| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2020-08-25 | |||
| 15:46:55 | dtantsur | I think our baremetal CLI should work the same as the SDK | |
| 15:48:05 | mordred | dtantsur: https://docs.openstack.org/openstacksdk/latest/user/config/configuration.html#ssl-settings | |
| 15:49:21 | dtantsur | we have docs \o/ I think I did try cacert though.. | |
| 15:50:19 | frickler | mordred: some discussion in #-nova going on about OSC support for interface tags and general strategy, if you might want to join or read logs | |
| 16:14:55 | dtantsur | yeah, cacert does not work for us as well, only explicit --os-cacert | |
| 16:15:02 | dtantsur | will look into that tomorrow | |
| 16:15:50 | dtantsur | pfff, ignore me, the cacert record hasn't been rendered in clouds.yaml (thank you ansible) | |
| 16:16:56 | gtema | and a great thank you ansible from me as well for such a wonderful documentation | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2020-08-26 | |||
| 01:13:13 | openstackgerrit | Zane Bitter proposed openstack/cliff master: Exit gracefully on Ctrl-C https://review.opendev.org/748060 | |
| 07:19:26 | openstackgerrit | Lewis Denny proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add API check for server_groups.create https://review.opendev.org/736104 | |
| 08:51:13 | stephenfin | mordred: At some point this week, could you give me some advice on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/745375/ (adding proper support for placement to openstacksdk) | |
| 08:52:17 | stephenfin | mordred: I'm happy to do the work but I'd like to make sure it makes sense and I don't know enough about keystoneauth to resolve the "older placement doesn't expose API stability information" issue yet | |
| 10:35:57 | openstackgerrit | Slawek Kaplonski proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Support tagging Neutron ports on creation https://review.opendev.org/723280 | |
| 13:09:08 | dtantsur | can someone please check my memory: I think keystone is moving away from the public/internal/admin split? | |
| 13:09:20 | dtantsur | I mean, both for keystone itself and services in the catalog? | |
| 13:09:25 | gtema_ | heh? | |
| 13:09:34 | dtantsur | should we stop creating internal and admin endpoints in bifrost? | |
| 13:09:48 | gtema_ | I never heard something like that | |
| 13:31:14 | dtantsur | mordred: any opinion on ^^ | |
| 13:40:23 | mordred | dtantsur: admin endpoints are a legacy thing. They were only ever used for keystone itself | |
| 13:40:51 | mordred | internal are still useful for public/private split | |
| 13:40:56 | dtantsur | mordred: so, can we just abruptly stop creating them? or will people be potentially unhappy? | |
| 13:40:59 | dtantsur | I mean, the admin ones | |
| 13:41:27 | mordred | Yup. | |
| 13:41:47 | mordred | Just stop making them. Nobody should be using them anywhere | |
| 13:55:09 | dtantsur | k thx | |
| 14:27:49 | frickler | dtantsur: mordred: except some services still seem to need them, like heat I think, which has blocked me from removing the admin endpoint from devstack. ymmv | |
| 14:29:58 | frickler | if anyone wants to help with that https://review.opendev.org/735472 they're welcome | |
| 14:32:32 | dtantsur | sigh | |
| 15:23:18 | openstackgerrit | Zane Bitter proposed openstack/cliff master: Exit gracefully on Ctrl-C https://review.opendev.org/748060 | |
| 20:07:06 | openstackgerrit | Slawek Kaplonski proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Support tagging Neutron ports on creation https://review.opendev.org/723280 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2020-08-27 | |||
| 06:56:52 | openstackgerrit | Slawek Kaplonski proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Support tagging Neutron ports on creation https://review.opendev.org/723280 | |
| 16:00:29 | elmiko | API SIG office hour open | |
| 16:03:01 | dtantsur | o/ | |
| 16:03:12 | dtantsur | I may soon lose the ability to show up at this slot.. | |
| 16:03:36 | dtantsur | this is the time I'll probably go climbing more or less regularly | |
| 16:04:14 | gtema | we were actually discussing dropping office hour in favor of SDK team meetings | |
| 16:04:45 | dtantsur | yeah. and I'd appreciate an earlier slot, at least one hour earlier | |
| 16:05:32 | gtema | yeah, in summer time it's 18:00 and pretty awkward | |
| 16:06:11 | dtantsur | usually it's not a problem for me since I work until 7pm. but if I go climbing, I'll probably leave home around 7 | |
| 16:09:32 | elmiko | dtantsur: ack, and yeah i've been meaning to send a messaged to the list announcing the end of sig-api office hourse | |
| 16:10:07 | elmiko | i think at this point we have plenty of data to suggest that this meeting is no longer needed | |
| 16:10:58 | dtantsur | ++ | |
| 16:11:02 | gtema | ++ | |
| 16:15:26 | elmiko | i will get off my butt and write that email ;) | |
| 16:15:46 | gtema | :) | |
| 20:24:56 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Show words indicating booted from volume for server image https://review.opendev.org/743429 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2020-08-28 | |||
| 11:31:28 | TomStappaerts | ||
| 14:53:48 | openstackgerrit | Maari Tamm proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP: Add support for shared file systems (manila) https://review.opendev.org/638782 | |
| 15:21:47 | slaweq | mordred: hi, can You please take a look at https://review.opendev.org/#/c/723280/ if You will have some time? I think it should be finally ready :) | |
| 20:51:07 | openstackgerrit | Thiago Paiva Brito proposed openstack/cliff master: Capturing argparse errors due to problem with cmd2 https://review.opendev.org/748753 | |
| 20:53:35 | openstackgerrit | Thiago Paiva Brito proposed openstack/cliff master: Capturing argparse errors due to problem with cmd2 https://review.opendev.org/748753 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2020-08-31 | |||
| 00:19:35 | openstackgerrit | Ian Wienand proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Switch nodepool test to containers https://review.opendev.org/748932 | |
| 11:37:57 | openstackgerrit | Yang JianFeng proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: [WIP] Add CRUD methods for Neutron router ndp proxy https://review.opendev.org/749036 | |
| 11:41:59 | openstackgerrit | Yang JianFeng proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: [WIP] Add router ndp proxy commands https://review.opendev.org/749038 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2020-09-01 | |||
| 17:58:07 | johnavp1989 | Hello. I'm hoping to submit a fix for this bug: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2007710 | |
| 17:58:49 | johnavp1989 | But I'm wondering what the state of python2 support is. Does python2 support need to be implemented or has it been dropped entirely at this point? | |
| 18:33:43 | smcginnis | johnavp1989: py2 support has been dropped for all but a few projects now. openstacksdk is one that has dropped it and only support python3.6 and later. (https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/setup.cfg#L15-L19) | |
| 19:38:19 | johnavp1989 | smcginnis: okay thank you | |
| 19:41:25 | openstackgerrit | John Petrini proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Don't set list_type to dict for server groups, this is not what the API returns. https://review.opendev.org/749381 | |
| 19:59:28 | openstackgerrit | John Petrini proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Don't set list_type to dict for server groups, this is not what the API returns. https://review.opendev.org/749381 | |
| 20:07:41 | openstackgerrit | John Petrini proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Don't set list_type to dict for server groups, this is not what the API returns. https://review.opendev.org/749381 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2020-09-02 | |||
| 12:52:47 | frickler | is anyone still working on microversion support for volume? I found https://review.opendev.org/695044 by dtroyer which does some preparation but what next? | |
| 13:05:49 | frickler | mordred: also is there any PTG activity planned for this team? or maybe the question should be: who's up as next ptl? :-/ | |
| 13:07:04 | frickler | slaweq: did you see my comments on 723280? I don't think we should break things for older clouds | |
| 13:41:50 | gtema | why, it's just a busy summer. | |
| 13:42:24 | slaweq | frickler: yes, I saw it but I didn't had time to change patch accordingly | |
| 13:42:25 | gtema | unfortunately there was no real work on microversions so far. And since there is no real movement since last PTG - no real topics to discuss | |
| 13:42:30 | slaweq | I will do that later this week probably | |
| 13:42:33 | slaweq | frickler: thx for review | |
| 13:42:34 | gtema | but agree, we should start planing | |
| 13:55:45 | nightmare_unreal | hello can someone take a look at these 2 patches. both are same but by different people . We need someone review to resolve this | |
| 13:55:57 | nightmare_unreal | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/740455/ , https://review.opendev.org/#/c/746405/ | |
| 13:57:49 | nightmare_unreal | both of these patches addresses the same issue. | |
| 17:24:24 | openstackgerrit | Rafael Weingärtner proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Introduce `schema_version` in the attribute mapping API https://review.opendev.org/749562 | |
| 17:24:24 | openstackgerrit | Rafael Weing채rtner proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Introduce `schema_version` in the attribute mapping API https://review.opendev.org/749562 | |
| 18:36:17 | openstackgerrit | Rafael Weingärtner proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Introduce `schema_version` in the federated attribute mapping API https://review.opendev.org/749572 | |
| 18:36:17 | openstackgerrit | Rafael Weing채rtner proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Introduce `schema_version` in the federated attribute mapping API https://review.opendev.org/749572 | |
| 20:26:17 | openstackgerrit | Rafael Weingärtner proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add source_ip_prefix and destination_ip_prefix to metering label rules https://review.opendev.org/749591 | |
| 20:26:17 | openstackgerrit | Rafael Weing채rtner proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add source_ip_prefix and destination_ip_prefix to metering label rules https://review.opendev.org/749591 | |
| 20:44:20 | openstackgerrit | Rafael Weingärtner proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add source_ip_prefix and destination_ip_prefix to metering label rules https://review.opendev.org/746586 | |
| 20:44:20 | openstackgerrit | Rafael Weing채rtner proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add source_ip_prefix and destination_ip_prefix to metering label rules https://review.opendev.org/746586 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2020-09-03 | |||
| 00:47:32 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add server migrate list CLI https://review.opendev.org/675304 | |
| 13:38:21 | nikparasyr | hello, i've noticed that for many resources such as projects, domains etc via the openstacksdk its not possible to get the tags of these resources | |
| 13:38:48 | nikparasyr | am i missing something or is that true? is there any blueprint to implement this? | |
| 13:39:04 | gtema | not all resources support tagging (not talking that resources you refer doesn't) | |
| 13:40:32 | gtema | generally a standard way to implement this is to mixin resource.TagMixin (https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/openstack/network/v2/port.py#L17) | |
| 13:40:51 | gtema | this will enable all standard tag operations | |
| 13:41:28 | gtema | and projects do that already, so there is support for tags there | |
| 13:41:36 | gtema | https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/openstack/identity/v3/project.py#L17 | |
| 13:42:11 | nikparasyr | domains dont: https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/openstack/identity/v3/domain.py#L17 | |
| 13:42:29 | nikparasyr | which was the resource i started looking at | |
| 13:43:06 | gtema | domains do not support tags as a feature at all | |
| 13:43:19 | gtema | it's nothing SDK can do about | |
| 13:44:26 | nikparasyr | hmmmmm, i thought they did but maybe im wrong, ( i actually have tagged domains that i do via terraform -> gophercloud ) but maybe im missing something | |
| 13:45:08 | nikparasyr | i'll have a look. this is a good starting point in any case. i might come back with more questions :P. thanks a lot | |
| 13:45:48 | gtema | are you talking about identity domain or something else? | |
| 13:46:20 | gtema | since I do not see terraform managing identity domains at all | |
| 13:48:00 | nikparasyr | yes about identity domain. via tf i do this via: https://www.terraform.io/docs/providers/openstack/r/identity_project_v3.html#is_domain but i have to double check gophercloud to see exactly how they have implemented it | |
| 13:48:38 | nikparasyr | but by creating it like this i can set tags, and via cli i can see them via a openstack domain show <id> and via the sdk i cannot | |