Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2019-12-09
04:36:50 iokiwi neither is_bootable=True nor bootable=True results in a bootable volume.
04:37:20 iokiwi Creating bootable volume via openstack client works fine though
05:03:47 eandersson iokiwi what is the output if you use bootable=True instead, identical?
05:05:09 eandersson but I see the bug
05:05:30 eandersson https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/blob/140eaf7547cf9f557fdd119bf278c41f7b49e1e2/openstack/cloud/_block_storage.py#L242
05:05:59 eandersson When bootable is set, the volume is just return, but not normalized.
05:06:12 eandersson mordred ^
05:07:07 eandersson So don't think is_bootable could ever be true?
09:56:47 iokiwi eandersson yes I tried bootable=True
10:00:48 iokiwi Yes, the volume will go to status 'CREATING' first so that condition will probably never be met. But I dont see a way via the sdk to set the volume bootable after the volume has been created
10:13:38 iokiwi Oh nevermind, I am inside the wait block. I am not sure what normalizing the volume means?
15:04:30 mordred eandersson: oh - yeah. that's unfortunate there
15:06:34 mordred eandersson: but iokiwi is using the resource layer
15:06:51 mordred iokiwi: can you try con.create_volume instead of con.block_storage.create_volume?
15:10:06 mordred or - alternately, if you want to use the resource layer - you need to get the Volume object back from that create call, then you need to update it with the bootable flag - like v.is_bootable = True ; v.commit(con.block_storage)
17:02:39 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add support for setting and removing tags from server instance https://review.opendev.org/697674
17:18:07 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: WIP Make an OpenStackModule base class https://review.opendev.org/698044
18:16:11 sshnaidm is it a duplicate? or intentional https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/blob/master/.zuul.yaml#L298-L314
18:17:49 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add collections metadata info https://review.opendev.org/684787
18:17:49 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Import modules from ansible/ansible https://review.opendev.org/684788
18:17:50 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: WIP Make an OpenStackModule base class https://review.opendev.org/698044
18:17:50 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add tox.ini file for running pep8 https://review.opendev.org/698056
18:18:16 mordred sshnaidm: duplicate :)
18:18:45 mordred sshnaidm, dtantsur|afk, Shrews, mnaser: ^^ added a pep8 job and rebased the other stuff on it
18:21:09 sshnaidm mordred, commented
18:22:58 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Remove duplicate job definition https://review.opendev.org/698057
18:29:27 eandersson oh yea my bad mordred
18:29:32 eandersson but still that should probably be fixed :p
18:47:27 mordred eandersson: ++
18:52:30 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: WIP Make an OpenStackModule base class https://review.opendev.org/698044
18:52:30 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix F841 and remove exclusion https://review.opendev.org/698063
18:52:31 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix E128 and remove exclusion https://review.opendev.org/698064
18:52:31 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix F401 and remove exclusion https://review.opendev.org/698065
18:52:32 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix H236 and remove exclusion https://review.opendev.org/698066
18:52:32 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Remove from __future__ lines https://review.opendev.org/698067
18:52:33 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix H301 and remove exclusion https://review.opendev.org/698068
18:52:40 mordred sshnaidm, mnaser: enjoy
18:55:25 sshnaidm mordred, ok, anyway we assigned all work to you iirc :D
18:59:03 mordred :)
20:54:48 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: DNM: test job https://review.opendev.org/698085
21:15:41 iokiwi Cheers mordred and eanderson I will try use con.create_volume instead
21:25:47 mordred iokiwi: sorry for the confusion there - it's sadly a two-step process which isn't modelled well down at the resource layer
21:29:26 iokiwi No worries - I can deal with that. Thanks for the help
#openstack-sdks - 2019-12-10
06:32:45 openstackgerrit Shogo Saito proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Adding basic implementation for Accelerator(Cyborg) https://review.opendev.org/679914
08:26:51 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add support for setting and removing tags from server instance https://review.opendev.org/697674
10:18:51 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: DNM: test job https://review.opendev.org/698085
19:06:30 cmurphy dtroyer: next time you have a few minutes, could i ask you to add https://review.opendev.org/677857 to your review queue? there's an open question on what the command name should be
#openstack-sdks - 2019-12-11
14:30:05 openstackgerrit Jens Harbott (frickler) proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add dns_publish_fixed_ip attribute to subnets https://review.opendev.org/679833
16:19:41 openstackgerrit Michael Johnson proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch to using osc_lib.utils.tags https://review.opendev.org/662864
#openstack-sdks - 2019-12-12
15:59:09 sshnaidm hello everyone
15:59:23 dtantsur we're about to hijack this slot again \o/
16:00:21 sshnaidm etherpad is here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-ansible-modules
16:00:31 sshnaidm please add topic for discussions there
16:00:40 sshnaidm dtantsur, can you run the bot please?
16:00:48 dtantsur #startmeeting api-sig
16:00:49 openstack Meeting started Thu Dec 12 16:00:48 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is dtantsur. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:50 openstack Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:53 openstack The meeting name has been set to 'api_sig'
16:00:59 dtantsur #chair sshnaidm elmiko
16:01:00 openstack Current chairs: dtantsur elmiko sshnaidm
16:01:05 sshnaidm dtantsur, thanks!
16:01:15 sshnaidm o/
16:01:26 dtantsur #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-ansible-modules agenda
16:01:38 dtantsur anyone else here? :)
16:01:42 gtema me
16:02:53 dtantsur a nice private party :)
16:02:57 gtema sure
16:03:00 gtema as usual
16:03:06 sshnaidm mnaser, mordred, odyssey4me
16:03:11 gtema last week was weird - too much people :D
16:03:18 sshnaidm just calling people from etherpad :)
16:03:21 odyssey4me o/
16:03:27 sshnaidm holidays I assume
16:03:51 gtema it's tooooooo early for holidays, who will do the work
16:04:03 sshnaidm so I've sent a mail to legal-discussion: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/legal-discuss/2019-December/thread.html
16:04:15 sshnaidm it's the only thread there
16:04:48 sshnaidm got responses that we'd better to keep developing in ansible sig repo under GPL
16:05:41 sshnaidm any other opinions about that? ^
16:05:45 odyssey4me hmm, is that an OK thing for openstack repositories?
16:05:50 mordred ohai!
16:06:05 gtema well, reading inside I would say there are no answers (mordred doesn't count)
16:06:10 sshnaidm odyssey4me, well, it's not really openstack repository
16:06:38 sshnaidm gtema, yeah, responses were from people of this meeting actually :)
16:07:10 mordred yeah - although while I don't count - the takeaway I've gotten from past encounters is that as along as it's not part of "the software" called openstack, it's ok
16:07:10 dtantsur it seems that we can host GPL code, just not make it official openstack delivarables
16:07:18 mordred yah
16:07:26 odyssey4me is that a problem?
16:07:39 sshnaidm I'd like to know what it blocks for us
16:07:42 mordred nope. should be fine. this is an effort of a sig
16:08:00 mordred I don't thnk it's blocks anything. ansible is already GPL
16:08:00 dtantsur nothing blocking. just a bit unfortunate that we cannot proudly call these modules official
16:08:03 sshnaidm what is consequences of not having this as deliverable?
16:08:13 odyssey4me we have imports both ways, right - the module imports ansible (GPL) stuff, and also imports openstack (Apache) stuff
16:08:15 mordred so anything that would use these modules must by definition be ok consuming gpl software
16:08:22 dtantsur sshnaidm: no promotion on openstack.org?
16:08:38 mordred I don't think it's a matter of not being able to call these modules official
16:08:49 dtantsur one things that I think is important re licensing:
16:08:50 sshnaidm mordred, this won't change anyway, we don't relicense them
16:08:51 mordred it's that they can't be part of an OpenStack release
16:09:01 mordred which they wouldn't be anyway, since that makes no sense

Earlier   Later