| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-12-16 | |||
| 16:01:11 | mordred | gtema: ^^ that stack was green - but I just added a release note to 699132 | |
| 16:01:41 | gtema | oki | |
| 16:20:19 | Shrews | mordred: ok | |
| 16:33:14 | openstackgerrit | Keith Berger proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: WIP:Fix openstack server list --deleted --marker option https://review.opendev.org/691045 | |
| 19:34:44 | openstackgerrit | Keith Berger proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix openstack server list --deleted --marker option https://review.opendev.org/691045 | |
| 19:59:32 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Remove python2 from project-template https://review.opendev.org/699130 | |
| 21:49:17 | openstackgerrit | Keith Berger proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix openstack server list --deleted --marker option https://review.opendev.org/691045 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-12-17 | |||
| 13:40:51 | mordred | gtema: heya! - wanna +A https://review.opendev.org/#/c/699132 ? | |
| 13:41:18 | gtema | done | |
| 13:41:36 | gtema | a milestone with mixed feeling | |
| 13:41:39 | mordred | \o/ | |
| 13:41:54 | mordred | python2 has served us well for many years | |
| 13:42:15 | gtema | sure, and it is still used in the backend of perhaps lots of installations | |
| 13:42:20 | mordred | yup | |
| 13:42:25 | gtema | at least unfortunately my cloud case | |
| 13:43:27 | mordred | yeah - I really wish a default transition to 3 had happened sooner | |
| 13:43:56 | gtema | yes, and perhaps even "harder" to force people | |
| 13:43:59 | mordred | I remember the first python3 summit session - during the *grizzly* summit | |
| 13:44:13 | Shrews | https://pythonclock.org | |
| 13:44:24 | mordred | we could never quite get people to take this one proactively | |
| 13:45:11 | mordred | although I blame rhel7 not shipping with even an optional python3 as a large part of the problem | |
| 13:45:24 | gtema | agree | |
| 13:45:29 | mordred | because for many people that made opting in to python3 a non-starter | |
| 13:46:04 | gtema | and the one available through EPEL (3.4) is not a good deal either | |
| 13:47:01 | mordred | yup | |
| 13:47:37 | mordred | this is an area where I really do think containers improve the story for many use cases | |
| 13:47:41 | mordred | not all | |
| 13:47:42 | mordred | but many | |
| 13:48:05 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch image to use SDK https://review.opendev.org/650374 | |
| 13:48:06 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Complete switch from glanceclient to SDK for image service https://review.opendev.org/699416 | |
| 13:48:22 | mordred | we've been working on switching gerrit to run in a container - and one of the big wins is that we don't have to care what version of java is shipped with the OS we're running on the gerrit server :) | |
| 13:49:05 | gtema | oh god, Java is the same for me. There are definitely still lots of Enterprises running JEE1.6 | |
| 13:49:26 | mordred | yup | |
| 13:49:43 | mordred | and - you know - that's fine - build it in your container image and stop caring about it :) | |
| 13:49:57 | mordred | dtroyer: heya - got a sec for an easy one: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/695427/ ? | |
| 13:50:16 | gtema | he, in environments, which still depend on J1.6 there is most likely no container support as well | |
| 13:51:56 | gtema | mordred: please have a look at https://review.opendev.org/#/c/698972/ for stdin support image upload in SDK | |
| 13:52:39 | mordred | gtema: yes - I'm excited about that! (was waiting for the jobs to go green) | |
| 13:53:15 | gtema | they are actually green, remaining red ones (non-voting) are not related failures | |
| 13:53:28 | mordred | Shrews: ^^ that one from gtema is needef for replacing glanceclient with sdk in osc | |
| 13:54:13 | gtema | I was actually a bit disappointed with summary from Glance team after summit. They claimed to have removed all OSC references from their docs | |
| 13:54:21 | gtema | and went back to "glance" | |
| 13:56:30 | mordred | gtema: question inline - it seems liek the hashes thing can't quite work right, no? | |
| 13:56:56 | mordred | gtema: that's very sad | |
| 13:57:18 | gtema | exactly, that's why in stdin case I'm passing validate_checksum as False | |
| 13:58:03 | gtema | surely it's sad, but I have no clue how else can we workaround this | |
| 13:58:20 | mordred | oh - nod. yeah | |
| 13:58:38 | mordred | gtema: I think that's just life if you decide that for some reason you need to stream the image over stdin | |
| 13:58:46 | gtema | exactly | |
| 14:00:11 | gtema | so basically if we are in stdin we should not come into this calculation logic due to if isinstance(data, bytes) | |
| 14:01:25 | mordred | gtema: that patch looks great - definitely less scary than I was thinking it would be | |
| 14:01:29 | mordred | oh - wait | |
| 14:01:35 | mordred | you should add a release note for that perhaps | |
| 14:01:41 | gtema | me as well | |
| 14:01:44 | gtema | ok | |
| 14:02:02 | mordred | since that'll be a key feature osc depends on | |
| 14:03:13 | Shrews | mordred: will look when I return from the gym | |
| 14:03:19 | mordred | Shrews: ew. gym | |
| 14:05:15 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Support uploading image from data and stdin https://review.opendev.org/698972 | |
| 14:05:20 | gtema | added RN only | |
| 14:07:31 | mordred | gtema: also - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/679914 looks good to me when you have a sec | |
| 14:07:49 | gtema | okay | |
| 14:12:08 | gtema | mordred: having a brief look there - in resources attributes are not in alphabetical order. While don't want to be neat-picky, do we want to get it this way? | |
| 14:13:44 | gtema | if it's ok for me - I can skip this comment | |
| 14:14:18 | gtema | I mean if ok for you | |
| 14:39:32 | mordred | gtema: I don't know that I care too much - I doubt a ton of people are going to be adding new attributes in parallel | |
| 14:39:47 | mordred | so I doubt we'll have too many merge conflicts | |
| 14:40:32 | gtema | it'S not about conflicts, it's more about keeping code clean. Especially if you look at image resources, where list of attrs take few pages - it'S really hard to orient | |
| 14:44:41 | mordred | nod. I'm also supportive of that comment if you want to make it | |
| 14:46:02 | gtema | Let us then +A this change with comment to order attributes. And in future really take care of this during review | |
| 14:46:11 | gtema | dtantsur - comments? | |
| 14:47:02 | mordred | gtema: ++ | |
| 14:49:30 | openstackgerrit | Vishakha Agarwal proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: [ussuri][goal] Drop python 2.7 support and testing https://review.opendev.org/699121 | |
| 15:54:56 | gtema | thanks Shrews | |
| 15:55:05 | Shrews | np | |
| 17:12:34 | openstackgerrit | Keith Berger proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix openstack server list --deleted --marker option https://review.opendev.org/691045 | |
| 20:02:31 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix openstack server list --deleted --marker option https://review.opendev.org/691045 | |
| 20:34:06 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Support uploading image from data and stdin https://review.opendev.org/698972 | |
| 22:59:53 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Stop supporting python2 https://review.opendev.org/699132 | |
| 23:36:26 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Remove extra python2 test jobs https://review.opendev.org/699133 | |
| 23:47:43 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Switch stable ansible job to 2.8 https://review.opendev.org/699134 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-12-18 | |||
| 07:28:56 | openstackgerrit | wangfaxin proposed openstack/api-sig master: update reviewer url. https://review.opendev.org/699570 | |
| 10:23:03 | openstackgerrit | Bo Tran proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add return cluster_id when query actions list https://review.opendev.org/699650 | |
| 11:56:53 | sshnaidm | mordred, dtantsur Shrews pabelanger gtema odyssey4me and all others I'd like to have your opinions about the subject, in your time: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-December/011597.html | |
| 11:58:41 | gtema | ack | |
| 13:48:00 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/cliff master: Add autoprogram_cliff_app_dist_name config opt https://review.opendev.org/692464 | |
| 18:26:19 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add dns_publish_fixed_ip attribute to subnets https://review.opendev.org/679833 | |
| 18:46:40 | openstackgerrit | David Shaughnessy proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: [POC] Neutron Classifier CLI Mock up of Neutron Classifier CLI https://review.opendev.org/687256 | |
| 18:46:41 | openstackgerrit | David Shaughnessy proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Extension to the DSCP Marking Rule This extends the CLI to include the classification_group_id and the classification_priority value for deciding the relitive priority of the rules. https://review.opendev.org/699832 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-12-19 | |||
| 02:17:19 | adriant | mordred, it appears that the SDK is busted when setting metadata on objectstorage container creation | |
| 02:17:46 | adriant | none of the header values are being marked as dirty, even though the resource does have them | |
| 02:18:19 | adriant | I have a feeling the issue is because of: https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/blob/master/openstack/object_store/v1/container.py#L116 | |
| 02:18:37 | adriant | any reason why you are setting "_synchronized=True" ? | |
| 02:18:45 | adriant | when by default, it never is? | |
| 02:20:24 | adriant | when I do: conn.object_store.create_container("test_5", read_ACL="stuff") | |
| 02:20:43 | adriant | I'd expect that read_ACL to be set, but it isn't, because while it does get added to resource headers, it isn't dirty | |
| 02:22:05 | adriant | yeah... based on your own docs. this is wrong: https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/blob/master/openstack/resource.py#L876-L880 | |
| 02:22:31 | adriant | _synchronized should be false | |
| 02:24:27 | adriant | Was that new function meant to actually be existing? because wouldn't the ID only be present when it already exists? | |
| 02:46:28 | openstackgerrit | Adrian Turjak proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix bug in object storage container creation setting metadata https://review.opendev.org/699904 | |