| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-04-17 | |||
| 18:26:17 | cdent | i'm hoping that mordred is going to have something to say about a universal "this is openstack X" identifier that is already in the works | |
| 18:28:15 | elmiko | wouldn't that be lovely | |
| 19:00:53 | openstackgerrit | Jeremy Houser proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Alter test_volume.py to ensure volume deletion https://review.openstack.org/652682 | |
| 19:52:29 | openstackgerrit | Jeremy Houser proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Alter test_volume.py to ensure volume deletion https://review.openstack.org/652682 | |
| 21:23:23 | openstackgerrit | Jeremy Houser proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Alter test_volume.py to ensure volume deletion https://review.openstack.org/652682 | |
| 22:53:46 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Make factory for a CloudRegion from CONF objects https://review.openstack.org/643601 | |
| 22:54:52 | efried | mordred, dustinc_away: FYI, filed a blueprint for openstacksdk-in-nova (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/openstacksdk-in-nova) and updated topics and commit messages in the nova and sdk patches to refer to it https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/openstacksdk-in-nova+(status:open+OR+status:merged) | |
| 22:57:57 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Make factory for a CloudRegion from CONF objects https://review.openstack.org/643601 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-04-18 | |||
| 08:08:52 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Continue refactoring of the image https://review.openstack.org/651534 | |
| 08:11:09 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Update baremetal to use proxy logger https://review.openstack.org/652083 | |
| 09:41:56 | openstackgerrit | Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add "name" filter in "list" call when retrieving a single register https://review.openstack.org/637238 | |
| 10:30:43 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Continue refactoring of the image https://review.openstack.org/651534 | |
| 13:03:55 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Remove now unused task_manager file https://review.openstack.org/653731 | |
| 13:43:15 | gtema | mordred: do you have an opinion on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/651534/12/openstack/resource.py@425? | |
| 13:43:41 | gtema | do we want to support this logic everywhere? | |
| 13:46:55 | gtema | dtantsur: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/651534/12/openstack/image/v1/image.py@103 - an existing logic to give possibility to the requestor to self iterate over the result | |
| 13:47:16 | mordred | gtema: yes - I replied | |
| 13:47:42 | gtema | thanks | |
| 13:48:22 | gtema | I can also move "output" logic under the Image.download method if we want it now | |
| 13:48:53 | mordred | yeah - I think that's a good idea | |
| 13:49:24 | gtema | ok. Will also add few tests on the proxy.download_image (were missing so far) | |
| 13:50:10 | dtantsur | gtema: then why not change the second place to just 'return resp'? | |
| 13:50:34 | gtema | hmm | |
| 13:50:48 | gtema | maybe | |
| 13:54:24 | gtema | what do we want for chunk_size? | |
| 13:54:44 | openstackgerrit | Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Support for the baremetal introspection service https://review.openstack.org/650044 | |
| 13:54:51 | dtantsur | mordred: a new service ^^^ \o/ | |
| 13:55:09 | dtantsur | gtema: I'd put at least 4k, but I don't have any reliable reasoning behind it | |
| 13:55:15 | dtantsur | ideally, we should benchmark it :) | |
| 13:56:07 | gtema | :D Benchmark will actually depend on the chosen setup/platform/image/etc | |
| 14:01:44 | gtema | dtantsur: returning resp instead of content breaks current behavior. This is not something I wanted to get with this change | |
| 14:17:04 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Continue refactoring of the image https://review.openstack.org/651534 | |
| 14:21:47 | dtantsur | gtema: ah, I see | |
| 14:49:09 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Move Orchestration methods into Proxy https://review.openstack.org/649273 | |
| 15:02:38 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Allow replacing service implementation https://review.openstack.org/648704 | |
| 16:00:10 | elmiko | API SIG office hour is now open! | |
| 16:00:30 | edleafe | Yay!!!! | |
| 16:00:34 | elmiko | \o/ | |
| 16:00:51 | elmiko | ooh la la | |
| 16:01:41 | edleafe | I did want to go over some outstanding api-sig patches, if that's ok with you | |
| 16:02:10 | elmiko | sure, i'm game! | |
| 16:02:15 | edleafe | I think the DNS guideline is ready for freeze https://review.openstack.org/#/c/651222/ | |
| 16:02:30 | elmiko | ++ | |
| 16:02:47 | edleafe | So is the version discovery doc, but it has a merge conflict https://review.openstack.org/#/c/459405/ | |
| 16:03:00 | elmiko | i guess we should just send custom freeze emails to the ml since we don't have the newsletter? | |
| 16:03:22 | elmiko | oh wow, so exciting to see the version discovery finally getting there =) | |
| 16:03:38 | edleafe | Generally that's what the tools do: send an email to the liaisons, and add them to the reviewer list for the patch | |
| 16:04:04 | elmiko | ok, sweet | |
| 16:04:06 | edleafe | But sure, we could also send out an email | |
| 16:04:29 | elmiko | i suppose we don't have to, i was just curious and apparently the cob-webs have gotten the better of that part of my memory XD | |
| 16:04:47 | edleafe | dtantsur had a suggestion on the liaisons file patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/645223/ | |
| 16:04:59 | edleafe | Once I fix that, I think that that should be a quick approve | |
| 16:05:21 | edleafe | I.e., it's not changing a guideline or anything | |
| 16:05:35 | elmiko | ok, cool. i will remove my +2 with a note just for clarity sake | |
| 16:05:42 | elmiko | i agree with dtantsur's idea | |
| 16:05:42 | edleafe | schweet | |
| 16:06:28 | edleafe | I thought that the tags update was ready, but after thinking a bit more about Akihiro's comment, I want to revisit it https://review.openstack.org/#/c/642497/ | |
| 16:07:05 | edleafe | And I was going to fast-approve the emai list name change https://review.openstack.org/#/c/632255/1 | |
| 16:07:25 | edleafe | but it was stated that it was a dupe without referencing what it is a dupe of | |
| 16:07:31 | edleafe | Do you have any idea? | |
| 16:07:58 | elmiko | edleafe: i agree about Akihiro's comment, thanks for taking that on | |
| 16:08:05 | dtantsur | edleafe: I don't see a dup, let's approve it.. | |
| 16:08:46 | edleafe | I just posted a reply to the dupe patch a few minutes ago. There's no rush, so if there is no good answer by next week, let's approve it then | |
| 16:09:49 | elmiko | edleafe: agreed | |
| 16:10:57 | edleafe | That's all I had on my plate to discuss | |
| 16:11:26 | elmiko | edleafe ++ | |
| 16:17:26 | edleafe | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/651222 has been frozen | |
| 16:17:41 | elmiko | thanks edleafe | |
| 16:19:01 | dtantsur | w00t! | |
| 16:19:09 | openstackgerrit | Ed Leafe proposed openstack/api-sig master: Added Placement to the liaisons file https://review.openstack.org/645223 | |
| 16:19:14 | edleafe | dtantsur: elmiko: ^^ Fixed the ordering | |
| 16:19:23 | edleafe | Either of you want to fast-approve that? | |
| 16:19:38 | elmiko | edleafe: looking now | |
| 16:19:50 | edleafe | Nobody will ask such a dumb question. We already know the answer is yes | |
| 16:20:26 | efried | Does the API SIG deal with things like adoption of OpenStack SDK? | |
| 16:20:49 | dtantsur | efried: it borders with our responsibilities, at least | |
| 16:20:53 | elmiko | ++ | |
| 16:20:53 | efried | not to interrupt; feel free to come back to me when you reach an appropriate spot in the agenda | |
| 16:21:04 | edleafe | efried: not specifically, but we do say things like "yes, that's a good thing to do" | |
| 16:21:07 | elmiko | no real agenda, this is just open office hours | |
| 16:21:25 | elmiko | dtantsur edleafe , +wf on the liaison file | |
| 16:21:39 | edleafe | elmiko: kewl | |
| 16:21:42 | dtantsur | efried: I think it's a good topic for right now, but what exactly do you have in mind? | |
| 16:21:57 | efried | Okay, so this is mostly FYI: I'm kind of involved in / leading a charge to make nova use the sdk. | |
| 16:22:07 | dtantsur | if you need some to do some work, we have mordred to appoint | |
| 16:22:07 | elmiko | nice | |
| 16:22:13 | elmiko | LOL | |
| 16:22:22 | efried | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/openstacksdk-in-nova | |
| 16:22:26 | dtantsur | because we don't do work here, it's not the goal of API SIG | |
| 16:22:27 | efried | mordred has already done some work. | |
| 16:22:43 | dtantsur | oh? | |
| 16:22:45 | elmiko | dtantsur ++ | |
| 16:22:47 | edleafe | We pride ourselves on convincing others to do the work | |
| 16:22:56 | elmiko | XD | |
| 16:23:05 | efried | there's this: https://review.openstack.org/643601 which needs to be cleaned up and have UT added | |
| 16:23:14 | efried | but has been integration-tested and works. | |
| 16:23:28 | dtantsur | efried: I'd really like to get to switching ironic-inspector to use SDK for talking to ironic and swift | |
| 16:23:33 | efried | tl;dr: lets you set up Connection with oslo.config ksa opts instead of clouds.yaml | |
| 16:23:34 | dtantsur | I mean, get to it in Train | |
| 16:23:53 | dtantsur | efried: I'm very much in favor of that. very. | |