Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2018-03-22
15:08:30 toker_ Well, I don't know.. Thats what one of the guys trying to help me said.
15:09:15 toker_ I would rather try to get it working with the current version of the SDK (then I dont need to try to upgrade the SDK that horizon may be depending on inside the container)
15:10:40 toker_ Is there something obvious with this code https://github.com/openstack/octavia-dashboard/blob/master/octavia_dashboard/api/rest/lbaasv2.py#L38 that makes it not return the endpoint for the loadbalancer ( I mean the error is pretty verbose, right ? "SDKException: public endpoint for load_balancer service in regionOne region not found")
15:11:15 toker_ I'm not sure updating the SDK would help with that error ?
15:13:23 toker_ I want to understand why the SDK cant find the public endpoint - however getting there seems hard
15:18:03 toker_ I also tried to revert one specific commit, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/524011/2/octavia_dashboard/api/rest/lbaasv2.py , which supposedly could make it work with "an older sdk". But I still get the same error from the sdk that it cant find the public endpoint..
15:20:32 mordred toker_: right - so - there's nothing in that code that would cause an error - the heavy-lifting of discovery is done in keystoneauth
15:21:33 mordred toker_: which is why I was curious about the output of that script - basically hoping something jumps out at me in the rest log
15:21:59 toker_ Can one do a similar script but for the older sDK ?
15:22:10 mordred so I think the things to verify are - which version of openstacksdk is installed in that container with octavia-dashboard
15:23:02 toker_ Ok, that is 0.9.17
15:24:06 mordred cool. so - now we get to figure out how to debug the old sdk ... one sec
15:24:35 toker_ ok ok
15:26:59 mordred toker_: ok. well - if it makes you feel any better, I can confirm that sdk 0.9.19 does not find the load balancer service in the vexxhost public cloud either - with the same error message
15:27:20 toker_ oh :/
15:27:27 toker_ Hm, thats interesting
15:31:22 mordred toker_: yah. well - all of the code to handle this was basically completely replaced in the 0.10 release
15:31:48 mordred toker_: but - I'm working on a patch for you ... since I can reproduce your issue here, it's a little easier
15:31:55 toker_ Oh, for the better then you mean ? It wasnt working properly before ?
15:31:59 toker_ Ok thats very nice of you
15:39:41 mordred toker_: ok. don't laugh ... http://paste.openstack.org/show/708978 <-- if you apply that to the files in your container - it should fix you
15:40:01 mordred toker_: it's obviously not a GENERAL fix, but the general fix involves upgrading more things
15:40:53 mordred toker_: part of the issue is that pike octavia doesn't have a working version discovery document ... I believe johnsom got that fixed this last cycle
15:42:35 toker_ laugh ? How could I laugh, you just fixed a problem I've been struggling with for over 10 hours !!
15:42:57 toker_ This is a very hacky setup at the moment, so adding more hacks to it doesn't really matter.
15:43:09 toker_ We are going to reinstall everything when OSP 13 is out anyway.
15:43:38 toker_ Omg, so simple fix!
15:43:41 toker_ Thank you
15:43:57 toker_ took you ten minutes to find, I've never would have found it :)
15:45:58 toker_ AttributeError: 'Proxy' object has no attribute 'listeners' <- stumbled on this now when trying to list listeners ...
15:46:09 toker_ But thats fine, dont really matter.
15:48:28 mordred woot!
15:49:01 toker_ https://github.com/openstack/python-openstacksdk/commit/d1b242ee850f286f1fae56021f2edf13cde1eb9c <- maybe I need this
15:49:16 toker_ one guy said that in the lbaas-channel
15:51:47 toker_ hm dont think thats related -.
16:01:45 mordred no - that shouldn't be related to the listeners issue - although in general that patch should be fine and safe to backport if you do need to get the list of pools on a health_monitor
16:15:00 openstackgerrit Doug Hellmann proposed openstack-infra/shade master: add lower-constraints job https://review.openstack.org/555299
16:25:12 dhellmann mordred : I updated your update to also change the test-requirements.txt file ^^
17:04:11 elmiko edleafe dtantsur , ready for review https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/api-sig-newsletter
17:07:08 dtantsur elmiko: one comment there, everything else LGTM
17:07:13 elmiko cool
17:07:15 dtantsur maybe I just misunderstood the phrase though
17:07:31 elmiko no no, good spot
17:07:55 elmiko i missed a word lol
17:12:21 edleafe elmiko: LGTM
17:13:40 elmiko thanks!
17:18:11 mordred dhellmann: sweet
18:21:52 openstackgerrit Doug Hellmann proposed openstack-infra/shade master: add lower-constraints job https://review.openstack.org/555299
18:25:36 openstackgerrit Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/cliff master: add lower-constraints job https://review.openstack.org/555405
19:13:48 jroll does anyone have experience running nodepool or shade against clouds that put services on subpaths, e.g. https://mycloud/nova/v2? we're playing around with that and shade seems to follow the links returned from / and not seeing a path prefix of sorts in most project's config (nova has one, but it's host and all, not just the path)
19:14:01 jroll or experience running a cloud like that, and could point to something I'm missing
19:14:25 jroll considering starting a thread on the mailing list about making a consistent config between projects for that, if there isn't something obvious I'm missing here
19:19:52 cdent jroll: is the service catalog returning reasonable entries?
19:20:18 cdent also you might be interested in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/459869/
19:22:11 mordred jroll: shade should totally work with suburls..
19:22:24 mordred jroll: as long as the service-catalog and version discovery documents are correct
19:22:59 mordred jroll: I'm not sure how to configure the services to return the correct thing in their version discovery docs...
19:23:18 mordred jroll: but devstack is running with suburl layout these days and shade's functional tests work against it -so it's gotta be possible _somehow_
19:23:31 jroll mordred: right, that last part is the catch
19:23:38 jroll oh, devstack does that now? I can look at that
19:23:41 mordred yah
19:23:49 mordred iirc it's the default deployment now
19:24:42 mordred jroll: but the tl;dr is that shade uses version discovery (except for neutron and swift) - and treats the values in the version discovery documents as being *mostly* the source of truth
19:25:07 jroll mordred: yeah, I was curious if we were doing something wrong with the service or with shade
19:25:41 mordred jroll: we do discard whatever host is returned in the version docs - because that is FREQUENTLY wrong in many configs (services return their rfc1918 ip in the url they make - so we replace the version discovery host, scheme and port with the host, scheme and port from the catalog)
19:26:55 mordred jroll: it's always possible we've got bugs, but shade is a pretty good litmus test for "is this service configured correctly" :)
19:27:12 jroll mordred: indeed :)
19:27:52 mordred jroll: (if you ever want WAY more information on this topic I'm happy to assault you - but I'd like consent first :) )
19:29:24 jroll mordred: ha, I'll pass for now. I know I'm missing something obvious, I just don't know what
19:41:40 openstackgerrit Bailey Johnson proposed openstack-infra/shade master: Adds Senlin support to shade https://review.openstack.org/542537
19:44:31 jroll to follow up, I dug in the code harder and turns out it comes from req.application_url here (at least in nova): https://docs.pylonsproject.org/projects/webob/en/stable/#urls
19:44:39 jroll so probably an issue with our apache config
19:55:08 openstackgerrit Bailey Johnson proposed openstack-infra/shade master: Adds Senlin support to shade https://review.openstack.org/542537
#openstack-sdks - 2018-03-23
00:06:50 openstackgerrit melissaml proposed openstack/cliff master: fix typos in documentation https://review.openstack.org/555507
00:47:51 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack-infra/shade master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/555551
01:02:43 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/555558
01:37:30 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/os-service-types master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/555579
01:38:50 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/551601
03:19:11 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/cliff master: fix typos in documentation https://review.openstack.org/555507
04:03:49 openstackgerrit Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: add lower-constraints job https://review.openstack.org/555625
06:06:30 openstackgerrit chenyb4 proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Fix api request miss microversions https://review.openstack.org/555231
07:13:14 openstackgerrit chenyb4 proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: fix doc title format error https://review.openstack.org/555666
07:45:30 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/openstackclient master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/521902
07:51:32 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/553257
09:22:55 openstackgerrit takahara.kengo proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Add instance_ha service https://review.openstack.org/555710
09:24:10 openstackgerrit takahara.kengo proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Add instance_ha service https://review.openstack.org/555710
09:36:45 openstackgerrit chenyb4 proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Fix api request miss microversions https://review.openstack.org/555231
12:33:33 openstackgerrit Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: add lower-constraints job https://review.openstack.org/555625
12:42:19 openstackgerrit chenyb4 proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Add function examples test for clustering https://review.openstack.org/555762
13:07:47 mnaser do we need a new release of python-openstacksdk with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/554615/ to fix the osc-functional-devstack job?
13:08:00 mnaser -tips job seems to be fixed
13:09:33 mnaser mordred: ^
13:16:36 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Rename python-openstacksdk to openstacksdk in zuul.yaml https://review.openstack.org/555765
13:16:37 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: Update python-openstacksdk references to openstacksdk https://review.openstack.org/555766
13:42:06 openstackgerrit chenyb4 proposed openstack/python-openstacksdk master: fix doc title format error https://review.openstack.org/555778
13:44:21 chenyb4 Hi, mordred
13:45:13 chenyb4 mordred, Can you help me review this ptach. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/555231/
13:45:38 chenyb4 thanks
13:46:23 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Rename python-openstacksdk to openstacksdk https://review.openstack.org/555779
13:57:51 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/os-client-config master: Rename python-openstascksdk to openstacksdk https://review.openstack.org/555792

Earlier   Later