Posted	Nick	Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2019-11-01
18:18:14	efried	mmkay
18:18:30	umbSublime	efried: I tried without and I get the same stack-trace as when using the nova register_ksa_opts
18:18:52	efried	you would need to remove that hackup from both places
18:19:43	efried	so 1) get_ksa_adapter_opts can go away and just use ks_loading.get_adapter_opts directly; and 2) kill L36-8
18:20:17	umbSublime	Ohhh I see, remove lines for "Removing version opts" and the ones that "add dummy opts for version"
18:20:47	efried	actually, it gets simpler.
18:21:32	efried	I only did this conf.register(get_opts) thing because I had to hack out those version things.
18:22:07	efried	There ought to be a ks_loading method like ks_loading.register_adapter_conf_options which you can call directly.
18:22:54	umbSublime	Ok, I'll look into that
18:30:48	efried	umbSublime: like this http://paste.openstack.org/show/785725/
18:37:58	umbSublime	For some reason i'm getting "keystoneauth1.exceptions.catalog.EndpointNotFound: Could not find requested endpoint in Service Catalog." with that code (adapted to my env of course)
18:39:14	efried	add to your conf:
18:39:15	efried	service_type = placement
18:39:39	efried	I simplified out the bit that detects that :P
18:39:48	efried	here's super pared down: http://paste.openstack.org/show/785726/
18:40:38	efried	btw, raise_exc=False means that for 4xx/5xx responses, instead of raising an exception, you still just get a Response back, which you can inspect yourself.
18:40:45	umbSublime	this fixed it for me http://paste.openstack.org/show/785727/
18:41:06	umbSublime	ohh very neat trick !
18:41:45	efried	and Response has a magic __bool__ so you can actually say things like:
18:41:45	efried	if resp:
18:41:45	efried	# status code was 2xx/3xx, do success path
18:41:45	efried	else:
18:41:45	efried	# status code was 4xx/5xx, do failure stuff
18:42:19	efried	umbSublime: yes, what fixed you there was the cfg.set_defaults(service_type='placement') which is the same thing as you setting it in the conf (but in code)
18:42:49	efried	so, either way
18:43:05	umbSublime	\o/
18:50:33	umbSublime	Say I want to wrap all this in a function that takes a region_name and return the adapter for the specified region. I'd need to do something similar to "example 3" and then do CONF(['--my-opt', "my_val"]) https://www.programcreek.com/python/example/106145/oslo_config.cfg.CONF
19:02:17	umbSublime	Ahh even easier I can just override the region_name attribute from the adapter
19:15:09	efried	depending where in the flow you want to do it, you could do CONF.set_override(region_name='foo', group='placement')
19:15:16	efried	(I may not have that syntax exactly right)
19:22:44	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: neutron: autogenerate docs https://review.opendev.org/691767
19:22:45	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: common: autogenerate docs https://review.opendev.org/691989
19:22:45	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Update a stale doc reference to use :neutron-doc: https://review.opendev.org/692605
19:25:56	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: neutron: autogenerate docs https://review.opendev.org/691767
19:25:57	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Update a stale doc reference to use :neutron-doc: https://review.opendev.org/692605
19:25:57	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: common: autogenerate docs https://review.opendev.org/691989
#openstack-sdks - 2019-11-04
07:33:19	jawad_axd	Hi all, Is there any function to get instance console url from openstacksdk? I can not find any..
09:24:34	openstackgerrit	Bence Romsics proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add router add/remove route operations https://review.opendev.org/674324
09:24:51	openstackgerrit	Bence Romsics proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Handle HTTP errors in add/remove router interface calls https://review.opendev.org/687304
13:33:04	mriedem	can i get another osc core on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/691039/ to help unblock novaclient 16.0.0? https://review.opendev.org/#/c/690097/
13:33:08	mriedem	please and thanks
15:14:56	gtema	mriedem: you are not alone with that, I would also like to get any review on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/650374/ for switching from glanceclient to SDK.
15:20:35	mriedem	heh, that glance one is much much bigger change
15:20:55	mriedem	mine is "change this one nova call to use the sdk", not "change all compute api calls to use the sdk"
20:46:57	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/osc-lib master: Update master for stable/train https://review.opendev.org/683493
21:39:46	umbSublime	Is it accurate to say openstack-sdk is just added functionnality around osc-lib ?
21:41:28	umbSublime	err other way around
21:42:42	dtroyer	umbSublime: neither really, osc-lib is the basis for the CLI commands in OpenStackClient, but it does not depend on the SDK specifically, it provides the common bits for OSC plugins
21:43:57	umbSublime	so then osc-lib is another layer ontop of cliff to facilitate plugin creation ?
21:46:24	dtroyer	basically, yes. It also includes the core functionality to enable making a stand-alone CLI that isn't OpenStackClient, such as a speciaized CLI for a stand-alone service installation
21:46:47	dtroyer	I am not certain that anyone has actually done that, but that was what the original request was for
21:47:10	umbSublime	Thanks for clearing that out for me. I'll look more into osc-lib and cliff :)
21:49:31	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: openstack.cli: autogenerate docs https://review.opendev.org/692914
22:03:46	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: compute: autogenerate docs https://review.opendev.org/692916
22:09:24	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Use SDK to get compute API extensions https://review.opendev.org/691039
22:09:28	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Use autoprogram-cliff for remaining plugin docs https://review.opendev.org/690387
22:10:08	efried	mriedem: ---^
22:10:22	efried	(16.0.0 should be unblocked now)
22:10:58	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: compute: autogenerate docs https://review.opendev.org/692916
22:17:44	mriedem	woot
22:31:06	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/osc-lib master: Add KeyValueAppendAction to osc-lib https://review.opendev.org/685359
22:31:07	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/osc-lib master: Switch to Ussuri jobs https://review.opendev.org/690839
#openstack-sdks - 2019-11-05
00:01:08	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add redirect testing https://review.opendev.org/692929
00:01:08	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Deflate .htaccess https://review.opendev.org/692930
00:01:09	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: WIP: identity: autogenerate docs https://review.opendev.org/692931
00:41:31	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: neutron: autogenerate docs https://review.opendev.org/691767
07:53:19	openstackgerrit	Bence Romsics proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add router add/remove route operations https://review.opendev.org/674324
07:53:43	openstackgerrit	Bence Romsics proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Handle HTTP errors in add/remove router interface calls https://review.opendev.org/687304
08:53:16	openstackgerrit	Thomas Bechtold proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: update OVH vendor entry https://review.opendev.org/692961
13:09:20	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Update a stale doc reference to use :neutron-doc: https://review.opendev.org/692605
13:09:21	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: common: autogenerate docs https://review.opendev.org/691989
13:09:21	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: openstack.cli: autogenerate docs https://review.opendev.org/692914
13:09:22	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: compute: autogenerate docs https://review.opendev.org/692916
13:09:22	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add redirect testing https://review.opendev.org/692929
13:09:23	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Deflate .htaccess https://review.opendev.org/692930
13:09:23	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: WIP: identity: autogenerate docs https://review.opendev.org/692931
13:09:50	efried	dtroyer: trivial rebase to resolve merge conflict ^
13:09:57	efried	couple of those already had your +A
13:48:34	dtroyer	efried: thanks, will have a look after the next call (or during depending on how it goes :)
13:49:29	efried	no hurry
14:23:40	mnasiadka	Hi there
14:24:06	mnasiadka	Any idea how to request a system scoped token in Ansible os_* modules that are using openstacksdk?
14:30:56	efried	mnasiadka: There are many words in there that I don't know. The people most likely to be able to answer your question are probably all at the summit/PTG in Shanghai at the moment, so you may want to ask your question on the mailing list, or wait until next week.
14:31:46	openstackgerrit	Eric Fried proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: identity: autogenerate docs https://review.opendev.org/692931
14:32:35	mnasiadka	efried: It was my plan to wait until next week, but I decided it won't hurt to ask now, and in a week ;-)
14:32:55	efried	good plan :)
14:33:58	gtema	the only opportunity to influence the token scope is not to specify project_name, but both domain_name and user_domain_name
14:34:07	gtema	this will give you domain scoped token
14:34:30	gtema	if you do not specify domain_name, but project_name - you get project scoped token
14:37:36	mnasiadka	gtema: we have a bug opened in Kolla (https://bugs.launchpad.net/kolla-ansible/+bug/1850656), we're trying to find the proper approach.
14:37:36	openstack	Launchpad bug 1850656 in kolla-ansible train "Deploy will fail if keystone.conf has '[oslo_policy]/enforce_scope=true'" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Radosław Piliszek (yoctozepto)
14:38:04	mnasiadka	gtema: seems for identity:create_endpoint we need system scoped token...
14:39:12	gtema	and this with Ansible (facepalm). efried, do you know how to get system scoped token from Keystone?
14:39:24	gtema	I was previously always referring to https://docs.openstack.org/keystone/pike/api_curl_examples.html for samples
14:39:39	efried	gtema: I don't even know what a system scoped token is.
14:40:02	gtema	it's kinda neither of both, but is even more powerful
14:40:22	gtema	https://docs.openstack.org/keystone/stein/admin/tokens-overview.html#system-scoped-tokens
14:41:23	gtema	I hoped you know a bit more than I about Keystone ;-)
14:41:32	efried	https://docs.openstack.org/keystone/stein/admin/tokens-overview.html#operation_create_system_token ?
14:41:51	efried	gtema: I know things about ksa, but very little about keystone itself :(

Earlier   Later