| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-01-14 | |||
| 12:44:08 | dtantsur | the results are in doc/build/html, I think | |
| 12:48:16 | openstackgerrit | Yuval Shalev proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix for not released thread in get_session_client https://review.openstack.org/630659 | |
| 12:56:33 | bha_77 | Thanks, I'll give a try. | |
| 13:39:46 | frickler | bha_77: if your patch runs a docs job like openstack-tox-docs, the results of that job will point to the html docs as generated by your patch | |
| 14:21:35 | openstackgerrit | Bruno Haleblian proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Document "Role Assignment Operations" https://review.openstack.org/630686 | |
| 15:22:25 | openstackgerrit | James Denton proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Adds prefixlen to the request body when creating subnets https://review.openstack.org/550558 | |
| 15:25:46 | openstackgerrit | James Denton proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Hides prefix_length column in subnet show output https://review.openstack.org/630703 | |
| 17:26:19 | openstackgerrit | Ding Baojian proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: fix raise unexpected exception while create_server and attach to a network given a net-name param Task: 28888 Story: 2004769 https://review.openstack.org/630743 | |
| 17:41:55 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix for not released thread in get_session_client https://review.openstack.org/630659 | |
| 19:53:35 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Document "Role Assignment Operations" https://review.openstack.org/630686 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-01-15 | |||
| 01:05:30 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/os-api-ref master: Update hacking version https://review.openstack.org/628593 | |
| 06:21:30 | openstackgerrit | Filippo Inzaghi proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: fix tox python3 overrides https://review.openstack.org/607453 | |
| 07:48:26 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add floating IP filter to floating IP list command https://review.openstack.org/628941 | |
| 09:08:08 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Use Server object for server in cloud layer https://review.openstack.org/630912 | |
| 10:11:44 | mordred | dtantsur, Shrews: ^^ I started hacking on making the server objects usable directly without the _normalize_server calls | |
| 10:12:02 | mordred | still a bunch more work to do there, obvs | |
| 11:04:20 | dtantsur | great! | |
| 11:08:20 | dtantsur | mordred: JFYI: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/619558/ | |
| 11:08:30 | dtantsur | finally enough baremetal operations :) | |
| 11:10:44 | mordred | dtantsur: SWEET! | |
| 11:11:22 | mordred | dtantsur: oh - btw - I was doing some scanning in codesearch yesterday and noticed you're using yaml.load and not yaml.safe_load in metalsmith - don't know if that's on purpose or not | |
| 11:15:49 | dtantsur | mordred: I cannot find any mentions tbh.. | |
| 11:33:02 | mordred | dtantsur: whoops! it wasn't metalsmith - it was molteniron | |
| 11:33:06 | mordred | to many metal related words | |
| 11:35:03 | dtantsur | heh | |
| 11:35:24 | dtantsur | it's all about baremetal and containers nowadays, right? | |
| 11:35:29 | dtantsur | and edge. something about edge. | |
| 11:35:45 | dtantsur | a.. sharp edge of a bare metal container? maybe | |
| 11:38:31 | mordred | edge container bare metal serverless I believe | |
| 11:41:43 | cdent | you guys are so behind the time. all you need to is spontaneously compose some transient computronium from the ether | |
| 11:42:14 | mordred | cdent: I'm always behind | |
| 11:42:56 | dtantsur | LOL | |
| 11:44:14 | mordred | cdent: oh - you like the REST things ... have you played much with doing REST calls directly from ansible? we've been using it for some infra admin things recently and it's been really pleasing | |
| 11:45:18 | mordred | cdent: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/system-config/tree/playbooks/zuul/build-image/promote-retag.yaml | |
| 11:45:26 | mordred | cdent: and starting at line 68 here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/626759/6/kubernetes/gitea/gitea-playbook.yaml | |
| 11:46:17 | cdent | I have not had the opportunity, but I'm not surprised to hear it is pleasing. I've always been a fan with "just do some http" | |
| 11:46:48 | cdent | that looks very familiar to gabbi... | |
| 11:47:29 | dtantsur | wow nice | |
| 11:47:54 | cdent | I can see that being super useful | |
| 11:48:38 | cdent | one can imagine replacing some heat use cases with some well formed ansible plays | |
| 11:50:12 | cdent | (amongst many other things) | |
| 11:53:53 | mordred | cdent: yah | |
| 11:54:32 | mordred | cdent: it looking a bit like gabbi is the thing that made me think to mention it to you actually | |
| 15:41:53 | samueldmq | hi shade o/ | |
| 15:42:28 | samueldmq | happy new year folks | |
| 15:42:48 | samueldmq | mordred: up for a quick convo on interop? | |
| 15:43:53 | samueldmq | more especifically on refstack's gaps | |
| 15:48:40 | mordred | samueldmq: yes - but today is probably not the right day for it - I'm in a very strange fog of jetlag, so I'm likely to say very dumb things :) | |
| 15:51:03 | samueldmq | mordred: sure - I will tell you so you think/remember about it. I just want a example of one of refstack's lacunae in interop (we said it has no consensus on some things, but no e.g.) | |
| 15:53:18 | samueldmq | mordred: we talk about it in the week when you recover, see ya | |
| 15:55:52 | mordred | samueldmq: yay! see ya ... | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-01-16 | |||
| 05:34:48 | openstackgerrit | lijunjie proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix the misspelling of "required" https://review.openstack.org/631135 | |
| 19:34:03 | openstackgerrit | Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: fix multiple server delete produce multiple new lines https://review.openstack.org/627493 | |
| 22:39:56 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: fix multiple server delete produce multiple new lines https://review.openstack.org/627493 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-01-17 | |||
| 01:07:37 | openstackgerrit | Duc Truong proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Change Resource location type to Header https://review.openstack.org/631362 | |
| 15:31:21 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add class to override clustering delete responses https://review.openstack.org/631362 | |
| 15:58:34 | edleafe | API-SIG Office Hour starts in 2 minutes. Buckle your seat belts! | |
| 15:59:25 | dtantsur | do they serve drinks in this flight? | |
| 15:59:42 | edleafe | Yes, but they're cash-only | |
| 16:00:18 | tosky | those low-cost companies | |
| 16:00:20 | dtantsur | ah this low-cost world | |
| 16:00:29 | dtantsur | great minds think alike, yeah? | |
| 16:00:46 | edleafe | You'd think moving from a WG to a SIG would be a step up, right? | |
| 16:00:50 | tosky | :D | |
| 16:01:23 | elmiko | o/ | |
| 16:01:34 | elmiko | someone say drinks? | |
| 16:02:15 | dtantsur | lol | |
| 16:56:45 | elmiko | heads up edleafe dtantsur, i'll be on CET next week so i will most likely show up for the early session (gonna be at a conference) | |
| 16:56:55 | edleafe | elmiko: ack | |
| 17:03:07 | aspiers | hi... we have a question about what the path for the new version of the oslo.middleware healthcheck API should be | |
| 17:03:30 | aspiers | IIUC the current one is /healthcheck | |
| 17:04:14 | aspiers | no doubt I'm about to ask a stupid question as never worked with OpenStack API code before | |
| 17:04:18 | aspiers | but I guess /v2/healthcheck is a bad idea since that stomps on the whole microversion thing? | |
| 17:04:30 | edleafe | aspiers: I'm not familiar with the usage. Do users specify a version for the healthcheck call? | |
| 17:04:38 | evrardjp | edleafe: not right nwo | |
| 17:04:41 | aspiers | I think the idea was to specify it in the path | |
| 17:04:47 | aspiers | but we're open to recommendations | |
| 17:04:59 | aspiers | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/617924/1/oslo_middleware/healthcheck/__init__.py | |
| 17:05:09 | aspiers | is the WIP prototype from mugsie | |
| 17:05:14 | edleafe | Generally a header is preferred over mangling the path with version info | |
| 17:05:17 | aspiers | I'm just polishing it up now | |
| 17:05:20 | dtantsur | elmiko: cool! | |
| 17:05:32 | aspiers | edleafe: OK, but this would be a different header to the normal microversion? | |
| 17:05:52 | dtantsur | "normal microversion"? :D | |
| 17:05:52 | elmiko | dtantsur: you gonna be at devconf? | |
| 17:05:59 | dtantsur | elmiko: devconf.cz - yep | |
| 17:06:02 | evrardjp | aspiers: it could technically be the same header, it's a different path | |
| 17:06:20 | mugsie | in this case, there is a pre-existing URL, so it should be something like /status - move away from the /healthcheck that v1 uses | |
| 17:06:22 | dtantsur | OpenStack-Api-Version: compute 2.42, healthcheck 1.1\ | |
| 17:06:24 | dtantsur | or something | |
| 17:06:25 | elmiko | dtantsur: \o/ | |
| 17:06:28 | aspiers | right, that one | |
| 17:06:40 | edleafe | aspiers: microversions are per-call | |
| 17:06:40 | evrardjp | mugsie: I like that idea | |
| 17:06:51 | aspiers | edleafe: sure | |
| 17:06:58 | aspiers | evrardjp: me too | |
| 17:07:04 | aspiers | status can be about more than just health | |
| 17:07:09 | mugsie | and microversions make it unusable for a lot of monitoring application uses - so we should avodi it if possible | |
| 17:07:09 | cdent | I think if we want the middleware to be super easy, all it should be is a path | |
| 17:07:15 | dtantsur | just a word of caution: obvious things like /status may clash with services that do not use major versions | |