| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2018-08-14 | |||
| 21:59:40 | amotoki | dtroyer: osc-lib 1.11.1 FFE has been accepted. | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2018-08-15 | |||
| 00:12:47 | dtroyer | amotoki: +1 | |
| 00:31:38 | amotoki | dtroyer: thanks. we can unblock neutronclient gate soon :) | |
| 07:42:15 | openstackgerrit | Matthias Lisin proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: fwaas: Add support for FWaaS v2.0 API https://review.openstack.org/591650 | |
| 07:48:13 | openstackgerrit | Shuo Liu proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: add release notes to readme.rst https://review.openstack.org/591943 | |
| 07:49:10 | openstackgerrit | yanpuqing proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add NODE and HOST parameters in "server create" help text https://review.openstack.org/591944 | |
| 10:24:23 | openstackgerrit | yanpuqing proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add NODE and HOST parameters in "server create" help text https://review.openstack.org/591944 | |
| 11:05:36 | openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/api-sig master: Add an api-design doc with design advice https://review.openstack.org/592003 | |
| 11:24:54 | openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/api-sig master: Add an api-design doc with design advice https://review.openstack.org/592003 | |
| 11:47:25 | openstackgerrit | Matthias Lisin proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: fwaas: Add support for FWaaS v2.0 API https://review.openstack.org/591650 | |
| 13:43:40 | openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/api-sig master: Explicitly link to the HTTP RFCs https://review.openstack.org/589131 | |
| 13:43:40 | openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/api-sig master: Add link to Building Protocols with HTTP https://review.openstack.org/589132 | |
| 14:18:24 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/cliff master: cap cmd2 also for python3 https://review.openstack.org/592060 | |
| 14:29:09 | gtema | mordred: are you here? | |
| 14:29:23 | mordred | gtema: heya | |
| 14:29:52 | gtema | mordred: can you please have a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/591445/, I need help finding problem in test failure | |
| 14:30:28 | mordred | gtema: hrm. it's only failing in the senlin and magnum jobs? | |
| 14:30:35 | gtema | yupp | |
| 14:30:48 | gtema | exactly this is suprising | |
| 14:31:00 | mordred | gtema: you know - it might just be a resourcing issue | |
| 14:31:19 | mordred | like, when magnum/senlin installed maybe there aren't enoguh resources on the test node to deal with the backup | |
| 14:31:20 | gtema | you think of "recheck"? | |
| 14:32:05 | mordred | gtema: I think perhaps we might want to consider doing $something to not run those tests in the senlin/magnum jobs ... one of the reasons those are in their own jobs in the first place is resource competition | |
| 14:32:12 | mordred | because 8G vms | |
| 14:32:41 | gtema | mordred: hmm, what can I do then? | |
| 14:33:24 | gtema | invent new super powerfull switch for tests? | |
| 14:35:21 | gtema | mordred: in http://logs.openstack.org/45/591445/3/check/openstacksdk-functional-devstack-senlin/059f44e/controller/logs/screen-c-bak.txt.gz | |
| 14:35:38 | gtema | seems to be details to failure | |
| 14:36:05 | mordred | yah. that sure does seem to be an issuein volumebackups | |
| 14:36:29 | mordred | oh! | |
| 14:37:01 | mordred | there's no swift in those jobs, but the devstack volumebackup code is looking to backup to swift | |
| 14:37:17 | gtema | hm | |
| 14:37:40 | mordred | gtema: you can add: | |
| 14:37:42 | mordred | if not self.user_cloud.has_service('object-store'): | |
| 14:37:44 | mordred | self.skipTest('Object service not supported by cloud') | |
| 14:37:58 | mordred | gtema: to the setUp of the volume backup functional test | |
| 14:38:24 | mordred | (although maybe make the skipTest message better) | |
| 14:38:42 | gtema | ok, will try now. Do you think it make sense to also add a "restore" functional test? | |
| 14:39:53 | mordred | gtema: probably? (assuming that it can work in devstack) | |
| 14:40:24 | mordred | gtema: also - it might be worth putting in that same has_service check to the backup proxy methods as well - the cinder docs here: | |
| 14:40:25 | mordred | https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/block-storage/v2/ | |
| 14:40:30 | mordred | https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/block-storage/v2/#backups-backups I mean | |
| 14:40:37 | gtema | mordred: ok, will try with devstack. So far only covered by unittests and in my cloud, but not in devstack | |
| 14:40:38 | mordred | say "The only supported service is Object Storage." | |
| 14:41:17 | gtema | mordred: nice catch | |
| 14:41:22 | mordred | so if the cloud doesn't have object-store it seems like the backup command will always fail - but we could give the user a better error | |
| 14:42:01 | gtema | you think also warning in proxy? | |
| 14:43:17 | gtema | or also adding it to openstackcloud? | |
| 16:14:44 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: DNM: implement block-storage backup resource https://review.openstack.org/591445 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2018-08-16 | |||
| 03:37:09 | openstackgerrit | yanpuqing proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add NODE and HOST parameters in "server create" help text https://review.openstack.org/591944 | |
| 07:40:09 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/cliff master: cap cmd2 also for python3 https://review.openstack.org/592060 | |
| 07:48:07 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: [WIP] implement block-storage backup resource https://review.openstack.org/591445 | |
| 07:54:33 | openstackgerrit | Wang Weijia proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Support firewall service for SDK https://review.openstack.org/592303 | |
| 07:59:39 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/cliff master: cap cmd2 also for python3 https://review.openstack.org/592060 | |
| 09:20:05 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/keystoneauth master: Update reno for stable/rocky https://review.openstack.org/586083 | |
| 10:28:14 | openstackgerrit | Wang Weijia proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Support firewall service for SDK https://review.openstack.org/592303 | |
| 14:32:31 | rabel | hi there. is the shade library going to be deprecated completely? | |
| 14:34:13 | gtema | dtroyer: in order to cap cmd2 for python3 do I need to ma change in "requirements" project? cliff change (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/592060/) seems not to be enough. | |
| 14:34:26 | gtema | s/ma/make | |
| 14:35:07 | gtema | rabel: AFAIK - yes | |
| 14:37:37 | openstackgerrit | David Rabel proposed openstack-infra/shade master: Fix format in release notes https://review.openstack.org/592507 | |
| 14:37:53 | gtema | dtroyer: I have reproduced the problem with python 3.4, 3.5, 3.6 using virtualenv and installing osc with pip | |
| 14:38:12 | mordred | rabel: the library itself should continue to work for forever - but new dev is focused on openstacksdk | |
| 14:39:23 | rabel | mordred: so it will always exist, but in the future it will only be calling openstacksdk ? | |
| 14:39:41 | dtroyer | gtema: pip is the fun part and why capping in cliff isn't enough, it needs to be capped everywhere it is called out in order to guarantee pip does the right thing. | |
| 14:39:59 | mordred | rabel: yes | |
| 14:40:12 | rabel | ok, thanks you two | |
| 14:40:20 | mordred | rabel: the idea is to maintain shade's api contract with its users so that the dev re-org doesn't break anyone | |
| 14:40:21 | dtroyer | making the cap in global-requirements is probably the right thing but that is no longer enforced automatically, we'll have to make that change in osc and osc-lib, etc | |
| 14:41:35 | gtema | dtroyer: change in cliff is not passing checks, so I assume it is required it modify upper_constants in "requirements" | |
| 14:43:03 | dtroyer | gtema: this has shifted recently and I don't have it all in my head anymore, possibly yes. I haven't looked at those cliff jobs yet, if they are the functional test it still may be to requirements in osc-lib or osc | |
| 14:43:59 | gtema | dtroyer: no, it's one the one hand job "requirements-check", which complains on requirements conflict, and then osc-tox-unit-tips | |
| 14:44:22 | gtema | s/osc-tox-unit-tips/cliff-tox-py27-neutronclient-tip/ | |
| 15:32:13 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack-infra/shade master: Fix format in release notes https://review.openstack.org/592507 | |
| 15:32:24 | mordred | rabel: ^^ thanks! | |
| 15:40:26 | edleafe | cdent: Can you or dtantsur|afk run the API-SIG meeting? I'm pretty distracted by my all-day meeting stuff | |
| 15:42:42 | cdent | aye | |
| 17:07:28 | edleafe | cdent_: Ready for your review: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/api-sig-newsletter | |
| 17:11:03 | cdent_ | edleafe: add the review in [12] to the pending review section? otherwise ok | |
| 17:11:59 | edleafe | cdent_: ah, good catch. Skipped updating that section. | |
| 17:13:54 | edleafe | Fixed. Good to go? | |
| 17:14:37 | cdent_ | yup, ship it | |
| 17:17:17 | edleafe | done | |
| 18:52:17 | harlowja | anyone seen anything like http://paste.openstack.org/raw/728226/ with shade recently? | |
| 18:53:30 | mordred | harlowja: no- but that doesn't look good | |
| 18:53:43 | harlowja | ya, that popped out of our latest kolla-ansible daily run | |
| 18:54:31 | harlowja | https://imgur.com/a/146tl8f pew pew pew, lol | |
| 18:54:47 | harlowja | `File \"/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/shade/********cloud.py` is weird, lol | |
| 18:54:55 | harlowja | secret cloud, lol | |
| 18:55:45 | mordred | SO SECRETS | |
| 18:57:16 | harlowja | ya | |
| 18:57:51 | harlowja | `_normalize.py` seems to have left the building in 1.29 | |
| 19:05:38 | harlowja | ya, hmmm, http://paste.openstack.org/show/728227/ can reproduce with 1.28.0 | |
| 19:06:39 | Shrews | harlowja: i blame Nargles | |
| 19:07:16 | harlowja | http://paste.openstack.org/show/728228/ (from using openstack cli which handles it) | |
| 19:19:41 | openstackgerrit | Joshua Harlow proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: On at least pike clouds metadata can be a json blob https://review.openstack.org/592658 | |
| 19:40:13 | openstackgerrit | Joshua Harlow proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Glance v2 allows people to overwrite metadata key https://review.openstack.org/592658 | |
| 20:38:44 | mnaser | mordred: guilhermesp and i figured out the root cause of that policy issue, turns out sending `enable_snat` is only allowed if you're an admin by neutron policy | |
| 20:39:08 | mnaser | so i think guilhermesp will be opening a github issue soon for this and probably push up a fix for os_router | |
| 20:39:20 | mordred | mnaser: awesome | |