786148 soon? | |
| 05:36:45 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Drop lower-constraints job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/773290 | |
| 05:36:45 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Drop lower-constraints job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/773290 | |
| 06:11:48 | openstackgerrit | Hudson Dahly proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for Messages resource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/777502 | |
| 08:33:12 | openstackgerrit | Ananya proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Migrating image module from AnsibleModule to OpenStackModule https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/774141 | |
| 08:33:12 | openstackgerrit | Ananya proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Migrating image module from AnsibleModule to OpenStackModule https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/774141 | |
| 09:06:20 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add compute microversion 2.77 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786169 | |
| 09:06:20 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add compute microversion 2.77 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786169 | |
| 09:24:29 | dtantsur | frickler: if you request a release, I can ack it | |
| 09:24:29 | dtantsur | frickler: if you request a release, I can ack it | |