Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2020-02-10
15:36:48 dtantsur elmiko: hey! at some point (maybe on Thu) we should talk about PTG plans.
15:37:11 dtantsur sshnaidm: btw, have we got a new meeting time for the ansible meeting?
15:39:34 sshnaidm dtantsur, I think yes, we'll have it in Tue 3pm UTC as winning from https://xoyondo.com/dp/ITMGRZSvaZaONcz
15:39:52 dtantsur sshnaidm: have you announced it already? especially if you expect it to happen tomorrow :)
15:40:13 sshnaidm dtantsur, right, I'll announce it today
15:40:23 dtantsur ++ thx
15:40:27 sshnaidm I think all that wanted to vote have already voted
15:41:02 dtantsur I'll be able to attend again \o/
15:41:28 sshnaidm dtantsur, welcome back! :)
15:43:15 sshnaidm dtantsur, do you know who can help with images work in SDK wrt https://review.opendev.org/#/c/705343/1..3/plugins/modules/os_image.py ?
15:43:39 gtema sshnaidm, what is exactly the question with that?
15:43:55 dtantsur I was about to mention gtema :)
15:44:02 sshnaidm gtema, seems like there is a bug with tagz and update_image_properties call
15:44:15 gtema I was taking care of rework of image and on the other side not happy with overall tag approach of modules
15:44:47 gtema ah, ok
15:44:52 sshnaidm gtema, I wouldn't like to pass workarounds to modules because of SDK bugs, but if no choice..
15:44:56 gtema will have a look on that tomorrow
15:45:05 sshnaidm gtema, great, appreciate that
15:45:32 gtema btw, just a question in the round: I want to have a separate module for doing tags operations, instead of implementing the whole madness in each module
15:45:50 gtema I was even proposing change in ansible, but it never got merged
15:45:58 gtema what do you think of such approach?
15:58:52 sshnaidm gtema_, I'd say we can try, can you submit an example patch?
15:59:57 gtema_ yes, when will find a time. But sure. The benefit is that in each module we need to repeat some logic otherwise
16:00:17 sshnaidm gtema_, I suppose it should go to modules_utils/openstack.py somewhere?
16:00:48 gtema_ well, this is another option, which is also on my desk
16:01:09 gtema_ 1st option was to add os_tag module, which take resource reference
16:01:30 gtema_ and 2nd is to integrate tag logic into base module
16:03:18 gtema_ okay. Sorry guys, need to fix my Zuul, therefore can't spend much time here now
16:03:39 gtema_ dtantsur, mordred: please please please https://review.opendev.org/#/c/700219/
16:05:14 mordred gtema_: yes - I'm halfway through it :)
16:05:37 gtema_ ths
16:05:41 gtema_ thks
16:25:00 sshnaidm do we need openstack-ansible-modules session in PTG?
16:25:16 sshnaidm I wonder if it can be part of SDK session if there is one
16:25:35 dtantsur it won't hurt, I think
16:25:45 dtantsur sshnaidm: a good topic to raise on the tomorrow's meeting
16:25:59 gtema_ I would like to have openstack-ansible-modules, I would like to have SDK. And that if I am allowed to go ;-)
16:37:47 gtema_ it was just vol.1 - more to come
22:52:04 adriant mordred: I find all the best edge cases and bugs :P
#openstack-sdks - 2020-02-11
10:17:11 openstackgerrit Vishakha Agarwal proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Adding options to user cli https://review.opendev.org/697444
11:20:28 openstackgerrit Daniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Stop configuring install_command in tox and stop use pip. https://review.opendev.org/694484
11:22:38 openstackgerrit Daniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Stop configuring install_command in tox and stop use pip. https://review.opendev.org/694484
#openstack-sdks - 2020-02-12
07:18:02 openstackgerrit Tobias Rydberg proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Change of auth url and regions https://review.opendev.org/707327
16:10:26 openstackgerrit Shilpa Devharakar proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add new filter `host_name` to segment list https://review.opendev.org/704814
23:48:25 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Change of auth url and regions https://review.opendev.org/707327
#openstack-sdks - 2020-02-13
09:00:11 openstackgerrit Abhijeet Kasurde proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update root hint documentation link https://review.opendev.org/707589
09:23:18 openstackgerrit Shilpa Devharakar proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add new filter `host_name` to segment list https://review.opendev.org/704814
10:38:37 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: WIP Make an OpenStackModule base class https://review.opendev.org/698044
10:46:36 openstackgerrit Vishakha Agarwal proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Adding options to user cli https://review.opendev.org/697444
10:51:33 openstackgerrit Vishakha Agarwal proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Adding options to user cli https://review.opendev.org/697444
11:29:22 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: WIP Make an OpenStackModule base class https://review.opendev.org/698044
12:43:40 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update root hint documentation link https://review.opendev.org/707589
16:01:10 elmiko API SIG office hour now open
16:14:42 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Lay a foundation for the project cleanup https://review.opendev.org/700219
17:05:59 elmiko have a good weekend all o/
17:06:20 gtema have I missed something?
17:06:27 elmiko no, it was quiet today
17:06:39 gtema I mean I missed even beginning :D
17:06:50 elmiko haha, well yeah perhaps you did =)
17:07:03 elmiko but there was no other meeting business today, just the api sig office hour
17:07:10 gtema for sure I did. But the day is really crazy
17:07:11 elmiko no ansible discussion
19:14:45 smcginnis dtroyer: If you have a moment, it would be great to get your ack on this cliff release request - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/705762/1
19:15:47 smcginnis dtroyer: Also may want to consider adding a release liaison to https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/src/branch/master/data/release_liaisons.yaml
19:16:07 smcginnis If you choose to delegate some of that release management, that is.
#openstack-sdks - 2020-02-14
09:51:46 openstackgerrit Abhijeet Kasurde proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: os_ironic: Correct parameter name https://review.opendev.org/707797
11:03:31 openstackgerrit Abhijeet Kasurde proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: os_ironic: Correct parameter name https://review.opendev.org/707797
12:01:09 openstackgerrit Moisés Guimarães proposed openstack/microversion-parse master: fix python version in tox file: py35 -> py37 https://review.opendev.org/707826
15:07:04 openstackgerrit Moisés Guimarães proposed openstack/microversion-parse master: fix python version in tox file: py35 -> py37 https://review.opendev.org/707826
#openstack-sdks - 2020-02-15
20:03:19 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/microversion-parse master: fix python version in tox file: py35 -> py37 https://review.opendev.org/707826
#openstack-sdks - 2020-02-17
08:41:20 openstackgerrit Abhijeet Kasurde proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: os_ironic: Correct parameter name https://review.opendev.org/707797
08:50:25 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Make an OpenStackModule base class https://review.opendev.org/698044
09:35:16 openstackgerrit Abhijeet Kasurde proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: os_ironic: Correct parameter name https://review.opendev.org/707797
12:15:23 openstackgerrit Roman Dobosz proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Make _get_microversion_for a class method. https://review.opendev.org/708111
12:15:24 openstackgerrit Roman Dobosz proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add method for bulk creating objects. https://review.opendev.org/708112
12:15:24 openstackgerrit Roman Dobosz proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Added bulk port create. https://review.opendev.org/708113
12:42:15 openstackgerrit Jesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Bump min openstacksdk version for os_network/{port_security_enabled,mtu} https://review.opendev.org/708119
12:49:08 openstackgerrit Jesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Bump min openstacksdk version for os_network/{port_security_enabled,mtu} https://review.opendev.org/708119
13:00:04 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Lay a foundation for the project cleanup https://review.opendev.org/700219
13:03:17 openstackgerrit Jesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Bump min openstacksdk version for os_network/{port_security_enabled,mtu} https://review.opendev.org/708119
13:13:48 tacco Hi there.. Looking for someone who could verrify a bug for me in the os_stack ansible module together with the openstack train release?
13:14:36 tacco i found out that when i try to create a stack i always get a error even when i use wait: True it shows a error but the stack state is "create in progress" and run trough
13:14:48 tacco is this a known bug or a feature?
13:15:27 gtema it'S definitely not a feature
13:16:05 tacco yes but in most of the example is also spot a "ignore_errors: True"
13:16:41 tacco https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/modules/os_stack_module.html in this examples section for example
13:17:45 gtema which sdk version you use and what is the error?
13:18:04 gtema it sounds familiar to me, but I can't remember exactly
13:19:04 tacco python-openstacksdk/stable,stable,now 0.17.2-2 all [installed]
13:19:29 gtema wow, it's actually like ancient SDK version. It's no surprise
13:19:39 gtema we are currently at 0.41
13:20:00 tacco uhh.. ok. let me check.. should get the lastest from pip right?
13:20:05 gtema yupp
13:20:30 tacco i'll give it a try. Thanks for pointing me there. Will get back to you if i verrified with a actual version.
13:20:41 gtema welcome
13:31:43 tacco nope still the same even with SDK 0.41.0
13:31:45 tacco http://paste.openstack.org/show/7SRhkgsjVYhP75y9i7rf/
13:33:27 tacco what confuses me is the "Munch{}.. part in the Failure message. And that the stack_status is 'stack_status': u'CREATE_IN_PROGRESS'
13:36:22 gtema worse is 'status_reason': u'Stack CREATE started'
13:36:43 gtema as if response was with bad RC

Earlier   Later