Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2017-08-05
21:28:36 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-client-config master: Remove OSIC https://review.openstack.org/491196
#openstack-sdks - 2017-08-06
04:22:07 openstackgerrit Rajath Agasthya proposed openstack/cliff master: Alias exit to cmd2's quit command to exit interactive shell https://review.openstack.org/491217
#openstack-sdks - 2017-08-07
00:51:35 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/os-client-config master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/491294
00:53:48 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/490862
07:10:08 openstackgerrit Lingyong Xu proposed openstack/os-client-config master: Update the documentation link for doc migration https://review.openstack.org/491374
07:13:30 openstackgerrit Zhaokun Fu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: add --password option for openstack server create Closes-Bug:1708570 https://review.openstack.org/490718
07:30:05 openstackgerrit Thomas Bechtold proposed openstack/cliff master: Make openstackdocstheme an optional doc dependency https://review.openstack.org/491378
09:33:27 openstackgerrit chenying proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add new commands for karbor osc plugin https://review.openstack.org/491416
18:14:35 openstackgerrit Rajath Agasthya proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add flavor value options https://review.openstack.org/302795
21:41:22 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/api-wg master: WIP: Explain, simply, why extensions are bad https://review.openstack.org/491611
21:53:00 openstackgerrit Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Convert network segment functional tests to JSON https://review.openstack.org/491612
22:38:41 openstackgerrit Joshua Harlow proposed openstack/os-client-config master: Update globals safely https://review.openstack.org/491618
22:44:44 openstackgerrit Joshua Harlow proposed openstack/os-client-config master: Update globals safely https://review.openstack.org/491618
22:47:04 openstackgerrit Joshua Harlow proposed openstack/os-client-config master: Update globals safely https://review.openstack.org/491618
23:33:40 openstackgerrit Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add .htaccess for docs migration https://review.openstack.org/491631
23:37:17 openstackgerrit Morgan Fainberg proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Remove use of positional decorator https://review.openstack.org/491632
23:47:39 openstackgerrit Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Convert network segment functional tests to JSON https://review.openstack.org/491612
#openstack-sdks - 2017-08-08
01:17:28 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/490862
04:14:54 openstackgerrit Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Allow PD as Subnetpool during Subnet creations https://review.openstack.org/491664
12:09:49 cdent thanks for the comments on the extensions thing edleafe . That effort was a bit half-hearted: trying to get myself started but not really having enough brain to really get it together.
12:13:16 edleafe Heh, at least in your case "not enough brain" is a temporary state.
12:16:17 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/api-wg master: WIP: Explain, simply, why extensions are bad https://review.openstack.org/491611
12:17:10 cdent I’m no longer sure. This last year has involved a startling decline.
12:35:40 openstackgerrit Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Convert network segment functional tests to JSON https://review.openstack.org/491612
14:48:20 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-client-config master: Update globals safely https://review.openstack.org/491618
15:24:25 efried Anyone know how/where to open bugs against service-types-authority?
15:26:38 cdent efried: i suspect we never got around to that
15:27:21 efried cdent Since os-service-types is on storyboard, would it be appropriate to create a storyboard... board for it?
15:27:40 cdent I think that would be fine idea
15:28:04 efried cdent Then the question would we where to make note of that. I guess in the sta readme and/or setup.py
15:28:28 cdent you have all the best questions. readme seems good for at least a start
15:35:58 cdent efried: I’ve nominated you for core on that repo as it seems unreasonable for you not to be. we’ll see what sdague and mordred say
15:36:19 mordred cdent: ++
15:36:21 efried cdent Okay, thanks!
15:36:30 mordred cdent, efried: wait ...
15:36:57 mordred service-types-authority is an API-WG repo, so it should do bugs whereever api-wg does bugs
15:37:24 mordred os-service-types is a lib consuming it that's part of the shade project, so it does bugs where shade does bugs
15:37:43 cdent it’s tc repo, not an api-wg repo, but that would also be fine, there is an openstack-api-wg launchpad presence
15:37:54 mordred that those two places are two different places is a temporary annoyance, but I think we should associated bugs with owning projects
15:38:05 mordred cdent: fair
15:39:05 cdent efried: as a token nearby api-wg person, I hereby authorize you to put bugs in api-wg if you want
15:39:37 efried cdent Wherezat?
15:39:45 cdent https://launchpad.net/openstack-api-wg
15:39:58 efried thx
15:40:38 sdague cdent: ++
15:40:42 efried cdent mordred btw, the bug I'm going to open is about placement not having an entry. Which started to be addressed by https://review.openstack.org/#/c/462140/ but needs to be driven to closure pretty soon, methinks.
15:42:00 efried https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-api-wg/+bug/1709353
15:42:01 openstack Launchpad bug 1709353 in openstack-api-wg "placement needs an entry in service-types-authority" [Undecided,New]
15:42:03 cdent yeah. that’s currently blocked on docs migration stuff, I think? There’s a bit of blip with regard to getting the right url, which we wouldn’t have until after the current stack of new docs is merged, which is stalled on feature freeze chaos
15:42:15 efried yarks
15:42:38 efried cdent it's not just https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/user/placement.html ?
15:42:47 cdent we could just go ahead without the docs ref
15:42:58 cdent no, that’s not the api-ref
15:43:04 cdent we coud use that as a stub for now
15:43:28 cdent I personally think the entry is far more important than whatever the doc link says
15:43:32 cdent we want placement to be consumable
15:43:41 cdent it is and has always been at the service-type placement
15:45:57 cdent efried: you should have +2 now, since mordred and sdague were immediately keen
15:46:07 efried cdent Sweet, thank you.
15:46:17 cdent abuse your power with grace!
15:46:20 sdague cdent: there should be an api-ref url for placement, no?
15:46:43 efried cdent sdague Yeah, the one listed in the change set is live, but actually redirects to the user one today.
15:46:47 sdague or is that not being published?
15:46:50 efried https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/placement.html
15:47:06 cdent sdague: there will be eventually but there isn’t yet: we held off on creating the publishing job because the docs migration was in progress
15:47:08 sdague efried: that's not the api-ref
15:47:19 efried bleh, right, developer.o.o?
15:47:26 sdague cdent: ok, so that doesn't really get impacted by docs migration
15:47:43 sdague I'd just do that and land it at developer.openstack.org/api-ref/placement
15:47:43 cdent and we didn’t want to move all the files until after they had all merged
15:48:02 sdague cdent: ok... I guess I'm confused where they are moving to
15:48:06 efried sdague To be clear, land it with a (for now) broken link?
15:48:44 cdent sdague: I’d need to chase some of the conversations with dhellmann and avolkov to really get my memory cear
15:49:58 sdague the api-ref sphinx extension is not guaunteed to not scramble the existing look feel of the main docs
15:50:04 sdague which is why it's in separate repo
15:50:18 sdague and I don't see reasons for that to change
15:50:27 sdague especially as they have a very different target site
15:52:30 cdent part of the issue may have been that having two api-ref-style jobs publishing from the same repo means that the second job needs to have some customizations, and if (I’m not sure if this is even desired?) the placement-api-ref directory was going to move under doc/source we’d wait until after all the pending changes merged before doing that
15:52:47 cdent that was based on the apparently very bad assumption that the pending docs reviews would merge much faster
15:53:13 cdent but mostly I don’t actually know that much of what’s going on: avolkov had that ball and I lost track of it
15:56:02 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: Add placement service https://review.openstack.org/462140
15:59:18 sdague I think things are going to be really goofy to try to put api-ref under doc/source
15:59:27 sdague and I would generally advise against that
15:59:37 sdague api-guide could probably move
16:01:05 cdent sdague: yeah, I’m really grasping at lose straws of memory here and since I think avolkov may be less around now than he was before, we may be able to just come up with a new correct plan and do whatever. I’m not clear what that should be.
16:02:05 sdague cdent: ok. Well I'm around this week but then gone for 2. So if you want assistance on that bit, getting the publishing patches posted soon would be good
16:03:54 cdent I’m so unanchored that I don’t know where to begin, but can probably resituate myself tomorrow (barring yet more tyre fires in allocations). One concerm was that I thought we didn’t want to publish incomplete docs?
16:06:34 sdague on the api-ref side I kind of thing incomplete is better than none
16:12:20 openstackgerrit Dean Troyer proposed openstack/osc-lib feature/osc4: Refactor initialize_app() to allow overriding https://review.openstack.org/491846
16:33:21 cdent sdague: I found some of the lost context. In https://review.openstack.org/#/c/480991/ dhellmann says to move the placement-api-ref into docs/source
16:34:30 cdent sdague, dhellmann : however I think much of what is said there is confusion over how placement and nova are nearby
16:34:57 sdague yeh
16:35:56 sdague it also doesn't seem to mention developer.openstack.org, as this would implicitely remove that
16:36:16 sdague however the developer experience folks were very very strongly in the camp that it was important that that was a top level construct
16:38:42 sdague and, actually, that ends up making the api-ref versioned per release, which is something we very much don't want to do
16:38:55 cdent very good point
16:42:40 sdague I left a post hoc comment in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472275/13
16:45:50 cdent sdague: cool. I’m going to push up a new gate job, which will make note of some of the conversation here and refer back to the abandoned one
17:01:29 cdent sdague: i made a new job, because i was nearly all the way done before I found the abandoned one: https://review.openstack.org/491860
17:03:01 cdent thanks

Earlier   Later