Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2018-10-16
15:48:00 openstackgerrit weizj proposed openstack/os-service-types master: Update the hacking to latst https://review.openstack.org/611054
15:49:50 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Move wait_for_baremetal_node_lock to the baremetal proxy https://review.openstack.org/610946
15:52:27 dtantsur mordred: re https://review.openstack.org/610024 are you okay with it for now?
15:52:36 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Remove duplicate code https://review.openstack.org/610404
15:54:23 mordred dtantsur: yeah - I thnk it's fine for today - it's not an additional issue from what today is
15:54:36 mordred dtantsur: I think we should solve the other question before we 1.0
15:55:22 dtantsur totally
15:56:29 dtantsur my personal minimum plan is to get rid of every single hardcoded microversion=1.6 by the release
15:57:56 mordred dtantsur: yah - I agree re: 1.0 ... I think this next point release will be close enough to 1.0 that we can start working on using it more within osc (discovery and resources-as-dicts were the last two things I was worried about getting in before we started doing that)
15:58:52 dtantsur ++
15:59:23 dtantsur and osc does not use baremetal stuff, so this is not a concern here
16:01:44 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/os-service-types master: Update the hacking to latst https://review.openstack.org/611054
16:20:06 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-service-types master: Don't quote {posargs} in tox.ini https://review.openstack.org/608973
16:20:06 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-service-types master: Removed older version of python added 3.5 https://review.openstack.org/606368
16:20:41 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-service-types master: Add unittest for os_service_types.data module. https://review.openstack.org/596701
17:12:51 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Switch bare metal NIC actions in OpenStackCloud to baremetal Proxy calls https://review.openstack.org/610024
17:41:02 eandersson anytime mordred !
19:02:47 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-service-types master: Update the hacking to latst https://review.openstack.org/611054
19:21:46 openstackgerrit Sean McGinnis proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Update sphinx extension logging https://review.openstack.org/611135
19:27:53 openstackgerrit Sean McGinnis proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Update sphinx extension logging https://review.openstack.org/611138
19:57:33 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Adding two new regions and dynamic auth_url based on region name. https://review.openstack.org/610921
20:14:45 openstackgerrit Sean McGinnis proposed openstack/os-api-ref master: Update sphinx extension logging https://review.openstack.org/611157
21:36:46 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: DNM Testing inline pep8 https://review.openstack.org/610744
23:21:03 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Update sphinx extension logging https://review.openstack.org/611138
#openstack-sdks - 2018-10-17
00:18:02 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Convert inspect_machine to use the baremetal proxy https://review.openstack.org/610941
10:37:36 ShilpaSD mordred: HI
10:42:30 ShilpaSD dtruong: Hi
10:44:26 ml samueldmq: I made some changes and answered commets after your review a few days ago, would be nice if you could have a look at it again https://review.openstack.org/#/c/604811/
12:02:41 Luzi hey, it would be nice to get some ideas from osc and sdk side on the library search for image encryption: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/library-for-image-encryption-and-decryption
13:47:46 mordred Luzi: I added a note to it - my vote is definitely for putting it in openstacksdk
13:53:59 Luzi thank you mordred :)
13:54:57 mordred Luzi: didn't you already write a patch for sdk for it?
13:55:28 Luzi that was for the signing of an image, now its about the encryption and decryption of images
13:55:37 mordred AH - gotcha
13:56:14 mordred yeah- I _definitely_ think it should go in sdk :)
13:57:53 Luzi mordred, we think that too, but there might be objections from nova or cinder - that's why there's an etherpad for a discussion :)
14:00:07 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack-infra/shade master: Add release note about decoupling https://review.openstack.org/611320
14:48:43 ShilpaSD dtruong: Hi
16:11:35 openstackgerrit Merged openstack-infra/shade master: Decouple OpenStackCloud from Connection https://review.openstack.org/610981
16:11:35 openstackgerrit Merged openstack-infra/shade master: Add release note about decoupling https://review.openstack.org/611320
16:11:42 dtruong hi ShilpaSD
16:12:55 ShilpaSD dtruong: Hi, its related to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/607061/
16:12:56 ShilpaSD , mordered helped me to resolve the query
16:13:23 ShilpaSD dtruong: query was, we have cluster related functional test cases under cloud package as well
16:13:53 ShilpaSD So can we move them here undr clustering package, that you have added
16:14:14 ShilpaSD Mordered replied that one day they should be merged
16:15:30 dtruong ShilpaSD: you are talking about the cluster tests in here: https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/blob/master/openstack/cloud/openstackcloud.py
16:17:23 dtruong sorry, wrong link. are you referring to the tests in here: https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/blob/master/openstack/tests/functional/cloud/test_clustering.py
16:17:25 ShilpaSD Functional tests 'test_cluster_templates.py' and 'test_clustering.py'
16:17:25 ShilpaSD under cloud package
16:17:31 ShilpaSD yes
16:20:46 dtruong ok, i guess i didn't realize that those tests existed
16:21:21 dtruong those tests are more comprehensive so i guess we can drop my functional tests in favor of those
16:24:11 dtruong ok, i see now. the functional tests in cloud package came from shade integration
16:24:32 dtruong so they test a different code path than my functional tests
16:24:32 ShilpaSD please elaborate this point for me
16:25:19 mordred dtruong: yah - that's right. we really should go through and make one set of tests - but also the plan (that we've just started on) is to get the openstackcloud.py layer things to be built on top of the things in the Proxy layer
16:26:01 mordred but we're still figuring out exactly what that should look like
16:27:10 dtruong so i think until that is done, it is useful to keep the two sets of tests
16:27:27 mordred dtruong: I agree
16:27:40 mordred dtruong: while I've got you there -- this just happened: http://logs.openstack.org/84/609984/1/gate/openstacksdk-functional-devstack-senlin/a6a39d7/testr_results.html.gz
16:27:47 mordred does that mean anythig to you?
16:28:28 mordred oh - that's stable/rocky
16:29:09 mordred I think it needs https://review.openstack.org/#/c/610753/ - but that is failing test
16:29:26 mordred *phew* I was worried something extra bad had happened
16:31:43 dtruong i have to look into why https://review.openstack.org/#/c/610753/ is failing
16:32:02 dtruong i don't see anything obvious but i'll check it out
16:35:21 mordred me either - and thanks!
16:37:43 dtruong ok, i need to backport one of my changes to rocky: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/597225/
16:37:52 dtruong then it should work
16:48:44 mordred dtruong: awesome. I rebased my senlin patch on top of your backport, then added a depends-on to that patch for the sdk patch
16:48:50 mordred maybe it'll all work this time :)
17:08:51 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Rearrange shade image code https://review.openstack.org/609683
21:50:11 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add some warnings and clarifications for discovery https://review.openstack.org/606113
23:27:41 eandersson mordred, I created a bug for the issue I mentioned yesterday https://bugs.launchpad.net/shade/+bug/1798489
23:27:41 openstack Launchpad bug 1798489 in Shade "v4-fixed-ip / v6-fixed-ip no longer supported in shade for new vms" [Undecided,New]
23:46:04 mordred eandersson: thanks! I'll take a peek at that when I wake up. are you using shade directly still or are you on sdk? (the bug will be in both - mostly just curious)
23:48:21 eandersson This is for ansible
23:59:01 eandersson (so ansible -> shade)
#openstack-sdks - 2018-10-18
00:42:31 openstackgerrit Robin Cernin proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Improve document 'openstack complete' https://review.openstack.org/611469
00:49:06 openstackgerrit Robin Cernin proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Improve document 'openstack complete' https://review.openstack.org/611469
06:50:49 openstackgerrit wangxiyuan proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add registered limit CRUD support https://review.openstack.org/609572
06:50:50 openstackgerrit wangxiyuan proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add limit CRUD support https://review.openstack.org/609604
06:51:30 openstackgerrit wangxiyuan proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add limit CRUD support https://review.openstack.org/609604
09:51:21 openstackgerrit Mike Chen proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Compute: Add description support for server https://review.openstack.org/568549
09:52:12 jayashri_bidwe hi team, I have one query that is it possible to move magnum test which is inside openstacksdk/openstack/tests/functional/cloud package? please help.
13:22:11 mordred jayashri_bidwe: sure - where do you want to move it?
14:26:30 openstackgerrit Mike Chen proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Compute: Add description support for server https://review.openstack.org/568549
15:15:46 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-api-ref master: Update sphinx extension logging https://review.openstack.org/611157
15:30:22 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack-infra/shade master: Support v4-fixed-ip and v6-fixed-ip in create_server https://review.openstack.org/611651
15:30:31 mordred eandersson: ^^ that should take care of your issue
15:31:01 mordred Shrews: if you get a sec, mind looking at that?
15:33:23 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Support v4-fixed-ip and v6-fixed-ip in create_server https://review.openstack.org/611652
15:34:52 Shrews mordred: alrighty
15:38:13 Shrews mordred: found a problem
15:40:58 mordred Shrews: oh no!
15:41:12 mordred Shrews: you mean I'm not infallible?
15:41:12 Shrews oh yeah!
15:41:34 Shrews mordred: i was disheartened to discover this too
15:41:58 Shrews i mean... what's real? what do i believe?

Earlier   Later