Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2019-04-09
15:22:04 dtantsur dear god, what is running python 2.7 tests still??
15:24:22 openstackgerrit Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/api-sig master: Repair building guidelines https://review.openstack.org/651260
15:24:49 openstackgerrit Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/api-sig master: Add guideline on DNS-based service discovery https://review.openstack.org/651222
15:29:20 edleafe dtantsur: https://twitter.com/python2clock/status/1115630437865537536
15:29:44 dtantsur yeaah. things start to break
15:48:07 mordred dtantsur: it's the api-sig repo - I betcha you could just drop the py27 job
15:48:21 dtantsur mordred: tried. it's probably coming from project-config
15:48:30 dtantsur I will figure out later, if nobody beats me to it
15:50:20 mordred dtantsur: remote: https://review.openstack.org/651282 Remove project config for api-sig repo
15:50:47 dtantsur thanks!
15:55:34 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/api-sig master: Repair building guidelines https://review.openstack.org/651260
15:55:47 mordred dtantsur: updated that just a smidge
15:56:00 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/api-sig master: Add guideline on DNS-based service discovery https://review.openstack.org/651222
15:57:16 cdent My tools for attention management aren't effective
16:47:04 mordred cdent: dude, you have tools for that?
16:47:25 mordred cdent: I just run around in circles hoping to trip over the thing I'm supposed to be paying attention to
16:52:07 elmiko mordred: does that work?
16:52:27 elmiko (asking for a friend XD)
16:53:01 cdent mordred: here we see the fundamental difference in our characters. I'm too tired to run.
16:57:05 mordred elmiko: depends on how you define "work"
16:57:39 mordred cdent: indeed. to be fair - this is also the problem - my process is running around in circles, but most times just laying here on the couch is much nicer
17:03:20 mordred cdent: I keep thinking one of these days they'll start paying us to just nod sagely from time to time
17:03:35 cdent I concur
17:04:40 cdent Surely we are old-timer enough that that's allowed, even encouraged. I'm ready for a sinecure that is of benefit to the payer. "We've got a {cdent,mordred}, we must be special"
17:05:01 mordred ++
17:05:04 cdent roll us in, nod sagely
17:05:17 mordred yeah. or - hell - video conference me in and I'll nod sagely
17:05:25 dtantsur|afk LOL
17:05:27 mordred although video conferencing sucks
17:08:24 cdent I concur
17:09:13 cdent (I assume everyone can see the implicit sage nod everytime I concur?)
17:16:50 mordred cdent: ooh. can we just _imply_ our sage nodding?
17:18:14 cdent It's medium dependent, and there has to be a corresponding action, such as concurring.
17:21:01 elmiko ooh, how do i get on the payroll for laying around and nodding sagely?
17:23:03 cdent you need to age a little bit
17:23:41 cdent and make obscure comments about old internet protocols that predate HTTP and are better than any of the new fangled stuff
17:25:48 cdent When we switched from POP3 to IMAP4 over Maildir on the AFS I was able to handle those 1000 emails per day with aplomb.
17:26:00 cdent For all four of my workstations.
17:26:06 cdent etc
17:48:51 elmiko cdent: lol, i'll have to work on that
17:54:08 mordred elmiko: it helps even more if you still use old internet protocols ... such as helping to run /afs/openstack.org ;)
18:01:46 elmiko haha ++
18:02:08 elmiko is anyone maintaing the openstack gopher instance? if not, maybe i could volunteer XD
18:05:25 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/keystoneauth master: Update the min version of tox https://review.openstack.org/651149
#openstack-sdks - 2019-04-10
04:53:16 openstackgerrit Thomas Bechtold proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: baremetal: Add support for mkisofs and xorrisofs for configdrive https://review.openstack.org/651193
12:14:11 openstackgerrit LIU Yulong proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add floating IP Port Forwarding commands https://review.openstack.org/650062
12:36:14 frickler is anyone working on making keystoneauth get rid of the identity admin endpoint? running devstack without it still seems to explode marvelously, although keystone claims that it shouldn't be needed anymore http://logs.openstack.org/92/651492/2/check/devstack/357b6f0/controller/logs/screen-g-api.txt.gz#_Apr_10_11_28_00_915073
12:53:31 openstackgerrit Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add "name" filter in "list" call when retrieving a single register https://review.openstack.org/637238
13:18:56 mordred frickler: not that I know of - but it seems like a thing we should do
13:19:14 mordred frickler: are we defaulting something to operating against the admin endpoint by default or something?
13:25:12 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: baremetal: Add support for mkisofs and xorrisofs for configdrive https://review.openstack.org/651193
13:40:05 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Continue refactoring of the image https://review.openstack.org/651534
13:42:06 frickler mordred: yes, but I fail to find the correct location. my first guess was this, but changing it to public doesn't fix my issue https://opendev.org/openstack/keystonemiddleware/src/branch/master/keystonemiddleware/auth_token/__init__.py#L910
13:42:53 mordred frickler: well - that definitely seems to need to be changed
13:43:52 mordred frickler: I don't see anything in ksa where we're setting anything to admin
13:44:13 mordred frickler: perhaps the job isn't actually using the proposed patch to keystonemiddleware?
13:48:07 frickler mordred: I'm testing locally, patching the installed version directly
13:48:40 mordred oh. well
13:48:48 mordred then it's likely not an installation issue
13:48:52 mordred :)
16:33:24 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Bail earlier on a version mismatch for a supported service https://review.openstack.org/637563
17:42:48 dustinc quick question fo ryou guys, perhaps this is more of a Nova question but I am working on the context of the SDK so going to ask here first..
17:43:13 dustinc I am looking at https://docs.openstack.org/openstacksdk/latest/user/resources/baremetal/v1/node.html#openstack.baremetal.v1.node.Node and it sounds like the Node object only has one instance_id
17:43:44 dustinc I would expect that to be a list of ids of all the associated instances
17:44:10 dustinc is there really a 1:1 of Node:Instance?
17:55:25 dustinc specifically when returned by "nodes" here https://docs.openstack.org/openstacksdk/latest/user/proxies/baremetal.html
17:55:42 dustinc or is it returning a Node object for each Node:Instance?
18:06:07 Shrews dustinc: you should ask dtantsur|afk for real clarification, but when it comes to the baremetal driver, you will only have a single "instance" as nova sees it for each baremetal machine, so 1:1 seems correct to me
19:34:53 openstackgerrit Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Before writing object data to stdout, re-open it in binary mode https://review.openstack.org/573465
21:34:50 dustinc Shrews: I feel silly, I was working on baremetal api but still thinking VMs in my head..thanks
22:24:01 cyberpear Would anyone mind reviewing an ansible PR that allows using subnetpool_id rather than use_default_subnetpool? https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/52608
#openstack-sdks - 2019-04-11
08:06:17 openstackgerrit Rico Lin proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Update auth plugin name list in document https://review.openstack.org/648920
08:35:27 dtantsur dustinc: instance_id in the context of nova is the server ID
08:35:46 dtantsur a bare metal node is not divisible, so it cannot host several instances
10:29:02 cdent dtroyer: with luck you are still sleeping, but when you come back to this world, you can probably help me: I want to make some tests of osc by passing a full suite of what would be the args to some entry point. Related to this: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2005411
10:57:49 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Clarify error if no version can be found https://review.openstack.org/640835
10:59:23 pas-ha cdent: can you add a noauth mode to placement? (might be useful any way) and then call openstackclient with 'noauth' auth plugin (should need just an endpoint)
10:59:45 cdent pas-ha: placement has support for 'noauth2'
11:00:40 cdent If you [api]/auth_strategy with 'noauth2' then a query with a header like 'x-auth-token: admin' will do the expected
11:00:48 cdent does that work?
11:01:14 cdent pas-ha: oh I see what you're saying, you're responding to what I said above
11:01:30 pas-ha yes
11:01:43 pas-ha on how to test w/o keystone etc running
11:01:47 cdent the issue isn't with auth handling, it's with not wanting to run external processes
11:01:54 pas-ha o, ok
11:02:10 cdent the PlacementFixture makes it possible to run the placement app in process (and in memory)
11:02:23 pas-ha but then you are not testing the thing people will actually use
11:02:31 cdent yes you are
11:02:32 pas-ha which is a CLI command
11:02:44 cdent if you can pass args like I'm describing
11:03:08 cdent in any case, the thing that is being tested is not whether openstack client can parse args
11:03:21 cdent but whether the plugin can generate the right args and process responses properly
11:31:28 dtroyer cdent: if my barely-awake brain is parsing that story, the OSC functional test may not be quite be what you are looking for: https://opendev.org/openstack/python-openstackclient/src/branch/master/openstackclient/tests/functional/base.py#L29 still uses subprocess.
11:31:43 dtroyer but the unit tests in https://opendev.org/openstack/python-openstackclient/src/branch/master/openstackclient/tests/unit/test_shell.py may be closer to what you want
11:32:59 dtroyer that calls the shell object in-process some of the magic is actually in osc-lib
11:34:44 cdent dtroyer: I think what I'm after is awareness of the method that receives some form of sys.argv, but based on what you are saying it sounds like that might be obscured under "stuff"
11:35:45 cdent like, somewhere there is a top level main(args), and I want to call that
11:35:56 cdent but I suspect I can't...
11:59:51 openstackgerrit Tobias Rydberg proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Removing region La1 from the list of regions. https://review.openstack.org/651770
12:21:40 dtroyer cdent: you can, it is in there, I thought the functional tests worked that way until I looked… but the unit test_shell bits do exactly that, but have the back-end mocked out. I've got a meeting at the top of the hour, I'll try to suss out a simple example after that...

Earlier   Later