Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2019-02-19
14:06:07 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Move image methods to sdk image proxy https://review.openstack.org/609684
14:12:04 gtema mordred: just rebased your change 609684 on top of master leaving all other related changes off, since there were lots of conflicts
14:44:24 mordred gtema: sweet. obviously the code needs some cleanup to start using Image resource objects internally - but I think if we can get that passing tests landing it in that state should let us Resource-ify it in smaller patches
14:46:55 gtema great
14:47:42 gtema mordred: let's see what the tests show now. Do you want to continue on it, or should I take it?
14:56:30 johnsom dulek: fyi, Octavia tags support has merged. Still waiting on the rest of those patches however.
15:02:23 dulek johnsom: Oh, I see, it's even released. :)
15:19:27 Shrews dtantsur: +A'd https://review.openstack.org/636594 but left a nit there you might want to see
15:22:51 openstackgerrit Vishakha Agarwal proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Cleanup: Remove deprecated role list filters https://review.openstack.org/637166
15:24:13 dtantsur Shrews: thanks! I'll check that and also the place I copy-pasted it from :)
15:42:16 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add image.task resource https://review.openstack.org/637913
16:13:54 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix help message of image add project https://review.openstack.org/637828
16:21:32 mordred gtema: if you haven't started yet - I'm going to take a quick stab at the failures on that WIP image reorg patch
16:22:48 mordred Shrews, dtantsur: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/637563/ if you have a sec ... odyssey4me was having a hard time debugging a failure yesterday in nodepool, and it's a failure mode that is always confusing to users when it happens
16:23:42 mordred Shrews, dtantsur: it's a behavior change, but I **seriously** doubt it's a behavior change anyone is depending on because I think I might be the only person to have that whole behavior stack in my head :)
16:24:53 mordred gtema: ^^ you might also want to look at that one
16:25:22 dtantsur mordred: any unit tests to update?
16:25:46 mordred dtantsur: no - it worked fine (although that maybe indicates there is a missing unittest)
16:25:55 dtantsur exactly ;)
16:27:27 mordred the only use case I could see this making harder is if a user has a cloud that only has an unknown verion of a known service - but even in that case they can set an endpoint_override and a version override and it'll work
16:27:55 mordred dtantsur: after I poke at this image patch I'll see if I can't come up with a unittest
16:31:16 gtema mordred: you should definitely have a look in to the image-reorg. I have managed to resolve some of the issues, but here a knowledge of shade-creator is required to do it properly
16:37:03 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: baremetal: implement set_node_power_state in the proxy https://review.openstack.org/636601
16:39:58 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: baremetal: support for allocation API https://review.openstack.org/636594
16:43:14 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add image.task resource https://review.openstack.org/637913
17:03:07 gtema mordred, odyssey4me: with https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/37390 a change of "default" port_security_enabled from True (when not given) to False (explicitly) was introduced. Now all openstacksdk-ansible-devel-functional-devstack are failing
17:08:10 gtema mordred, odyssey4me: I do not really understand why so far, but comparing logs from stable-2.6 and master I see that in 2.6 when no port_security_enabled was given - a net with "True" was created, even when in the SDK we have a default of "False"
17:13:07 gtema mordred, odyssey4me: I got it. Ansible calls cloud.create_network and it bypasses Resource completely, so a "deployed default" plays role. I think we need to create a follow-up in Ansible to make default 'None'
17:14:14 Shrews mordred: 563 lgtm, but will wait for your unittest
17:14:38 Shrews mordred: also, sorry for delay. still quite sick :(
17:14:41 mordred Shrews: coolio
17:14:49 mordred Shrews: no worries! you should stop being sick :(
17:14:54 Shrews ikr?
17:35:51 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add image.task resource https://review.openstack.org/637913
18:49:35 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add image attributes from v2.7 https://review.openstack.org/637538
20:20:26 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add image attributes from v2.7 https://review.openstack.org/637538
#openstack-sdks - 2019-02-20
09:33:23 openstackgerrit David Rabel proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix help message of image add project https://review.openstack.org/638113
11:33:03 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Move image methods to sdk image proxy https://review.openstack.org/609684
11:38:03 openstackgerrit Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix minor issues in the baremetal proxy docs https://review.openstack.org/638136
11:38:08 dtantsur Shrews: ^^^ (also get better soon!)
13:25:25 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Move image methods to sdk image proxy https://review.openstack.org/609684
13:56:16 Shrews dtantsur: thanks, feeling much better today
13:56:30 dtantsur great :)
14:01:38 Shrews dtantsur: i guess something in neutron is broken based on the failures in your doc change?
14:02:12 dtantsur dunno, haven't checked yet (crazy day)
14:02:33 Shrews embrace the crazy
14:03:42 openstackgerrit Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix minor issues in the baremetal proxy docs https://review.openstack.org/638136
14:06:22 frickler slaweq: ^^ that looks like a neutron regression, have you seen that yet? http://logs.openstack.org/36/638136/1/check/openstacksdk-functional-devstack/1cdc712/controller/logs/screen-q-svc.txt.gz#_Feb_20_12_04_53_392346
14:10:03 slaweq frickler: I will check
14:10:18 frickler https://review.openstack.org/635671 looks slightly suspicous in that context
14:14:26 slaweq frickler: TBH I hope it's not that one :)
14:26:29 slaweq frickler: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1816771
14:26:30 openstack Launchpad bug 1816771 in neutron "Creation of router fails in devstack" [Undecided,New]
14:26:44 slaweq frickler: we now have L3 subteam meeting so I will try to raise this one there
14:28:36 frickler slaweq: thx
14:38:13 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Move image methods to sdk image proxy https://review.openstack.org/609684
14:53:40 openstackgerrit Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add "name" filter in "list" call when retrieving a single register https://review.openstack.org/637238
16:01:09 ralonsoh dtantsur, hi. About https://review.openstack.org/#/c/637238/2/requirements.txt@11. oslo.utils is already required in nova, neutron and many other projects. I usually prefer not to copy/paste code and use the libraries provided by the OpenStack ecosystem
16:01:33 dtantsur ralonsoh: usually copy-paste is bad, but this is quite an overkill
16:01:35 ralonsoh dtantsur, I'm using both in the code and the tests
16:01:53 dtantsur keep in mind that openstacksdk targets consumers that do not use oslo libraries
16:02:09 dtantsur like this https://github.com/openstack/metalsmith/blob/master/requirements.txt
16:02:09 ralonsoh dtantsur, ok, I'll implement both functions in sdk repo
16:05:22 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Move image methods to sdk image proxy https://review.openstack.org/609684
16:06:07 mordred yeah. we don't use oslo libraries in sdk because our users are end-users and not just openstack services
16:09:57 gtema mordred: I'm passing image-reorg to you. 'properties' need to be fixed, but I do not know how you wanted to do this
16:10:16 mordred gtema: oh - hah. I've got a huge update to that patch locally
16:10:43 gtema mordred: ups. Fun merging
16:10:54 mordred although i'm also at "properties needs to be fixed"
16:11:06 gtema but you can then simply throw away my changes then
16:16:51 mordred :)
16:17:02 mordred gtema: just think how much fun we both got to have
16:17:13 gtema yeah
16:17:27 gtema and this all is just a beginning of aligning things
16:18:14 gtema mordred: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/637913/ - have you wanted it for ImageTask this way?
16:19:56 mordred gtema: yeah - I think that's a great idea (although I haven't read the whole patch yet)
16:20:20 gtema no hurry. Just a brief idea, especially with respect to wait_for_task
16:22:48 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Move image methods to sdk image proxy https://review.openstack.org/609684
16:23:01 mordred gtema: ok. I think that should work now
16:23:12 gtema mordred: great
16:23:17 mordred gtema: unless it doesn't
16:23:48 gtema :D let's see
16:30:30 ralonsoh dtantsur, mordred: thanks! I'll implement those functions in the repo
17:37:56 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add image.service_info resources https://review.openstack.org/638227
19:17:19 mordred dtroyer: does this: http://logs.openstack.org/84/609684/9/check/openstacksdk-functional-devstack-tips/0c1b740/job-output.txt.gz#_2019-02-20_16_51_39_497256 mean anything to you?
19:19:33 Shrews mordred: slaweq opened a bug for that this morning https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1816771
19:19:34 openstack Launchpad bug 1816771 in neutron "Creation of router fails in devstack" [Undecided,New]
19:19:46 mordred Shrews: oh awesome
19:22:04 johnsom mordred Who should I poke to get the rest of this chain merged? We want to start using some of this in the dashboard. https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/openstacksdk+owner:self+status:open
19:43:02 dtroyer mordred: no, that's new to me
19:43:21 mordred dtroyer: seems there is a neutron bug open - so yay
19:48:34 mordred johnsom: I pushed them in (responded to dtantsur|afk on the first one) - although it's possible we'll hit that neutron bug
19:49:03 johnsom mordred Thank you!
19:49:47 mordred Shrews: got a sec to look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/634558 ?
20:28:45 Shrews mordred: sure
22:46:23 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Bail earlier on a version mismatch for a supported service https://review.openstack.org/637563
22:46:36 mordred Shrews, dtantsur|afk : ^^ I made tests
#openstack-sdks - 2019-02-21
00:48:02 mordred slaweq: let me know if I can be helpful investigating that devstack/neutron thing - it's hitting all of our patches now
00:48:11 mordred slaweq: I'm pretty open tomorrow and can debug or whatnot if it's helpful
08:03:17 slaweq mordred: frickler: I found the culprit of Your issue :)

Earlier   Later