| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2020-01-21 | |||
| 16:13:45 | smcginnis | So it's looking like issues with how the job is configured maybe. | |
| 16:17:56 | smcginnis | This is also running with py3.6 on a branch that technically only supported up to 3.5. | |
| 16:37:28 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Run functional devstack job on ansible collection https://review.opendev.org/703383 | |
| 16:41:01 | KeithMnemonic | smcginnis thanks for the analysis. is this something swift needs to fix? | |
| 16:41:35 | smcginnis | No, I don't think so. | |
| 16:42:03 | smcginnis | I've run out of time to dig more right now, so I'll have to try to look more later. But first impression is that there is an issue with the way that job is defined. | |
| 16:42:16 | smcginnis | It shouldn't be running base_python=3.6 for a stable/stein job. | |
| 16:42:45 | smcginnis | And somehow it is installing the right version of osc, but then running tests from master (I'm assuming that's what's happening at least). | |
| 16:44:09 | KeithMnemonic | ok thanks for looking at this when you have more time | |
| 16:56:17 | openstackgerrit | Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix os_user_role issue to grant a role in a domain https://review.opendev.org/703428 | |
| 18:33:46 | openstackgerrit | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/js-openstack-lib master: WIP: New nodejs jobs https://review.opendev.org/702132 | |
| 19:23:41 | frickler | KeithMnemonic: smcginnis: oh, I completely missed the fact that this is a backport. then I think the solution is simple, the failing tests are introduced within the patch, so they need to be amended to match the pre-train available options https://review.opendev.org/#/c/702260/2/openstackclient/tests/functional/compute/v2/test_server.py | |
| 19:27:49 | KeithMnemonic | frickler i can resubmit my patch and run a recheck | |
| 19:29:52 | frickler | KeithMnemonic: you need to drop those parts of the tests that require --changed-before according to what smcginnis wrote | |
| 19:30:28 | KeithMnemonic | thanks let me try it now | |
| 19:30:41 | smcginnis | Ah, didn't even notice those tests were being added in the patch. | |
| 19:30:54 | smcginnis | That's good, a lot simpler than the scenarios I was imagining. | |
| 19:35:11 | KeithMnemonic | yup i just posted a new revision | |
| 19:54:55 | openstackgerrit | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/js-openstack-lib master: WIP: New nodejs jobs https://review.opendev.org/702132 | |
| 19:55:25 | openstackgerrit | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/js-openstack-lib master: WIP: New nodejs jobs https://review.opendev.org/702132 | |
| 19:56:09 | openstackgerrit | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/js-openstack-lib master: WIP: New nodejs jobs https://review.opendev.org/702132 | |
| 23:09:19 | openstackgerrit | Colleen Murphy proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix copypaste errors in access rule command https://review.opendev.org/703707 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2020-01-22 | |||
| 06:16:11 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: "qos_network_policy_id" attribute added to port resource https://review.opendev.org/693247 | |
| 07:03:54 | openstackgerrit | Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Use the bifrost bionic CI job https://review.opendev.org/703739 | |
| 07:19:05 | openstackgerrit | Vishakha Agarwal proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Adding options to user cli https://review.opendev.org/697444 | |
| 07:27:06 | openstackgerrit | Vishakha Agarwal proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Adding options to user cli https://review.opendev.org/697444 | |
| 08:10:40 | openstackgerrit | Daniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Stop configuring install_command in tox and stop use pip. https://review.opendev.org/694510 | |
| 09:28:08 | openstackgerrit | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/js-openstack-lib master: WIP: New nodejs jobs https://review.opendev.org/702132 | |
| 10:36:13 | gtema | sshnaidm: if you merge it with 703565 it would be much better, so that in single patch we "replace" test jobs | |
| 10:36:49 | sshnaidm | gtema, you mean to squash it? | |
| 10:37:13 | gtema | i mean make 1 change out of 703565 and 703342 | |
| 10:38:20 | sshnaidm | yeah, np | |
| 10:38:48 | openstackgerrit | Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fail a job for ansible modules with message https://review.opendev.org/703342 | |
| 10:38:53 | sshnaidm | gtema, ^ | |
| 10:39:27 | gtema | perfect. | |
| 10:53:26 | openstackgerrit | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/js-openstack-lib master: WIP: New nodejs jobs https://review.opendev.org/702132 | |
| 11:19:44 | openstackgerrit | Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix argument spec for os_subnet and os_zone https://review.opendev.org/703554 | |
| 11:55:59 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix os_user_role issue to grant a role in a domain https://review.opendev.org/703428 | |
| 12:30:05 | sshnaidm | this patch needs some love: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/703342/ | |
| 19:09:47 | openstackgerrit | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/js-openstack-lib master: WIP: New nodejs jobs https://review.opendev.org/702132 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2020-01-23 | |||
| 07:08:40 | openstackgerrit | Bram Verschueren proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add os_routers_info module https://review.opendev.org/703927 | |
| 07:26:00 | openstackgerrit | Bram Verschueren proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: fix os_user_role for groups in multidomain context https://review.opendev.org/703930 | |
| 10:56:08 | elmiko | dtantsur: is there another ansible meeting during the office hour today? | |
| 11:25:27 | dtantsur | elmiko: probably? sshnaidm? | |
| 11:26:01 | sshnaidm | elmiko, dtantsur I think as usual, ansible-sig mtg | |
| 11:26:50 | sshnaidm | I'll start it anyway, if no participants will close, 16.00 UTC | |
| 11:26:54 | elmiko | thanks dtantsur and sshnaidm | |
| 11:27:14 | dtantsur | elmiko: did you want to discuss anything re API SIG? | |
| 11:27:18 | elmiko | i am travelling currently and i might not be able to be around for the meeting | |
| 11:27:28 | elmiko | no, i don't think i have any specific topics | |
| 11:27:58 | sshnaidm | if you're here, please vote :) https://review.opendev.org/#/c/703342/ | |
| 11:28:00 | elmiko | i /still/ would like to get back to a few PRs for the guidelines, but i have not found any spare time | |
| 11:32:00 | dtantsur | same.. | |
| 11:32:08 | elmiko | ^5 | |
| 11:33:01 | elmiko | bbl o/ | |
| 11:33:48 | dtantsur | mordred, gtema, when you have time, a very simple CI fix: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/703739/ | |
| 12:00:04 | gtema | ok | |
| 12:03:57 | dtantsur | thx | |
| 12:04:05 | gtema | wlcm | |
| 12:07:43 | sshnaidm | dtantsur, how do I make clean node with SDK? that's all I found: https://docs.openstack.org/openstacksdk/train/user/proxies/baremetal.html#openstack.baremetal.v1._proxy.Proxy.set_node_provision_state | |
| 12:09:10 | dtantsur | sshnaidm: you mean, run cleaning? what exactly are you trying? | |
| 12:09:27 | sshnaidm | dtantsur, run cleaning, yes | |
| 12:10:09 | dtantsur | sshnaidm: this is the call to run manual cleaning, yes. I can help you more if you tell me the context. | |
| 12:10:33 | sshnaidm | dtantsur, I think I need a parallel to "openstack baremetal node clean " | |
| 12:10:55 | dtantsur | sshnaidm: okay, so do set_node_provision_state('clean', clean_steps=...) | |
| 12:11:10 | dtantsur | eeehhmm, missed a node, but I think you get an idea | |
| 12:14:55 | dtantsur | sshnaidm: you can ping me for any related reviews (it's actually quite encouraged) | |
| 12:15:17 | sshnaidm | dtantsur, ack, preparing now ansible module for that in tripleo | |
| 12:15:38 | dtantsur | sshnaidm: they it's even more encouraged (tripleo has a.. hmm.. known track of misunderstanding ironic ;) | |
| 12:16:19 | sshnaidm | dtantsur, traditions | |
| 12:16:33 | sshnaidm | dtantsur, it's everything :) | |
| 12:22:13 | dtantsur | :D | |
| 13:19:49 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Use the bifrost bionic CI job https://review.opendev.org/703739 | |
| 14:14:19 | openstackgerrit | Hervé Beraud proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Incorrect title for service provider https://review.opendev.org/703600 | |
| 15:59:10 | sshnaidm | whoever is available for ansible sig meeting, in 2 minutes | |
| 15:59:34 | dtantsur | in another meeting, but lurking | |
| 16:00:25 | sshnaidm | dtantsur, mordred gtema odyssey4me mnaser | |
| 16:00:33 | sshnaidm | just pinging all from etherpad | |
| 16:00:37 | sshnaidm | dtantsur, ack | |
| 16:00:48 | sshnaidm | #startmeeting api-sig | |
| 16:00:49 | openstack | Meeting started Thu Jan 23 16:00:48 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is sshnaidm. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:00:50 | openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:00:52 | openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'api_sig' | |
| 16:00:58 | odyssey4me | heh, somehow I'm in three meetings at once :) | |
| 16:01:07 | sshnaidm | who is available? | |
| 16:01:17 | gtema | me | |
| 16:01:21 | sshnaidm | if there are conflict we can change time meeting | |
| 16:01:33 | dtantsur | I'd prefer to, to be honest | |
| 16:01:52 | dtantsur | and since we're occupying the API SIG slot, we should probably set up a special meeting for our working group | |
| 16:01:58 | sshnaidm | ok, will create a poll in etherpad about a new time | |
| 16:02:02 | dtantsur | an hour earlier later would work for me, for example | |
| 16:02:07 | dtantsur | * or later | |
| 16:02:25 | dtantsur | sshnaidm: you can start a doodle or similar | |
| 16:02:34 | sshnaidm | dtantsur, yeah, good idea | |
| 16:02:43 | odyssey4me | yeah, or we could agree on a SIG meeting time... when trying to get https://review.opendev.org/697278 done I couldn't find an appropriate set time for the SIG to set the schedule | |
| 16:03:14 | dtantsur | odyssey4me: if we don't use one of the meeting channels, we can probably use any time that works for us | |
| 16:03:14 | sshnaidm | ok, we'll see in doodle which is best | |
| 16:03:46 | odyssey4me | dtantsur: yep, easy enough - I just wanted to make it easy to communicate and get updates | |
| 16:03:54 | sshnaidm | #action sshnaidm to choose better time for sig meeting | |
| 16:04:09 | sshnaidm | So, as you can know from openstack-discuss list the tranisition is in the progress. Tracking of it is in our etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-ansible-modules | |