Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2019-12-19
16:32:38 elmiko yes
16:33:06 elmiko i was just thinking about sending an email to let the community know. we don't get many visitors, but just in case.
16:33:16 gtema agree
16:33:28 elmiko also, we should probably re-evaluate whether we should even host an office hour. i don't think we've had any serious issues in months
16:33:57 elmiko at this point we could handle all questions via the mailing list, and if something like this current discussion (ansible) comes up, we can always schedule something.
16:34:11 elmiko but, i'll leave that debate for 2020 ;)
16:34:13 gtema you are right
16:34:17 gtema sure
16:36:43 elmiko if don't see you online, have a nice holiday and joyous new year gtema =)
16:37:02 gtema thanks elmiko, you too a very nice holidays
17:01:08 Shrews gtema: your recent comment on https://review.opendev.org/687304 confuses me
17:02:08 Shrews PS4 used assertRaises() but you -1'd that because the exception message was not checked, which requires using testtools.ExpectedException. I don't understand your recommendation to go back to assertRaises()
17:02:16 gtema if we don't need to check the message content itself why not to have self.assertRaises(SDKException, sot.remove_interface, sess, **body)
17:02:28 gtema it is shorter and doesn'T require additional import
17:02:31 Shrews yes, but see your previous -1 :)
17:02:58 gtema aaaah, it was so long ago
17:03:25 gtema if we do not check the message (what would be nice) - we can have shorter form.
17:03:39 gtema but even if we do this - there is no need for import testtools
17:03:55 Shrews i think we all agree on that, but the other form is needed to satisfy your request to check the message
17:04:13 gtema beah
17:04:25 gtema this is anyway not done
17:04:31 Shrews yes it is
17:04:46 Shrews the 'msg' variable is the expected message
17:04:57 Shrews ExpectedException(type, msg)
17:04:58 gtema ah, ok
17:05:06 gtema sorry, overseen it - long day
17:09:32 Shrews no worries :)
17:11:00 gtema ok, hacking "project-cleanup" into SDK, so brain is in a quite weird state
18:20:48 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Handle HTTP errors in add/remove router interface calls https://review.opendev.org/687304
18:59:05 gundalow sshnaidm If you ask in #ansible-devel there should be others that can help.
18:59:35 sshnaidm gundalow, thanks, I think we're good, no rush
19:02:07 gundalow Ok
#openstack-sdks - 2019-12-20
05:15:38 rm_work I'd like to add "--loadbalancer" to the `openstack availability zone list` client function ... but ... that'll mean I need to actually add octaviaclient as a dep? MAYBE? I guess I could try to weave it in to detect whether it's present or not... anyway, thoughts on the whole concept?
05:15:42 rm_work mordred maybe? ^^
13:25:59 rm_work so much part/join spam, lol
13:26:22 rm_work restating: I'd like to add "--loadbalancer" to the `openstack availability zone list` client function ... but ... that'll mean I need to actually add octaviaclient as a dep? MAYBE? I guess I could try to weave it in to detect whether it's present or not... anyway, thoughts on the whole concept? would this be accepted?
13:26:53 rm_work (also, is this the right channel for the client?)
13:32:38 frickler rm_work: this is the right channel, that question I can answer easily
13:32:54 rm_work :D
13:33:17 frickler for the real question, mordred and/or dtroyer may be able to be more helpful
13:34:29 frickler and now that I summoned them, I'm also asking for reviews on https://review.opendev.org/679834 , that feature just merged in neutron and the OSC patch is used in it's docs https://review.opendev.org/679834
14:00:06 mordred rm_work: how about use sdk for that instead of octaviaclient
14:00:47 mordred there's already an sdk object in osc - you can use it to do things. if the feature you need isn't in sdk - adding it is likely a good idea :)
14:01:24 mordred (we're wanting to migrate osc away from *client completely anyway - so adding new *client deps would be ++sad)
14:08:11 rm_work mordred: ah you know, i think i might already be doing that (had started working on the code)
14:08:17 rm_work yeah i think I am, lol
14:08:18 rm_work whelp
14:08:32 rm_work anyway, question is also about whether folks are cool with adding that to the main call there
15:00:03 dtroyer rm_work: that —loadbalancer option is fine as long as it doesn't add a hard dependency
15:00:58 dtroyer frickler: I think I can make some time for reviews later this morning… it is waaaaay overdue
15:01:31 gtema yey, dtroyer is back at reviewing patches
15:03:14 gtema one of those is https://review.opendev.org/#/c/698874/ - I would reuse this then for network and image
15:24:30 rm_work Cool thanks dtroyer 👍
18:31:06 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Lay a foundation for the project cleanup https://review.opendev.org/700219
20:18:32 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Lay a foundation for the project cleanup https://review.opendev.org/700219
#openstack-sdks - 2019-12-22
19:59:37 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add return cluster_id when query actions list https://review.opendev.org/699650
#openstack-sdks - 2019-12-23
09:33:59 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Lay a foundation for the project cleanup https://review.opendev.org/700219
14:34:20 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Lay a foundation for the project cleanup https://review.opendev.org/700219
16:29:31 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Lay a foundation for the project cleanup https://review.opendev.org/700219
20:53:43 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-service-types master: Bump the openstackdocstheme extension to 1.20 https://review.opendev.org/688250
20:53:44 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-service-types master: Blacklist sphinx 2.1.0 (autodoc bug) https://review.opendev.org/687795
21:03:34 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-service-types master: Update the constraints url https://review.opendev.org/685556
21:14:38 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-service-types master: Updated from OpenStack Service Type Authority https://review.opendev.org/672295
#openstack-sdks - 2019-12-24
06:46:11 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-service-types master: Switch to Ussuri jobs https://review.opendev.org/690859
10:40:56 openstackgerrit Vishakha Agarwal proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Adding options to user cli https://review.opendev.org/697444
10:46:09 openstackgerrit Vishakha Agarwal proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Adding options to user cli https://review.opendev.org/697444
10:47:59 openstackgerrit Vishakha Agarwal proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Adding options to user cli https://review.opendev.org/697444
14:21:13 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Lay a foundation for the project cleanup https://review.opendev.org/700219
#openstack-sdks - 2019-12-27
08:06:15 openstackgerrit pengyuesheng proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Drop python 2.7 support and testing https://review.opendev.org/700686
13:29:43 openstackgerrit Pedro Henrique Pereira Martins proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add documentation about login with federation https://review.opendev.org/693232
13:50:04 openstackgerrit Pedro Henrique Pereira Martins proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Add OTP to v3OIDCpassword plugin https://review.opendev.org/697348
15:30:04 openstackgerrit Pedro Henrique Pereira Martins proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Add OTP to v3OIDCpassword plugin https://review.opendev.org/697348
#openstack-sdks - 2020-01-02
13:19:43 mordred dtroyer: whence you are back online, https://review.opendev.org/#/c/695427/ https://review.opendev.org/#/c/700686/ are both easy post-new-years patches
13:21:45 mordred also - happy new year!
13:58:43 mordred eandersson: I think we need https://review.opendev.org/700897 Add support for global_request_id for your backport of connection backrefs to work
13:58:46 mordred in stein
14:00:21 mordred I rebased it to stack them together - let's see if it works now
16:26:14 mordred eandersson: nope! I think it's a different problem
19:16:11 eandersson mordred it looks close thou maybe two compounding issues?
20:06:15 openstackgerrit Keith Berger proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix openstack server list --deleted --marker option https://review.opendev.org/691045
#openstack-sdks - 2020-01-03
18:28:01 mordred eandersson: pushed up a new try
18:28:14 eandersson sweet
18:28:32 mordred it's a smidge of a hack - but if it works, I think it's an acceptable one in this case
18:38:23 eandersson Do you know why we ended up here?
18:54:39 KeithMnemonic dtroyer: can you please help get this patch merged? https://review.opendev.org/#/c/691045/
19:14:39 KeithMnemonic of course anyone else able to review is greatly appreciated
19:15:37 mordred eandersson: no, I still haven't been able to sort out a root cause
#openstack-sdks - 2020-01-05
12:14:18 openstackgerrit Alex Katz proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Show correct name for resource with quota set to zero https://review.opendev.org/701110
12:29:25 openstackgerrit Alex Katz proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Show correct name for resource with quota set to zero https://review.opendev.org/701110
#openstack-sdks - 2020-01-06
01:40:39 openstackgerrit Adrian Turjak proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix bug in object storage container creation setting metadata https://review.opendev.org/699904
01:40:58 openstackgerrit Adrian Turjak proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for object storage container policies https://review.opendev.org/699905
09:05:11 openstackgerrit zhufl proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix duplicated words issue like "was not not found" https://review.opendev.org/701174
10:21:30 openstackgerrit Riccardo Pittau proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add reset_interfaces argument to patch_node https://review.opendev.org/689414
14:59:08 KeithMnemonic can anyone help me figure out this zuul failure. https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/e3e57f71fea4489ab614e6b174ea5c26/log/job-output.txt#1958
15:09:39 efried KeithMnemonic: I can't get to the results (rackcdn takes forever to populate for me, for some reason) but: is it running under py3 by chance?
15:10:30 efried oh, nm, got to the results. Looks like a requirements conflict?
15:12:50 KeithMnemonic yeah, something with osc-lib 1.11.1 vs 1.40.0
15:12:55 KeithMnemonic yeah, something with osc-lib 1.11.1 vs 1.14.0
15:13:55 KeithMnemonic I would not have thought that cherry pick wolud have caused that.
15:15:13 efried no, I agree

Earlier   Later