Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2020-09-16
00:28:50 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Remove translation sections from setup.cfg https://review.opendev.org/723212
00:46:22 openstackgerrit Wenping Song proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Support create more than one device profile with one request https://review.opendev.org/752130
00:48:38 openstackgerrit Zihao Wang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Support boot from volume option volume-type https://review.opendev.org/751959
00:49:50 openstackgerrit Zihao Wang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Support boot from volume option volume-type https://review.opendev.org/751959
01:16:31 openstackgerrit Zihao Wang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Support boot from volume option volume-type https://review.opendev.org/751959
01:19:06 openstackgerrit Zihao Wang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Support boot from volume option volume-type https://review.opendev.org/751959
02:48:10 openstackgerrit Zihao Wang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Support boot from volume option volume-type https://review.opendev.org/751959
08:56:05 openstackgerrit jayaditya gupta proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Provides live migration abort feature in openstackclient https://review.opendev.org/716960
09:33:53 openstackgerrit jayaditya gupta proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Provide support for live-migration-force-complete command in openstackclient https://review.opendev.org/721594
09:56:35 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add ALPN support to load balancer listener https://review.opendev.org/746770
09:56:36 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Don't set list_type to dict for server groups. https://review.opendev.org/749381
09:56:42 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Squeeze SnapshotDetail class into Snapshot https://review.opendev.org/749971
10:51:33 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Increase IRONIC_VM_SPECS_RAM to avoid KP https://review.opendev.org/751584
11:41:25 openstackgerrit Rafael Weingärtner proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Deprecate 'remote_ip_prefix' parameter in metering label rules https://review.opendev.org/746578
11:45:06 nightmare_unreal gtema: can you take a look : https://review.opendev.org/#/c/733573/ .when you have time. Thanks
11:45:17 gtema will try to
11:45:47 nightmare_unreal thank you
11:48:33 openstackgerrit Rafael Weingärtner proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add source_ip_prefix and destination_ip_prefix to metering label rules https://review.opendev.org/746586
17:04:58 fungi i don't suppose anybody knows what "load" subcommand is being described here, and why it would have been removed? http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-September/017311.html
17:05:11 fungi i went hunting in release notes and commit history, but found no mention
18:54:02 mordred fungi: I'm not here - but this sounds like it could be something something underlying cliff or cmd2. I know cmd2 has the ability to script interactions: https://cmd2.readthedocs.io/en/latest/features/scripting.html ... but I don't know anything specific about an osc load command
18:55:17 fungi mordred: much appreciated!
#openstack-sdks - 2020-09-17
10:29:26 openstackgerrit Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Provide the default get_auth_ref implementation https://review.opendev.org/747670
13:01:47 vinay_m hi all one doubt , is there any option of implementing pagination from CLI
13:14:40 nightmare_unreal --marker , --limit flag
13:14:45 nightmare_unreal docs : https://docs.openstack.org/python-openstackclient/pike/contributor/command-options.html
15:04:52 vinay_m thank you nightmare_unreal
#openstack-sdks - 2020-09-18
03:09:34 brinzhang0 Hi osc core team, hope you can review the server migration CLI support patch, https://review.opendev.org/#/c/675304
03:13:03 brinzhang0 thanks
03:27:41 openstackgerrit Zihao Wang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: bump py37 to py38 in tox.ini https://review.opendev.org/752609
03:51:26 openstackgerrit Zihao Wang proposed openstack/osc-lib master: bump py37 to py38 in tox.ini https://review.opendev.org/752613
03:57:00 openstackgerrit Zihao Wang proposed openstack/osc-lib master: bump py37 to py38 in tox.ini https://review.opendev.org/752613
06:30:25 openstackgerrit likui proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Remove six.PY2 https://review.opendev.org/750288
06:32:32 openstackgerrit Zihao Wang proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Bump hacking min version to 3.0.1 https://review.opendev.org/752624
#openstack-sdks - 2020-09-19
08:30:00 openstackgerrit Jens Harbott (frickler) proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Compute: Add tag support for server add port https://review.opendev.org/580977
#openstack-sdks - 2020-09-21
12:22:16 nightmare_unreal Hello this patch just has workflow check remaining : https://review.opendev.org/#/c/733573/ .
16:52:22 openstackgerrit Marta Laís de Macedo Dantas proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: [WIP] Volume Target support for Ironic on OpenStack SDK https://review.opendev.org/753092
16:52:22 openstackgerrit Marta Laís de Macedo Dantas proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: [WIP] Volume Target support for Ironic on OpenStack SDK https://review.opendev.org/753092
18:13:23 openstackgerrit Sean McGinnis proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Switch to wallaby job template https://review.opendev.org/753114
18:14:08 openstackgerrit Sean McGinnis proposed openstack/keystoneauth stable/victoria: Switch to victoria job template https://review.opendev.org/753115
18:37:50 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/keystoneauth stable/victoria: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/victoria https://review.opendev.org/751053
#openstack-sdks - 2020-09-22
00:58:01 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add server migration list CLI https://review.opendev.org/675304
05:12:09 openstackgerrit Adit Sarfaty proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Remove None valued network quota entries https://review.opendev.org/746392
06:17:20 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add server migration list CLI https://review.opendev.org/675304
06:40:54 openstackgerrit wu.shiming proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: bump py37 to py38 in tox.ini https://review.opendev.org/753225
07:32:37 openstackgerrit likui proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Remove six.PY2 https://review.opendev.org/750288
09:45:40 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-service-types master: Fix pep8 testing for ubuntu focal https://review.opendev.org/750815
10:58:26 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add server migration list CLI https://review.opendev.org/675304
11:32:19 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/microversion-parse master: Adding pre-commit https://review.opendev.org/742156
11:33:01 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-api-ref master: Adding pre-commit https://review.opendev.org/742159
12:19:11 brinzhang0 Hi all, can someone explain what benefits the introduction of openstacksdk can bring us? Compared to appclient
12:48:49 fungi brinzhang0: who is "us" in your question? the primary benefit is to users of openstack deployments, and the idea that they only need one consistently architected library to interface with the 50+ different openstack apis (instead of having to install and keep track of calling into 50+ different libraries)
13:05:02 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/requestsexceptions master: Fix pep8 testing for ubuntu focal https://review.opendev.org/750817
13:15:47 openstackgerrit Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: MAke it possible to create a health monitor to a pool https://review.opendev.org/753306
13:23:07 brinzhang0 fungi: got it, I think I have got the answer in #openstack-nova channel, thanks too ^^
14:10:32 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/osc-lib master: Fix l-c testing for ubuntu focal https://review.opendev.org/750830
14:33:21 dtantsur gtema: hey, any objections to an sdk release? we still need the unreleased fix for _fix_argv
14:33:39 gtema only after we land some more stuff
14:33:44 gtema which is already there
14:34:07 gtema https://review.opendev.org/#/c/751234/
14:34:11 gtema https://review.opendev.org/#/c/750072/
14:34:31 gtema https://review.opendev.org/#/c/746578/
14:34:35 gtema https://review.opendev.org/#/c/746586/
14:35:02 dtantsur I don't think it's far to hold a serious bug fix for more than 1k loc of features..
14:35:20 gtema I need those to proceed with OSC
14:35:43 gtema and waiting for 2 weeks already
14:37:02 gtema if you promise me to review those this week and cut additional release next week - I am fine
14:37:12 gtema :D
14:37:32 dtantsur I can promise it, although I should let you know that I don't like your approach to this
14:37:48 gtema why?
14:38:42 dtantsur you're hold up issuing a fix for consumer problems based on the features you personally need
14:38:46 dtantsur * holding
14:39:06 gtema me personally? This is a joke, not?
14:39:31 dtantsur no, I'm serious
14:39:38 gtema I am not holding a fix. I just want us to move with features, and not only bugs
14:40:05 dtantsur https://review.opendev.org/#/c/746578/ has an unmerged dependency
14:40:10 gtema everybody complains OSC sucks, but nobody work on it. And nobody even caring doing review for work
14:40:43 gtema that is is what really not good
14:41:22 dtantsur hmm, sure, let's keep a high impact bug, so that ironic folks regret using openstacksdk or...?
14:41:32 gtema didn't noticed one patch is not yet merged
14:41:35 gtema okay
14:42:06 gtema would you create release change or should I do?
14:42:32 dtantsur like, I hear your pain. but now it's the 2 of us and hberaud, right?
14:42:45 dtantsur and I suspect only you is actually paid to work on SDK/OSC
14:42:46 gtema yes
14:42:59 gtema nope, I am not paid for that
14:43:04 dtantsur okay, even worse
14:43:19 dtantsur I'm trying my best with SDK reviews, but I have a lot of stuff happening on both ironic upstream and RH downstream fronts
14:44:01 dtantsur gtema: I can request a release. we can release as often as we want to, realistically. even every week.
14:44:03 gtema I can suggest introducing 2-weeks rule for changes by cores: no objections in 2 weeks - okay for self merge
14:44:06 gtema what do you think?
14:44:30 dtantsur I'd switch to 1x +2 for cores (similar to what is done for stable branches)
14:44:47 gtema but we don't have a single +2
14:44:56 gtema my changes are there for 2 weeks
14:45:46 gtema that is the problem - there are no reviews at all, neither in SDK nor in OSC
14:46:57 gtema just permanently pinging somebody else for a review is like: switch the light off and go home
14:48:39 dtantsur gtema: please let me know if you want to address minor issues in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/751234/ or in a follow-up
14:49:04 gtema followup
14:53:42 dtantsur same for https://review.opendev.org/#/c/750072/
14:53:56 gtema okay, thanks

Earlier   Later