Posted	Nick	Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2020-03-20
15:23:01	nightmare_unreal	blank line error by tox
15:23:21	smcginnis	nightmare_unreal: If you want to push up an update to that review, I can take a look at it and see if I can figure out what's going on.
15:23:52	smcginnis	Based on https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/g2wfhXlK/error it looks like one file doesn't have a new line at the end, and the other might have two (so one extra?)
15:24:09	nightmare_unreal	in a minute I think i figured out :)
15:24:10	nightmare_unreal	thanks
15:24:20	smcginnis	Great! :)
15:51:03	openstackgerrit	jayaditya gupta proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: added fix for pep8, releasenote, test case for --force flag https://review.opendev.org/714153
16:01:07	openstackgerrit	jayaditya gupta proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: FIX for openstack quota set --force https://review.opendev.org/713881
17:07:25	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Update the content about Import Format https://review.opendev.org/569931
17:07:26	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Replace port 35357 with 5000 for "auth_url" https://review.opendev.org/583514
17:09:40	openstackgerrit	jayaditya gupta proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: FIX for openstack quota set --force https://review.opendev.org/713881
18:59:44	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Now we can add description for role creation in OSC https://review.opendev.org/484355
#openstack-sdks - 2020-03-21
17:10:16	openstackgerrit	jayaditya gupta proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: FIX for openstack quota set --force https://review.opendev.org/713881
#openstack-sdks - 2020-03-22
14:08:23	openstackgerrit	Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Run fetch-subunit-output role conditionally https://review.opendev.org/714302
14:13:29	openstackgerrit	Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add ansible stable-2.9 job and run 2.8 and 2.9 https://review.opendev.org/711471
14:14:35	sshnaidm	folks, please review these two patches ^^ dtantsur|afk mordred odyssey4me
19:13:48	openstackgerrit	Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/queens: Fix subnet host_routes error https://review.opendev.org/659545
21:36:47	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add dependencies for long jobs on linters https://review.opendev.org/714070
21:40:54	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add rocky, stein jobs https://review.opendev.org/714073
#openstack-sdks - 2020-03-23
01:28:34	openstackgerrit	Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add ansible stable-2.9 job and run 2.8 and 2.9 https://review.opendev.org/711471
01:33:50	openstackgerrit	Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Don't fetch subunit in jobs https://review.opendev.org/714342
01:37:48	openstackgerrit	Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: DNM test fetch_subunit https://review.opendev.org/714343
02:26:35	openstackgerrit	Sam Morrison proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add availability zone and availability zone profile resources to load balancer https://review.opendev.org/714345
04:19:58	openstackgerrit	Sam Morrison proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add availability zone and availability zone profile resources to load balancer https://review.opendev.org/714345
08:34:13	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Lay a foundation for the project cleanup https://review.opendev.org/700219
08:55:36	openstackgerrit	Mark Chappell proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for not including the ID in creation requests https://review.opendev.org/714120
09:01:26	openstackgerrit	Daniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Stop configuring install_command in tox and stop use pip. https://review.opendev.org/694510
09:17:02	openstackgerrit	Mark Chappell proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for Identity Providers https://review.opendev.org/714122
09:29:29	rpittau	good morning everyone, just a doubt looking at the code, in the service_description module, shouldn't we set skip_discovery to True for the proxy object if we have both endpoint_override and version_string? Precisely inside this "if" https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/openstack/service_description.py#L174
10:38:10	dtantsur	I'll look after the mandatory tea
10:59:00	dtantsur	rpittau: why so? there is still information to discover, e.g. the precise location of a major version or available microversions
11:09:45	rpittau	dtantsur: this is related to the migration of ironic-inspector to use openstacksdk for the ironic module, when running the functional test it fails with the current conf, I tracked down the issue to the discovery part between openstacksdk and keystone, when creating the proxy object
11:12:22	dtantsur	rpittau: if you have problems with discovery, it usually means you've got a wrong URL
11:12:31	dtantsur	and I do agree that the error message may be quite confusing
11:14:44	rpittau	dtantsur: yeah, the current config has endpoint_override=http://url , I tried with different ones with no luck
11:15:00	dtantsur	rpittau: unless you mock out keystoneauth, it will try accessing that
11:15:35	rpittau	dtantsur: I also tried that, maybe I'm mocking it in the wrong place :/
11:16:02	dtantsur	rpittau: just mock the hell out of get_client or how it's called now
11:16:11	dtantsur	I don't think it's useful to go deeper
11:22:38	rpittau	dtantsur: tried that too :/ again maybe I'm doing something wrong while mocking
11:23:04	dtantsur	rpittau: do you have a patch with get_client mocked? if it's mocked properly, it cannot end up in keystoneauth
11:24:13	rpittau	dtantsur: no, I didn't upload it as it was failing
11:24:44	ouroboros8	I have an open review ( https://review.opendev.org/#/c/713698/ ) for a change to the openstack cli, but one of the later Zuul build steps is failing (osc-promote-image). I've had a look at it but the logs don't really make much sense to me, and I'm not sure what the step is trying to achieve. Anyone able to give me some pointers?
11:26:50	dtantsur	ouroboros8: your patch has merged. I'm not sure what that job does, but you may talk to #openstack-infra about it.
11:27:34	ouroboros8	thanks!
11:30:16	dtantsur	rpittau: I suggest you upload it and we walk from there?
11:30:27	rpittau	dtantsur: alright, will do
12:48:53	openstackgerrit	Mark Chappell proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for Federation Protocols https://review.opendev.org/714431
13:02:20	openstackgerrit	jayaditya gupta proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: FIX for openstack quota set --force https://review.opendev.org/713881
13:09:18	openstackgerrit	Monty Taylor proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Change dockerhub password https://review.opendev.org/714436
13:42:49	openstackgerrit	Mark Chappell proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for Federation Protocols https://review.opendev.org/714431
13:55:58	mordred	dtantsur, rpittau: another option past normal mocking is to use requests-mock ... although that's probably not a _awesome_ choice in the short-term if this isn't in sdk itself. I started work on building a fixture in sdk that can be used in other places: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/675187/ - but am not yet done
13:56:41	mordred	not that it helps today - but the idea there would be to be able to make a FakeOpenStackCloud object and tell it what you want it to do and it'll do all the underlying requests-mock magic that we do in the sdk unit tests
13:56:52	rpittau	mordred: hey, thanks :) in the end it was actually a bug in ironic-inspector
13:56:54	mordred	but in a form that other projects consuming sdk could actually use
13:56:56	mordred	rpittau: cool!
14:02:37	openstackgerrit	Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add OpenStack Client for Manila docs https://review.opendev.org/706252
14:03:49	gtema_	dtantsur, mordred: I'm back, and so the https://review.opendev.org/#/c/700219 (project cleanup) is now rebased and waiting for your ok
14:06:09	dtantsur	thx
14:07:43	mordred	gtema: yay!
14:07:47	mordred	gtema: welcome back!
14:07:53	gtema	thks
14:08:10	mordred	gtema: so ... don't hate me ... but I may have *completely* forgotten to tell you about a discussion we had at the shanghai summit
14:08:35	gtema	okaaayy, and...???
14:10:08	mordred	apparently https://opendev.org/x/ospurge has project cleanup logic and people were suggesting we suck that into sdk and start from there. at this point since you've got the underlying framework maybe instead of doing that we just port in whatever knowledge is in there?
14:10:44	gtema	well, 99% of what ospurge could do (AFAIR) is now done
14:11:10	mordred	yeah. I just feel bad I didn't mention "just copy in ospurge as a starting point" before you started work :)
14:11:19	gtema	oh, no, it was another similar project
14:11:49	openstackgerrit	Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: identity: autogenerate docs https://review.opendev.org/692931
14:11:49	openstackgerrit	Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: image: autogenerate docs https://review.opendev.org/693025
14:11:52	gtema	basically my change gives a framework for that and the individual services can be easily covered
14:12:32	gtema	so with followups we can integrate more stuff from ospurge, but I would prefer to put it into the cleanup framework
14:13:06	mordred	oh - totally. we should definitely put it in the cleanup framework
14:13:13	mordred	gtema: left a quick question on that patch
14:13:20	gtema	especially that it does not seem to support parallel execution
14:14:14	gtema	so you mean I should drop this "single thread fallback"?
14:14:48	mordred	I think so? cause I think it's covered with futurist - but maybe dtantsur has a different pov
14:15:26	gtema	if he don't mind - will definitely do this
14:16:52	mordred	gtema: also - don't know if you saw - but we merged the sdk and osc teams - so welcome to being core on osc now too
14:17:04	gtema	cool.
14:17:28	gtema	I have seen discussion and adding OSC to cores in SDK, but haven't seen SDKs in OSC
14:17:37	openstackgerrit	Akihiro Motoki proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix network segment range "_get_ranges" function https://review.opendev.org/710031
14:17:51	gtema	but am now glad to have possibility to put more efforts in OSC as well ;)
14:18:05	openstackgerrit	Monty Taylor proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch image to use SDK https://review.opendev.org/650374
14:18:11	openstackgerrit	Monty Taylor proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Complete switch from glanceclient to SDK for image service https://review.opendev.org/699416
14:18:16	openstackgerrit	Monty Taylor proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Don't look up project by id if given id https://review.opendev.org/712810
14:18:23	openstackgerrit	Monty Taylor proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Optimize adding project to image slightly more https://review.opendev.org/712813
14:18:44	gtema	any thoughts already on how the virtual PTG will look like?
14:18:45	mordred	gtema: we should merge that stack before the ussuri feature freeze :)
14:18:54	gtema	oh sure
14:18:58	mordred	I think people are working on it
14:19:11	mordred	but I don't know what it will look like yet
14:19:18	gtema	oki
14:19:46	mordred	corvus deployed a POC of jitsi-meet integrated with etherpad that I believe we're going to deploy as a new service
14:20:00	mordred	so it's like etherpad as the main screen, but also with video chat capabilities
14:20:24	gtema	would be cool, but definitely TZ will play a nice role :D
14:20:30	mordred	so hopefully that should help some with virtual ptg
14:20:31	mordred	yeah
14:20:59	mordred	maybe we should all just give ourselves jetlag in our local location for a week
14:21:08	gtema	anyway glad it is not finally decided to do it this way - sitting here in prison and not knowing how the June will look like was a bit ...

Earlier   Later