| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2018-10-11 | |||
| 16:06:37 | mordred | edleafe: are we there yet? | |
| 16:07:09 | edleafe | mordred: I swear, if you don't settle down, I'm turning this car around and going back home!! | |
| 16:08:18 | mordred | edleafe: but but but | |
| 16:13:42 | elmiko | edleafe: lol | |
| 16:13:54 | elmiko | edleafe: are we there yet? | |
| 16:14:18 | edleafe | elmiko: I'm going to count to 3... | |
| 16:17:07 | mordred | edleafe: elmiko keeps hitting me! | |
| 16:18:02 | mordred | if people are bored in office hours and want to review some fairly insane python patches - I've got plenty I can point you at ... | |
| 16:18:55 | elmiko | best office hours ever! | |
| 17:02:58 | edleafe | Well, that was underwhelming. :) | |
| 17:29:18 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Correct updating baremetal nodes by name or ID https://review.openstack.org/608674 | |
| 18:14:55 | elmiko | edleafe: lol | |
| 18:21:18 | openstackgerrit | Sean McGinnis proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Handle not having cinderclient.v1 available https://review.openstack.org/609473 | |
| 20:02:52 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Use discovery instead of config to create proxies https://review.openstack.org/600292 | |
| 20:16:47 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Remove api version default values https://review.openstack.org/600330 | |
| 21:02:50 | openstackgerrit | Sean McGinnis proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Handle not having cinderclient.v1 available https://review.openstack.org/609473 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2018-10-12 | |||
| 03:09:39 | openstackgerrit | Yang JianFeng proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for octavia's resuorces quota https://review.openstack.org/590193 | |
| 07:53:00 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add functional tests for clustering https://review.openstack.org/607061 | |
| 09:50:26 | openstackgerrit | Vishakha Agarwal proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Modify the help message for 'registered limit set' https://review.openstack.org/609985 | |
| 11:32:24 | openstackgerrit | Matthias Lisin proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: openstackcloud.py: Implement FWaaS wrapper methods. https://review.openstack.org/604811 | |
| 12:51:20 | openstackgerrit | Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Switch bare metal NIC actions in OpenStackCloud to baremetal Proxy calls https://review.openstack.org/610024 | |
| 13:01:41 | dtantsur | Shrews: hi, if you have a minute: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/609399/ | |
| 13:16:12 | Shrews | dtantsur|afk: sure, will take a look in a little bit | |
| 13:43:02 | mordred | oh my god the discovery patch landed | |
| 13:46:14 | edleafe | mordred: ?? Which patch? | |
| 13:46:42 | mordred | edleafe: Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Use discovery instead of config to create proxies https://review.openstack.org/600292 | |
| 13:46:53 | mordred | edleafe: sdk is now fully discovery driven | |
| 13:47:15 | mordred | with config values only used for override | |
| 13:47:47 | edleafe | mordred: ah. For a second there, I thought you were referring to https://review.openstack.org/459405 | |
| 13:48:02 | mordred | edleafe: bah. like we'll ever finish that. it's too hard :) | |
| 13:48:43 | edleafe | nah, we have dtantsur|afk on it. | |
| 13:49:21 | mordred | good point | |
| 13:49:31 | Shrews | mordred: good grief. i +A'd that DAYS ago | |
| 13:49:33 | mordred | mnaser: do you know who a good person is to ping about the broken magnum job for sdk? | |
| 13:49:39 | Shrews | i assumed it merged already | |
| 13:50:00 | mordred | Shrews: there was an oslo.messaging release which broke bifrost which broke the sdk bifrost gate | |
| 13:50:30 | Shrews | see... this is why we should test in a silo | |
| 13:50:33 | mnaser | mordred: I think spyros (PTL) is usually pretty good about that stuff. I can’t recall his IRC nick off the top of my head | |
| 13:51:01 | mnaser | mordred: strigazi | |
| 13:51:05 | mordred | awesome- thanks! | |
| 13:51:37 | mordred | mnaser: openstack-magnum doesn't seem to be their irc channel ... | |
| 13:55:24 | hansmoleman | dtroyer: i was just reminded of this bug i opened for osc https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2002158 - curious as to how to handle that. you can't set a volume as read-only while it's being created, but the option is on the volume create CLI. | |
| 13:55:42 | hansmoleman | there is a --wait option on the volume create CLI, so if --wait and --read-only, then wait for it to be available and then make the read-only change? | |
| 13:55:50 | hansmoleman | or make --read-only imply --wait? | |
| 13:56:21 | hansmoleman | oh nvm, i guess there is no --wait option for volume create | |
| 13:56:23 | hansmoleman | that's on server create | |
| 13:56:51 | hansmoleman | welp, i could add --wait to volume create and then build on that for --read-only, but that wouldn't work for anyone using older versions of osc | |
| 14:04:45 | mnaser | mordred: #openstack-containers is the one to look at | |
| 14:25:27 | openstackgerrit | Chuck Short proposed openstack/os-client-config master: Change python3.5 job to python3.7 job on Stein+ https://review.openstack.org/610051 | |
| 14:42:51 | mordred | hansmoleman: does the volume have to be in ready state to have its readonly attribute set? | |
| 14:43:05 | hansmoleman | yeah it has to be available | |
| 14:43:10 | mordred | how fun | |
| 14:43:17 | hansmoleman | $ openstack volume create --size 1 --read-only read-only-vol1 | |
| 14:43:17 | hansmoleman | Failed to set volume read-only access mode flag: Invalid volume: Volume 70539836-fbb9-478d-9cd1-0e733c0eb0cc status must be available to update readonly flag, but current status is: creating. (HTTP 400) (Request-ID: req-ac54552a-3784-4028-8262-8a600844c186) | |
| 14:43:42 | mordred | well - I'd certainly support --read-only implying --wait | |
| 14:43:50 | mordred | because otherwise it's a pretty useless flag | |
| 14:43:57 | hansmoleman | either that or that option just needs to die because it never worked | |
| 14:44:01 | hansmoleman | and was clearly not tested when it was added | |
| 14:44:04 | mordred | yah | |
| 14:44:14 | openstackgerrit | Chuck Short proposed openstack/os-client-config master: Change python3.5 job to python3.7 job on Stein+ https://review.openstack.org/610051 | |
| 14:44:30 | mordred | hansmoleman: I say add a wait, make --read-only imply it, and don't worry about backwards compat bcaues the previous thing never worked | |
| 14:44:35 | hansmoleman | there is no --wait on the volume create CLI, so i figure i can just make --read-only wait and i'll update the help on the option to say if you use this, the command will wait | |
| 14:44:46 | hansmoleman | or that | |
| 14:45:25 | hansmoleman | ok that wfm | |
| 14:47:22 | mordred | \o/ | |
| 14:57:31 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: cloud: rename with deprecation validate_node -> validate_machine https://review.openstack.org/609399 | |
| 19:19:58 | openstackgerrit | Sean McGinnis proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Handle not having cinderclient.v1 available https://review.openstack.org/609473 | |
| 19:52:59 | smcginnis | mordred or dtroyer: If one of you has a few minutes - I have a couple openstack volume command additions with one +2 that I would like to make sure are good before proceeding on more updates. | |
| 19:53:03 | smcginnis | https://review.openstack.org/#/q/owner:sean.mcginnis%2540gmail.com+status:open+project:openstack/python-openstackclient | |
| 19:53:31 | dtroyer | smcginnis: I'll have a look in a bit | |
| 19:54:10 | smcginnis | Thanks dtroyer! | |
| 20:31:24 | dtroyer | smcginnis: around? now that I see both commands I have a question… | |
| 20:31:45 | smcginnis | Sure! | |
| 20:31:50 | dtroyer | I had assumed 'volume backend capability' and 'volume backend pool' were your resource names | |
| 20:32:02 | dtroyer | you added 'volume backend' to commands.rst | |
| 20:32:29 | dtroyer | maybe that should be the resource name and —capability and —pool are attributes? dunno, trying to sort out how to thing about these | |
| 20:33:02 | smcginnis | I think that may be confusing. Thinking though... | |
| 20:34:09 | dtroyer | it isn't obvious to me, but I don't have the data models around the backends in my head either | |
| 20:35:06 | smcginnis | I guess you could look at it that way that a backend has a set of capabilities and one or more pools, so I suppose you could use flags for those attributes of the backend. | |
| 20:35:13 | smcginnis | Doesn't really sit right with me though. | |
| 20:35:21 | dtroyer | will there ever be other verbs for this/these resources? | |
| 20:35:37 | dtroyer | maybe it feels like capabilities are attributes but pools are resources | |
| 20:35:38 | smcginnis | What would be the expected behavior of not providing a flag. List both capabilities and pools? | |
| 20:35:54 | dtroyer | so let's go with what you have… and just update commands.rst to list ehm both separately | |
| 20:36:08 | smcginnis | I don't think there will be any other verbs. At least nothing on the horizon that I can tell. | |
| 20:36:10 | dtroyer | ok, yeah, that seals it, too ambiguous | |
| 20:36:42 | smcginnis | Yeah, I kind of like how unambiguous this turned out after changing directions from where I started off. | |
| 20:36:59 | smcginnis | So I should update commands.rst to have each one separately? | |
| 20:37:30 | smcginnis | And it would just be "openstack volume backend capability" and "openstack volume backend pool", no verbs, right? | |
| 20:38:55 | dtroyer | right… I'm leaving comments | |
| 20:39:27 | smcginnis | OK, great. Would it be OK if I did that in a follow up patch? There's one or two other internal things I would like to clean up too. | |
| 20:40:27 | smcginnis | Guess that's what I get for using one of Monty's release notes as a template. :D | |
| 20:40:42 | dtroyer | that works for me, they both had tweaks needed :) | |
| 20:40:58 | smcginnis | Will get that going right now... | |
| 20:40:58 | dtroyer | I re-write release notes before a release to make then have at least a similar voice | |
| 20:41:15 | dtroyer | ok, if you're going to do a follow-up I'll +W these now | |
| 20:41:23 | smcginnis | Great. Often overlooked, but I think that makes them much easier to consume when projects do that. | |
| 20:43:32 | dtroyer | in the v1 change, is importing from cinderclient.v3 going to be a problem for v2 commands? | |
| 20:45:19 | dtroyer | smcginnis: basically I just want to be sure that importing v3 but not setting microversions keeps us at v2-compat? | |
| 20:45:23 | mordred | smcginnis: never copy from me :) | |